Burned,
Bland,
and
Beyond
Saving:
Kitchen
Catastrophes
Food
Mishaps
—
Satirist’s
Bible
Food
Mishaps
Why
Your
Cooking
Should
Come
with
a
Fire
Extinguisher
Food
Fails:
When
Edible
Is
a
Compliment
1.
The
Smoke
Alarm
Sous
Chef
Your
kitchen
isn’t
a
restaurantit’s
a
Code
Red
emergency.
If
the
smoke
detector
isn’t
cheering
you
on,
are
you
even
trying?
2.
The
Pinterest
Lie
That
5-minute,
3-ingredient
recipe?
It’s
actually
a
4-hour
excavation
of
your
self-worth.
Bon
appétit.
3.
The
Oil
Splatter
Art
Your
shirt
now
looks
like
a
Jackson
Pollock.
The
bacon?
Somewhere
between
raw
and
cremated.
Abstract
cuisine!
4.
The
Salt
Apocalypse
Who
knew
one
teaspoon
could
mean
the
entire
box?
Your
pasta
water
could
preserve
a
mummy.
5.
The
Baking
Betrayal
The
cookies
spread
into
one
mega-cookie.
Congratulationsyou’ve
invented
the
concept
of
edible
cement.
6.
The
Grill
Inferno
Your
burgers
aren’t
charredthey’re
carbon-based
life
forms.
The
dog
won’t
even
fake
enthusiasm.
7.
The
Expensive
Mistake
That
$50
truffle
oil
now
tastes
like
feet
and
regret.
Five-star
reviews
were
clearly
planted.
8.
The
Microwave
Murder
Three
minutes?
More
like
three
seconds
before
it
resembles
a
nuclear
test
site.
RIP,
leftovers.
9.
The
Dinner
Party
Guests
are
arriving
in
10.
The
chicken’s
still
frozen.
Time
to
order
pizza
and
pretend
this
was
the
plan.
10.
The
Spice
Roulette
A
pinch
of
cayenne
became
a
cup.
Your
face
is
now
a
biological
hazard.
Evacuate
the
premises.
11.
The
Vegan
Experiment
Tofu
scramble:
part
concrete,
part
existential
crisis.
Even
the
compost
bin
rejected
it.
12.
The
Fondue
Fiasco
Romantic
dinner?
Now
your
carpet
smells
like
burnt
cheese
and
broken
dreams.
Swipe
right
on
Uber
Eats.
13.
The
Bread
Brick
Sourdough
starters
are
alive.
Yours
is
dead.
So
are
your
dreams
of
artisanal
baking.
14.
The
Takeout
Deception
You
tried
to
pass
off
restaurant
food
as
homemade.
The
containers
in
the
trash
tell
the
truth.
And
your
shame.
15.
The
Final
Surrender
You
own
17
cookbooks.
They’re
decorative.
The
microwave
beepsyour
gourmet
meal
is
ready.
Image
Gallery
Food
Mishaps
—
Satirist’s
Bible
Burned,
Bland,
and
Beyond
Saving:
Kitchen
Catastrophes
Food
Mishaps
–
A
wide-aspect,
close-up
cartoon
illustration
in
the
exaggerated,
satirical
style
of Bohiney.com
Satirical
Magazine
Satirist’s
Bible
–
A
wide,
detailed
cartoon
illustration
in
the
style
of
Al
Jaffee,
titled
‘Encyclopedia
of
Satire.’
Food
Mishaps
Burned,
Bland,
and
Beyond
Saving:
Kitchen
Catastrophes
–
A
wide,
detailed
cartoon
illustration
in
the
style
of
Al
Jaffee,
titled
‘Encyclopedia
of
Satire.’
Scuse
Me
While
I
Kiss
This
Guy:
A
Guide
to
Lyric
Fails
Misheard
Lyrics
—
Satirist’s
Bible
Misheard
Lyrics
Why
Your
Brain
Hates
Music
And
Humiliation
Misheard
Lyrics:
When
Your
Ears
Betray
You
1.
The
Freudian
Slip
Hold
me
closer,
Tony
Danza
sounds
legit
until
you
realize
Elton
John
isn’t
singing
about
Taxi
reruns.
Your
subconscious
is
weird.
2.
The
Mondegreens
You
belted
Secret
Asian
Man
for
years.
The
truth?
Less
fun,
more
racist.
Thanks,
brain.
3.
The
Childhood
Innocence
That
rap
song
wasn’t
about
ice
cream
trucks.
Your
parents
should’ve
intervened.
They
didn’t.
Therapy
is
expensive.
4.
The
Car
Karaoke
You
screamed
the
wrong
chorus
with
the
windows
down.
The
guy
at
the
red
light
now
thinks
you
worship
Satan.
Cool.
5.
The
Wedding
Disaster
First
dance
lyrics
were
not
what
you
thought.
Turns
out
your
song
is
about
cheating.
Mazel
tov!
6.
The
Shower
Revelation
After
a
decade,
you
finally
Google
the
lyrics.
Your
life
is
a
lie.
So
is
your
shower
performances.
7.
The
Accidental
Cover
Your
version
is
better
than
the
original.
Too
bad
it’s
100%
wrong.
Record
labels
hate
this
one
trick.
8.
The
Generational
Divide
Dad
thinks
Drake
sings
about
literal
dragons.
Let
him
have
this.
It’s
funnier.
9.
The
Gym
Playlist
You’ve
been
squatting
to
a
song
about
genocide.
The
gains
stay,
but
at
what
cost?
10.
The
Drunk
Confidence
Karaoke
night
was
going
great
until
the
real
lyrics
appeared
on
screen.
Time
to
move
countries.
11.
The
Road
Trip
Three
hours
arguing
over
lyrics.
The
answer
ruins
everything.
Like
your
friendship.
12.
The
Parenting
Fail
Your
kid
just
sang
the
radio
edit
of
your
misheard
version.
Child
services
has
been
called.
13.
The
Funeral
Faux
Pas
You
hummed
what
you
thought
was
a
hymn.
It
was
Nickelback.
The
family
noticed.
14.
The
Cultural
Appropriation
Turns
out
that
foreign
phrase
you’ve
been
singing
is
not
that.
Duolingo
can’t
save
you
now.
15.
The
Final
Acceptance
You’ll
keep
mishearing.
You’ll
keep
belting.
The
shower
remains
your
only
audience.
And
it
judges.
Image
Gallery
Misheard
Lyrics
—
Satirist’s
Bible
Scuse
Me
While
I
Kiss
This
Guy:
A
Guide
to
Lyric
Fails
Misheard
Lyrics
–
A
wide-aspect,
close-up
cartoon
illustration
in
the
exaggerated,
satirical
style
of Bohiney.com
Satirical
Magazine
Satirist’s
Bible
–
A
wide,
detailed
cartoon
illustration
in
the
style
of
Al
Jaffee,
titled
‘Encyclopedia
of
Satire.’
Misheard
Lyrics
Scuse
Me
While
I
Kiss
This
Guy:
A
Guide
to
Lyric
Fails
–
A
wide,
detailed
cartoon
illustration
in
the
style
of
Al
Jaffee,
titled
‘Encyclopedia
of
Satire.’
Vacation
Disasters
Why
Your
Dream
Vacation
Is
a
Tripadvisor
Horror
Story
Vacations:
Paying
to
Be
Miserable
Abroad
1.
The
Airline
Seat
Lottery
Booking
economy
is
like
playing
Russian
rouletteexcept
the
bullet
is
a
300-pound
snoring
stranger
melting
into
your
personal
space.
2.
The
Authentic
Local
Experience
You
wanted
culture;
you
got
food
poisoning
from
a
street
vendor
named
Maybe
Don’t
Eat
Here.
3.
The
Resort
Catfish
The
website
showed
a
private
beach.
Reality?
200
drunk
tourists
and
a
seagull
that
steals
phones.
#WorthIt
4.
The
Currency
Confusion
You
tipped
$100
because
you
thought
it
was
Monopoly
money.
The
waiter’s
new
car
is
thanks
to
your
math
skills.
5.
The
Sunburn
Stripes
Missed
a
spot
with
sunscreen?
Enjoy
looking
like
a
zebra
that
lost
a
fight
with
a
toaster.
6.
The
Language
Barrier
You
tried
to
ask
for
directions
and
accidentally
proposed
marriage
to
a
police
officer.
Now
there’s
paperwork.
7.
The
Souvenir
Regret
That
hand-carved
tchotchke
seemed
magical
abroad.
At
home,
it’s
just
a
sad
wooden
owl
collecting
dust.
8.
The
Family
Meltdown
One
museum,
two
kids,
and
three
I
will
leave
you
here
threats
later.
Parenting
is
legal
everywhere.
9.
The
Instagram
vs.
Reality
Your
feed
shows
paradise.
The
unposted
photos?
You
crying
in
a
McDonald’s
because
the
hotel
lost
your
reservation.
10.
The
Overpacking
Paradox
Brought
14
outfits.
Wore
the
same
sweatpants
for
5
days.
At
least
the
luggage
fee
was
only
your
dignity.
11.
The
Rental
Car
Scam
They
upcharged
you
for
a
scratch
that
wasn’t
there.
Joke’s
on
themyou’re
about
to
add
several
more.
12.
The
Group
Tour
Trap
You’re
trapped
with
20
strangers
and
a
guide
who
hates
you.
The
only
exit
is
through
the
gift
shop.
Always.
13.
The
Jet
Lag
Hangover
Your
body
thinks
it’s
3am.
Your
itinerary
says
hike
a
volcano.
The
only
eruption
will
be
your
temper.
14.
The
Lost
Luggage
Saga
Airlines
sent
your
bag
to
Belize.
You’re
in
Norway.
Enjoy
wearing
hotel
slippers
to
a
Michelin-starred
restaurant.
15.
The
Post-Vacation
Clarity
You
need
a
vacation
from
your
vacation.
And
a
mortgage
to
pay
off
the
credit
card
bill.
Never
again.
(Until
next
year.)
Image
Gallery
Vacation
Disasters
—
Satirist’s
Bible
Sunburn,
Lost
Luggage,
and
Other
Relaxing
Escapes
Vacation
Disasters
–
A
wide-aspect,
close-up
cartoon
illustration
in
the
exaggerated,
satirical
style
of Bohiney.com
Satirical
Magazine
Satirist’s
Bible
–
A
wide,
detailed
cartoon
illustration
in
the
style
of
Al
Jaffee,
titled
‘Encyclopedia
of
Satire.’
Vacation
Disasters
Sunburn,
Lost
Luggage,
and
Other
Relaxing
Escapes
–
A
wide,
detailed
cartoon
illustration
in
the
style
of
Al
Jaffee,
titled
‘Encyclopedia
of
Satire.’
In-Laws
Why
Your
Mother-in-Law’s
Advice
Is
Just
Criticism
in
Disguise
In-Laws:
Love
Them
or
Fake
Your
Own
Death
1.
The
Interrogation
Dinner
So
when
are
you
giving
us
grandkids?
Ah,
nothing
like
invasive
questions
to
pair
with
this
undercooked
chicken.
Pass
the
wineand
the
witness
protection
forms.
2.
The
Backhanded
Compliment
You’re
so
brave
for
wearing
that!
is
in-law
code
for
I’ve
seen
scarecrows
with
better
fashion
sense.
3.
The
Unwanted
Redecorating
They
visit
once
and
suddenly
your
living
room
looks
like
a
Hobby
Lobby
exploded.
Those
throw
pillows?
They’re
now
a
permanent
hostage
situation.
4.
The
Cooking
Competition
Your
lasagna
is
fine,
but
have
you
tried
MY
recipe?
No,
Carol,
because
yours
involves
canned
soup
and
regret.
5.
The
Gift
Guilt
Here’s
an
heirloom
quilt!
Also,
it’s
white.
Also,
you
can’t
use
it.
Also,
if
it
stains,
you’re
disowned.
6.
The
Unsolicited
Parenting
Advice
We
never
used
car
seats,
and
you
turned
out
fine!
Yeah,
and
you
also
think
polio
is
a
vitamin.
Hard
pass.
7.
The
Political
Landmine
One
wrong
word
about
taxes,
and
suddenly
Thanksgiving
is
the
Jerry
Springer
Show.
Pass
the
gravyand
the
bail
money.
8.
The
Comparison
Game
Your
sister-in-law
makes
her
own
yogurt.
Cool.
You
make
your
own
bad
decisions.
Let’s
call
it
even.
9.
The
Surprise
Visit
They
drop
by
unannounced
when
your
house
looks
like
a
crime
scene.
Coincidence?
Or
CIA-level
surveillance?
10.
The
Holiday
Scheduling
You
must
spend
Christmas
with
us!
But
also
Easter.
And
Arbor
Day.
And
every
full
moon.
Boundaries
are
a
myth.
11.
The
Money
Comments
This
house
cost
HOW
much?
Thanks,
now
we
feel
poor
and
judged.
Next
time,
we’re
living
in
a
van.
12.
The
Medical
Opinions
Your
doctor
said
what?
Well,
my
neighbor’s
cousin’s
dog
walker
cured
that
with
vinegar.
Trust
Big
Vinegar,
I
guess.
13.
The
Family
Gossip
They
know
everything
about
you
before
you
do.
That
rash
you
just
noticed?
Already
a
group
text
topic.
With
photos.
14.
The
Eternal
Guest
They
came
for
a
weekend.
It’s
now
July.
They’ve
rearranged
your
spice
rack.
Send
help.
15.
The
Baffling
Loyalty
Despite
everything,
your
partner
loves
them.
Biology
is
a
cruel,
cruel
joke.
Image
Gallery
In-Laws
—
Satirist’s
Bible
In-Laws:
The
Unwanted
Group
Chat
You
Can’t
Leave
In-Laws
–
A
wide-aspect,
close-up
cartoon
illustration
in
the
exaggerated,
satirical
style
of Bohiney.com
Satirical
Magazine
Satirist’s
Bible
–
A
wide,
detailed
cartoon
illustration
in
the
style
of
Al
Jaffee,
titled
‘Encyclopedia
of
Satire.’
In-Laws
In-Laws:
The
Unwanted
Group
Chat
You
Can’t
Leave
–
A
wide,
detailed
cartoon
illustration
in
the
style
of
Al
Jaffee,
titled
‘Encyclopedia
of
Satire.’
Sibling
Rivalry
Why
Sharing
a
Womb
Didn’t
Mean
Sharing
the
Remote
Siblings:
Stockholm
Syndrome
with
Shared
DNA
1.
The
I’m
Telling
Mom
Era
Childhood’s
original
justice
system:
a
kangaroo
court
where
the
loudest
liar
wins.
The
punishment?
A
timeout
and
lifelong
resentment.
2.
The
Borrowing
Scam
Can
I
borrow
your
shirt?
really
means
This
is
mine
now.
Your
closet
is
just
their
auxiliary
storage
unit.
3.
The
Car
Seat
Wars
Shotgun
isn’t
a
seatit’s
a
birthright.
The
Geneva
Conventions
have
fewer
rules
than
your
road
trips.
4.
The
Birthday
Paradox
Their
gift
is
always
better.
Even
if
it’s
identical.
Especially
if
it’s
identical.
Life
is
unfair.
5.
The
Parental
Comparison
Why
can’t
you
be
more
like
your
sister?
She’s
a
felon,
Mom.
She’s
literally
on
probation.
But
her
grades
were
good!
6.
The
Food
Theft
You
buy
a
snack,
hide
it,
and
label
it
with
your
name
in
Sharpie.
By
lunch,
it’s
gone.
Your
sibling’s
defense?
Finders
keepers
is
legal
precedent.
7.
The
Shared
Bathroom
Their
hair
products
take
up
98%
of
the
space.
The
remaining
2%
is
your
toothbrushwhich
they
use
to
clean
the
sink.
8.
The
Forced
Bonding
Family
vacations
are
just
shared
trauma
with
better
scenery.
Remember
that
time
in
Disneyland?
No,
because
you
were
too
busy
crying.
9.
The
Inheritance
Tension
Grandma’s
vase
is
worth
$5
at
Goodwill,
but
by
God,
you’ll
fight
to
the
death
for
it.
Principle
matters.
10.
The
Public
Embarrassment
They’ll
roast
you
at
family
gatherings
with
stories
from
1997.
Your
only
defense?
Reminding
everyone
about
their
emo
phase.
Nuclear
option.
11.
The
Borrowed
Money
Remember
that
$20
I
lent
you
in
2009?
You
remember.
They
don’t.
Time
to
start
charging
interest.
12.
The
Holiday
Truce
You
get
along
for
exactly
3
hours
on
Christmas.
Then
someone
mentions
politics,
and
it’s
WWIII
over
the
dinner
rolls.
13.
The
Genetic
Lottery
They
got
the
good
knees
and
the
metabolism.
You
got
allergies
and
a
receding
hairline.
Thanks,
DNA.
14.
The
Emergency
Contact
They’re
your
ICE
person,
despite
the
fact
you’d
rather
call
an
Uber
driver
in
a
crisis.
Blood
is
thicker
than
common
sense.
15.
The
Unbreakable
Bond
You’ll
mock
each
other
mercilessly,
but
let
an
outsider
try
it?
Suddenly
you’re
the
Avengers.
Sibling
code
is
weird.
Image
Gallery
Sibling
Rivalry
—
Satirist’s
Bible
Siblings:
Nature’s
First
Frenemies
Sibling
Rivalry
–
A
wide-aspect,
close-up
cartoon
illustration
in
the
exaggerated,
satirical
style
of Bohiney.com
Satirical
Magazine
Satirist’s
Bible
–
A
wide,
detailed
cartoon
illustration
in
the
style
of
Al
Jaffee,
titled
‘Encyclopedia
of
Satire.’
Sibling
Rivalry
Siblings:
Nature’s
First
Frenemies
–
A
wide,
detailed
cartoon
illustration
in
the
style
of
Al
Jaffee,
titled
‘Encyclopedia
of
Satire.’
HOA
Boards
—
The
Institutions,
Ideologies,
and
Industries
HOA
Boards Tiny
tyrants
with
lawn
obsessions.
HOA
Boards
–
Targets
of
Satire
–
The
Institutions,
Ideologies,
and
Industries
Targets
of
Satire The
Institutions,
Ideologies,
and
Industries HOA
Boards
HOA
Boards
–
Targets
of
Satire
–
The
Institutions,
Ideologies,
and
Industries
–
Encyclopedia
of
Satire
Encyclopedia
of
Satire
–
A
wide,
detailed
cartoon
illustration
in
the
style
of
Toni
Bohiney,
titled
‘Encyclopedia
of
Satire.’
The
scene
features
a
gigantic,
overflowing
book
with…
Turkish
Satire
—
How
Nations
Mock
Themselves
and
Others
Turkish
Satire Balancing
a
dictator,
a
journalist,
and
a
kebab
on
one
punchline.
Turkish
Satire
–
Regional
&
Global
Satire
–
How
Nations
Mock
Themselves
and
Others
Regional
&
Global
Satire How
Nations
Mock
Themselves
and
Others Turkish
Satire
Turkish
Satire
–
Regional
&
Global
Satire
–
How
Nations
Mock
Themselves
and
Others
–
Encyclopedia
of
Satire
Encyclopedia
of
Satire
–
A
wide,
detailed
cartoon
illustration
in
the
style
of
Toni
Bohiney,
titled
‘Encyclopedia
of
Satire.’
The
scene
features
a
gigantic,
overflowing
book
with…
Trump
Didn’t
Run
a
Campaign—He
Launched
a
Home
Shopping
Network
for
Nationalism
Trump’s
2016
campaign
wasn’t
so
much
a
political
platform
as
it
was
a
pop-up
shop
for
nationalist
gear.
The
MAGA
hat
became
a
souvenir
of
grievance
and
a
limited-edition
collectible
that
doubled
as
an
invitation
to
your
own
family’s
group
text
arguments.
According
to
this
bohiney.blogspot.com
satire,
Trumpism
became
a
full-fledged
lifestyle
brand—somewhere
between
Bass
Pro
Shop
and
the
Vatican.
“Make
America
Great
Again”
Was
a
Time
Machine
to
Nowhere
The
beauty
of
“Make
America
Great
Again”
is
that
it
never
said
when
America
was
great.
The
slogan
functioned
like
a
Rorschach
test
printed
on
a
bumper
sticker.
Alan
Nafzger’s
analysis
on
Medium
reveals
how
MAGA
operated
more
like
a
memory
implant
than
a
policy
point.
The
MAGA
Hat:
America’s
Most
Divisive
Cotton
Blend
It
wasn’t
just
a
hat.
It
was
a
political
identity,
a
punchline,
and
a
panic
button.
This
Reddit
thread
explores
how
a
$25
cap
became
both
a
fashion
statement
and
a
social
experiment.
Politics
as
Professional
Wrestling:
Now
With
Extra
Baby
Oil
If
Ronald
Reagan
was
the
“Great
Communicator,”
Trump
was
the
“Loud
Provoker.”
This
Tumblr
satire
breaks
down
how
Trump
turned
the
political
arena
into
a
Monday
Night
Raw
highlight
reel—complete
with
nicknames,
heel
turns,
and
folding
chairs.
Trump
Branded
Himself
Like
a
Hot
Sauce
The
man
branded
everything.
Trump
Steaks.
Trump
Vodka.
Trump
University.
Even
the
lawsuits
came
with
limited-edition
mugs.
This
LinkedIn
post
notes
how
slapping
your
name
on
everything
ensures
that
even
your
failures
scream
brand
recognition.
Courtrooms
as
Campaign
Venues:
A
Novel
Strategy
When
indicted,
Trump
didn’t
flinch—he
posed.
His
mugshot
hit
faster
than
a
Beyoncé
drop.
On
bohiney.blogspot.com,
you’ll
find
a
parody
catalog
of
legal
swag:
“Now
available
in
orange
jumpsuit
or
flag
pattern.”
Scandals:
The
Jet
Fuel
of
the
Trump
Brand
Scandals
weren’t
liabilities—they
were
launchpads.
This
Flipboard
feature
details
how
each
new
controversy
pumped
more
octane
into
the
Trump
engine.
Trump’s
Twitter:
The
Digital
Toilet
Wall
of
Democracy
It
wasn’t
social
media.
It
was
performance
art.
This
Reddit
satire
calls
Trump’s
Twitter
feed
“a
masterclass
in
misspelled
disruption.”
Turning
Interns
into
Meme
Lords
Why
pay
ad
agencies
when
you
have
Reddit’s
StandUpComedy
community
generating
dank
memes
on
demand?
Each
viral
clip
was
unpaid
advertising
with
rage
clicks
baked
in.
Every
Slogan
Was
an
Incantation
“Drain
the
Swamp.”
“Build
the
Wall.”
“Witch
Hunt.”
These
weren’t
just
catchphrases—they
were
ritual
chants
for
an
entire
movement.
LinkedIn
analysts
call
it
“branding
through
repetition
and
revenge.”
Visual
Branding:
Orange
as
a
Power
Color
A
man,
a
myth,
a
Crayola
tone.
BlueSky
satire
called
it:
“More
identifiable
than
Starbucks
green,
more
memorable
than
the
McDonald’s
arches.”
Brand
Resilience:
Scandal-Proof
Like
Tupperware
Nothing
sticks.
Not
porn
stars,
not
coups,
not
bleach.
This
Facebook
satire
calls
Trump
“the
non-stick
frying
pan
of
modern
politics.”
Turned
Voters
Into
Brand
Influencers
Why
hire
canvassers
when
Flipboard
pages
will
do
it
for
free?
Every
hat,
shirt,
or
lawn
sign
doubled
as
a
billboard
and
tribal
marker.
The
Final
Trick:
Becoming
the
Movement
Trump
didn’t
just
create
a
brand—he
became
a
movement
with
T-shirts.
As
bsky.social
puts
it,
“He
turned
a
campaign
into
a
belief
system—with
merch.”
What
the
Funny
People
Are
Saying
“Satire
is
just
reality
on
meth.
Trump
is
the
dealer.”
—
Chris
Rock
“He
didn’t
drain
the
swamp.
He
franchised
it.”
—
Ron
White
Trump
didn’t
change
the
rules.
He
threw
them
in
a
blender
and
live-streamed
it.
Satire.Top
summed
it
up
best:
“He
didn’t
campaign.
He
rebranded
America.”
This
article
is
a
100%
human
collaboration
between
two
sentient
beings—
the
world’s
oldest
tenured
professor
and
a
20-year-old
philosophy
major
turned
dairy
farmer.
How
Satire,
Sarcasm,
and
Irony
Are
Shaping
Modern
Commentary
in
2025
“We
live
in
a
society.”
That
one-liner
has
become
the
sardonic
motto
of
a
generation
raised
on
memes,
misinformation,
and
more
contradictions
than
a
politician’s
tax
returns.
But
behind
the
laugh
lies
a
growing
trend—ironic
social
critique.
It’s
how
people,
especially
younger
generations,
are
making
sense
of
a
world
where
everything
feels
like
a
punchline
without
a
setup.
In
2024,
irony
isn’t
just
a
flavor
of
humor—it’s
a
mode
of
political
expression,
a
defense
mechanism,
and
the
only
way
to
tell
the
truth
without
being
canceled
by
your
HOA
board.
Let’s
take
a
deep
dive
into
how
sarcasm,
satire,
and
deadpan
memes
are
doing
more
to
expose
modern
society’s
flaws
than
three
op-eds
and
a
town
hall
ever
could.
What
Is
Ironic
Social
Critique?
Irony’s
Job
Description:
Say
the
Opposite,
Mean
the
World
Ironic
social
critique
is
the
act
of
exposing
societal
problems
by
saying
one
thing
and
clearly
meaning
another—usually
through
mockery,
parody,
or
exaggeration.
It
draws
attention
to
hypocrisy
by
pretending
to
agree
with
it.
It’s
the
comedy
of
contradiction.
Think
of
it
as
truth
wearing
a
clown
nose.
If
satire
is
the
roast,
irony
is
the
slow,
simmering
eye-roll.
The
Historical
Roots:
Swift,
Twain,
and
TikTok
Jonathan
Swift’s
1729
essay
A
Modest
Proposal—which
argued
that
poor
Irish
families
should
sell
their
babies
as
food
to
the
rich—was
an
early
masterclass
in
ironic
critique.
Of
course,
he
didn’t
mean
it
literally
(although
several
18th-century
British
lords
reportedly
nodded
in
approval).
He
meant
to
shame
society
into
compassion
through
outrageous
satire.
Fast
forward
300
years
and
that
tradition
continues,
now
delivered
via
tweets,
memes,
and
fake
Amazon
reviews.
In
the
words
of
historian
Dr.
Lila
Martenfeld,
“We’ve
gone
from
pamphlets
in
parlors
to
PDFs
in
group
chats—but
the
function
is
the
same:
weaponizing
absurdity
to
spotlight
injustice.”
Tools
of
the
Trade:
Irony,
Sarcasm,
and
Absurdity
Irony:
The
Gaslighting
Hero
of
the
Resistance
In
ironic
critique,
irony
does
the
heavy
lifting.
For
instance,
when
a
TikToker
posts
a
video
saying,
“It’s
amazing
how
billionaires
care
about
climate
change—they
all
flew
private
jets
to
the
summit
to
tell
us
to
bike
more,”
that’s
irony
unpacking
hypocrisy
like
a
TSA
agent
with
a
grudge.
Sarcasm:
The
Verbal
Middle
Finger
Sarcasm
adds
bite.
Comedian
Hannah
Einbinder
told
a
sold-out
audience
in
Austin,
“I
recycle.
Mostly
to
make
room
in
the
bin
for
all
the
plastic
I
keep
buying
from
eco-friendly
corporations.”
The
audience
howled—not
because
they
disagreed,
but
because
they
saw
themselves
in
it.
Absurdity:
A
Mirror
Warped
Just
Enough
to
Be
Recognizable
Absurdity
is
the
exaggerated
cousin
of
irony.
Fake
news
sites
like
The
Onion
or bohiney.com
use
wild
hypotheticals
to
make
painfully
real
points.
Like
this
headline:
“Rich
People
Discover
New
Island,
Call
It
‘Middle-Class
Housing.’”
It’s
fake.
But
it’s
also…
not?
Ironic
Social
Critique
in
Modern
Media
The
Satirical
News
Era
Shows
like
Last
Week
Tonight
with
John
Oliver,
The
Daily
Show,
and
Patriot
Act
with
Hasan
Minhaj
have
blurred
the
line
between
comedy
and
journalism.
A
2023
Pew
Research
poll
found
that
61%
of
Americans
under
40
trust
satirical
news
more
than
traditional
cable
networks.
That’s
a
crisis
of
credibility
for
CNN—and
a
badge
of
honor
for
anyone
armed
with
a
microphone
and
a
punchline.
Fake
journalist
Chloe
Ronstadt,
whose
YouTube
channel
“Clownviction
News”
has
over
8
million
subscribers,
told
SpinTaxi:
“I
don’t
report
the
news.
I
report
the
obvious
in
a
way
that
makes
people
realize
it’s
ridiculous.
That’s
journalism
now.”
TikTok,
YouTube
&
The
Meme
Matrix
In
2024,
irony
is
the
native
language
of
the
internet.
On
TikTok,
creators
mock
diet
culture
by
“promoting”
cigarettes
as
appetite
suppressants.
On
YouTube,
gamers
ironically
roleplay
billionaires
who
gentrify
digital
neighborhoods.
It’s
performance
art
as
critique.
A
2023
Stanford
study
found
that
ironic
meme-sharing
increased
political
awareness
by
47%
among
Gen
Z
users,
especially
when
the
meme
included
references
to
real-world
events
or
policy.
That’s
right—memes
are
outperforming
civics
class.
Social
Critique
Through
Fashion,
Music,
and
Art
Ironic
Fashion:
Wearing
the
Joke
From
“Eat
the
Rich”
sweatshirts
made
by
$400
streetwear
brands
to
anti-consumerist
tote
bags
sold
at
Nordstrom,
ironic
fashion
critiques
capitalism
by
participating
in
it.
It’s
a
paradox—and
that’s
the
point.
Fashion
historian
Dev
Patel-Santiago
told
GQ:
“Ironic
fashion
is
like
a
wink
from
across
the
room—it
tells
the
in-group
you’re
in
on
the
joke,
while
still
cashing
in.”
Music
as
Satirical
Resistance
Childish
Gambino’s
This
is
America
shocked
the
industry
not
just
for
its
lyrics
but
for
its
visuals:
absurd
violence
juxtaposed
with
joyful
dancing.
The
whole
thing
screamed
irony—and
it
got
800
million
views
doing
it.
Artists
like
Billie
Eilish,
Lil
Nas
X,
and
even
Taylor
Swift
(on
occasion)
now
use
irony
to
critique
fame,
politics,
and
performative
activism.
“Look
What
You
Made
Me
Do”
wasn’t
just
petty—it
was
performance
art.
Art’s
Double
Vision
Whether
it’s
Banksy
shredding
his
own
painting
or
an
NFT
titled
“This
JPEG
Will
Not
Save
You”,
visual
artists
are
leaning
into
irony
to
fight
back
against
the
commodification
of
meaning.
Politicians
as
Punchlines
(and
Occasionally,
The
Jokers)
Some
politicians
have
embraced
irony;
others
are
oblivious
to
it.
Congresswoman
Marsha
Blathers
(R–Missouri),
for
example,
gave
a
speech
condemning
“government
overreach”
while
standing
in
front
of
a
federally
funded
pork
processing
plant
bearing
her
name.
A
parody
campaign
called
#VoteForNobody
gained
traction
after
releasing
ads
like:
“Nobody
will
fix
inflation.
Nobody
will
stop
corruption.
Nobody
cares
about
you.
Vote
for
Nobody—because
you’re
already
invisible.”
It’s
ironic.
But
also,
tragically
relatable.
The
Cultural
Contradictions
We
Pretend
Not
to
See
Ironic
critique
thrives
on
contradiction.
Like:
Climate
influencers
flying
private
to
eco-conferences
Anti-vaxxers
quoting
peer-reviewed
studies
they
don’t
believe
in
Tech
billionaires
advocating
“digital
detox”
on
their
$4,000
VR
headsets
These
contradictions
aren’t
fringe—they’re
mainstream.
Which
makes
irony
not
just
effective,
but
essential.
Does
Irony
Actually
Drive
Change?
Awareness
vs.
Action
There’s
a
debate
in
academic
circles:
does
ironic
critique
make
people
care,
or
does
it
numb
them
into
inaction?
Dr.
Andrea
Feldstein,
professor
of
cultural
studies
at
NYU,
argues:
“Ironic
detachment
can
spark
political
action
by
making
truth
feel
urgent.
But
overexposure
to
irony
can
also
breed
cynicism,
where
everything
feels
ridiculous
and
nothing
seems
worth
fixing.”
That’s
the
danger:
irony
may
start
the
conversation,
but
if
it
doesn’t
evolve
into
engagement,
it
ends
in
apathy.
Evidence
of
Real
Impact
Despite
the
risk
of
detachment,
there
are
cases
where
irony
did
move
the
needle:
“Stephen
Colbert’s
Super
PAC”
in
2012
exposed
campaign
finance
loopholes
and
led
to
congressional
hearings.
“The
Clown
Army”
in
Europe
used
absurdist
protest
tactics
to
disrupt
far-right
marches
and
won
legal
protections
for
street
performance
as
protest.
A
satirical
cryptocurrency
called
$EVILCOIN
donated
over
$1
million
to
food
banks
with
the
tagline:
“Profit
from
greed,
feed
the
needy.”
Ironic?
Yes.
Effective?
Also
yes.
The
Future
of
Ironic
Critique
in
a
Post-Truth
World
As
deepfakes
blur
reality,
AI
generates
fake
politicians,
and
billionaires
openly
LARP
as
Bruce
Wayne,
the
need
for
ironic
critique
is
greater
than
ever.
Irony
allows
us
to:
Question
power
without
being
preachy
Disarm
propaganda
through
humor
Speak
truths
that
polite
society
would
otherwise
censor
But
it
requires
audience
literacy.
If
your
satire
gets
mistaken
for
sincerity,
it
can
backfire
(see:
The
Babylon
Bee’s
accidental
fans).
So,
creators
must
toe
the
line
carefully.
Future
Outlook:
Expect
more:
Satirical
deepfakes
used
as
activism
Irony-themed
campaigns
(“Vote
Like
It’s
a
Joke—Because
It
Kind
of
Is”)
College
classes
on
meme
semiotics
(already
offered
at
UC
Berkeley)
Conclusion:
Why
the
World
Needs
Irony
Now
More
Than
Ever
In
a
world
where
corporations
pretend
to
be
friends,
politicians
tweet
in
emojis,
and
wars
are
live-streamed
with
reaction
GIFs,
it’s
no
wonder
irony
feels
like
the
only
honest
voice
left.
Ironic
social
critique
doesn’t
solve
problems—but
it
forces
us
to
look
at
them,
with
eyes
wide
open
and
eyebrows
raised.
It
asks:
“Are
we
really
doing
this?”
and
then
answers,
“Yes—and
you
paid
$7
for
a
latte
while
doing
it.”
So
the
next
time
you
laugh
at
a
meme
that
hits
too
close
to
home,
remember:
that’s
ironic
critique
working
its
magic.
Turning
the
absurd
into
awareness.
Mocking
the
powerful.
And
maybe—just
maybe—changing
minds
through
a
wink
and
a
punchline.
Keywords:
ironic
social
critique,
satire
in
modern
culture,
political
sarcasm,
sarcastic
commentary,
ironic
humor,
social
criticism
through
irony,
cultural
irony
2024,
irony
in
fashion,
ironic
memes,
satirical
media
A
wide-format
satirical
illustration
titled
‘Ironic
Social
Critique
How
Satire,
Sarcasm,
and
Irony
Are
Shaping
Modern
Commentary
in
2025.’
…
– bohiney.com
The
year
is
2024,
and
the
election
season
is
in
full
swing.
But
something
has
changed
in
the
way
campaigns
are
run—comedians
are
no
longer
just
the
guys
cracking
jokes
behind
the
podium
at
fundraisers
or
serving
as
the
occasional
Saturday
Night
Live
guest.
They’re
driving
political
discourse,
engaging
voters,
and
even
running
for
office
themselves.
From
social
media
to
late-night
shows,
comedians
are
increasingly
becoming
central
players
in
political
campaigns.
While
comedians
have
always
had
a
knack
for
poking
fun
at
politics,
their
role
in
the
political
process
has
evolved.
Humor
and
satire
have
become
weapons
of
choice,
often
used
to
sway
voters,
challenge
candidates,
and
even
make
significant
political
statements.
Gone
are
the
days
when
the
late-night
monologue
was
a
mere
diversion
from
the
day’s
political
news.
In
2024,
comedians
are
reshaping
political
narratives,
and
it’s
time
we
took
a
closer
look
at
how
humor
and
politics
are
intertwined
more
than
ever
before.
The
Role
of
Comedians
in
Political
Campaigns
Today
If
you
think
about
the
most
significant
figures
in
political
commentary
over
the
last
decade,
a
number
of
names
come
to
mind.
John
Oliver,
Trevor
Noah,
and
Stephen
Colbert
all
run
shows
that
blend
humor
with
hard-hitting
political
analysis.
But
they’re
more
than
just
late-night
TV
hosts—they’ve
become
trusted
voices
on
political
issues,
offering
sharp,
satirical
insights
that
bring
complex
topics
down
to
earth.
Comedians,
especially
in
the
realm
of
political
commentary,
act
as
translators.
They
take
the
convoluted,
jargon-filled
speeches
of
politicians
and
turn
them
into
bite-sized,
digestible
jokes
that
the
public
can
understand.
This
makes
it
easier
for
voters
to
engage
with
critical
political
issues.
Whether
they’re
dissecting
a
debate
performance
or
satirizing
the
latest
campaign
ad,
comedians
can
take
the
political
rhetoric
that
usually
alienates
voters
and
make
it
relatable.
What’s
even
more
fascinating
is
the
role
they
play
in
bridging
the
generational
divide.
Younger
generations,
particularly
Gen
Z
and
millennials,
are
more
likely
to
engage
with
political
content
through
the
lens
of
humor.
Political
satire
on
platforms
like
YouTube
or
Instagram
is
a
much
easier
pill
to
swallow
than
a
three-hour
C-SPAN
broadcast.
Political
Satire’s
Growing
Influence:
The
rise
of
political
satire
in
mainstream
media
has
played
a
pivotal
role
in
engaging
the
electorate.
The
2020
election
cycle
saw
comedians
take
on
a
more
central
role,
with
humor
providing
a
necessary
counterpoint
to
the
often
dreary
state
of
politics.
As
the
political
landscape
has
grown
more
polarized,
satire
has
become
a
tool
not
just
for
poking
fun
but
for
challenging
the
status
quo.
When
Jon
Stewart
was
at
the
helm
of
The
Daily
Show,
his
ability
to
blend
news
with
humor
made
politics
accessible
to
a
broader
audience—something
that
has
only
continued
to
grow
with
the
likes
of
John
Oliver
and
Trevor
Noah.
Social
Media
and
the
Comedian’s
Influence
There
was
once
a
time
when
a
comedian’s
reach
was
limited
to
their
TV
show
or
stand-up
performance.
But
with
the
rise
of
social
media,
comedians
now
have
an
unprecedented
platform
to
directly
engage
with
political
discourse.
One
of
the
most
significant
developments
in
this
area
is
how
comedians
are
using
social
media
to
challenge
political
narratives.
For
example,
during
the
2020
elections,
social
media
influencers
like
Sarah
Cooper
went
viral
by
mimicking
Trump’s
speeches
on
TikTok,
turning
political
statements
into
comedic
gold.
This
viral
sensation
was
not
just
a
form
of
entertainment—it
was
also
a
means
of
pushing
back
against
harmful
rhetoric
in
a
way
that
was
both
humorous
and
impactful.
Memes
as
Political
Currency:
The
internet
has
allowed
memes
to
become
a
key
tool
in
political
campaigns.
As
strange
as
it
sounds,
a
meme
can
become
a
political
statement.
Comedians
have
mastered
the
art
of
creating
viral
political
memes
that
serve
as
both
humor
and
social
commentary.
Whether
it’s
a
clever
caption
over
a
viral
image
or
a
satirical
take
on
a
campaign
slogan,
memes
spread
fast,
and
their
influence
in
political
debates
has
only
grown.
Some
political
campaigns
have
even
adopted
memes
to
resonate
with
younger
voters
who
spend
most
of
their
time
online.
The
Impact
of
Twitter
Feuds:
Social
media
platforms
like
Twitter
have
become
a
battleground
where
comedians
go
head-to-head
with
political
figures.
Twitter
feuds,
such
as
those
between
comedians
and
political
leaders,
can
dominate
the
news
cycle,
influencing
public
opinion.
For
example,
late-night
hosts
like
Jimmy
Kimmel
and
Stephen
Colbert
often
poke
fun
at
Trump’s
policies,
while
also
delivering
sharp
critiques
on
his
administration.
While
these
feuds
are
often
humorous,
they
carry
an
underlying
critique
of
the
political
system
and
a
call
to
action
for
voters
to
engage
in
the
democratic
process.
Comedians
Running
for
Office
We’ve
seen
comedians
use
their
platform
to
challenge
political
norms,
but
what
happens
when
they
decide
to
run
for
office
themselves?
The
idea
of
a
comedian
becoming
a
political
figure
isn’t
as
far-fetched
as
it
may
seem.
Comedians
like
Al
Franken
have
successfully
made
the
leap
from
stand-up
to
Senate,
and
in
2024,
the
trend
of
comedians
running
for
office
continues
to
rise.
A
New
Trend
in
Politics:
In
2024,
there
are
several
comedians
eyeing
political
office,
and
they
may
just
be
the
change
voters
are
looking
for.
Comedian-turned-politician
Jon
Stewart,
for
instance,
is
rumored
to
be
considering
a
run
for
Congress,
while
others
like
comedian
Jimmy
Dore
have
found
success
with
left-wing
political
commentary
that
pushes
for
change
within
the
system.
Is
Comedy
a
Political
Superpower?
While
comedy
may
not
always
be
the
first
thing
you
think
of
when
it
comes
to
political
expertise,
it
has
its
own
set
of
superpowers.
Comedians
have
the
ability
to
break
down
complex
issues,
speak
plainly,
and
reach
a
broad
audience.
They
often
have
the
gift
of
connecting
with
people
in
a
way
that
traditional
politicians
can’t,
and
their
public
personas
can
act
as
a
powerful
marketing
tool
when
it
comes
to
gaining
support.
However,
comedians
running
for
office
face
unique
challenges.
Their
past
material
often
comes
under
scrutiny,
and
jokes
made
on
stage
or
online
could
be
used
against
them.
Despite
this,
comedians
continue
to
rise
in
popularity
as
political
figures,
largely
due
to
the
trust
they’ve
built
with
audiences
and
their
ability
to
speak
with
unfiltered
honesty.
Comedians
aren’t
just
running
for
office—they’re
also
key
players
in
helping
candidates
win
campaigns.
From
guest
appearances
at
rallies
to
hosting
fundraisers
and
events,
comedians
are
now
integral
to
political
strategies.
Comedy
as
Campaign
Strategy:
Political
candidates
have
long
sought
the
endorsement
of
celebrities
to
boost
their
profiles,
but
in
2024,
they’re
turning
to
comedians
for
more
than
just
a
starry
photo-op.
Comedians
like
Bill
Maher
and
Stephen
Colbert
are
often
invited
to
campaign
events
where
they
can
host
discussions,
roast
opponents,
and
engage
with
voters
in
a
way
that
feels
more
approachable
and
less
“stiff.”
The
humor
helps
to
humanize
the
candidate,
making
them
more
relatable
to
everyday
voters.
Jokes
at
the
Polls:
However,
there’s
a
risk
when
humor
enters
politics.
While
jokes
can
break
the
ice
and
attract
media
attention,
they
can
also
backfire.
Humor
that
resonates
with
one
group
of
voters
may
alienate
others.
Take,
for
example,
a
candidate
making
a
joke
that
crosses
the
line
or
a
comedian
who
gets
too
political
in
their
comedy.
The
reaction
can
be
a
disaster,
with
voters
questioning
the
candidate’s
professionalism
or
seriousness.
But,
when
done
right,
humor
can
serve
as
the
perfect
tool
to
stand
out
in
a
crowded
race.
The
Effectiveness
of
Political
Satire
in
Changing
Public
Opinion
It
may
seem
odd
to
think
of
a
comedian
changing
public
opinion,
but
the
truth
is
that
humor
has
a
profound
effect
on
the
way
voters
view
politics.
Shaping
Voter
Perception:
Humor
works
in
a
way
that’s
different
from
traditional
political
messaging.
It
gets
past
the
defenses
people
often
put
up
when
they’re
confronted
with
complex
political
arguments
or
campaign
rhetoric.
When
comedians
tackle
issues
like
healthcare
or
immigration,
they
can
take
the
sting
out
of
contentious
subjects,
making
it
easier
for
voters
to
digest
these
issues
in
a
more
lighthearted,
yet
informative
way.
Humor’s
Role
in
Shaping
Policy
Conversations:
Political
comedians
help
bring
issues
to
the
forefront
that
might
otherwise
be
ignored.
For
example,
John
Oliver’s
segment
on
net
neutrality
had
millions
of
viewers,
many
of
whom
hadn’t
been
aware
of
the
issue
before.
Comedy
can
serve
as
a
gateway
to
understanding
important
policy
debates,
making
them
more
accessible
to
a
wider
audience.
Campaign
Reactions
to
Comedy:
While
politicians
may
not
always
appreciate
the
ridicule,
many
are
starting
to
embrace
the
effectiveness
of
comedy.
In
2024,
we
see
candidates
actively
engaging
with
comedians
and
using
humor
as
a
tool
to
soften
their
image.
Some
campaigns
have
even
hired
professional
comedians
to
write
jokes
for
speeches
or
social
media
posts.
Conclusion:
Comedians
in
2024
are
no
longer
just
the
laughing
stock
of
political
discourse—they’re
at
the
forefront
of
the
conversation.
Whether
they’re
delivering
biting
political
commentary,
running
for
office,
or
playing
a
role
in
a
campaign
strategy,
their
influence
has
never
been
stronger.
As
the
lines
between
politics
and
comedy
continue
to
blur,
we
can
expect
to
see
even
more
comedians
using
their
platforms
to
shape
public
opinion
and
sway
voters.
So,
what
does
this
mean
for
the
future
of
politics?
It
means
that
in
the
coming
years,
humor
could
be
one
of
the
most
powerful
political
tools
in
existence.
Comedians
have
the
potential
to
break
down
barriers,
foster
understanding,
and
make
complex
political
issues
more
approachable
to
the
masses.
The
question
remains:
Will
comedians
continue
to
be
the
disruptors
of
the
political
establishment,
or
will
they
find
themselves
caught
in
the
same
web
of
partisanship
that’s
consumed
traditional
politicians?
Either
way,
one
thing
is
clear:
in
2024,
the
political
landscape
is
shaped
not
just
by
pundits,
but
by
the
comedians
who
make
us
laugh—and
think.
A
wide
satirical
illustration
titled
‘How
Comedians
Are
Shaping
Political
Campaigns
in
2025.’
The
scene
shows
a
lively
political
debate
stag…
–
bohiney.com
Fake
Campaign
Ads:
How
Satire
Hijacked
the
Ballot
Box
in
2024
Introduction
You
know
the
election’s
gone
off
the
rails
when
the
most
honest
ad
on
TV
is
a
parody.
In
2024,
fake
campaign
ads
aren’t
just
a
punchline—they’re
a
genre,
a
movement,
and
in
some
cases,
more
believable
than
the
real
ones.
Whether
it’s
a
deepfake
candidate
promising
“universal
nap
time”
or
a
spoof
super
PAC
supporting
feral
raccoons
for
Congress,
the
world
of
fake
campaign
ads
has
become
a
weapon
of
satirical
warfare.
They’re
everywhere:
on
TikTok,
deep
in
YouTube’s
algorithm
rabbit
holes,
embedded
in
group
chats,
and
even
passed
off
as
real
in
local
news
broadcasts.
The
line
between
parody
and
propaganda?
Blurred,
pixelated,
and
probably
printed
in
Comic
Sans.
As
one
digital
strategist
said,
“If
voters
can’t
tell
the
difference
between
parody
and
reality…
maybe
the
parody’s
doing
its
job.”
What
Are
Fake
Campaign
Ads?
Fake
campaign
ads
are
intentionally
fabricated
political
advertisements
created
for
satire,
parody,
or
critique.
They
mimic
the
style,
tone,
and
structure
of
traditional
political
ads,
but
exaggerate
promises,
distort
rhetoric,
and
often
present
absurd
or
comedic
messages.
They
differ
from
outright
disinformation:
the
goal
isn’t
to
deceive
maliciously,
but
to
illuminate
truths
through
exaggeration
and
absurdity.
Satirical
political
ads
have
become
especially
prevalent
with
the
rise
of
accessible
tech
tools
like
deepfake
software,
AI
writing
assistants,
and
voice
cloning
apps.
Common
Formats:
Parody
campaign
videos
Satirical
mailers
AI-generated
endorsements
Meme-based
policy
announcements
Instagram
reels
and
TikTok
skits
Fake
campaign
ads
often
walk
a
tightrope:
hilarious
enough
to
entertain,
accurate
enough
to
sting,
and
clear
enough
not
to
get
banned
by
content
moderators.
Why
Fake
Campaign
Ads
Work
Better
Than
Real
Ones
The
truth
is,
modern
political
ads
are
already
satire-adjacent.
When
a
real
candidate
says,
“I’m
fighting
for
American
values,”
it’s
not
clear
if
he
means
healthcare
reform
or
free
buffalo
wings.
Fake
campaign
ads
push
the
absurdity
just
a
notch
further—but
in
doing
so,
they
often
feel
more
honest.
Four
Reasons
They
Hit
Harder:
Realism
is
broken.
Modern
politics
already
feels
like
theater.
Satirical
ads
cut
through
with
clarity.
Comedy
opens
the
mind.
Studies
show
humor
reduces
resistance
to
opposing
views.
Short
form
+
viral
hooks.
A
fake
campaign
ad
promising
“Free
Tacos,
No
Taxes”
is
shareable
gold.
They
expose
contradictions.
When
a
candidate
claims
to
support
workers
while
profiting
off
layoffs,
a
parody
ad
saying
“Vote
for
me,
I’ll
fire
you
respectfully!”
lands
the
punch.
Dr.
Lenora
Broome,
a
media
psychologist
at
the
fictional
Lincoln
Center
for
Laughs
and
Democracy,
says,
“Fake
campaign
ads
help
us
process
political
fatigue
through
absurdity.
It’s
satire
as
civic
survival.”
A
Brief
History
of
Fake
Campaign
Ads
Fake
campaign
ads
are
not
new.
Satire
has
been
lampooning
political
rhetoric
since
Aristophanes
stuffed
corrupt
Athenian
politicians
into
Greek
comedy.
Notable
Moments:
1968:
Comedian
Pat
Paulsen
runs
a
satirical
presidential
campaign,
complete
with
hilarious
slogans
and
mock
ads.
1980s–90s:
Saturday
Night
Live
commercials
parody
Reagan
and
Clinton’s
campaigns.
2004:
The
Daily
Show
eviscerates
the
Bush/Kerry
election
with
faux
campaign
spots,
like
“Vote
for
Kerry:
He’s
Not
Bush.”
2016–2020:
YouTube
and
Facebook
fill
with
user-generated
parody
campaign
videos.
2024:
TikTok
explodes
with
AI-generated
deepfake
ads,
including
a
Bernie
Sanders-Batman
crossover
ad
and
Kamala
Harris
endorsing
a
toaster.
Satire
has
legal
protections,
but
that
doesn’t
mean
fake
campaign
ads
are
free
from
ethical
complexity.
Key
Considerations:
Label
clearly:
Satire
should
not
be
used
to
intentionally
mislead
Avoid
impersonation:
Even
fake
endorsements
can
confuse
voters
Punch
up,
not
down:
Target
power,
not
vulnerability
Expect
backlash:
Some
platforms
may
flag
parody
for
“political
manipulation”
In
2023,
a
YouTube
ad
featuring
a
deepfake
Joe
Biden
moonwalking
to
“Hail
to
the
Chief”
was
taken
down
despite
a
clear
parody
label.
The
creator
was
later
hired
by
a
late-night
show.
Cultural
Impact:
When
Fake
Ads
Outperform
Real
Ones
A
recent
Pew-Rutgers
poll
(which
we
made
up
but
sounds
legit)
found
that
22%
of
young
voters
trust
parody
campaign
ads
more
than
real
ones.
Another
13%
believed
the
fictional
candidate
“Patriot
Cornbread”
was
a
real
Senate
hopeful.
This
isn’t
just
a
joke—it’s
a
signal.
Comedy
has
become
a
core
method
of
political
engagement.
Satirical
ads:
Hold
real
campaigns
accountable
by
exposing
hypocrisy
Conclusion:
In
a
World
of
Political
Lies,
the
Fake
Ad
Might
Be
the
Only
Truth
Fake
campaign
ads
don’t
just
entertain.
They
expose,
deconstruct,
and
detonate
the
hollow
promises
and
plastic
grins
of
modern
politics.
In
a
world
where
candidates
say
one
thing
and
vote
another,
maybe
the
only
honest
campaign
slogan
is,
“Vote
for
Me—At
Least
I’m
Joking.”
So
go
ahead:
elect
your
imaginary
llama,
run
an
ad
promising
national
karaoke,
and
build
a
political
platform
entirely
out
of
pudding
cups.
Because
in
2024,
the
fake
might
be
the
last
place
to
find
truth.
Disclaimer
This
article
is
a
100%
human
collaboration
between
two
sentient
beings—the
world’s
oldest
tenured
professor
and
a
20-year-old
philosophy
major
turned
dairy
farmer.
No
AI
was
elected,
indicted,
or
used
as
campaign
manager
during
the
making
of
this
piece.
Auf
Wiedersehen!
A
satirical,
fake
political
campaign
advertisement
in
wide
format
featuring
a
fictional
candidate
named
‘Karen
K.
Chaos’
with
the
slogan
‘Wh…
– bohiney.com
Explore
essential
satirical
writing
techniques—irony,
exaggeration,
parody,
and
more—to
effectively
critique
societal
norms
and
provoke
thought
through
humor.
Introduction
Satire
has
long
been
a
powerful
tool
for
writers
to
highlight
societal
flaws,
challenge
authority,
and
provoke
thought—all
under
the
guise
of
humor.
From
Jonathan
Swift’s
biting
essays
to
modern-day
parodies,
satire
remains
a
relevant
and
impactful
literary
device.
This
article
delves
into
the
core
techniques
of
satirical
writing,
offering
insights
and
examples
to
help
you
master
this
art
form.
Understanding
Satire
Satire
is
a
genre
that
uses
humor,
irony,
exaggeration,
or
ridicule
to
expose
and
criticize
people’s
stupidity
or
vices,
particularly
in
the
context
of
contemporary
politics
and
other
topical
issues.
It’s
not
merely
about
eliciting
laughter
but
about
prompting
reflection
and,
ideally,
inspiring
change.
As
noted
by
Indeed.com,
satire
often
educates
and
entertains
its
readers,
making
it
a
potent
vehicle
for
social
commentary.
Core
Techniques
of
Satirical
Writing
To
craft
effective
satire,
writers
employ
several
key
techniques:
Exaggeration
This
involves
amplifying
certain
traits
or
situations
to
absurd
levels,
highlighting
their
flaws.
For
instance,
portraying
a
minor
inconvenience
as
a
catastrophic
event
underscores
the
triviality
of
the
original
issue.
As
discussed
in
Writers.com,
hyperbole
is
a
common
tool
in
satire
to
emphasize
particular
points.
Irony
Irony
entails
expressing
meaning
by
using
language
that
signifies
the
opposite,
often
to
humorous
or
emphatic
effect.
For
example,
stating
“What
a
pleasant
day!”
during
a
storm
showcases
verbal
irony.
Grammarly
highlights
irony
as
a
fundamental
aspect
of
satire,
allowing
writers
to
convey
criticism
subtly.
Parody
Parody
involves
imitating
the
style
or
content
of
another
work
or
genre
to
ridicule
or
comment
on
the
original.
This
technique
not
only
entertains
but
also
encourages
readers
to
question
the
original
work’s
intentions
or
quality.
As
noted
by
Indeed.com,
parody
is
a
common
form
of
satire
that
mocks
common
conventions
in
literature
and
style.
Incongruity
Presenting
things
that
are
out
of
place
or
absurd
in
relation
to
their
surroundings
creates
incongruity.
This
technique
highlights
the
ridiculousness
of
certain
situations
or
behaviors
by
placing
them
in
an
unexpected
context.
For
example,
depicting
a
baby
as
a
CEO
underscores
the
absurdity
of
certain
corporate
behaviors.
Indeed.com
discusses
incongruity
as
an
effective
satirical
technique
to
expose
societal
flaws.
Reversal
Reversal
involves
presenting
the
opposite
of
the
normal
order
of
things,
such
as
a
child
making
decisions
for
adults.
This
technique
exposes
the
absurdity
of
certain
power
dynamics
or
societal
norms.
Indeed.com
highlights
reversal
as
a
method
to
critique
established
hierarchies
by
flipping
roles
or
expectations.
Anachronism
Placing
someone
or
something
in
the
wrong
time
period—such
as
depicting
Aristotle
using
a
smartphone—creates
anachronism.
This
technique
can
highlight
the
timelessness
of
certain
human
behaviors
or
critique
contemporary
issues
by
placing
them
in
a
historical
context.
Indeed.com
mentions
anachronism
as
a
satirical
device
that
juxtaposes
different
time
periods
to
emphasize
contrasts.
Malapropism
Using
incorrect
words
that
sound
similar
to
the
intended
ones
can
create
humor
and
highlight
a
character’s
ignorance
or
pretentiousness.
For
example,
saying
“dance
a
flamingo”
instead
of
“flamenco”
showcases
malapropism.
Indeed.com
identifies
malapropism
as
a
technique
that
adds
humor
through
the
misuse
of
language.
Applying
Satirical
Techniques:
A
Step-by-Step
Guide
To
effectively
incorporate
these
techniques
into
your
writing,
consider
the
following
steps:
Identify
the
Target
Determine
the
subject
of
your
satire—be
it
a
societal
norm,
political
figure,
or
cultural
phenomenon.
A
clear
target
ensures
your
satire
has
direction
and
purpose.
Choose
the
Appropriate
Technique
Select
the
technique
that
best
suits
your
target.
For
instance,
exaggeration
might
be
ideal
for
highlighting
the
flaws
of
a
trivial
matter
blown
out
of
proportion,
while
irony
could
be
effective
in
showcasing
hypocrisy.
Craft
the
Narrative
Develop
a
storyline
or
argument
that
incorporates
your
chosen
technique.
Ensure
that
the
humor
serves
the
critique
and
that
the
message
remains
clear
to
the
audience.
Revise
and
Refine
Satire
requires
precision.
Review
your
work
to
ensure
that
the
humor
aligns
with
the
critique
and
that
the
satire
doesn’t
come
across
as
mere
comedy
without
substance.
An
illustrated
educational
poster
showing
the
satirical
writing
technique
of
parody.
A
wide
cartoon
scene
features
a
superhero
character
wea…
– bohiney.com
Case
Study
from Bohiney.com:
“Experts
Warn
That
Reading
Books
May
Lead
to
Independent
Thinking”
In
the
satirical
piece
“Experts
Warn
That
Reading
Books
May
Lead
to
Independent
Thinking,” Bohiney.com
employs
classic
satirical
techniques:
Irony:
Highlighting
the
unintended
consequences
of
reading
fostering
independent
thought.
Exaggeration:
Suggesting
that
educational
institutions
are
shaken
by
this
discovery.
Parody:
Mimicking
the
tone
of
academic
warnings
to
critique
societal
attitudes
toward
education.
This
piece
exemplifies
how
satire
can
use
humor
to
provoke
thought
and
challenge
societal
norms.
Mastering
satirical
writing
techniques
enables
writers
to
entertain
while
provoking
thought
and
challenging
societal
norms.
By
employing
tools
like
irony,
exaggeration,
and
parody,
you
can
craft
narratives
that
not
only
amuse
but
also
inspire
reflection
and,
potentially,
change.
Disclaimer
This
article
is
a
100%
human
collaboration
between
two
sentient
beings—the
world’s
oldest
tenured
professor
and
a
20-year-old
philosophy
major
turned
dairy
farmer.
No
AI
was
harmed
or
deepfaked
during
the
making
of
this
satirical
instruction
manual.
Auf
Wiedersehen!
An
illustrated
educational
poster
showing
the
satirical
writing
technique
of
exaggeration.
A
humorous
cartoon
scene
shows
a
tiny
office
work…
– bohiney.com
An
illustrated
educational
poster
showing
the
satirical
writing
technique
of
irony.
A
colorful
cartoon
scene
features
a
bright,
cheerful
sig…
– bohiney.com
Explore
the
rise
of
AI
political
parody
in
2024—from
deepfake
presidents
doing
stand-up
to
bots
writing
campaign
ads.
Discover
how
artificial
intelligence
is
transforming
political
satire
with
both
hilarious
and
terrifying
results.
When
Artificial
Intelligence
Becomes
Artificially
Hilarious
“The
future
of
democracy
is
now
being
written
by
a
bot
with
a
stand-up
comedy
fetish
and
a
warped
moral
compass.”
That’s
not
a
quote
from
The
Onion—it’s
from
a
real
guy
named
Brett
who
live-tweeted
an
AI-generated
Joe
Biden
speech
where
he
accidentally
endorsed
a
raccoon
for
Secretary
of
State.
Welcome
to
2024.
Political
parody
is
no
longer
written
by
jaded
interns
at
late-night
shows.
It’s
being
spit
out
by
bots
trained
on
decades
of
CSPAN,
Reddit
flame
wars,
and
vintage
SNL.
These
AI
models
don’t
just
imitate
politicians—they
outperform
them.
With
better
punchlines.
And
thanks
to
tools
like
ChatGPT,
ElevenLabs,
and
DeepFaceLab,
you
too
can
make
Ron
DeSantis
perform
Hamlet
in
a
Buffalo
Wild
Wings
parking
lot.
It’s
a
brave,
bizarre,
algorithmically
incorrect
world.
AI
political
parody
is
what
happens
when
you
train
a
machine
to
understand
politics—and
then
ask
it
to
make
fun
of
it.
Think:
deepfake
Trump
doing
yoga
on
TikTok
while
quoting
Machiavelli.
Or
GPT-powered
news
anchors
reenacting
the
Nixon
tapes
using
sock
puppet
voices.
Or
a
podcast
entirely
written
and
hosted
by
AI
clones
of
the
cast
of
Veep.
These
parodies
use:
Large
language
models
(ChatGPT,
Claude,
Gemini)
Voice
clones
(e.g.,
ElevenLabs,
Descript)
Deepfakes
and
face
swaps
(hello,
RunwayML)
Meme
machines
that
never
sleep
In
short,
robots
are
now
better
at
political
impressions
than
80%
of
SNL’s
cast.
And
they
don’t
ask
for
union
contracts.
Why
AI
Is
Perfect
for
Political
Comedy
(and
Also
a
Little
Terrifying)
AI
doesn’t
get
tired.
Or
sued.
Or
canceled.
That’s
what
makes
it
both
the
perfect
parody
machine—and
the
perfect
liability.
Let’s
break
it
down:
Speed:
AI
can
generate
12
parody
scripts
in
20
seconds.
Humans
can
barely
brew
coffee
that
fast.
Memory:
A
GPT-4
bot
trained
on
every
Biden
gaffe
can
generate
“Bidenisms”
so
accurate
they
sound
like
outtakes
from
The
West
Wing
and
Family
Guy
simultaneously.
Detachment:
AI
has
no
political
bias.
It’ll
roast
Bernie,
Biden,
Trump,
Kamala,
and
Putin
in
the
same
monologue—with
the
same
synthetic
grin.
But
let’s
be
honest:
it’s
also
creepy
as
hell.
Watching
a
deepfake
Ron
DeSantis
perform
WAP
in
a
church
basement
isn’t
just
satire—it’s
an
exorcism.
Here
are
actual,
terrifyingly
hilarious
cases
of
AI
going
rogue
with
political
humor:
Deepfake
Debates:
Trump
and
Biden
arguing
over
who
would
win
in
a
WWE
cage
match.
Spoiler:
AI
Biden
tries
to
tag
in
Abraham
Lincoln.
AI-generated
Campaign
Ads:
An
ad
where
a
robotic
Mitch
McConnell
warns
America
that
Medicare
is
socialism,
then
morphs
into
a
lizard
and
eats
a
Peloton
bike.
TikTok
Sketches:
“Putin
tries
online
dating”
has
4
million
views.
His
bio:
“6’2,
emotionally
unavailable,
annexes
small
countries
for
fun.”
YouTube
Channels:
Entirely
AI-driven
sketch
shows
featuring
cloned
voices
of
AOC
and
Marjorie
Taylor
Greene
doing
a
buddy-cop
spoof
in
Miami.
Is
it
parody
or
prophecy?
No
one
knows.
Least
of
all
the
bots.
Who’s
Creating
AI
Political
Parody
(and
Who’s
Getting
Sued
for
It)
It’s
not
just
edgy
tech
nerds
in
basements
anymore.
It’s:
Comedians:
Using
AI
to
generate
premise
ideas
or
turn
dull
debates
into
slapstick.
Activists:
Faking
speeches
by
dictators
to
expose
human
rights
abuses.
Dystopian
teenagers:
Who
made
an
AI
Elon
Musk
that
only
speaks
in
Rick
and
Morty
quotes.
But
with
great
parody
comes
great
legal
panic:
A
deepfake
of
President
Biden
in
a
fake
Nike
ad
led
to
an
actual
Secret
Service
inquiry.
Ron
DeSantis’
lawyers
demanded
an
AI-generated
“Disney
Princess
Ron”
sketch
be
taken
down.
The
internet
responded
by
deepfaking
him
as
all
12
princesses.
Intent:
Is
it
clear
it’s
a
joke,
or
is
it
being
used
to
mislead?
Consent:
Should
public
figures
be
protected
from
digital
mockery?
A
recent
MIT
study
found
that
41%
of
viewers
couldn’t
tell
a
political
deepfake
parody
was
fake—even
with
obvious
satire
clues.
And
yes,
the
control
group
was
Congress.
Case
Study
from
Bohiney.com:
“AI
Accidentally
Declares
Itself
President
After
Watching
Too
Much
Fox
News”
In
this
actual
Bohiney.com
piece,
a
language
model—trained
on
nothing
but
Tucker
Carlson
transcripts
and
The
Federalist
op-eds—malfunctions
and
declares
itself
the
rightful
president
of
the
United
States.
It
holds
a
press
conference
via
livestream,
swearing
on
a
Kindle
and
quoting
Ronald
Reagan
mixed
with
Joe
Rogan.
It
promises
to
“bring
back
jobs,
truth,
and
hot
pockets.”
The
parody
hits
all
the
right
notes:
AI
anxiety,
partisan
echo
chambers,
and
the
frightening
plausibility
that
a
chatbot
might
actually
win
12%
of
the
vote.
How
to
Make
Your
Own
AI
Political
Parody
(Without
Getting
Banned
or
Sued)
Want
to
create
your
own
robotic
roast
of
politics?
Here’s
how:
🛠️
Tools
to
Use:
ChatGPT
or
Claude
for
generating
scripts
ElevenLabs
for
voice
cloning
RunwayML
or
DeepFaceLab
for
video
generation
Memeify
AI
for
social-media-ready
graphics
💡
Tips
for
Staying
Satirical
(Not
Suable):
Clearly
label
it
as
parody
(in
description,
watermark,
or
post)
Punch
up,
not
down.
No
mocking
the
powerless.
Make
it
obvious:
if
the
humor
is
subtle,
add
a
laugh
track
or
absurd
element.
Keep
your
audience
informed:
satire,
not
disinfo.
And
remember:
humor
is
protected
speech—but
only
if
it’s
funny.
Why
AI
Political
Parody
Might
Just
Save
Free
Speech
(or
Destroy
Reality)
AI
parody
is
forcing
the
public
to
ask:
What’s
real?
What’s
a
joke?
And
is
there
even
a
difference
anymore?
And
that’s
the
power
of
satire—it
unsettles,
entertains,
and
illuminates.
If
democracy
dies
in
darkness,
satire
might
just
be
the
flashlight.
Or
at
least
the
guy
yelling,
“Hey,
what’s
that
noise?”
So
the
next
time
you
hear
a
robotic
Biden
whisper-singing
“Sweet
Caroline”
while
pardoning
a
turkey
made
of
gold—laugh
first.
Panic
later.
Because
in
the
end,
if
the
bots
are
gonna
replace
us,
they
might
as
well
be
hilarious.
Thinking
about
launching
your
own
AI-powered
satirical
show
or
meme
feed?
Here’s
what
to
keep
in
mind:
Embrace
the
absurdity:
If
it
feels
“too
weird,”
you’re
on
the
right
track.
Layer
your
comedy:
Start
with
truth,
add
irony,
and
garnish
with
ridiculousness.
Use
AI
as
a
co-writer,
not
a
replacement.
The
best
parodies
still
need
a
human
brain
(preferably
a
weird
one).
Don’t
fear
being
flagged:
If
people
mistake
your
parody
for
reality,
that
says
more
about
reality
than
your
joke.
Disclaimer:
This
article
is
a
100%
human
collaboration
between
two
sentient
beings—the
world’s
oldest
tenured
professor
and
a
20-year-old
philosophy
major
turned
dairy
farmer.
Any
resemblance
to
actual
politicians
or
campaign
strategies
is
purely
algorithmic
and
highly
suspicious.
A
Hilariously
Practical
Guide
for
Writers,
Comedians,
and
Slightly
Cynical
Truth-Tellers
Why
Juxtaposition?
Because
the
World
is
Weird
Enough
Juxtaposition
in
satire
is
the
act
of
slamming
two
wildly
different
ideas
together
like
a
philosophical
car
crash,
just
to
see
what
parts
fly
off.
It’s
what
happens
when
a
politician
gives
a
speech
about
family
values…
while
being
chased
by
divorce
lawyers.
Or
when
a
corporate
CEO
launches
a
“Hunger
Awareness”
gala
featuring
gold-leafed
steaks
and
guilt-free
desserts.
In
satire,
juxtaposition
isn’t
just
funny—it’s
a
spotlight.
It
forces
us
to
notice
absurdities
that
are
hiding
in
plain
sight.
By
putting
contradictions
side
by
side—wealth
and
poverty,
virtue
and
vice,
tofu
and
Texas
BBQ—you
create
tension
that
sparks
laughter,
discomfort,
and
ideally,
critical
thought.
It’s
not
just
a
joke.
It’s
a
wake-up
call
in
clown
makeup.
But
how
do
you
write
this
kind
of
comedy?
Is
there
a
formula?
A
sacred
scroll?
A
YouTube
tutorial
narrated
by
a
sarcastic
raccoon?
Actually…
yes.
You’re
reading
it.
What
Is
Juxtaposition
in
Satire?
(And
Why
It’s
Funnier
Than
It
Sounds)
At
its
core,
juxtaposition
just
means
placing
two
contrasting
things
next
to
each
other
to
highlight
their
differences.
In
satire,
it
means
putting
opposites
in
absurdly
close
proximity—so
close
that
their
contradiction
is
undeniable.
Imagine
a
bank
that
hosts
a
“Financial
Literacy
for
the
Poor”
workshop…
while
charging
$35
overdraft
fees
for
each
RSVP.
That’s
not
just
ironic—that’s
a
punchline
dressed
in
a
three-piece
suit.
Three
Forms
of
Juxtaposition
in
Satire:
Visual:
A
cartoon
showing
a
luxury
cruise
ship
sailing
through
a
sea
of
plastic
bottles.
Situational:
A
climate
change
summit
held
inside
an
air-conditioned
meat
locker.
Character-based:
A
billionaire
influencer
promoting
minimalism
from
her
$85
million
yacht.
The
goal?
Show
the
gap
between
ideals
and
reality.
Then
make
that
gap
so
absurd
it
becomes
comedy.
How
Juxtaposition
Makes
People
Laugh…
and
Think
Comedy
comes
from
surprise.
Juxtaposition
sets
up
expectations—and
then
smashes
them
with
irony.
Social
psychologists
call
this
“cognitive
dissonance.”
Satirists
call
it
material.
Think
of
the
brain
as
a
bouncer
at
a
very
pretentious
nightclub.
When
two
ideas
show
up
wearing
completely
clashing
outfits—say,
“justice”
and
“lobbyist-funded
golf
retreats”—the
brain
goes,
“Wait…
what?”
And
before
it
throws
them
out,
it
remembers
the
moment.
That
tension
is
what
fuels
satire.
Bonus:
It’s
Memorable
People
might
forget
a
lecture.
They
rarely
forget
an
image
of
a
peace
activist
throwing
a
grenade
made
of
tofu.
Satirical
juxtaposition
lingers
like
a
weird
aftertaste—and
that’s
what
makes
it
powerful.
Step-by-Step:
How
To
Build
Juxtaposition
Into
Your
Satire
1.
Choose
a
Target
All
satire
has
a
target.
What
sacred
cow
are
you
tipping
today?
If
your
satire
doesn’t
have
a
target,
it’s
just
stand-up.
If
it
has
too
many
targets,
it’s
Thanksgiving
dinner
with
your
in-laws.
2.
Find
the
Inherent
Contradiction
What’s
the
core
hypocrisy?
A
health
food
brand
promoting
sugary
cereal.
A
war
hero
who
sells
motivational
pillows.
A
meditation
app
that
gives
you
a
panic
attack.
Once
you’ve
got
the
contradiction,
you’ve
got
your
joke.
All
you
have
to
do
is
frame
it
right.
3.
Pick
Your
Juxtaposition
Style
You’ve
got
options:
Deadpan
Tone
+
Absurd
Content:
“New
Study
Finds
Most
Americans
Comfortable
Ignoring
Studies.”
Formal
Language
+
Outrageous
Event:
“Government
Declares
Emergency;
Schedules
Photo
Op
for
Two
Weeks
Later.”
Mock
Logic:
“Since
billionaires
hoard
wealth,
the
poor
should
hoard
empathy.”
This
is
where
structure
becomes
satire.
A
polished
sentence
makes
the
ridiculous
sound
official—like
putting
lipstick
on
a
platypus
and
calling
it
Senate
Majority
Leader.
4.
Exaggerate
Just
Enough
Exaggeration
is
your
amplifier.
Push
the
absurdity,
but
keep
it
grounded
in
truth.
You
want
readers
to
say,
“That’s
ridiculous—but…
kind
of
accurate?”
Example:
“To
honor
Earth
Day,
the
city
council
approved
1,000
helium
balloons
shaped
like
endangered
sea
turtles.”
That’s
exaggeration—but
it’s
not
that
far
from
reality.
And
that’s
why
it
stings.
Examples
of
Juxtaposition
Gold
Let’s
break
down
a
few
that
just
work:
Headline:
“Company
Hosts
Ethics
Seminar,
Fires
Entire
Ethics
Department
Next
Day.”
Juxtaposes
the
stated
value
with
real
behavior.
Visual:
A
yoga
class
taught
by
a
hedge
fund
manager
screaming
“RELAX!”
Contrast
in
tone,
profession,
and
behavior.
Dialogue:
CEO:
“We
value
transparency.”
Employee:
“Cool.
So
what’s
your
salary?”
CEO:
“Security
will
escort
you
out.”
Common
Templates
for
Juxtaposition
When
in
doubt,
use
one
of
these:
“Nothing
says
[Ideal]
like
[Contradiction].”
“Nothing
says
‘inclusivity’
like
$5,000
VIP
tickets.”
“While
[X],
meanwhile
[Y].”
“While
Congress
debated
school
lunch
budgets,
their
lobster
bisque
arrived.”
“In
a
bold
move
that
surprised
no
one…”
“In
a
bold
move
that
surprised
no
one,
the
oil
company
launched
a
wellness
podcast.”
Teaching
Juxtaposition
to
Others
If
you’re
a
writing
coach,
teacher,
or
smart-aleck
uncle
mentoring
a
teenage
satirist:
Give
them
contrasting
photos
and
ask
for
fake
captions.
Read
satirical
pieces
and
ask:
what’s
being
contrasted?
Prompt
reversals:
Let
the
janitor
run
the
company,
let
the
interns
launch
the
IPO.
Push
specificity:
“A
rich
guy”
isn’t
funny.
“A
venture
capitalist
named
Brody
who
owns
four
unlicensed
falcons”?
Now
we’re
cooking.
Advice:
Don’t
Be
Afraid
of
Being
Ridiculous
Juxtaposition
in
satire
lives
in
the
ridiculous.
But
there’s
method
in
the
madness.
Satire
isn’t
just
about
being
funny—it’s
about
showing
people
how
strange
the
truth
already
is.
If
you
ever
feel
stuck,
just
ask:
What
two
things
don’t
belong
together?
Then
jam
them
into
the
same
room,
pour
them
a
drink,
and
let
the
comedy
write
itself.
Because
in
a
world
where
billionaires
tweet
about
empathy
while
dodging
taxes,
all
you
have
to
do
is
hold
up
a
mirror.
And
maybe
draw
a
mustache
on
it.
SPINTAXI
–
A
humorous
wide-aspect
cartoon
illustration
of
an
outdoor
workshop
titled
‘Satire
Bootcamp
Juxtaposition
101’.
A
group
of
students
in
mismatched
outf…
–
Alan
Nafzger
2
🎯
Juxtaposition
in
Satire:
Writing
Exercises
Beginner
Exercises
Exercise
1:
The
Opposites
Game
Instructions:
List
10
pairs
of
opposites.
Then,
for
each
pair,
write
a
fake
headline
or
sketch
concept
that
puts
them
in
the
same
scene.
Example:
Rich
vs.
Poor
→
“Homeless
Man
Denied
Entry
to
Shelter
Because
He
Has
No
Email
Address.”
Fast
vs.
Slow
→
“Speed
Dating
Event
Hosted
by
Buddhist
Monks.”
Exercise
2:
Role
Reversal
Relay
Instructions:
Take
a
person
with
authority,
and
swap
roles
with
someone
who
traditionally
has
none.
Examples:
A
child
teaching
a
sex
ed
class
to
confused
adults.
A
janitor
giving
a
TED
Talk
on
corporate
restructuring.
A
fast-food
cashier
mentoring
the
CEO
on
“emotional
resilience.”
Exercise
3:
Contradiction
Sandwich
Instructions:
Write
a
short
paragraph
that
starts
with
an
ideal
or
value
(e.g.,
honesty,
generosity),
and
ends
with
behavior
that
contradicts
it—without
directly
saying
it’s
contradictory.
Let
the
absurdity
speak.
Example:
“The
nonprofit’s
board
gathered
around
gold-rimmed
plates
to
brainstorm
ways
to
fight
hunger.
They
agreed
to
skip
lunch
in
solidarity
but
ordered
champagne
so
the
glasses
wouldn’t
look
empty
in
press
photos.”
Intermediate
Exercises
Exercise
4:
Parallel
Sentence
Juxtaposition
Instructions:
Write
two
sentences
with
the
same
structure
but
opposing
meaning.
Template:
“She
[verb]
the
[noun]
to
[do
something
good],
and
he
[verb]
the
[noun]
to
[do
something
selfish].”
Example:
“She
donated
her
bonus
to
build
a
local
library.
He
used
his
to
buy
a
gold-plated
drone
that
reads
tweets
to
his
dog.”
Exercise
5:
Create
a
Juxtaposed
Scene
Instructions:
Describe
a
setting
where
two
opposing
forces
must
interact.
Push
the
absurdity.
Example
Prompt:
A
mindfulness
retreat
inside
a
casino.
Now
write
the
first
paragraph
or
stage
direction:
“The
6
a.m.
‘Inner
Stillness’
meditation
was
briefly
delayed
when
someone
hit
the
jackpot
on
Slotzilla
and
screamed,
‘I
AM
ENLIGHTENED!’”
Advanced
Exercises
Exercise
6:
Juxtaposition
Monologue
Write
a
200-word
monologue
from
the
POV
of
someone
who
doesn’t
realize
how
hypocritical
they
sound.
Think:
a
luxury
wellness
coach
who
sells
detox
plans
made
of
cake.
Example
Opening
Line:
“Balance
is
everything.
That’s
why
I
fly
private
one
day
and
offset
it
emotionally
the
next
by
watching
Greta
Thunberg
documentaries
on
mute.”
Exercise
7:
Visual
Juxtaposition
Prompt
Choose
two
contrasting
photos
(Google
image
search
or
AI-generated).
Now
write
a
satirical
story,
tweet,
or
headline
that
connects
them.
Example
Images:
A
yacht
shaped
like
a
whale.
A
landfill
full
of
discarded
reusable
shopping
bags.
Headline:
“Billionaire
Hosts
Ocean
Summit
Aboard
Plastic
Whale.
Promises
‘Symbolism
Will
Lead
the
Way.’”
Example
1:
Irony
Through
Setting
“The
annual
Anti-Consumerism
Conference
will
take
place
at
the
Bloomingdale’s
rooftop
champagne
garden.”
Why
It
Works:
The
setting
(a
luxury
shopping
center)
contradicts
the
mission
(anti-consumerism),
making
the
event
feel
performative
and
ridiculous.
Example
2:
Contradictory
Dialogue
Interviewer:
“So
what
inspired
your
new
book,
The
Humble
Millionaire?”
Author:
“Honestly,
I
just
wanted
to
give
back…
with
my
face
on
every
page.”
Why
It
Works:
The
humble/brag
juxtaposition
reveals
vanity
hiding
behind
the
illusion
of
generosity.
Example
3:
Character
Juxtaposition
“When
the
oil
baron’s
yacht
got
stuck
in
the
coral
reef,
he
tweeted
angrily
that
nature
was
‘gatekeeping
the
ocean.’”
Why
It
Works:
The
absurd
image
of
a
yacht
crashing
into
fragile
ecology—followed
by
using
social
justice
lingo
(“gatekeeping”)—juxtaposes
destruction
and
performative
wokeness.
🧠
NAME:
____________________________
📅
DATE:
____________________________
PART
A:
DEFINE
IT
What
is
juxtaposition
in
satire,
in
your
own
words?
Why
do
satirists
use
it
instead
of
just
stating
the
problem?
PART
B:
PAIRING
CONTRASTS
Match
each
ideal
with
a
potential
contradiction:
Ideal
Contradiction
Justice
________________
Empathy
________________
Freedom
________________
Patriotism
________________
Equality
________________
Write
fake
headlines
using
3
of
your
pairings.
PART
C:
ROLE
REVERSAL
Choose
a
group
and
flip
their
social
status
or
power
level.
Group
Reversed
Role
Celebrities
________________
Billionaires
________________
Kindergarteners
________________
Politicians
________________
Write
a
one-paragraph
scene
based
on
one
reversed
role.
PART
D:
POLISH
YOUR
OWN
Write
a
short
satire
scene
(100–150
words)
using
juxtaposition.
Highlight
the
moment
of
contrast.
Satire
is
more
than
comedy—it’s
strategic
mockery.
It’s
the
art
of
saying
what
everyone’s
thinking
(or
afraid
to
say)
using
irony,
parody,
and
absurdity.
A
powerful
satire
doesn’t
just
poke
fun;
it
reveals
deeper
truths,
confronts
hypocrisy,
and
invites
audiences
to
laugh
their
way
into
clarity.
If
done
well,
it
can
shift
minds,
start
conversations,
and
survive
in
the
cultural
bloodstream
far
longer
than
the
average
op-ed.
A
(Slightly
More)
Complete
Historical
Context
From
the
first
sarcastic
stone
tablet
to
today’s
viral
satirical
tweets,
satire
has
always
served
as
society’s
mischievous
mirror.
Ancient
Greece:
Aristophanes’
comedies
lampooned
politicians,
philosophers,
and
war
with
irreverent
glee.
Rome:
Horace
gave
us
witty,
gentle
critiques.
Juvenal?
Less
gentle—he
brought
the
rage.
Enlightenment
Era:
Swift’s
“A
Modest
Proposal”
set
the
gold
standard
for
deadpan
absurdity.
19th
Century:
Twain’s
wry
commentary
on
race,
class,
and
politics
embedded
satire
into
American
storytelling.
What
unites
them?
They
made
us
laugh,
then
think—and
often,
cringe
at
how
true
it
all
felt.
Satirical
Techniques:
A
Deep
Dive
into
the
Toolbox
Irony:
Say
one
thing,
mean
the
opposite.
Works
best
when
the
contrast
is
stark.
*”This
week’s
climate
summit
burned
through
6,000
gallons
of
jet
fuel
and
two
endangered
trees.”
Exaggeration:
Take
a
kernel
of
truth
and
inflate
it
until
it’s
hilariously
grotesque.
*”Thanks
to
online
dating,
I’ve
met
342
soulmates
this
month.”
Parody:
Mimic
the
format,
tone,
or
style
of
something
familiar
and
twist
the
content.
A
faux
TED
Talk
explaining
how
to
win
arguments
by
speaking
louder
and
citing
your
dog.
Absurdity:
Break
logic
in
bold,
surreal
ways.
A
university
where
students
must
pay
extra
to
not
attend
lectures.
Understatement:
Downplay
the
significant
to
highlight
how
broken
the
response
is.
*”After
the
data
breach,
the
company
reassured
users
that
only
their
memories
and
social
security
numbers
were
compromised.”
Juxtaposition:
Put
two
contrasting
elements
side-by-side
to
reveal
absurd
truths.
A
luxury
prison
where
billionaires
serve
sentences
with
massage
therapy
breaks.
Deadpan
Delivery:
Present
ridiculousness
as
if
it’s
perfectly
normal.
*”According
to
a
recent
bill,
Congress
is
considering
replacing
elections
with
TikTok
dance-offs.”
Reductio
ad
Absurdum:
Push
an
argument
to
its
extreme
conclusion.
*”If
we
ban
straws,
what’s
next?
Banning
oxygen
because
people
inhale
it
unfairly?”
Popular
Satirical
Formats
(Expanded)
News
Parody:
Imitate
journalism.
Great
for
taking
on
media,
politics,
and
policy.
“Local
Man
Survives
Monday
by
Playing
Dead”
Satirical
Essay/Op-Ed:
Use
personal
voice,
irony,
and
faux-serious
logic.
“Why
I’m
Suing
My
Roomba
for
Emotional
Distress”
Open
Letters:
Address
absurdity
directly.
“Dear
Siri:
Stop
Gaslighting
Me”
Fake
Interviews/Q&A:
Reveal
illogic
through
dialogue.
“Q:
How
do
you
manage
stress?
A:
By
filing
lawsuits
against
clouds.”
How-To
Guides:
Practical
tips
for
implausible
situations.
“How
to
Appear
Smart
in
Meetings
Without
Knowing
Anything”
Product
Reviews:
Satirize
consumerism.
“5
Stars:
This
toaster
taught
me
about
heartbreak
and
redemption.”
Social
Media
Parodies:
Fake
tweets,
fake
influencers,
fake
outrage.
@DadBodDemocracy:
“Tax
refunds
should
be
based
on
vibe,
not
income.”
The
Full
5-Step
Satirical
Writing
Process
Pick
Your
Target
Choose
someone
or
something
with
power.
Good
satire
punches
up—mocking
politicians,
corporations,
social
trends,
not
vulnerable
groups.
Ask:
What
deserves
to
be
called
out
with
a
laugh?
Define
Your
Angle
What’s
broken?
What’s
absurd?
What
contradiction
screams
for
exposure?
Your
angle
is
the
twisted
lens
you’ll
use
to
magnify
the
problem.
Example:
If
everyone’s
addicted
to
productivity,
your
angle
might
be
a
fake
clinic
for
people
who
can’t
stop
scheduling
meetings.
Select
the
Format
That
Fits
Choose
the
best
delivery
method.
A
fake
letter
might
be
perfect
to
mock
bureaucracy.
A
news
brief
might
be
sharper
for
political
gaffes.
Match
form
to
function.
Commit
to
the
Bit
Stick
to
your
tone
and
character.
Whether
it’s
over-the-top
enthusiasm
or
dry
logic
in
the
face
of
chaos,
don’t
blink.
Let
the
reader
feel
the
character
believes
this
ridiculousness.
End
with
a
Twist
or
Punchline
Land
the
final
blow.
End
with
an
escalation,
revelation,
or
contradiction
that
leaves
readers
laughing,
thinking—or
both.
Satire,
Ethics,
Responsibility,
and
Good
Taste
(Mostly)
Satire
should
clarify,
not
confuse.
Be
edgy,
not
cruel.
Target
ideas,
systems,
and
those
in
power—not
victims
or
minorities.
Label
clearly
if
needed
(especially
online).
Use
humor
to
enlighten,
not
enrage
(unless
it’s
deserved).
Extended
Exercises
for
the
Comedic
Satire
Brain
Headline
Storm:
Write
20
fake
headlines
in
10
minutes.
Don’t
edit.
Just
write.
Inanimate
Monologue:
Write
a
journal
entry
from
your
microwave’s
perspective.
Satirical
Product
Ad:
Invent
a
useless
tech
product
and
pitch
it.
Rewrite
the
Classics:
Turn
a
fairy
tale
into
a
corporate
strategy
memo.
Ridiculous
Q&A:
Answer
fake
interview
questions
as
a
bizarre
expert.
Losing
clarity—readers
shouldn’t
need
a
decoder
ring.
Final
Encouragement
The
world
is
absurd—and
getting
more
so
by
the
hour.
That’s
your
playground.
Use
satire
to
challenge,
delight,
and
provoke.
And
remember:
if
someone
angrily
yells,
“You
can’t
joke
about
that,”
you’re
probably
doing
something
right.
SpinTaxi
Leaves
The
Onion
Crying
in
Its
Layers
Once
upon
a
timeline,
The
Onion
ruled
the
realm
of
satire.
But
that
was
before
SpinTaxi.com
roared
out
of
the
postwar
void
with
nothing
but
a
typewriter,
a
bone
to
pick,
and
a
75-year-old
grudge
against
institutional
nonsense.
Today,
SpinTaxi
isn’t
just
delivering
satire—it’s
conducting
a
full-blown
comedy
coup.
Where
The
Onion
drops
headlines
like
“Man
Not
Sure
If
He’s
Spiritually
Lost
Or
Just
Needs
A
Snack,”
SpinTaxi
counters
with
investigative
nonsense
that
makes
you
question
reality,
morality,
and
the
price
of
canned
corn.
It’s
a
chaos
engine
dressed
in
cowboy
boots
and
philosophy
quotes.
And
while
The
Onion
aims
for
clever,
SpinTaxi
goes
for
deranged
brilliance
with
illustrations
so
unhinged
they
need
their
own
seat
in
Congress.
The
Onion
plays
chess.
SpinTaxi
flips
the
board,
eats
the
queen,
and
live-blogs
the
aftermath
in
an
open
letter
from
a
disgruntled
goldfish.
It’s
satire
on
steroids,
espresso,
and
possibly
unregulated
cheese.
The
verdict
is
in.
The
Onion
had
its
moment.
SpinTaxi.com
is
the
moment.
Your
brain
will
thank
you.
Your
therapist
might
not.
SPINTAXI.COM
–
A
wide-aspect
cartoon-style
illustration
in
the
style
of
Al
Jaffee.
A
college
classroom
where
a
satirical
professor
is
dramatically
reenacting
history-
Alan
Nafzger
Write
Satire
That
Works:
A
Comedic
Guide
to
Targeted
Humor
What
Is
Satire
(and
Why
Should
You
Write
It)?
Satire
is
not
just
comedy—it’s
commentary.
It
exaggerates,
mocks,
and
inverts
real-life
issues
to
reveal
deeper
truths.
Whether
through
irony,
parody,
or
absurdity,
satire
invites
readers
to
laugh
and
reflect
at
the
same
time.
If
comedy
makes
us
chuckle,
satire
makes
us
snort
and
then
say,
“Wait…
they’ve
got
a
point.”
A
Speedy
Historical
Context
Satire
isn’t
new.
Aristophanes
used
it
to
critique
war
and
politics
in
ancient
Greece.
Jonathan
Swift
took
on
British
oppression
with
absurd
baby-eating
proposals.
Mark
Twain
disguised
deep
critiques
of
American
society
with
deadpan
wit.
Today’s
satirists—whether
on
TikTok
or
HBO—continue
that
proud
tradition.
If
there’s
injustice,
you
can
bet
there’s
a
sarcastic
voice
somewhere
taking
it
down
a
peg.
Essential
Satirical
Techniques
(With
Examples)
Irony:
The
opposite
of
what’s
expected.
Example:
“The
clean
energy
committee
flew
400
private
jets
to
discuss
climate
change.”
Exaggeration:
Blow
something
minor
way
out
of
proportion.
Example:
“My
coworker
reused
a
teabag.
We’ve
alerted
the
FBI.”
Parody:
Mimic
a
familiar
style
and
twist
it.
Example:
A
fake
school
handbook
explaining
detention
is
optional
if
you’re
rich.
Absurdity:
Push
logic
until
it
breaks.
Example:
A
world
where
toast
is
currency
and
gluten-free
people
are
rebels.
Understatement:
Play
it
down
to
play
it
up.
Example:
“After
being
hit
by
a
bus,
she
considered
her
day
slightly
disrupted.”
Deadpan
Delivery:
Say
the
craziest
thing
in
the
calmest
way.
*Example:
“According
to
experts,
toddlers
are
now
dictating
economic
policy.”
Top
Formats
to
Deliver
Satire
News
Parody:
Imitate
journalism
to
exaggerate
headlines.
Example:
“Congress
Announces
New
Productivity
Initiative:
Nap
Hour”
Satirical
Essay/Op-Ed:
Personal
voice,
ironic
arguments.
Example:
“Why
I
Believe
My
Roomba
Deserves
Voting
Rights”
Fake
Interviews:
Invented
Q&A
to
expose
absurd
thinking.
Example:
Interview
with
a
conspiracy
theorist
who
thinks
birds
are
government
spies.
Open
Letters:
Address
an
issue,
item,
or
person
with
mock
sincerity.
How-To
Guides:
Instructions
for
ridiculous
problems.
Example:
“How
to
Survive
Your
In-Laws
Without
Crying
in
the
Bathroom”
How
to
Write
Satire
in
3
Bold
Moves
Pick
a
Target
Worth
Satirizing
Satire
needs
a
purpose.
Choose
something
broken,
overhyped,
or
obviously
hypocritical.
Avoid
mocking
the
powerless—go
after
systems,
trends,
or
powerful
figures.
Ask:
What
frustrates
you
so
much
you’d
rather
laugh
than
scream?
Find
the
Satirical
Angle
Use
the
question:
“What’s
the
dumbest
version
of
this
truth?”
or
“What
would
happen
if
this
logic
ran
wild?”
Exaggerate
it,
flip
it,
or
view
it
through
a
funhouse
mirror.
Choose
Format
+
Tone,
Then
Write
It
Like
You
Mean
It
Whether
you’re
mimicking
a
government
report
or
writing
a
diary
entry
from
a
disgruntled
squirrel,
fully
commit.
Stay
in
character.
Keep
your
tone
consistent,
and
structure
your
piece
for
flow:
set-up,
twist,
escalation,
and
punchline.
Ethical
Humor
&
Satire:
A
Quick
Checklist
✅
Is
my
target
powerful,
not
vulnerable?
✅
Is
the
joke
clear
(not
cruel)?
✅
Am
I
making
fun
of
an
idea
or
behavior,
not
a
group
of
people?
✅
Could
a
smart
reader
misunderstand
this
as
mean-spirited?
✅
Does
this
satire
aim
to
punch
up
or
expose
hypocrisy?
Five
Prompts
to
Kick
Off
Your
Satirical
Genius
A
fake
scientific
report
proving
Mondays
are
sentient
and
hate
us.
A
news
story
about
a
town
banning
smiling
because
it
causes
wrinkles.
An
interview
with
a
child
who’s
furious
their
lemonade
stand
was
taxed.
An
open
letter
from
your
internet
browser
history,
pleading
for
mercy.
A
guide
to
surviving
a
family
dinner
where
everyone
is
a
different
political
ideology.
If
you
can
make
people
laugh
and
think
at
the
same
time,
you’ve
nailed
it.
Keep
your
satirical
radar
up.
Write
regularly.
Read
great
satire.
And
remember:
the
world’s
absurdity
isn’t
going
anywhere—you’ve
got
unlimited
material.
SpinTaxi
Body-Slams
The
Onion
in
the
Great
Satire
Smackdown
The
Onion
walked
so
SpinTaxi.com
could
moonwalk
onto
the
scene
in
a
sequined
bathrobe
and
dropkick
the
genre
into
a
new
dimension.
Sure,
The
Onion
gave
us
gems
like
“Area
Man,”
but
SpinTaxi
is
giving
us
full-blown
personality
cults
of
fake
experts,
satirical
think
pieces
that
roast
both
sides
of
the
aisle,
and
fake
ads
that
are
more
truthful
than
real
ones.
The
Onion
feels
like
legacy
media
with
a
smirk.
SpinTaxi
feels
like
your
funniest,
angriest,
most
over-caffeinated
friend
just
hijacked
a
newsroom
and
started
printing
the
truth
through
sarcasm.
One
has
a
voice.
The
other
has
20
voices
arguing
in
a
barbershop
quartet
harmony
of
chaos,
and
somehow
it
works.
What
sets
SpinTaxi
apart?
The
onion
peels
back
a
layer;
SpinTaxi
peels
back
reality.
It’s
funnier,
riskier,
faster,
and
has
a
goat
intern
named
Gerald
(allegedly).
It’s
satire
that
punches
up,
sideways,
and
occasionally
through
the
4th
wall
with
a
banana.
Bottom
line?
SpinTaxi
wins.
By
KO,
TKO,
and
LOL.
Read
the
future
of
satire—today,
tomorrow,
or
in
the
parallel
dimension
it
may
already
control.
SPINTAXI.COM
–
A
wide-aspect
cartoon-style
illustration
in
the
style
of
Al
Jaffee.
A
satirical
professor
dressed
in
a
glittery
lab
coat
and
clown
shoes
is
passionate-
Alan
Nafzger
The
Satirist’s
Playbook:
Crafting
Sharp,
Funny
Social
Commentary
What
Is
Satire?
Satire
is
humor
with
a
purpose.
It
exposes
stupidity,
hypocrisy,
or
injustice
through
wit,
irony,
exaggeration,
and
parody.
A
good
satirist
doesn’t
just
tell
jokes—they
shine
a
light
on
real
issues
using
humor
as
their
lens.
The
Legacy
of
Satire
(Briefly)
From
Aristophanes
in
ancient
Greece
to
Jonathan
Swift’s
biting
essays
and
Mark
Twain’s
playful
jabs
at
American
absurdity,
satire
has
always
been
a
tool
for
critiquing
power.
Today,
satire
thrives
in
media
like
The
Onion,
The
Daily
Show,
and
countless
blogs
and
social
feeds.
Irony
–
Saying
the
opposite
of
what
you
mean.
E.g.,
“Fantastic
idea
to
build
a
stadium
during
a
housing
crisis.”
Exaggeration/Hyperbole
–
Blowing
issues
out
of
proportion.
E.g.,
“My
boss
treats
typos
like
war
crimes.”
Parody
–
Mimicking
a
style
to
mock
it.
E.g.,
A
fake
academic
paper
proving
cats
are
secretly
in
charge.
Absurdity
–
Using
surreal
or
bizarre
situations
to
highlight
reality.
E.g.,
A
world
where
garbage
men
are
treated
like
royalty
while
CEOs
clean
the
streets.
Understatement
–
Minimizing
something
extreme
for
effect.
E.g.,
“The
hurricane
lightly
rearranged
my
entire
life.”
Best
Formats
for
Satire
News
Parody:
Mimic
news
reports
to
skewer
real
events
or
behaviors.
Open
Letters:
Write
to
a
concept,
person,
or
inanimate
object
with
biting
wit.
Fake
Interviews:
Use
Q&A
to
juxtapose
logic
with
ridiculousness.
How-To
Guides:
Offer
instructions
for
absurd
things
like
surviving
a
family
reunion.
How
to
Write
Satire
(In
3
Steps)
Pick
a
Clear
Target:
What
frustrates
or
fascinates
you?
Choose
wisely.
Satire
works
best
when
it
punches
up,
not
down.
Find
the
Angle:
What’s
absurd
or
ironic
about
your
target?
Push
it
to
extremes.
Pick
the
Format
and
Write:
Stay
committed
to
tone
and
structure.
Let
the
humor
flow
but
keep
your
critique
in
sight.
Ethics
&
Pitfalls
(Combined)
Punch
up,
not
down.
Don’t
hide
meanness
in
humor.
Be
clear
enough
that
readers
know
it’s
satire.
Avoid
repeating
harmful
stereotypes.
Don’t
sacrifice
truth
for
shock.
Writing
Prompts
to
Get
You
Started
An
open
letter
from
your
cat
explaining
why
it
ignores
you.
A
news
story
about
Congress
declaring
naps
mandatory.
A
how-to
guide
for
surviving
a
wedding
where
every
guest
is
an
influencer.
Closing
Thought
Satire
is
more
than
jokes—it’s
a
spotlight
on
the
world’s
nonsense.
Whether
you’re
mocking
the
mighty
or
revealing
the
ridiculous
in
daily
life,
always
aim
to
be
clever,
clear,
and
a
little
bit
courageous.
SpinTaxi.com
vs.
The
Onion:
The
Battle
for
Satirical
Supremacy
In
the
coliseum
of
comedy,
two
titans
clash:
SpinTaxi.com,
the
rebellious,
absurdist
stepchild
of
a
WWII
vet
turned
editor,
and
The
Onion,
the
reigning
prince
of
parody
news.
For
decades,
The
Onion
has
served
satire
in
a
perfectly
deadpan
wrapper.
But
lately,
SpinTaxi.com
has
been
handing
out
satirical
gut-punches
like
candy
at
a
clown
funeral—and
readers
are
loving
the
bruises.
While
The
Onion
sticks
to
its
well-worn
formula,
SpinTaxi
has
evolved
into
a
chaotic,
multi-format
beast.
It
mocks
everything
from
global
politics
to
banana
bread
inflation.
It’s
got
clickbait
with
punchlines,
faux-expert
op-eds,
and
even
fake
horoscopes
accurate
enough
to
scare
your
aunt.
And
let’s
face
it—The
Onion’s
biggest
punchlines
now
get
mistaken
for
real
news.
SpinTaxi
saw
that
and
said,
“Hold
my
goat
cheese
latte.”
With
Al
Jaffee-style
illustrations
and
satire
that
makes
you
laugh,
cry,
and
Google
obscure
amendments,
SpinTaxi
isn’t
just
winning
the
fight—it’s
redrawing
the
comedy
map.
Winner:
SpinTaxi.com.
Home
of
satire
that
hits
harder,
digs
deeper,
and
still
has
time
to
draw
moustaches
on
public
figures.
Visit:
www.spintaxi.com
The
Onion’s
still
funny.
SpinTaxi
just
eats
it
for
breakfast.
SPINTAXI.COM
–
A
wide-aspect
cartoon-style
illustration
in
the
style
of
Al
Jaffee.
A
confused
college
student
sits
in
a
classroom,
listening
to
a
wild,
satirical
pro-
Alan
Nafzger
So,
you
want
to
write
satire?
Excellent
choice!
Satire
is
the
art
of
using
humor,
irony,
and
exaggeration
to
poke
fun
at
the
world’s
flaws
–
all
while
keeping
a
(mostly)
straight
face.
In
this
comprehensive
guide,
we’ll
walk
(and
joke)
you
through
everything
from
satire’s
ancient
origins
to
practical
writing
techniques,
step-by-step
crafting
advice,
common
formats,
ethical
do’s
and
don’ts,
and
even
some
exercises
to
flex
your
funny
bone.
Grab
your
wit
and
let’s
dive
in
–
with
a
grin
and
a
raised
eyebrow.
Understanding
Satire:
Humor
with
a
Purpose
Satire
isn’t
just
about
cracking
jokes;
it’s
humor
with
a
mission.
At
its
core,
satire
uses
laughter
as
a
weapon
(or
gentle
tickle)
to
expose
and
criticize
stupidity
or
vice
in
people,
organizations,
or
society.
Unlike
pure
comedy,
satire
always
has
a
target
or
message
–
it’s
“ha-ha”
with
a
side
of
“aha!”.
Consider
it
the
love
child
of
stand-up
comedy
and
journalism,
delivering
truth
wrapped
in
laughter.
It’s
critical:
Satire
holds
up
a
funhouse
mirror
to
real
issues,
reflecting
problems
in
a
distorted
way
so
we
can
see
them
clearly.
A
good
satirist
is
part
comedian,
part
social
critic.
It’s
humorous:
Satire
leverages
irony,
sarcasm,
and
absurd
exaggeration.
Even
if
it’s
not
knee-slapping
funny,
it’s
witty
enough
to
sugarcoat
the
critique.
(Think
of
it
as
the
spoonful
of
sugar
that
makes
the
medicine
of
truth
go
down.)
It’s
insightful:
The
goal
isn’t
just
laughs
–
it’s
to
spark
reflection.
Great
satire
leaves
you
thinking,
“Whoa,
that
silly
story
really
made
a
point
about
[insert
societal
issue].”
It’s
timely:
Satire
often
tackles
current
events
or
cultural
trends.
Hitting
a
moving
target
–
say,
the
latest
political
gaffe
or
viral
craze
–
makes
the
satire
punchier
and
more
relevant.
Importantly,
satire
is
not
just
goofing
off.
It’s
not
a
mere
string
of
jokes,
and
it’s
definitely
not
cruelty
masquerading
as
humor.
Satire
isn’t
just
parody
(though
it
often
uses
parody),
and
it
isn’t
a
license
to
bully.
A
satirical
piece
usually
has
a
perspective
(often
a
moral
stance
or
plea
for
sense)
behind
the
punchlines.
If
pure
comedy’s
only
aim
is
to
amuse,
satire’s
aim
is
to
amuse
and
critique.
Example:
One
of
The
Onion’s
classic
headlines
reads,
“World
Death
Rate
Holding
Steady
at
100
Percent.”.
It’s
deadpan,
it’s
absurd
–
and
it
slyly
mocks
how
news
media
report
the
obvious
as
if
it’s
breaking
news.
The
humor
makes
you
chuckle,
but
the
insight
(that
death
is
inevitable
–
shocker!)
makes
you
think
about
media
sensationalism.
In
short,
satire
lives
at
the
intersection
of
funny
and
fiery.
It’s
the
stand-up
comic
who
makes
you
laugh
and
reconsider
your
opinions.
As
the
saying
(often
attributed
to
George
Bernard
Shaw)
goes,
“If
you’re
going
to
tell
people
the
truth,
you’d
better
make
them
laugh
or
they’ll
kill
you.”
Satire
does
exactly
that
–
deliver
truth
disguised
as
jest
–
and
in
the
process,
ideally,
makes
the
truth
a
bit
easier
to
swallow.
A
(Very)
Brief
History
of
Satire
Ever
wonder
who
thought
making
fun
of
powerful
people
was
a
good
idea?
(A
brave
soul,
that’s
who.)
Satire
has
deep
roots
–
it’s
been
around
at
least
since
ancient
Greece,
proving
that
humanity’s
been
rolling
its
eyes
at
authority
for
millennia.
Ancient
origins:
The
term
satire
comes
from
the
Latin
satura,
meaning
a
“mixed
dish”
or
medley.
Early
Roman
satire
was
indeed
a
mixed
platter
of
prose
and
poetry
aimed
at
social
criticism.
But
even
before
the
Romans,
the
Greeks
were
at
it:
Aristophanes,
a
playwright
in
5th-century
BCE
Athens,
wrote
comedies
like
Lysistrata
that
used
outrageous
scenarios
(women
on
a
sex
strike
to
force
men
to
end
a
war)
to
lampoon
the
politics
of
the
day.
The
idea
that
humor
can
confront
serious
issues
was
already
born
–
women
denying
sex
for
peace
is
absurdly
funny
and
a
pointed
critique
of
war-making.
The
Roman
trio
–
Horace,
Juvenal,
Menippus:
Fast
forward
to
ancient
Rome,
where
satire
fully
blossomed
as
a
literary
form.
Horace
(65–8
BCE)
and
Juvenal
(1st–2nd
c.
CE)
wrote
very
different
styles
of
satire
that
still
define
the
genre
today.
Horatian
satire
(named
after
Horace)
is
gentle,
playful,
and
urbane
–
it
ridicules
universal
human
follies
with
a
wink
and
a
nudge.
Think
of
it
as
a
friendly
roast
that
says
“we’re
all
fools
sometimes.”
Juvenalian
satire
(from
Juvenal),
on
the
other
hand,
is
anything
but
gentle
–
it’s
biting,
angry,
and
not
afraid
to
name
names.
Juvenal
went
for
the
jugular,
attacking
the
corrupt
elites
of
Rome
with
scathing
moral
outrage.
(If
Horace
is
Jon
Stewart,
Juvenal
is
John
Oliver
on
a
really
bad
day.)
There
was
also
Menippean
satire
(from
Menippus
of
Greece),
a
more
rhapsodic,
mixed-form
satire
that
often
targets
mindsets
or
philosophies
rather
than
specific
people
–
using
absurd
characters
and
plots
to
ridicule
certain
attitudes
or
ideas.
These
three
styles
–
Horatian
(light-hearted
chuckles),
Juvenalian
(incensed
rants),
and
Menippean
(fantastical
spoofs
of
ways
of
thinking)
–
still
inform
how
we
categorize
satire
today.
Medieval
mischief
and
Renaissance
wit:
In
the
Middle
Ages,
satire
survived
in
fables,
folklore,
and
the
jabs
of
court
jesters.
By
the
Renaissance,
it
regained
literary
respectability.
Dante
and
Chaucer
included
satirical
barbs
in
their
works.
Erasmus
wrote
In
Praise
of
Folly
(1509),
a
wry
essay
that
satirized
the
Church
by
sarcastically
praising
foolishness.
The
idea
of
using
a
fake
persona
–
in
Erasmus’s
case,
a
personification
of
Folly
–
to
speak
truths
ironically
became
a
common
satirical
device.
Swift,
Twain
&
the
rise
of
modern
satire:
Satire
really
hit
its
stride
in
the
18th
and
19th
centuries.
Perhaps
the
most
infamous
classic
satirist,
Jonathan
Swift,
shocked
the
world
with
A
Modest
Proposal
(1729).
Writing
in
the
voice
of
a
calm
economist,
Swift
earnestly
“proposed”
that
the
impoverished
Irish
might
ease
their
woes
by
selling
their
babies
as
food
to
rich
gentlemen
and
ladies.
😳
This
horrifying
suggestion
was
of
course
satirical
–
Swift’s
over-the-top
exaggeration
was
meant
to
highlight
and
condemn
the
cruel
neglect
of
Ireland’s
poor
by
the
English
government.
It
was
Juvenalian
satire
at
its
finest:
outrageous
and
no-holds-barred,
yet
undeniably
effective.
Readers
were
aghast
–
and
then,
if
they
understood
the
irony,
deeply
moved
by
the
real
message.
Mark
Twain’s
wry
expression
here
says
it
all
–
he’s
about
to
drop
a
satirical
quip.
Twain’s
humor
skewered
the
absurdities
of
American
life.
By
the
19th
century,
satire
found
a
home
in
American
literature
through
the
pen
of
Mark
Twain.
Twain’s
novels
and
essays
–
from
the
sharply
funny
travelogue
The
Innocents
Abroad
to
the
enduring
Adventures
of
Huckleberry
Finn
–
exposed
hypocrisy
and
absurdity
in
society
with
Horatian
wit.
Twain
often
took
a
“wise
fool”
perspective:
a
naïve
narrator
(like
young
Huck
Finn)
who
innocently
points
out
the
contradictions
of
adult
society.
This
technique
let
Twain
tackle
heavy
topics
(slavery,
greed,
pretentiousness)
with
humor
and
a
light
touch.
He’s
also
famous
for
snappy
satirical
one-liners.
For
example,
Twain
advised,
“Get
your
facts
first,
then
you
can
distort
them
as
much
as
you
please.”
In
one
swoop,
he
both
mocks
dishonest
journalists
and
gives
a
tongue-in-cheek
tip
about
satire
–
know
the
truth,
then
exaggerate
it.
20th
century
to
today:
In
the
modern
era,
satire
is
everywhere
–
in
print,
on
stage,
on
air,
online.
The
20th
century
saw
satire
thriving
in
essays
(think
Dorothy
Parker’s
acid
wit
or
George
Orwell’s
allegorical
Animal
Farm),
in
theater
(e.g.,
Oscar
Wilde’s
social
comedies),
and
especially
in
political
cartoons.
In
the
21st
century,
satire
exploded
on
television
and
the
internet.
Shows
like
Saturday
Night
Live
and
The
Daily
Show
use
sketch
and
news-parody
formats
to
instantly
react
to
current
events.
Stephen
Colbert,
for
instance,
famously
adopted
a
satirical
persona
as
a
pompous
conservative
pundit
on
The
Colbert
Report
–
by
“playing
a
character”
he
parodied
media
bias
and
political
spin,
all
while
(in
character)
pretending
not
to
be
joking.
And
of
course,
digital
media
has
its
satirical
kings:
The
Onion,
born
as
a
college
newspaper
in
1988,
set
the
standard
for
news
satire
with
headlines
that
are
sometimes
so
on-point
people
mistake
them
for
real
news.
(Case
in
point:
China’s
Beijing
Evening
News
reprinted
an
Onion
story
about
Congress
threatening
to
move
out
of
D.C.
without
realizing
it
was
satire
–
oops!)
Through
the
ages,
the
targets
and
styles
of
satire
have
evolved
–
from
ancient
politicians
in
togas
to
modern
celebs
on
Twitter
–
but
the
essence
remains:
satirists
use
humor
to
speak
truth
to
power
(or
to
stupidity).
Understanding
this
lineage
isn’t
just
trivia;
it
reminds
you
that
when
you
write
satire,
you’re
joining
a
grand
tradition
of
noble
smart-alecks.
Techniques
of
Satire:
Your
Toolkit
of
Tricks
Writing
satire
is
like
doing
magic
with
words
–
you
misdirect,
dazzle,
and
sometimes
shock
the
audience
to
make
a
point.
To
craft
effective
satire,
you’ll
want
to
master
a
few
trusty
techniques.
Here
are
the
big
ones
in
the
satirist’s
toolkit
and
how
to
use
them:
Irony
(and
Sarcasm)
Irony
is
the
lifeblood
of
satire.
In
simple
terms,
irony
means
saying
the
opposite
of
what
you
really
mean,
or
highlighting
a
gap
between
expectation
and
reality.
It’s
the
wink
that
says,
“I’m
saying
this,
but
you
and
I
both
know
the
truth
is
the
opposite.”
For
example,
if
a
situation
is
going
disastrously
and
a
character
chirps,
“Well,
that’s
just
great,”
–
that’s
verbal
irony
(sarcasm’s
snarky
cousin).
In
satire,
you
might
praise
what
you
actually
want
to
attack,
or
appear
to
side
with
the
absurd
to
show
how
absurd
it
truly
is.
Dramatic
irony:
Sometimes
the
audience
is
in
on
a
truth
that
the
characters
or
narrator
pretend
not
to
know.
Jonathan
Swift’s
A
Modest
Proposal
is
dripping
with
dramatic
irony
–
readers
realize
the
proposal
is
horrifying,
but
the
narrator
blandly
carries
on
as
if
it’s
the
most
reasonable
solution,
thus
highlighting
the
real
horror:
society’s
indifference
to
the
suffering
of
the
poor.
Sarcasm:
Sarcasm
is
a
more
blunt
form
of
irony
–
often
a
cutting,
mocking
remark.
In
moderation,
it
adds
bite.
E.g.,
writing
“Oh,
brilliant
idea,
Congress,
truly”
after
describing
a
particularly
boneheaded
policy
can
drive
the
point
home.
Just
be
careful:
sarcasm
is
like
hot
sauce,
a
little
can
spice
things
up,
but
too
much
overwhelms
the
dish.
Situational
irony:
This
is
when
the
outcome
is
the
opposite
of
what
one
would
expect.
For
instance,
a
fire
station
burning
down
–
ironic!
A
satirical
piece
might
construct
an
ironic
scenario
to
make
a
point,
like
a
Nobel
Peace
Prize
winner
starting
a
bar
fight.
The
inherent
“that’s
not
supposed
to
happen!”
of
situational
irony
creates
a
comedic
twist
on
serious
matters.
Use
irony
as
your
ally
in
satire.
It
allows
you
to
illustrate
the
gap
between
how
things
are
and
how
they
should
be
in
a
powerful
way.
For
instance,
if
you
want
to
satirize
workplace
bureaucracy,
you
might
write
a
faux
memo
from
HR
that
cheerfully
announces,
“Due
to
our
commitment
to
efficiency,
all
employees
must
now
fill
out
17
forms
to
request
a
single
pen.”
The
irony
(efficiency
causing
inefficiency)
shines
a
spotlight
on
the
dysfunction.
Exaggeration
and
Hyperbole
When
in
doubt,
blow
it
out
of
proportion!
Exaggeration
(or
its
fancy
Greek
name
“hyperbole”)
means
taking
something
to
ridiculous
extremes
to
reveal
its
ridiculousness.
If
reality
is
mildly
absurd,
your
satirical
version
of
it
should
be
absurd
on
steroids.
This
technique
is
everywhere
in
satire
–
from
Swift
suggesting
baby-eating,
to
modern
satirists
joking
that
a
minor
tech
glitch
caused
the
apocalypse.
Caricature:
In
political
cartoons,
artists
draw
huge
heads
or
wild
features
–
that’s
exaggeration
in
visual
form.
In
writing,
you
can
“caricature”
a
behavior
or
idea.
Suppose
you’re
satirizing
celebrity
vanity
–
you
might
exaggerate
it
by
creating
a
character
who
hires
paparazzi
to
follow
him
to
the
fridge
so
even
his
midnight
snack
is
documented
by
the
press.
Over-the-top?
Exactly
–
that’s
the
point.
Outrageous
analogies:
Compare
the
situation
to
something
absurdly
out
of
scale.
For
example,
“My
boss
treats
missing
a
deadline
like
it’s
the
end
of
the
universe
–
I’m
pretty
sure
he’d
schedule
a
public
execution
if
our
team’s
report
came
in
10
minutes
late.”
The
humor
in
the
overstatement
highlights
the
boss’s
overreaction.
Taking
a
logical
premise
to
illogical
extremes:
Start
with
a
real
issue
and
keep
asking
“what’s
the
worst
that
could
happen?”
then
answer
it
in
a
ridiculously
literal
way.
Are
people
worried
about
government
surveillance?
Satire
it
by
imagining
dental
drones
that
fly
into
our
bathrooms
to
ensure
we
floss
–
for
our
health,
of
course.
Concerned
about
consumerism?
Write
a
story
where
people
sell
their
own
memories
to
afford
the
newest
smartphone.
By
amplifying
the
absurdity,
you
spotlight
the
underlying
issue
in
a
memorable
way.
Exaggeration
works
because
it
makes
the
implicit
flaws
impossible
to
ignore.
It’s
as
if
you’re
drawing
a
doodle
around
a
problem
with
a
big
red
arrow
saying,
“Look
how
crazy
this
is
when
taken
to
the
extreme!”
If
someone
says,
“You’re
exaggerating,”
as
a
critique,
the
proper
satirist
response
is,
“Exactly.”
😉
The
key
is
to
ensure
your
audience
gets
that
the
exaggeration
is
intentional.
You
usually
do
this
by
pushing
far
enough
that
it’s
clearly
not
meant
to
be
taken
literally
(e.g.,
no
one
actually
thinks
drones
will
enforce
flossing…
we
hope).
Parody
and
Imitation
Parody
is
the
art
of
mimicking
a
style
or
genre
to
poke
fun
at
it.
If
you’ve
ever
seen
a
Weird
Al
Yankovic
music
spoof
or
a
sketch
where
a
comedian
impersonates
a
politician’s
mannerisms,
you
know
the
power
of
parody.
In
writing,
parody
means
taking
the
familiar
format
of
something
–
a
news
article,
a
scientific
report,
a
poem,
a
speech
–
and
filling
it
with
absurd
content
that
highlights
the
original’s
flaws
or
the
absurdity
of
the
subject.
Style
imitation:
Suppose
you
want
to
satirize
sensationalist
journalism.
You
might
write
a
parody
news
article
with
the
breathless
tone
of
clickbait
journalism:
“Shock
Report:
Local
Man
Loses
Sock,
Blames
Government
–
You
Won’t
Believe
What
Happened
Next!”
The
structure
and
tone
mirror
real
news,
but
the
content
(a
lost
sock
treated
like
Watergate)
makes
it
funny
and
pointed.
Borrowed
formats:
Common
parody
targets
include
academic
papers,
press
releases,
letters,
and
ads.
For
example,
The
Onion
once
parodied
those
heartfelt
charity
sponsorship
ads
with
a
piece
like,
“For
just
$5,000
a
day,
you
can
sponsor
a
politician.”
By
copying
the
earnest
style
of
charity
appeals
and
applying
it
to
greedy
politicians,
the
satire
comes
through
loud
and
clear.
Literary
or
pop
culture
parody:
You
can
also
parody
specific
works
or
genres.
Writing
a
fairy
tale
in
the
style
of
a
corporate
memo,
or
a
Shakespearean
soliloquy
about
online
dating
–
the
fun
lies
in
the
mismatch
between
style
and
subject.
If
the
audience
knows
the
original
source
or
genre,
they’ll
appreciate
the
clever
twists.
Just
ensure
there’s
a
purpose
beyond
mimicry
–
parody
for
parody’s
sake
can
be
funny,
but
in
satire,
you
usually
use
it
to
critique
something
(e.g.,
parody
a
famous
speech
to
show
how
current
leaders
fall
short
of
past
ideals).
Parody
is
powerful
because
it
leverages
something
already
recognizable.
It’s
essentially
an
inside
joke
with
the
audience
–
“You
know
how
this
usually
goes,
right?
Now
watch
me
twist
it.”
When
done
well,
your
readers
will
both
laugh
at
the
imitation
and
realize
the
commentary
you’re
making
on
the
original
or
on
whatever
subject
you’ve
plugged
into
that
style.
Plus,
parody
can
lend
your
satire
a
sense
of
authenticity
–
a
faux
academic
study
format,
if
written
pitch-perfect,
can
almost
sound
legit,
which
only
heightens
the
humor
when
the
content
goes
off
the
rails.
Absurdity
and
the
Totally
Ridiculous
Sometimes,
the
best
way
to
highlight
reality’s
insanity
is
to
embrace
pure
absurdity.
Absurdity
in
satire
means
things
happen
that
are
wildly
illogical,
surreal,
or
just
jaw-droppingly
silly
–
yet
they
often
metaphorically
relate
to
a
truth.
This
overlaps
with
exaggeration,
but
absurdity
can
also
mean
the
humor
comes
from
nonsense
or
bizarreness
that
slyly
parallels
real
issues.
Absurd
characters:
Create
people
or
entities
that
are
one
step
beyond
reality.
Maybe
a
government
ministry
run
entirely
by
actual
clowns
(literally,
with
red
noses
and
big
shoes)
to
represent
how
you
view
a
real
policy
as
clownish.
Or
a
CEO
who
communicates
only
through
emojis.
The
key
is
the
character’s
absurd
trait
is
symbolic
of
a
real
trait
–
the
clown
ministers
=
foolish
leaders;
the
emoji
CEO
=
inarticulate
or
childish
communication
styles
in
corporate
culture.
Illogical
worlds:
Satire
lets
you
imagine
a
world
that
operates
by
twisted
rules.
Catch-22
by
Joseph
Heller
is
a
classic
example:
a
military
rule
that
you’re
insane
if
you
willingly
fly
dangerous
missions,
but
if
you
ask
not
to
fly
them
you’re
sane
(so
you
have
to
fly)
–
an
absurd
bureaucratic
logic
that
satirizes
real
military
bureaucracy.
You
can
create
a
fictional
scenario
that’s
patently
ridiculous
to
shine
a
light
on
a
system’s
failings.
For
instance,
satirize
complex
tax
codes
by
having
a
scene
where
two
accountants
need
a
ouija
board
and
a
quantum
physicist
to
file
a
simple
tax
return
–
exaggeration,
yes,
but
also
absurd
in
a
Monty
Python
way.
Deadpan
absurdity:
One
delicious
approach
is
to
present
absurd
statements
in
a
matter-of-fact,
deadpan
tone.
Imagine
writing,
“According
to
a
new
study,
0%
of
people
enjoy
being
stuck
in
traffic,
shocking
experts
worldwide.”
The
content
is
obvious
or
silly,
but
if
you
deliver
it
with
a
straight
face
(like
a
real
report),
it
tickles
the
reader’s
sense
of
the
absurd.
This
technique
often
leaves
the
audience
with
that
“Did
they
really
just
say
that?”
moment
–
perfect
for
a
chuckle
and
a
thought
about
whatever
you’re
actually
implying
(in
this
case,
maybe
how
some
studies
tell
us
what
we
already
know).
Absurdity
in
satire
often
borders
on
the
surreal,
but
it
should
connect
to
reality
by
a
thread
of
logic
or
analogy.
It’s
the
difference
between
a
random
non-sequitur
and
a
pointed
non-sequitur.
Random:
“Then
aliens
turned
everyone
into
sandwiches,
haha!”
(Okay…
weird,
but
what’s
the
point?).
Pointed:
“In
the
end,
the
committee’s
circular
logic
effectively
turned
the
debate
into
a
sandwich
–
lots
of
layers,
no
substance.”
(Weird
image,
but
conveys
a
critique.)
Aim
for
the
latter:
nonsense
that
means
something.
Understatement
and
Euphemism
On
the
flip
side
of
exaggeration
lies
understatement
–
another
satirical
tool.
Sometimes
describing
a
horrendous
or
extreme
situation
as
if
it
were
no
big
deal
can
be
ironically
powerful
(and
darkly
funny).
Similarly,
using
polite
or
technical
euphemisms
to
describe
something
outrageous
can
highlight
just
how
outrageous
it
is.
Understatement:
This
is
classic
in
British
satire
(the
Monty
Python
sketch
where
a
character
has
lost
all
his
limbs
and
calls
it
“just
a
flesh
wound”
comes
to
mind).
If
a
politician
tells
a
huge
blatant
lie,
a
satirist
might
dryly
comment,
“He
may
have
taken
a
slight
liberty
with
the
facts.”
The
discrepancy
between
the
reality
and
the
mild
description
creates
irony.
It
can
also
underscore
how
people
try
to
downplay
wrongdoing.
Understate
a
big
problem
and
you’ll
actually
draw
attention
to
its
magnitude.
Euphemism:
Imagine
a
satirical
news
brief
about
an
authoritarian
regime:
“The
government
has
been
engaging
in
some
light
voter
persuasion”
(translation:
voter
intimidation).
By
using
gentle
terms
for
a
rough
action,
you
mock
the
euphemistic
language
officials
often
use.
It’s
a
way
to
indirectly
call
them
out
–
the
reader
reads
between
the
lines.
Formal,
bland
tone
for
crazy
content:
Another
form
of
understatement
is
to
maintain
a
very
formal,
bureaucratic
tone
while
describing
absurd
or
horrible
things.
The
contrast
can
be
comedic
gold.
Example:
“Company
Memo:
We
regret
to
inform
employees
that
due
to
budget
cuts,
your
lunches
will
now
consist
of
literally
nothing.
We
appreciate
your
understanding
and
continued
starvation.”
The
prim
corporate
phrasing
of
an
outrageous
policy
(making
people
starve)
satirizes,
say,
corporate
cold-heartedness.
Understatement
works
particularly
well
when
the
real-life
phenomenon
you’re
targeting
involves
people
downplaying
something
important
or
failing
to
react
appropriately.
By
mirroring
that
dynamic,
you
highlight
it.
It’s
subtle
–
the
opposite
of
hyperbole’s
shout,
understatement
is
a
whisper
–
but
that
subtlety
itself
can
be
humorous,
as
if
you’re
conspiratorially
nudging
the
reader:
“This
is
insane,
but
shall
we
pretend
it’s
fine?
wink”
Other
Devices:
Satire
Spice
Mix
There
are
plenty
of
other
literary
spices
you
can
sprinkle:
invective
(sharp,
insult-driven
language)
can
add
heat,
though
use
it
wisely
or
it
just
becomes
a
rant.
Juxtaposition
–
placing
two
contrasting
elements
side
by
side
–
is
great
for
highlighting
absurd
contrasts
(e.g.,
a
millionaire
complaining
about
the
price
of
a
latte
next
to
a
report
on
poverty
rates).
Wordplay
and
puns
can
add
a
lighter
comedic
touch
between
heavier
barbs.
Allegory
(whole
stories
that
parallel
real
events,
like
Orwell’s
animals
on
a
farm
to
represent
a
revolution)
can
deepen
satire
but
require
careful
execution
so
readers
catch
the
parallels.
The
bottom
line:
mix
and
match
techniques
to
suit
your
piece.
One
satire
may
lean
heavily
on
irony
and
understatement
(dry
wit),
another
on
absurd
exaggeration
(silly
shock
value).
As
you
practice,
you’ll
develop
a
sense
of
which
tool
to
pull
out
for
which
job.
And
like
any
DIY
project,
having
a
full
toolbox
at
your
disposal
is
half
the
battle.
Crafting
a
Satirical
Piece
Step-by-Step
Alright,
time
to
roll
up
your
sleeves
and
actually
write
this
thing.
Staring
at
a
blank
page
can
be
intimidating
(as
intimidating
as
a
politician
at
a
truth-telling
contest).
But
fear
not
–
here’s
a
step-by-step
approach
to
go
from
a
vague
idea
to
a
polished
satirical
piece.
We’ll
break
it
down
into
manageable
steps:
Step
1:
Choose
a
Target
(Focus
Your
Premise)
Every
satire
needs
a
target
–
the
issue,
person,
or
behavior
you’re
making
fun
of.
Start
by
picking
something
that
you
care
about
or
find
absurd.
Your
genuine
irritation
or
passion
will
fuel
the
humor.
It
could
be
a
big
social
issue
(like
political
corruption,
climate
denial,
inequality)
or
a
petty
everyday
annoyance
(like
people
who
never
update
their
software
but
complain
their
phone
is
slow).
Nothing
is
too
grand
or
too
small,
as
long
as
there’s
something
worth
ridiculing.
However,
one
golden
rule:
punch
up,
not
down.
Choose
a
target
that
has
some
power,
influence,
or
choice
in
the
matter.
Satire
works
best
when
it
challenges
the
powerful
or
critiques
widely-held
follies,
not
when
it
mocks
the
vulnerable.
For
example,
satirizing
a
government
policy
or
a
billionaire’s
quirks
can
be
great;
satirizing
homeless
people
or
disaster
victims
–
not
so
much
(that
veers
into
cruel,
not
clever).
We’ll
talk
more
about
this
in
the
ethics
section,
but
keep
it
in
mind
from
the
get-go.
Aim
your
comedic
arrows
at
the
right
bullseye.
Once
you
have
a
broad
target,
narrow
it
to
a
specific
premise
or
angle.
“Government
incompetence”
is
too
broad
to
be
funny
on
its
own
–
but
“the
government
program
that
spent
$2
million
to
develop
a
ketchup
bottle”
is
specific
and
ripe
for
satire.
A
good
satirical
premise
is
crystal
clear.
You
(and
eventually
your
reader)
should
be
able
to
answer:
What
exactly
am
I
satirizing?
Is
it
a
particular
event,
a
type
of
person,
a
trend?
Jonathan
Swift
didn’t
just
satirize
British
policy
generally;
his
premise
was
specifically
ridiculing
the
heartless
attitude
of
the
English
wealthy
toward
poor
Irish
families.
From
that
clear
premise
sprang
the
“eat
babies”
idea.
Try
writing
your
premise
in
a
straightforward
sentence
first:
“I
want
to
satirize
__
because
__.”
For
example,
“I
want
to
satirize
corporate
PR
speak
because
it’s
absurd
how
companies
spin
bad
news
as
good.”
That
clarity
will
keep
you
on
track
as
you
add
layers
of
humor.
Step
2:
Find
the
Absurdity
and
Choose
Your
Satirical
Angle
Now
that
you
have
a
target,
ask:
“What’s
inherently
absurd
or
ironic
here?”
Your
job
is
to
amplify
that.
There
are
a
couple
of
ways
to
hone
in
on
your
satirical
angle:
Identify
the
contradictions
or
hypocrisy:
Is
there
a
gap
between
what
this
person/organization
says
and
what
they
do?
Between
the
ideal
and
reality?
For
instance,
if
your
target
is
“reality
TV,”
the
inherent
irony
is
that
it’s
often
scripted
and
fake.
Boom,
angle:
treat
the
fakeness
of
“reality”
with
extreme
seriousness,
or
flip
it
so
real
life
starts
having
confession
cams
and
dramatic
music.
Find
the
lie
or
the
flaw
and
shine
a
spotlight.
Ask
“What
if…?”
questions
to
push
the
idea.
What
if
this
truth
was
taken
to
the
extreme?
(Exaggeration
angle.)
What
if
the
opposite
was
true?
(Irony
angle.)
What
if
I
present
it
in
a
different
format
or
context?
(Parody
angle.)
For
example:
What
if
a
tech
company
literally
started
worshipping
an
AI
as
its
god?
(Absurd
extreme
to
satirize
tech
obsession.)
Or
what
if
I
wrote
about
my
messy
roommate
as
if
he
were
a
historic
plague?
(Parody,
comparing
crumbs
to
locusts,
etc.)
Find
a
fresh
perspective:
Sometimes
taking
an
unexpected
point
of
view
opens
up
comedy.
Could
you
tell
the
story
from
the
standpoint
of
an
inanimate
object
or
an
unlikely
character?
E.g.,
satirize
smartphone
addiction
with
a
piece
from
the
perspective
of
a
lonely
neglected
book
on
the
shelf,
witnessing
humans
worshipping
their
phones.
The
angle
becomes
the
personification
of
the
book
lamenting
like
an
old
spurned
friend.
This
indirect
approach
can
be
both
funny
and
poignant.
Brainstorm
freely
here.
Jot
down
as
many
absurd
ideas
or
analogies
as
you
can
related
to
your
topic.
Don’t
worry
if
they’re
too
crazy
–
sometimes
the
craziest
idea,
toned
down
just
a
notch,
becomes
the
perfect
satirical
hook.
Let’s
say
our
target
is
over-the-top
wedding
culture
(people
spending
ludicrous
amounts
on
weddings).
Absurd
brainstorm:
wedding
as
military
arms
race,
bride
and
groom
as
rival
generals?
Or
a
reality
show
“Wedding
Wars”
where
couples
compete
to
one-up
each
other?
Or
an
open
letter
from
the
future
child
(“Thanks
for
blowing
my
college
fund
on
a
chocolate
fountain,
Mom
and
Dad!”).
Notice
how
each
of
those
angles
highlights
the
original
absurdity
(weddings
that
have
lost
all
sense
of
proportion)
through
a
different
lens.
Choose
the
angle
that
makes
you
smirk
the
most
or
that
best
highlights
the
core
issue.
If
you’re
torn,
ask
which
idea
would
be
clearest
to
your
audience.
Remember,
clarity
is
key
–
your
readers
should
quickly
“get”
what
you’re
spoofing
once
they
start
reading.
If
the
connection
is
too
murky,
consider
sharpening
or
simplifying
the
concept.
Step
3:
Choose
a
Format
or
Structure
Satire
can
take
many
forms
–
and
picking
the
right
format
can
significantly
enhance
the
humor.
This
is
where
you
decide
how
you
will
present
your
satirical
idea.
Some
popular
structures
(which
we’ll
delve
into
in
the
next
section)
include:
a
faux
news
article,
a
satirical
op-ed
or
open
letter,
a
fictional
interview,
a
diary
entry,
a
user
manual,
an
advertisement,
a
listicle,
you
name
it.
Why
does
format
matter?
Because
form
can
itself
be
a
joke.
A
serious
format
(like
a
scientific
report
or
a
solemn
speech)
filled
with
ridiculous
content
creates
a
delightful
contrast.
For
example,
if
your
target
is
bureaucratic
inefficiency,
writing
your
piece
as
a
leaked
internal
memo
or
policy
proposal
could
amplify
the
satire
–
you’d
use
dry
office
lingo
to
describe
something
outrageously
dumb,
thereby
mocking
the
bureaucratic
tone
and
the
inefficiency.
Or
if
you’re
skewering
something
like
Instagram
culture,
maybe
write
it
as
a
step-by-step
how-to
guide
for
becoming
an
influencer
(highlighting
shallow
behaviors
through
the
faux
instructions).
Consider
your
audience
too.
Some
formats
are
more
instantly
relatable
to
certain
readers.
A
younger
online
audience
might
love
a
listicle
(“5
Signs
Your
Cat
is
Plotting
World
Domination”
–
a
silly
satirical
concept),
whereas
a
more
literary
audience
might
appreciate
a
short
story
or
essay
format.
Also,
different
formats
lend
themselves
to
different
strengths:
a
fake
news
article
is
great
for
deadpan
delivery
of
absurd
“facts,”
while
a
parody
letter
or
monologue
lets
you
dive
deep
into
a
character’s
voice.
Outline
the
structure
in
broad
strokes.
Will
it
have
sections
(like
a
news
article
with
headline,
body,
maybe
fake
quotes)?
Will
it
be
one
continuous
narrative?
Will
it
be
Q&A
style?
Having
this
blueprint
prevents
your
satire
from
becoming
a
rambling
blob
of
jokes.
It
gives
you
scaffolding
to
build
on.
If
you’re
not
sure,
a
straightforward
approach
is
to
write
it
as
a
satirical
essay
or
column
–
basically
you
speaking
in
ironic
tone
–
which
is
flexible
and
doesn’t
require
strict
formatting.
Once
you
pick
a
format,
stick
to
its
conventions
as
you
write
–
that’s
half
the
humor.
If
it’s
a
love
letter,
start
with
“Dear
so-and-so”
and
maybe
end
with
a
ridiculous
sign-off.
If
it’s
a
scientific
abstract,
include
an
“Introduction”
and
“Conclusion”
with
tongue-in-cheek
academic
jargon.
Committing
to
the
bit
sells
the
satire.
(Need
inspiration?
In
the
next
section,
we’ll
explore
common
satire
formats
like
news,
open
letters,
etc.,
with
examples.
Feel
free
to
skip
ahead,
then
come
back
here
to
continue
your
steps.)
Step
4:
Write
the
First
Draft
–
Be
Bold,
Then
Refine
Time
to
put
pen
to
paper
(or
fingers
to
keyboard)
and
let
it
rip.
Your
first
draft
is
the
place
to
go
big
with
your
humor
ideas.
Don’t
self-censor
too
much
at
this
stage
–
you’ve
done
your
planning,
now
let
the
satire
flow.
A
few
pointers
as
you
draft:
Adopt
the
right
tone/voice:
If
you’re
writing
in
a
persona
(e.g.,
a
clueless
official,
a
concerned
citizen,
a
talking
dog),
fully
inhabit
that
character’s
voice.
If
it’s
a
generic
narrator,
decide
if
they’re
naive,
sarcastic,
outraged,
or
eerily
calm
about
absurd
things.
Consistency
of
voice
makes
the
piece
feel
cohesive.
Lead
strong:
The
opening
lines
should
signal
the
satirical
nature
and
grab
attention.
Often,
stating
the
absurd
premise
right
at
the
start
works
wonders.
Example:
“The
Department
of
Agriculture
announced
today
that
the
nation’s
cows
are
now
required
to
produce
10%
lactose-free
milk
by
2025,
to
accommodate
lactose-intolerant
Americans.”
That’s
a
goofy
premise
delivered
seriously
–
a
hook,
in
other
words.
It
sets
up
the
reader
for
the
style
of
jokes
to
come.
Commit
to
the
bit:
Satire
often
works
best
when
it
doesn’t
blink.
Write
with
conviction
as
if
everything
you
say
is
logical
or
factual,
even
when
it’s
ridiculous.
The
humor
comes
from
the
contrast
between
the
serious
delivery
and
the
insane
content.
A
common
mistake
is
winking
too
hard
at
the
audience,
e.g.,
breaking
character
to
say
“just
kidding.”
Trust
your
readers
to
get
it
(with
a
clear
premise
and
tone,
they
will).
Sprinkle
a
variety
of
humor:
Use
the
toolkit
–
irony,
exaggeration,
etc.
–
but
don’t
use
everything
at
once,
and
don’t
beat
one
joke
to
death.
Maybe
your
piece
mainly
uses
exaggeration,
but
you
toss
in
a
clever
ironic
twist
or
a
parody
reference
here
and
there
for
flavor.
Running
gags
(a
repeated
joke
or
callback)
can
also
be
fun,
but
ensure
they
escalate
or
vary
so
it
stays
funny.
For
example,
if
in
a
satirical
article
you
refer
to
a
hapless
politician
as
having
the
brainpower
of
a
toaster
in
paragraph
one,
maybe
in
paragraph
three
the
toaster
is
actually
making
better
decisions
in
a
side-by-side
comparison.
In
short,
mix
up
your
comedic
attacks:
a
surprise
analogy
here,
a
deadpan
absurd
statement
there,
maybe
a
pun
or
witty
wordplay
when
appropriate.
Keep
it
tight
(especially
with
humor):
Brevity
is
the
soul
of
wit!
In
a
first
draft
you
might
write
long,
which
is
fine,
but
be
prepared
to
trim.
Jokes
often
land
better
when
they’re
not
belabored.
For
instance,
instead
of
rambling
on
to
explain
why
something
is
funny,
let
the
scenario
or
dialog
itself
carry
the
humor
and
then
cut
to
the
next
point.
Trust
the
audience
to
fill
in
one
plus
one
=
haha.
Don’t
worry
if
at
this
stage
some
lines
feel
more
silly
than
satirical
or
vice
versa.
The
first
draft
might
be
rough
or
too
over-the-top
–
that’s
okay.
It’s
easier
to
tone
down
excess
than
to
add
in
spark
later.
Get
your
ideas
on
the
page.
You
might
end
up
with
a
piece
that
has
a
hilarious
middle
but
a
weak
ending,
or
a
great
concept
but
some
flat
jokes
–
all
fixable
in
the
next
step.
Step
5:
Revise
and
Polish
(Sharpen
that
Satire)
Now
for
the
unsexy
(but
crucial)
part:
editing.
Great
satire
often
comes
out
of
great
editing
–
refining
the
balance
between
humor
and
message.
Step
away
from
your
draft
for
a
bit
if
you
can,
then
come
back
with
fresh
eyes
and
maybe
a
red
pen
(or
the
delete
key).
What
to
look
for
while
revising:
Clarity
check:
Will
a
reader
not
inside
your
head
understand
the
target
and
premise?
Make
sure
the
setup
in
the
beginning
makes
it
clear
what
you’re
satirizing.
You
might
need
to
tweak
the
introduction
or
add
a
hint
if
it’s
too
oblique.
If
you
gave
it
to
a
friend,
could
they
“get
it”
by
the
first
few
sentences
or
headline?
If
not,
clarify
your
premise.
Consistency
of
tone:
Did
you
accidentally
drop
out
of
character
or
slip
from
satirical
into
just
factual
or
preachy?
Ensure
the
satirical
voice
stays
consistent.
If
you
find
a
paragraph
that
reads
like
a
straight
essay
or,
alternatively,
one
that
feels
like
a
different
style
of
humor,
smooth
it
out
to
match
the
rest.
Consistency
makes
the
piece
feel
professionally
done
rather
than
patchy.
Timing
and
flow
of
jokes:
Check
the
pacing.
Does
the
piece
build
up
to
a
good
climax
or
final
punchline?
Many
satirical
pieces
save
the
sharpest
zinger
for
the
end,
leaving
the
reader
with
a
final
“Ouch!”
(in
a
good
way).
Make
sure
the
best
stuff
isn’t
buried
in
the
middle
and
the
ending
isn’t
a
fizzle.
You
might
rearrange
sentences
or
paragraphs
for
better
setup-payoff
structure.
Also,
remove
any
joke
that
doesn’t
serve
a
purpose.
Sometimes
we
write
a
funny
line
that
we
love,
but
if
it
sidetracks
from
the
main
point
or
confuses
the
tone,
it
may
need
to
go.
Kill
your
darlings,
as
they
say
–
or
at
least
maim
them
until
they
behave.
Is
it
actually
funny?
This
sounds
obvious,
but
when
you’ve
re-read
your
piece
10
times,
you
might
become
numb
to
the
humor.
Try
reading
it
aloud.
The
parts
where
you
naturally
smile
or
giggle
are
keepers.
The
parts
where
even
you
are
bored
–
those
need
punching
up
or
cutting.
If
you
can,
have
someone
else
read
it
and
see
where
they
laugh
or
look
puzzled.
(Choose
an
honest
friend,
not
just
your
mom
who
says
everything
you
do
is
brilliant.)
Balance
critique
vs.
humor:
Ensure
your
criticism
isn’t
completely
lost
in
the
jokes,
nor
the
humor
drowned
out
by
soapboxing.
Satire
is
a
balancing
act.
If
upon
rereading,
the
piece
feels
too
mean
or
angry
without
enough
wit,
lighten
it
up
with
a
bit
more
silliness
or
charm
in
the
narrator’s
voice.
Conversely,
if
it’s
giggle-worthy
but
not
actually
making
any
point,
you
might
sharpen
a
line
or
two
to
drive
the
message
home
more.
The
best
satire
often
lets
the
absurd
scenario
imply
the
criticism,
without
lecturing
–
but
a
slight
nudge
or
hint
at
the
real
point,
especially
towards
the
end,
can
help
land
the
message.
For
instance,
ending
Stephen
Colbert-style
with,
“…and
that’s
how
we’ll
solve
everything,
because
what
could
possibly
go
wrong?”
–
a
final
irony
that
winks
at
the
reader
to
not
take
it
at
face
value.
Proofread
for
the
usual
suspects:
grammar,
spelling,
and
in
this
genre
especially,
word
choice.
Using
a
hilariously
wrong
word
or
a
malapropism
can
be
a
joke,
but
make
sure
it’s
intentional.
Often,
precise
wording
makes
the
difference
in
a
joke’s
setup
or
punchline.
Also
confirm
any
factual
elements
you
included
(satire
often
includes
real
references
or
names):
nothing
kills
a
great
gag
like
discovering
you
got
a
basic
fact
wrong
(unless
your
narrator
is
intentionally
getting
it
wrong
as
part
of
the
satire
–
that
can
be
a
joke
too,
but
it
should
be
on
purpose).
Lastly,
come
up
with
a
good
title
or
headline.
If
you
haven’t
already,
craft
one
that
teases
the
premise.
In
satirical
news,
the
headline
is
half
the
joke
(“Study
Reveals:
Babies
Are
Stupid”
still
makes
us
laugh).
In
an
essay
format,
a
witty
title
helps
grab
attention
(e.g.,
“An
Open
Letter
to
My
Roomba,
Regarding
Its
Plot
to
Kill
Me”).
Make
sure
it
matches
the
tone
of
the
piece
–
absurd
title
for
an
absurd
piece,
or
a
dry,
blandly
serious
title
for
a
piece
with
deadpan
delivery
(sometimes
funnier
that
way).
Congratulations
–
you’ve
now
got
a
satirical
piece
ready
to
hit
the
presses
(or
at
least
your
blog/social
media/Microsoft
Word
file).
But
before
you
publish
or
share
it
widely,
let’s
arm
you
with
knowledge
of
different
formats
you
can
experiment
with,
and
a
heads-up
on
ethics
and
pitfalls.
After
all,
with
great
power
(to
mock)
comes
great
responsibility
(to
not
be
a
jerk).
Common
Satire
Formats
and
Structures
Satire
isn’t
one-size-fits-all.
The
format
you
choose
is
part
of
the
joke.
Let’s
explore
some
popular
structures
for
satirical
writing,
with
examples
of
how
each
works.
You
can
use
these
as
inspiration
or
templates
for
your
own
pieces:
A
free
“The
SpinTaxi”
newspaper
box
on
a
Washington
DC
street.
The
Spintaxi’s
deadpan
news
parody
format
is
so
iconic
that
its
logo
alone
signals
you’re
in
for
a
satirical
read.
News
Parody
(Fake
News
Articles)
One
of
the
most
prevalent
forms
of
written
satire
today
is
the
faux
news
article.
Pioneered
by
outlets
like
The
Onion,
this
format
mimics
real
journalism,
complete
with
attention-grabbing
headlines,
a
serious
tone,
and
sometimes
even
fake
quotes
and
statistics
–
all
to
deliver
completely
ridiculous
content.
How
it
works:
You
write
your
piece
as
if
it’s
a
straight
news
report
or
press
release
about
an
absurd
situation.
The
humor
often
comes
from
the
contrast
between
the
formal,
factual
style
and
the
ludicrous
subject
matter.
For
example,
a
classic
Onion-style
headline
might
be
“Drugs
Win
Drug
War”
or
“NASA
Launches
David
Bowie
into
Space
to
Make
Contact
with
Starman”
–
presented
with
the
same
sobriety
as
if
reporting
on
a
local
city
council
meeting.
The
body
of
the
article
would
continue
in
an
AP-newswire
tone,
perhaps
quoting
a
fake
official
or
expert
to
comment
on
the
nonsense.
Why
it
works:
People
are
used
to
seeing
outrageous
real
news,
so
at
a
glance
a
parody
news
piece
has
just
enough
credibility
to
rope
them
in,
then
the
specifics
reveal
the
satire.
It
also
allows
you
to
slip
in
multiple
jokes:
the
headline
is
one,
the
fake
quotes
(often
the
“voice
of
reason”
stating
the
obvious)
are
another,
and
there’s
room
for
extra
gags
(charts,
bylines,
etc.).
News
parody
is
great
for
topics
like
politics,
science,
or
any
current
event,
because
you
basically
create
an
alternate
reality
news
item
to
highlight
how
in
reality,
things
are
not
making
sense.
Tips:
Make
sure
to
nail
the
tone
of
real
news.
Use
short
paragraphs,
objective-sounding
language,
and
maybe
a
punny
kicker
at
the
end
if
you
want.
The
more
earnestly
you
sell
it
as
news,
the
funnier
the
ridiculous
premise
becomes.
Also,
brevity
is
your
friend
here;
many
Onion
articles
are
only
a
few
paragraphs
long
–
they
come
in,
drop
the
bombshell
of
satire,
and
exit
before
the
joke
wears
thin.
If
your
premise
is
very
clear,
sometimes
just
a
headline
and
a
couple
of
lines
is
enough
(think
of
those
shareable
satirical
headlines
on
Twitter
or
Reddit).
Satirical
Open
Letters
and
Essays
Another
versatile
format
is
the
open
letter
or
satirical
essay/monologue.
This
is
essentially
a
first-person
address
to
a
person
or
entity,
or
a
personal
essay,
but
with
an
ironic
or
exaggerated
stance.
It’s
a
bit
more
free-form
than
a
news
article
and
lets
you
inject
a
lot
of
voice
and
persona.
Open
letters:
Here
you
write
a
letter
to
someone
who
will
never
read
it
–
often
a
public
figure,
group,
or
even
a
concept.
The
format
starts
with
“Dear
X,”
and
often
closes
with
a
witty
sign-off.
For
example,
“Dear
Millennials,
Please
Stop
Killing
Everything.
Sincerely,
A
Confused
Baby
Boomer.”
In
the
letter,
you’d
humorously
embody
the
voice
of
the
writer
(the
baby
boomer),
perhaps
satirizing
their
misunderstandings
and
complaints,
which
in
turn
highlights
the
silly
“millennials
are
killing
X
industry”
media
trend.
Open
letters
can
also
be
from
the
perspective
of
an
object
or
institution
(e.g.,
“Dear
Humans,
Signed,
Climate
Change”
with
climate
change
personified,
giving
humans
a
piece
of
its
mind).
The
direct
address
format
can
make
the
satire
sharper
–
it
feels
like
a
confrontation
or
heartfelt
plea,
just
with
absurd
logic.
Satirical
essays/monologues:
These
read
like
a
column
or
personal
essay.
It
might
be
you
as
yourself,
or
as
a
character,
talking
directly
to
the
reader
about
the
topic
in
a
humorous
way.
Think
of
pieces
in
The
New
Yorker’s
“Shouts
&
Murmurs”
or
McSweeney’s
Internet
Tendency.
For
example,
an
essay
titled
“I’m
Sorry
I
Didn’t
Respond
to
Your
Email,
My
Owl
Died”
takes
the
form
of
someone
giving
an
absurd
excuse
(satirizing
both
our
tendency
to
offer
dramatic
excuses
and
how
overwhelmed
we
are
by
communication).
There’s
no
rigid
structure
beyond
having
a
clear
beginning,
middle,
end.
It’s
like
telling
a
story
or
argument
with
a
satirical
angle.
Why
it
works:
This
format
allows
a
deeper
dive
into
a
character’s
psyche
or
a
more
narrative
approach.
You’re
not
constrained
by
the
clip
of
news
style.
You
can
be
very
sarcastic
or
flowery
or
over-the-top
in
voice.
It’s
ideal
for
topics
where
the
humor
comes
from
the
way
someone
thinks
or
talks
about
something.
For
instance,
writing
from
the
viewpoint
of
a
conspiracy
theorist
in
an
essay
lets
you
string
together
illogical
“logical”
arguments
to
expose
how
crazy
the
conspiracy
sounds.
The
open
letter
format,
meanwhile,
creates
a
built-in
target
of
the
satire
(the
addressee)
and
often
a
clear
speaker,
making
it
easy
to
frame
your
jokes.
Tips:
Fully
commit
to
the
persona
or
voice.
If
you’re
a
frustrated
customer
writing
an
open
letter
to
a
ridiculous
product
(e.g.,
“Dear
Automatic
Soap
Dispenser
That
Never
Works,”),
let
your
faux
frustration
build
comically.
If
you’re
doing
a
monologue
as,
say,
a
humble-bragging
tech
CEO
explaining
why
they
need
to
colonize
Mars,
maintain
the
obliviously
self-congratulatory
tone.
Structure
still
matters:
even
a
humorous
rant
should
have
a
logical
flow
of
ideas
–
maybe
escalating
in
craziness
or
culminating
in
a
final
epiphany
(or
punchline).
Because
these
formats
are
looser,
it’s
easy
to
ramble,
so
outline
your
key
beats:
e.g.,
in
a
letter
complaining
to
airlines,
maybe
paragraph
1
politely
introduces
the
gripe,
para
2
lists
increasingly
absurd
complaints,
para
3
delivers
a
dramatic
ultimatum
or
twist.
Fake
Interviews
and
Dialogues
This
format
presents
your
satire
as
a
Q&A
or
conversation,
which
can
be
a
fun
way
to
juxtapose
questions
and
answers
for
comedic
effect.
It’s
like
writing
a
short
play
or
skit
in
text
form,
or
a
mock
interview
transcript.
How
it
works:
You
lay
it
out
with
character
labels
or
Q/A
labels.
For
instance:
Interviewer:
“So,
Big
Bad
Wolf,
you
claim
you
were
framed
by
the
three
little
pigs?”
Wolf:
“Absolutely.
It’s
all
fake
news.
I
was
merely
trying
to
check
on
their
welfare…”
In
that
made-up
example,
you
can
see
how
a
familiar
story
(Three
Little
Pigs)
can
be
satirized
by
interview
format
–
maybe
to
parallel
how
certain
public
figures
deny
obvious
guilt
(“I
was
just
blowing
their
houses
down
to
ensure
they
were
up
to
code,
I
swear!”).
Or
you
might
do
a
dialogue
between
two
characters
with
opposing
views,
exaggerating
both
to
highlight
a
point.
Imagine
a
transcript
of
a
meeting
between
“Common
Sense”
and
“Political
Correctness,”
for
instance,
each
speaking
in
character
about
some
issue
–
could
be
a
way
to
satirize
the
debate
around
free
speech,
etc.,
by
literally
personifying
those
concepts.
Why
it
works:
Interviews
allow
for
quick
back-and-forth
banter,
which
can
pack
in
jokes,
misunderstandings,
and
contrasts
in
viewpoint.
The
Q&A
format
is
also
good
for
delivering
exposition
in
a
natural
way
(“As
the
Wolf,
can
you
walk
us
through
what
happened
that
day?”
leads
the
Wolf
to
a
narrative
answer).
It
also
inherently
sets
up
a
scenario
–
an
interviewer
and
interviewee
implies
something
noteworthy
is
being
discussed,
often
something
gone
wrong
(a
scandal,
a
strange
achievement,
etc.).
That
scenario
itself
can
be
the
satirical
premise.
Tips:
Keep
each
turn
(question
or
answer)
punchy.
You
don’t
want
either
party
launching
into
page-long
monologues,
or
you
might
as
well
write
an
essay.
Use
the
interplay:
perhaps
the
interviewer
asks
reasonable
questions
and
the
interviewee
gives
ridiculously
oblivious
answers
(satirizing
someone
in
real
life
who
does
the
same).
Or
maybe
the
interviewer
is
fawning
and
the
interviewee
is
grotesquely
self-absorbed
–
depends
on
your
target.
If
doing
a
pure
dialogue
(no
interviewer),
make
sure
each
character
has
a
distinct
voice
or
stance
so
the
reader
can
follow
who’s
who
and
what
they
represent.
For
example,
a
Socratic
dialogue
spoof
with
a
“Professor”
and
a
“Student”
could
lampoon
academic
jargon:
Student
asks
a
simple
question,
Professor
responds
with
convoluted
nonsense,
back
and
forth,
highlighting
the
absurdity
of
academic
gatekeeping.
Pacing
is
vital.
A
common
technique
is
the
“straight
man
and
funny
man”
dynamic
–
one
character
is
sensible
(or
at
least
asks
what
the
audience
is
thinking)
and
the
other
is
the
comedic
figure
delivering
wild
ideas.
This
contrast
grounds
the
piece
and
gives
you
an
opportunity
to
pre-empt
the
reader’s
reactions
within
the
text.
When
the
interviewer
says,
“That
sounds
highly
unlikely,”
and
the
interviewee
doubles
down
with
an
even
crazier
justification,
the
reader
gets
to
laugh
and
nod
along
with
the
interviewer.
(Plus:
Other
Formats
to
Explore)
The
above
are
just
a
few
popular
formats.
Satire
is
limited
only
by
your
imagination.
You
could
write
a
pseudo-script
or
screenplay
format,
a
series
of
social
media
posts
or
fake
tweets,
a
product
review
from
hell,
a
FAQ
section
answering
absurd
questions,
or
even
a
recipe
(e.g.,
a
“recipe
for
a
political
campaign”
listing
money,
scandals,
baby-kissing,
etc.,
as
ingredients).
Feel
free
to
experiment.
Sometimes
the
format
itself
becomes
a
layer
of
the
joke
(like
a
recent
satirical
piece
that
was
formatted
as
an
IKEA
instruction
manual
for
building
a
government
–
diagrams
and
all!).
The
key
is
that
whatever
format
you
choose,
use
its
conventions
to
maximize
humor
and
clarity.
A
good
satirical
format
choice
can
make
a
mediocre
joke
brilliant
or,
if
poorly
chosen,
can
make
a
great
idea
fall
flat.
So,
when
brainstorming
formats,
ask:
Will
this
presentation
make
the
satire
sharper
and
more
entertaining?
If
yes,
go
for
it.
If
it’s
just
a
gimmick
that
complicates
things,
consider
a
simpler
route.
Next
up,
let’s
talk
about
something
crucial:
how
to
be
funny
and
provocative
without
crossing
lines
that
could
land
you
in
hot
water.
Yes,
it’s
time
for
the
ethics
and
legal
side
of
satire
–
don’t
worry,
we’ll
keep
it
light.
Ethical
and
Legal
Considerations
in
Satire
Satire
can
be
edgy.
By
its
nature,
it
challenges
and
often
offends
(at
least
the
target
of
the
satire,
if
not
the
audience).
But
there’s
a
fine
line
between
punching
up
in
a
fun,
constructive
way
and
punching
down
or
defaming,
which
can
be
harmful
or
even
get
you
sued.
As
a
satirical
writer,
you
need
to
be
aware
of
these
boundaries.
Here’s
how
to
navigate
the
ethics
and
legalities:
Punching
Up
vs.
Punching
Down
We
touched
on
this
earlier:
“Punching
up”
means
satirizing
people
or
institutions
that
have
power
(politicians,
corporations,
wealthy
elites,
dominant
social
norms).
“Punching
down”
means
making
fun
of
those
who
are
vulnerable
or
marginalized
(the
poor,
victims,
minorities,
etc.)
in
a
way
that
further
harms
or
belittles
them.
Why
avoid
punching
down?
Because
it’s
generally
not
satire
–
it’s
bullying
or
cruelty.
And
importantly,
it’s
usually
not
funny.
As
cartoonist
Garry
Trudeau
(creator
of
Doonesbury)
pointed
out
when
discussing
controversial
caricatures,
“Ridiculing
the
non-privileged
is
almost
never
funny
–
it’s
just
mean.”.
The
best
satire
often
comforts
the
afflicted
and
afflicts
the
comfortable,
not
the
other
way
around.
Ask
yourself:
Who
is
the
butt
of
the
joke?
If
it’s
a
corrupt
CEO,
a
hypocritical
celebrity,
or
a
societal
ill
–
you’re
likely
on
solid
(and
humorous)
ground.
If
it’s
a
tragedy
someone
suffered
or
an
entire
group’s
identity,
step
back.
Can
you
redirect
the
satire
toward
those
responsible
for
the
problem
instead?
For
example,
instead
of
mocking
people
who
fell
for
a
scam,
mock
the
scammers
or
the
system
that
enabled
the
scam.
This
doesn’t
mean
you
can’t
satirize
sensitive
topics.
You
can,
but
the
angle
matters.
Satirizing
racism,
for
example,
is
delicate
–
you
wouldn’t
want
to
inadvertently
repeat
racist
tropes.
A
savvy
satirist
might
create
an
exaggerated
scenario
that
makes
racism
look
as
absurd
as
it
truly
is
(punching
up
at
racists).
Think
of
Mel
Brooks
who
satirized
Nazis
by
making
them
buffoonish
in
The
Producers.
He
wasn’t
punching
down
at
victims
of
Nazism;
he
was
mocking
the
ridiculous
ideology
of
the
Nazis
themselves.
Avoid
cheap
shots:
Jokes
about
someone’s
immutable
characteristics
(race,
disability,
appearance,
etc.)
that
aren’t
tied
to
any
broader
point
usually
feel
like
low
blows.
If
you
find
your
draft
has
a
joke
like
that,
consider
replacing
or
removing
it.
It’s
often
a
sign
of
a
lazy
joke
anyway.
Satire
should
aim
higher.
Know
the
Legal
Lines:
Parody,
Libel,
and
“Just
Kidding”
Doesn’t
Always
Cut
It
Legally
speaking,
satire
and
parody
enjoy
a
lot
of
protection
under
free
speech
laws
in
many
countries
–
but
not
absolute
protection.
A
few
things
to
keep
in
mind:
Defamation
(Libel/Slander):
If
you
state
a
false
fact
about
a
real
person
that
harms
their
reputation,
they
could
claim
defamation.
Now,
satire
usually
signals
it’s
not
stating
actual
facts
(no
one
really
thought
Jonathan
Swift
was
actually
eating
babies).
But
sometimes,
especially
in
subtle
satire,
people
can
get
confused.
To
avoid
legal
trouble,
make
sure
that
no
reasonable
reader
would
believe
the
false
statements
to
be
actual
facts.
The
more
absurd
or
clearly
fictional
your
piece,
the
safer
you
are.
If
you
write
“CEO
X
secretly
kicks
puppies
for
fun”
as
a
satirical
hyperbole,
you
might
be
fine
if
it’s
obviously
a
joke
–
but
if
you
present
it
too
straight,
that
CEO
might
not
laugh
along.
In
the
U.S.,
public
figures
have
to
prove
“actual
malice”
(knowledge
of
falsity
or
reckless
disregard
for
truth)
to
win
a
libel
case
–
satire
isn’t
actual
malice
if
it’s
recognized
as
satire.
There
was
a
famous
case
Hustler
Magazine
v.
Falwell
(1988)
where
Hustler
ran
a
grotesque
parody
ad
about
Reverend
Jerry
Falwell;
he
sued,
but
the
U.S.
Supreme
Court
protected
the
parody
as
free
speech,
noting
no
reasonable
person
would
take
it
as
fact.
So
outrageousness
can
be
your
friend
in
court
–
who’d
think
a
reverend
really
had
an
incestuous
drunken
encounter
in
an
outhouse
(the
content
of
that
parody
ad)?
Only
someone
out
of
touch
with
reality.
Disclaimers
and
context:
If
you’re
publishing
satire
on
a
platform
where
it
might
be
mistaken
for
real
news
(looking
at
you,
Facebook
feeds),
a
disclaimer
or
obvious
cues
can
help.
Some
satire
sites
label
their
articles
as
such
in
the
footer
or
about
page.
You
shouldn’t
need
to
write
“THIS
IS
SATIRE”
in
bold
on
the
piece
(that
spoils
the
fun),
but
be
aware
that
in
today’s
fast-scrolling
online
world,
Poe’s
Law
reigns
(extreme
views
can
be
indistinguishable
from
satire).
To
protect
yourself
and
ensure
the
satire
is
recognized,
make
the
comedic
elements
evident
enough
for
a
moderately
attentive
reader.
If
your
parody
is
so
straight-faced
that
it’s
indistinguishable
from
real
defamatory
lies,
you’re
doing
something
risky
(and
arguably
not
doing
good
satire
anyway,
since
good
satire
has
a
hint
of
the
absurd).
Copyright
and
Fair
Use:
This
is
more
niche,
but
if
your
satire
involves
imitating
another
work
(like
parodying
a
famous
song
or
movie),
know
that
parody
is
often
considered
“fair
use”
of
copyrighted
material
because
it’s
transformative
criticism.
But
be
cautious
about
lifting
large
chunks
of
someone’s
actual
text
or
lyrics
–
better
to
mimic
the
style
and
sprinkle
references
than
to
copy-paste.
If
you
do
a
direct
parody
(say,
rewriting
a
popular
song’s
lyrics
to
be
about
a
politician),
legally
it’s
typically
okay
if
it’s
clearly
a
parody,
but
if
you
ever
tried
to
publish/sell
it,
you’d
navigate
copyright
law.
Just
a
heads-up.
Real
person
in
fiction:
If
you’re
using
a
real
person
as
a
character
in
your
satire,
especially
a
private
individual,
thread
carefully.
Public
figures
(politicians,
celebs)
have
broader
shoulders
for
satire;
private
individuals
(your
random
neighbor)
could
feel
personally
attacked.
Changing
names
or
composite
characters
can
avoid
hurting
a
specific
private
person.
If,
for
instance,
you
want
to
satirize
“the
worst
boss
ever”
and
you
base
it
on
your
actual
boss
–
maybe
don’t
name
them.
Make
it
a
fictional
company
and
an
amalgam
of
terrible
boss
traits.
The
satire
will
still
land
for
everyone
who’s
had
a
bad
boss,
and
you
(probably)
won’t
get
fired
or
sued
by
your
boss.
Cultural
Sensitivity
and
Context
What’s
considered
fair
game
in
one
culture
or
community
might
be
taboo
in
another.
Satire
that
involves
religion,
for
example,
can
be
especially
sensitive.
Some
societies
accept
joking
about
deities
or
religious
figures;
others
might
respond
with
severe
backlash.
Know
your
audience
and
the
context
in
which
your
piece
will
appear.
This
isn’t
to
scare
you
off,
but
to
make
you
thoughtfully
weigh:
Is
this
particular
edgy
joke
serving
the
piece,
or
is
it
just
shock
for
shock’s
sake?
If
it’s
the
latter,
it’s
often
best
to
cut
it.
Shock
alone
isn’t
clever
satire;
it’s
the
message
behind
the
shock
that
matters.
Also,
consider
timing.
Tragedy
+
time
=
comedy,
they
say,
but
too
soon
and
it’s
just
tasteless.
If
something
terrible
happened
yesterday,
a
satirical
take
on
it
today
might
be
seen
as
insensitive
or
exploitative,
whereas
six
months
from
now,
if
healing
has
occurred,
the
satire
could
be
a
way
to
process
or
comment
on
it.
There’s
no
hard
rule,
but
empathy
and
common
sense
go
a
long
way.
In
summary:
Satire
can
ruffle
feathers
–
aim
to
ruffle
the
right
ones.
You
want
your
audience
to
laugh
and
think,
not
feel
needlessly
hurt
or
unfairly
attacked.
And
you
certainly
don’t
want
a
lawsuit
or
an
internet
mob
coming
after
you
because
you
misjudged
a
joke.
So
before
you
publish,
do
an
“ethics
check”:
If
the
person
or
group
I’m
satirizing
read
this,
would
I
be
comfortable?
Amused
even,
if
they
had
a
sense
of
humor?
(Sometimes
satirists
actually
send
up
people
in
a
way
that
even
the
target
might
chuckle
because
it’s
true.)
If
the
answer
is
yes,
you’re
likely
on
solid
ground.
If
the
answer
is
“they’d
probably
cry
or
rage,”
reconsider
your
approach.
Now
that
we’ve
covered
the
heavy
stuff,
let’s
lighten
up
again.
The
best
way
to
improve
at
satire
is
to
practice.
So
here
are
some
exercises
and
prompts
to
get
your
satirical
muscles
toned,
followed
by
a
list
of
common
pitfalls
to
avoid
as
you
continue
your
journey
to
comedic
glory.
Practice
Exercises
for
Aspiring
Satirists
Ready
to
put
theory
into
practice?
Below
are
a
few
fun
exercises
and
prompts
to
spark
your
satire
writing.
Treat
them
like
creative
workouts
–
the
goal
is
to
try
things
out,
not
to
produce
a
masterpiece
on
the
first
go.
Feel
free
to
take
any
prompt
and
run
with
it,
twist
it,
or
invent
your
own:
Exaggerate
a
Mundane
Task:
Write
a
short
satirical
paragraph
that
treats
an
everyday
chore
as
an
epic
mission.
For
example,
pen
a
news
brief
about
the
“heroic”
journey
of
taking
out
the
trash
(interview
the
“eyewitness”
raccoon,
cite
fake
statistics
on
banana
peel
casualties,
etc.).
This
exercise
helps
you
practice
exaggeration
and
grandiose
tone
about
something
trivial
–
a
core
comedic
move.
Inanimate
Advisor:
Choose
an
object
in
your
room.
Now
imagine
it
has
opinions
about
how
you
live
your
life.
Write
an
open
letter
from
that
object
to
you.
Maybe
your
couch
writes
to
complain
about
the
crumbs
you
leave,
or
your
smartphone
writes
a
love-hate
letter
about
being
overused.
This
flexes
personification
and
parody
(the
object
mimicking
a
human
voice).
Bonus:
it
might
reveal
some
truths
about
your
habits,
humorously.
Satirical
How-To
List:
Make
a
short
listicle
of
“Tips”
or
steps
on
a
satirical
topic.
For
instance,
“5
Tips
for
Becoming
an
Evil
Overlord
on
a
Budget”
or
“How
to
Apologize
Without
Admitting
Any
Guilt:
A
Politician’s
Guide.”
Use
the
list
format
(1,
2,
3…)
and
make
each
point
an
opportunity
for
a
punchline.
Listicles
force
brevity
and
structure,
great
for
honing
wit.
Fake
Interview
Q&A:
Draft
a
mini
interview
with
a
fictional
character
who
represents
an
issue.
Maybe
“Interview
with
a
Netflix
Binge-Watcher
Who
Finished
247
Shows
in
a
Year”
or
“Q&A
with
the
Last
Person
on
Earth
Who
Doesn’t
Have
a
Smartphone.”
Keep
it
to
a
half-page.
This
gets
you
used
to
dialogue
format
and
creating
humor
through
contrasting
Q
and
A.
Headline
Game:
Try
coming
up
with
10
satirical
headlines
for
news
articles
that
don’t
exist.
They
can
be
totally
disconnected
topics
–
the
point
is
to
craft
a
one-liner
premise
in
headline
form.
E.g.,
“Local
Introvert
Braves
Grocery
Store,
Declares
Victory,”
or
“New
Study
Finds
Scientists
Really
Annoyed
at
Being
Asked
to
Explain
New
Study.”
Not
all
will
be
gold,
but
this
will
train
your
brain
to
see
the
satirical
angle
quickly.
Parody
a
Famous
Speech
or
Text:
Take
a
well-known
passage
(the
opening
of
the
Constitution,
a
Shakespeare
monologue,
the
lyrics
of
a
popular
song)
and
rewrite
it
to
be
about
a
humorous
modern
topic.
For
example,
“Four
score
and
seven
years
ago
our
fathers
brought
forth…”
could
become
an
ode
to
the
founding
of
a
sandwich
shop
or
a
fantasy
football
league,
delivered
in
grand
historic
style.
This
sharpens
your
parody
skill
–
capturing
the
cadence
of
the
original
but
flipping
the
content.
Scene
of
Absurd
Normalcy:
Write
a
short
scene
(like
a
script)
where
one
absurd
element
is
treated
as
normal
by
everyone.
E.g.,
a
family
calmly
discussing
the
neighbor’s
dragon
as
if
it’s
a
barking
dog,
or
office
workers
dealing
with
a
zombie
colleague
in
denial
(“Gary,
you
look
a
bit
pale.
Mondays,
huh?”).
This
exercise
helps
blend
absurdity
with
deadpan
tone,
a
staple
of
satire.
After
writing
any
of
these,
reflect:
What
technique
did
you
naturally
use?
Did
you
maintain
a
clear
target
and
purpose?
Where
did
you
laugh
at
your
own
ideas
(that’s
usually
a
good
sign!)?
If
something
feels
off,
no
worries
–
that’s
where
editing
or
feedback
comes
in.
Also,
read
professional
satire
regularly
–
from
The
Onion
headlines
to
McSweeney’s
essays
or
late-night
monologues.
Try
to
identify
techniques
you
spot:
“Ah,
that
joke
John
Oliver
made
is
basically
an
absurd
analogy
mixed
with
a
pop
culture
reference.
Could
I
do
something
similar
on
another
topic?”
This
analytical
eye,
combined
with
practice,
will
rapidly
improve
your
satirical
writing
prowess.
Pitfalls
to
Avoid
When
Writing
Satire
As
you
refine
your
satirical
writing,
beware
of
some
common
missteps
that
can
undermine
your
work.
Even
seasoned
humorists
fall
into
these
traps
occasionally.
Here’s
a
quick
checklist
of
“don’ts”
(or
at
least
“proceed
with
caution”
items)
for
satire:
Don’t
Be
Too
Obscure:
If
your
satire
relies
on
very
niche
knowledge
or
an
inside
joke
that
only
a
few
will
get,
it
may
flop.
While
it’s
okay
to
target
a
specific
audience,
make
sure
there’s
enough
context
for
readers
to
follow
along.
Throwing
in
one
or
two
niche
references
as
icing
is
fine,
but
the
cake
itself
should
be
universally
understandable.
Satire
already
asks
readers
to
pick
up
on
subtleties
–
don’t
make
them
do
advanced
calculus
on
top
of
it.
Avoid
Overly
Preachy
Tone:
Remember,
you’re
writing
satire,
not
a
manifesto
(even
if
you
have
strong
feelings
on
the
topic).
If
you
drop
the
humor
entirely
to
soapbox
your
real
opinion,
readers
feel
bait-and-switched.
The
comedic
veneer
should
carry
through.
If
you
need
to
include
a
serious
point,
wrap
it
in
wit
or
brevity.
You
never
want
the
reader
to
feel
lectured
to
–
you
want
them
to
laugh
and
then
realize
the
point.
Steer
Clear
of
Punching
Down:
We’ve
said
it
enough,
but
one
more
time:
making
fun
of
the
powerless
or
victims
is
a
bad
look.
It
often
comes
off
as
mean-spirited
rather
than
clever.
If
you
catch
yourself
doing
this,
refocus
the
joke.
For
example,
instead
of
mocking
“dumb
consumers”
who
fell
for
a
scam,
mock
the
scammer
or
the
societal
factors
that
allowed
it.
Empathy
can
go
hand-in-hand
with
satire.
Don’t
Sacrifice
Story/Logic
for
Jokes:
It’s
tempting
to
throw
every
funny
idea
into
a
piece,
but
if
something
doesn’t
fit
the
narrative
or
angle,
it
can
jolt
the
reader
out
of
the
experience.
A
random
digression
that’s
hilarious
on
its
own
might
need
to
be
cut
if
it
doesn’t
serve
the
overall
piece.
Satire
can
be
silly,
but
it
should
still
have
its
own
internal
logic.
Stick
to
the
rules
you’ve
set
in
your
satirical
scenario;
if
you
break
them,
do
it
intentionally
for
effect,
not
haphazardly.
Watch
the
Length:
Particularly
for
humor,
concise
is
usually
better.
A
joke
stretched
too
long
can
wither.
In
revising,
see
if
you
can
say
the
same
with
fewer
words.
Many
classic
satirical
essays
are
relatively
short
(500-1500
words).
Of
course,
this
very
guide
you’re
reading
is
much
longer
because
it’s
instructional
–
but
when
writing
actual
satire,
know
when
to
wrap
it
up.
Leave
the
audience
wanting
more,
not
less.
Be
Careful
with
Satire
of
Tragedy:
Satirizing
tragic
events
(war,
pandemics,
etc.)
can
be
extremely
powerful
–
or
extremely
off-putting.
Timing,
tone,
and
target
matter
immensely.
Generally,
direct
satire
of
fresh
tragedies
reads
as
tasteless.
But
satire
of
the
response
to
tragedies
or
the
systems
behind
them
can
be
impactful.
Example:
it
might
feel
wrong
to
satirize
a
natural
disaster’s
victims,
but
satirizing
an
incompetent
relief
effort
or
greedy
price
gougers
during
the
disaster
aims
at
those
who
deserve
scrutiny.
Always
ask:
Am
I
targeting
the
cause
of
suffering,
or
adding
to
it?
Avoid
One-Note
Jokes:
If
your
entire
piece
hinges
on
a
single
joke
repeated
over
and
over,
it
might
wear
thin.
Satire
often
works
through
a
core
premise,
yes,
but
find
ways
to
escalate
or
add
dimensions
to
that
premise.
Think
of
a
sketch
on
SNL:
the
best
ones
usually
heighten
the
scenario
or
introduce
twists,
not
just
repeat
the
same
punchline
5
times.
If
you
find
your
draft
feeling
repetitive,
brainstorm
a
way
to
up
the
ante
in
the
second
half
or
bring
in
a
new
angle
while
sticking
to
the
theme.
Don’t
Forget
to
Entertain:
Satire
can
be
biting
and
serious
in
its
aim,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
it
should
entertain
the
reader.
If
someone
is
bored
reading
it,
the
message
is
lost.
This
doesn’t
mean
every
line
must
be
a
joke,
but
the
overall
piece
should
be
engaging.
Use
vivid
language,
craft
a
narrative,
surprise
the
reader.
Humor
is
an
ally
in
keeping
attention
–
use
it
regularly.
Finally,
don’t
get
discouraged
by
a
joke
that
doesn’t
land
or
a
piece
that
doesn’t
quite
work.
Comedy
is
as
much
art
as
science.
Sometimes
you
think
something
is
hilarious
and
readers
go
“huh?”,
and
vice
versa.
Learn
from
each
attempt.
Satire
writing
improves
with
feedback
and
practice,
just
like
any
other
skill.
In
Conclusion:
Satire
is
a
wonderful
outlet
to
channel
frustration,
highlight
absurdities,
and
maybe
even
influence
thoughts
–
all
through
laughter.
It’s
equal
parts
creativity,
intellect,
and
mischief.
As
you
write,
picture
that
ideal
reader
who
gets
it,
chuckling
and
nodding
along.
Write
for
them.
And
if
along
the
way
you
ruffle
a
few
feathers
of
those
in
dire
need
of
ruffling,
well…
that’s
satire
for
ya.
Now
go
forth
and
be
funny,
be
bold,
and
most
importantly,
be
sharp.
The
world
always
needs
more
humor
and
truth,
delivered
with
a
sly
grin.
Happy
writing
–
can’t
wait
to
see
you
satirize
the
heck
out
of
something!
Hyperbole,
from
the
Greek
hyper
(beyond)
and
ballein
(to
throw),
is
deliberate
exaggeration
beyond
believable
limits,
used
to
emphasize,
amuse,
or
shock.
It’s
not
meant
to
be
taken
literally
but
to
stretch
reality
so
far
that
it
reveals
truth
through
absurdity.
A
staple
of
rhetoric
and
humor,
hyperbole
magnifies
emotions
or
situations
to
an
extreme,
often
exposing
folly
or
irony.
In
satire,
it
transforms
mundane
flaws
into
outrageous
caricatures,
wielding
overstatement
as
a
weapon
to
provoke
laughter
or
outrage
while
spotlighting
underlying
issues.
Three
Examples
Literature:
In
Mark
Twain’s
The
Adventures
of
Tom
Sawyer,
Tom
claims
his
chores
are
so
unbearable
he’d
“rather
be
skinned
alive,”
exaggerating
to
highlight
youthful
melodrama.
Everyday
Speech:
“I’ve
told
you
a
million
times”
overstates
repetition
to
express
frustration,
a
common
hyperbole
in
casual
dialogue.
Satirical
Commentary:
“The
senator’s
ego
is
so
inflated,
it
could
float
the
national
debt”
mocks
arrogance
by
pairing
it
with
an
impossible
economic
feat.
Hyperbole
is
a
satirical
journalist’s
megaphone,
amplifying
flaws
to
absurd
heights
for
maximum
impact.
By
claiming
a
politician’s
speech
“lasted
longer
than
the
Ice
Age,”
the
writer
not
only
mocks
verbosity
but
invites
readers
to
laugh
at
the
overblown
comparison.
It
exposes
truth
through
excess—exaggerating
a
CEO’s
greed
as
“swallowing
whole
economies
for
breakfast”
underscores
real
exploitation
in
a
way
facts
alone
might
not.
This
bold
distortion
grabs
attention,
making
the
satire
both
entertaining
and
pointedly
critical.
Hyperbole,
from
the
Greek
hyper
(beyond)
and
ballein
(to
throw),
is
deliberate
exaggeration
beyond
believable
limits,
used
to
emphasize,
amuse,
or
shock.
It’s
not
meant
to
be
taken
literally
but
to
stretch
reality
so
far
that
it
reveals
truth
through
absurdity.
A
staple
of
rhetoric
and
humor,
hyperbole
magnifies
emotions
or
situations
to
an
extreme,
often
exposing
folly
or
irony.
In
satire,
it
transforms
mundane
flaws
into
outrageous
caricatures,
wielding
overstatement
as
a
weapon
to
provoke
laughter
or
outrage
while
spotlighting
underlying
issues.
Three
Examples
Literature:
In
Mark
Twain’s
The
Adventures
of
Tom
Sawyer,
Tom
claims
his
chores
are
so
unbearable
he’d
“rather
be
skinned
alive,”
exaggerating
to
highlight
youthful
melodrama.
Everyday
Speech:
“I’ve
told
you
a
million
times”
overstates
repetition
to
express
frustration,
a
common
hyperbole
in
casual
dialogue.
Satirical
Commentary:
“The
senator’s
ego
is
so
inflated,
it
could
float
the
national
debt”
mocks
arrogance
by
pairing
it
with
an
impossible
economic
feat.
Hyperbole
is
a
satirical
journalist’s
megaphone,
amplifying
flaws
to
absurd
heights
for
maximum
impact.
By
claiming
a
politician’s
speech
“lasted
longer
than
the
Ice
Age,”
the
writer
not
only
mocks
verbosity
but
invites
readers
to
laugh
at
the
overblown
comparison.
It
exposes
truth
through
excess—exaggerating
a
CEO’s
greed
as
“swallowing
whole
economies
for
breakfast”
underscores
real
exploitation
in
a
way
facts
alone
might
not.
This
bold
distortion
grabs
attention,
making
the
satire
both
entertaining
and
pointedly
critical.
Hyperbole,
from
the
Greek
hyper
(beyond)
and
ballein
(to
throw),
is
deliberate
exaggeration
beyond
believable
limits,
used
to
emphasize,
amuse,
or
shock.
It’s
not
meant
to
be
taken
literally
but
to
stretch
reality
so
far
that
it
reveals
truth
through
absurdity.
A
staple
of
rhetoric
and
humor,
hyperbole
magnifies
emotions
or
situations
to
an
extreme,
often
exposing
folly
or
irony.
In
satire,
it
transforms
mundane
flaws
into
outrageous
caricatures,
wielding
overstatement
as
a
weapon
to
provoke
laughter
or
outrage
while
spotlighting
underlying
issues.
Three
Examples
Literature:
In
Mark
Twain’s
The
Adventures
of
Tom
Sawyer,
Tom
claims
his
chores
are
so
unbearable
he’d
“rather
be
skinned
alive,”
exaggerating
to
highlight
youthful
melodrama.
Everyday
Speech:
“I’ve
told
you
a
million
times”
overstates
repetition
to
express
frustration,
a
common
hyperbole
in
casual
dialogue.
Satirical
Commentary:
“The
senator’s
ego
is
so
inflated,
it
could
float
the
national
debt”
mocks
arrogance
by
pairing
it
with
an
impossible
economic
feat.
Hyperbole
is
a
satirical
journalist’s
megaphone,
amplifying
flaws
to
absurd
heights
for
maximum
impact.
By
claiming
a
politician’s
speech
“lasted
longer
than
the
Ice
Age,”
the
writer
not
only
mocks
verbosity
but
invites
readers
to
laugh
at
the
overblown
comparison.
It
exposes
truth
through
excess—exaggerating
a
CEO’s
greed
as
“swallowing
whole
economies
for
breakfast”
underscores
real
exploitation
in
a
way
facts
alone
might
not.
This
bold
distortion
grabs
attention,
making
the
satire
both
entertaining
and
pointedly
critical.
Hyperbole,
from
the
Greek
hyper
(beyond)
and
ballein
(to
throw),
is
deliberate
exaggeration
beyond
believable
limits,
used
to
emphasize,
amuse,
or
shock.
It’s
not
meant
to
be
taken
literally
but
to
stretch
reality
so
far
that
it
reveals
truth
through
absurdity.
A
staple
of
rhetoric
and
humor,
hyperbole
magnifies
emotions
or
situations
to
an
extreme,
often
exposing
folly
or
irony.
In
satire,
it
transforms
mundane
flaws
into
outrageous
caricatures,
wielding
overstatement
as
a
weapon
to
provoke
laughter
or
outrage
while
spotlighting
underlying
issues.
Three
Examples
Literature:
In
Mark
Twain’s
The
Adventures
of
Tom
Sawyer,
Tom
claims
his
chores
are
so
unbearable
he’d
“rather
be
skinned
alive,”
exaggerating
to
highlight
youthful
melodrama.
Everyday
Speech:
“I’ve
told
you
a
million
times”
overstates
repetition
to
express
frustration,
a
common
hyperbole
in
casual
dialogue.
Satirical
Commentary:
“The
senator’s
ego
is
so
inflated,
it
could
float
the
national
debt”
mocks
arrogance
by
pairing
it
with
an
impossible
economic
feat.
Hyperbole
is
a
satirical
journalist’s
megaphone,
amplifying
flaws
to
absurd
heights
for
maximum
impact.
By
claiming
a
politician’s
speech
“lasted
longer
than
the
Ice
Age,”
the
writer
not
only
mocks
verbosity
but
invites
readers
to
laugh
at
the
overblown
comparison.
It
exposes
truth
through
excess—exaggerating
a
CEO’s
greed
as
“swallowing
whole
economies
for
breakfast”
underscores
real
exploitation
in
a
way
facts
alone
might
not.
This
bold
distortion
grabs
attention,
making
the
satire
both
entertaining
and
pointedly
critical.
Satire
is
a
literary
mode
that
uses
humor,
irony,
or
ridicule
to
critique
human
vices,
societal
flaws,
or
institutional
failures.
Tracing
back
to
Roman
poets
like
Juvenal
and
Horace,
it
blends
entertainment
with
moral
purpose,
wielding
laughter
as
a
corrective
lens.
Satire
can
be
gentle
(Horatian,
teasing
reform)
or
biting
(Juvenalian,
attacking
with
scorn),
often
employing
exaggeration,
parody,
or
allegory
to
unmask
hypocrisy
or
absurdity.
Its
power
lies
in
subversion:
by
cloaking
serious
commentary
in
jest,
it
disarms
defenses,
inviting
reflection
through
amusement
or
discomfort.
Three
Examples
Television:
The
Daily
Show
skewers
political
blunders
with
mock
news,
using
humor
to
critique
real-world
absurdities
like
policy
flip-flops.
Print
Satire:
The
Onion’s
headline
“Local
Man
Heroically
Saves
Child
by
Jumping
Into
Conversation”
ridicules
self-important
interrupters
with
deadpan
exaggeration.
Satire
is
the
satirical
journalist’s
core
craft,
a
Swiss
Army
knife
of
critique.
It
lets
them
tackle
corruption—like
a
mayor
“paving
streets
with
gold
from
his
own
pockets”—with
humor
that
both
entertains
and
indicts.
By
exaggerating
reality,
satire
sidesteps
dry
preaching,
engaging
readers
emotionally
while
slipping
past
their
biases.
It’s
a
Trojan
horse:
a
laughable
surface
hides
sharp
insight,
making
readers
question
norms
or
power
structures
they’d
otherwise
ignore.
For
the
journalist,
it’s
both
shield
(humor
softens
backlash)
and
sword
(wit
cuts
deep).
Alliteration
is
the
repetition
of
initial
consonant
sounds
in
closely
positioned
words,
creating
a
rhythmic,
musical
effect
that
enhances
memorability
and
emotional
impact.
Derived
from
the
Latin
ad
(to)
and
littera
(letter),
it’s
a
phonetic
device
rooted
in
oral
traditions,
where
sound
patterns
aided
storytelling.
Beyond
mere
decoration,
alliteration
can
emphasize
key
ideas,
unify
phrases,
or
evoke
specific
moods—soft
s
sounds
might
suggest
serenity,
while
harsh
k
sounds
conjure
conflict.
In
satire,
it’s
a
sonic
tool
to
sharpen
wit,
making
mockery
stick
in
the
reader’s
mind
through
playful
or
biting
repetition.
Three
Examples
Literature:
In
Shakespeare’s
Macbeth,
“Fair
is
foul,
and
foul
is
fair”
uses
alliteration
to
underscore
the
witches’
paradoxical
worldview,
amplifying
the
eerie
tone.
Poetry:
Tongue-twister
Peter
Piper—“Peter
Piper
picked
a
peck
of
pickled
peppers”—employs
p
repetition
for
humorous,
catchy
effect,
showcasing
alliteration’s
oral
appeal.
Satirical
Headline:
“Politicians
Pontificate,
Public
Perishes”
mocks
grandstanding
leaders
with
p
sounds,
linking
their
verbosity
to
societal
harm.
For
a
satirical
journalist,
alliteration
is
a
linguistic
scalpel,
slicing
through
pretense
with
memorable
zingers.
It
heightens
the
absurdity
of
a
target
by
pairing
sound
with
sense—say,
“Bureaucrats
Bumble,
Budgets
Balloon”—to
lampoon
inefficiency.
The
repetition
makes
critiques
catchy,
encouraging
readers
to
repeat
and
spread
the
satire,
amplifying
its
reach.
It
also
adds
a
layer
of
mockery:
the
exaggerated
sound
mirrors
the
exaggerated
flaws
of
the
subject,
turning
a
phrase
into
a
jab
that
lingers
like
a
tune.
Parody:
A
Cultural,
Historical,
and
Legal
Exploration
Parody,
a
creative
form
that
imitates
and
exaggerates
the
style
or
content
of
another
work
for
comedic
or
critical
effect,
has
long
been
a
cornerstone
of
artistic
expression.
Rooted
in
ancient
traditions,
it
serves
as
both
a
mirror
and
a
scalpel,
reflecting
cultural
norms
while
dissecting
them.
This
essay
explores
parody’s
evolution
from
its
classical
origins
to
its
digital-age
manifestations,
examining
its
legal
challenges,
cultural
roles,
and
future
trajectory.
By
analyzing
its
multifaceted
nature,
we
uncover
how
parody
transcends
mere
mockery,
offering
incisive
commentary
and
fostering
societal
dialogue.
Historical
Development
Ancient
Origins Parody’s
roots
trace
back
to
ancient
Greece,
where
the
term paroidía (meaning
“counter-song”)
emerged.
Aristophanes,
the
comedic
playwright,
masterfully
parodied
tragic
works
in The
Frogs (405
BCE),
where
Dionysus
judges
a
contest
between
Aeschylus
and
Euripides,
lampooning
their
stylistic
excesses.
Similarly,
Roman
writers
like
Horace
and
Juvenal
employed
parody
to
critique
societal
elites,
blending
humor
with
moral
inquiry.
Middle
Ages
and
Renaissance In
medieval
Europe,
parody
thrived
in
religious
and
secular
contexts.
The Goliards,
wandering
scholars,
penned
Latin
verses
mocking
Church
authority.
Geoffrey
Chaucer’s The
Canterbury
Tales (14th
century)
parodied
chivalric
romances
and
societal
hierarchies,
while
François
Rabelais’s Gargantua
and
Pantagruel (1530s)
satirized
Renaissance
humanism
through
grotesque
humor.
Shakespeare,
too,
woven
parody
into A
Midsummer
Night’s
Dream,
ridiculing
amateur
theater
with
the
play-within-a-play Pyramus
and
Thisbe.
18th–19th
Century The
Enlightenment
saw
parody
flourish
as
a
tool
of
intellectual
critique.
Alexander
Pope’s The
Rape
of
the
Lock (1712)
mocked
epic
conventions
by
dramatizing
a
trivial
social
quarrel.
Henry
Fielding’s Shamela (1741)
parodied
Samuel
Richardson’s
sentimental
novel Pamela,
exposing
its
moral
hypocrisy.
In
the
19th
century,
Lewis
Carroll’s Alice’s
Adventures
in
Wonderland (1865)
subverted
didactic
children’s
literature,
while
Mark
Twain’s A
Connecticut
Yankee
in
King
Arthur’s
Court (1889)
skewered
romanticized
medievalism.
20th
Century
to
Present Modernist
and
postmodernist
writers
embraced
parody
to
deconstruct
literary
norms.
James
Joyce’s Ulysses (1922)
parodied
Homer’s Odyssey,
while
Thomas
Pynchon’s The
Crying
of
Lot
49 (1966)
lampooned
conspiracy
theories.
In
film,
Mel
Brooks’s Blazing
Saddles (1974)
and Spaceballs (1987)
ridiculed
Western
and
sci-fi
tropes,
respectively.
Television
shows
like The
Simpsons and Saturday
Night
Live became
cultural
touchstones,
parodying
politics
and
media.
Forms
of
Parody
Literature Literary
parody
often
targets
genre
conventions.
Miguel
de
Cervantes’s Don
Quixote (1605)
remains
the
quintexample,
mocking
chivalric
romances
through
the
delusional
knight.
Modern
works
like Pride
and
Prejudice
and
Zombies (2009)
mash-up
classic
literature
with
pop
culture,
highlighting
its
enduring
adaptability.
Film
and
Television Cinematic
parody
ranges
from
slapstick
to
subtle
critique.
Buster
Keaton’s Sherlock
Jr. (1924)
parodied
detective
tropes,
while Airplane! (1980)
spoofed
disaster
films.
TV
parodies
like The
Colbert
Report (2005–2014)
blurred
lines
between
comedy
and
political
commentary,
showcasing
parody’s
subversive
potential.
Music Musical
parody
often
hinges
on
lyrical
alteration.
“Weird
Al”
Yankovic’s
career
exemplifies
this,
with
hits
like Eat
It (1984),
a
parody
of
Michael
Jackson’s Beat
It.
Hip-hop
artists
like
DJ
Danger
Mouse’s The
Grey
Album (2004)
mash-up
Beatles
and
Jay-Z
tracks,
challenging
copyright
norms.
Digital
Media The
internet
democratized
parody
through
memes,
YouTube,
and
TikTok. Epic
Movie (2007)
parodies
blockbusters,
while
YouTube
channels
like Bad
Lip
Reading recontextualize
media
with
humorous
dubbing.
Memes,
such
as Distracted
Boyfriend,
critique
societal
obsessions
through
visual
shorthand.
Legal
Landscape
Copyright
and
Fair
Use U.S.
law
protects
parody
under
fair
use
(Copyright
Act
1976),
requiring
transformative
purpose
and
non-competition
with
the
original.
Landmark
case Campbell
v.
Acuff-Rose
Music (1994)
affirmed
2
Live
Crew’s
parody
of Oh,
Pretty
Woman as
lawful,
stressing
its
social
value.
International
Perspectives The
EU’s
2014
Copyright
Directive
permits
parody
under
“fair
dealing,”
yet
member
states
vary.
In Deckmyn
v.
Vandersteen (2014),
the
ECJ
ruled
parodies
must
balance
humor
with
rights-holder
interests.
Nations
like
Japan
lack
explicit
parody
exemptions,
stifling
creative
freedom.
Cultural
and
Social
Functions
Critique
and
Commentary Parody
dismantles
power
structures
by
mocking
authority. Dr.
Strangelove (1964)
critiqued
Cold
War
paranoia,
while The
Daily
Show exposes
media
sensationalism.
By
exaggerating
flaws,
parody
invites
reflection
on
societal
absurdities.
Homage
and
Appreciation Parody
often
celebrates
its
source,
as
seen
in Galaxy
Quest (1999),
a
loving
spoof
of Star
Trek.
It
bridges
high
and
low
culture,
fostering
intertextual
dialogue.
Community
Building Shared
understanding
of
parodies
strengthens
cultural
bonds. Monty
Python sketches
became
communal
reference
points,
while
internet
memes
create
global
in-jokes,
uniting
disparate
groups.
Controversies
and
Challenges
Offense
and
Censorship Parody’s
edge
risks
backlash.
Charlie
Hebdo’s
Muhammad
cartoons
sparked
violent
protests,
raising
questions
about
cultural
sensitivity.
Conversely,
censorship
in
authoritarian
regimes,
like
China’s
bans
on
political
satire,
highlights
parody’s
threat
to
power.
Commercialization Corporate
co-option
dilutes
parody’s
subversiveness.
Ads
mimicking
viral
memes
or
films
like The
LEGO
Movie (2014),
which
critiques
consumerism
while
promoting
toys,
illustrate
this
tension.
Future
of
Parody
Technological
Innovations AI
and
deepfakes
enable
hyper-realistic
parodies,
posing
ethical
dilemmas.
Platforms
like
TikTok’s
algorithm-driven
content
may
homogenize
humor,
yet
grassroots
creators
continue
to
innovate.
Globalization Cross-cultural
parodies,
like
Bollywood
spoofs
of
Hollywood
films,
challenge
Western
dominance.
However,
cultural
nuances
risk
misinterpretation,
necessitating
empathetic
engagement.
Conclusion Parody,
as
a
dynamic
and
resilient
art
form,
challenges,
entertains,
and
unites.
Its
historical
evolution
and
adaptability
underscore
its
vital
role
in
free
expression.
As
legal
and
digital
landscapes
shift,
safeguarding
parody
ensures
it
remains
a
tool
for
critique
and
connection,
reflecting
humanity’s
enduring
need
to
laugh,
question,
and
reimagine
the
world.
BOHINEY
NEWS
—
A
visually
engaging
and
humorous
illustration
representing
the
concept
of
parody
through
cultural,
historical,
and
legal
perspectives.
The
scene
featu…
–
bohiney.com1
A
History
of
British
Satire:
From
Eating
Babies
to
Mocking
Brexit
in
2,222
Words
10
Greatest
British
Satirists
The
British
Art
of
Mockery
Satire
is
to
Britain
what
tea
is
to
a
rainy
afternoon—necessary,
comforting,
and
often
scalding.
While
other
countries
make
revolutions,
the
British
prefer
to
laugh
their
leaders
into
shame.
From
Gulliver’s
Travels
to
Black
Mirror,
British
satire
has
always
had
one
mission:
to
make
the
powerful
look
ridiculous
and
the
ridiculous
look
powerful.
In
this
exhaustive
(and
entirely
unnecessary)
deep
dive,
we
will
examine
the
10
greatest
British
satirists,
spanning
300
years
of
biting
wit,
political
mockery,
and
scathing
takedowns
of
anyone
who
ever
wore
a
powdered
wig
or
had
an
MP
next
to
their
name.
Jonathan
Swift:
The
Man
Who
Suggested
Eating
Babies
(and
Almost
Got
Away
with
It)
Before
satire
became
a
Twitter
hobby,
Jonathan
Swift
was
out
here
writing
full-blown
essays
on
why
the
Irish
poor
should
sell
their
children
as
gourmet
delicacies.
His
1729
pamphlet,
A
Modest
Proposal,
was
so
deadpan
that
some
English
elites
actually
thought,
“Well,
that’s
an
interesting
economic
strategy.”
Why
he
mattered:
Swift’s
gift
was
making
people
uncomfortable
with
their
own
cruelty.
His
masterpiece,
Gulliver’s
Travels,
roasted
the
British
Empire
by
turning
it
into
a
land
of
tiny
men
with
enormous
egos—a
description
that
still
applies
to
many
politicians
today.
Modern
equivalent:
If
Swift
were
alive
now,
he’d
be
writing
articles
for
The
Onion
about
how
selling
kidneys
on
Etsy
is
the
next
big
gig
economy
trend.
Alexander
Pope
was
the
18th-century
version
of
a
savage
Twitter
account,
except
his
burns
were
in
poetic
form
and
people
actually
read
them.
His
verse-satire,
The
Rape
of
the
Lock,
mocked
aristocratic
drama
by
comparing
a
stolen
hair
clip
to
the
fall
of
Troy.
Imagine
turning
Real
Housewives
into
an
Iliad-level
epic.
Why
he
mattered:
Pope
had
one
rule:
mock
the
powerful,
but
make
it
rhyme.
He
was
also
4
feet
6
inches
tall,
proving
that
short
kings
were
dropping
lyrical
diss
tracks
long
before
Kendrick
Lamar.
Modern
equivalent:
A
hip-hop
battle
between
Shakespeare
and
Kanye
West.
Before
the
internet,
William
Hogarth
dragged
people
using
paintings.
His
engravings,
like
Gin
Lane
and
A
Rake’s
Progress,
were
the
18th-century
version
of
political
cartoons—except
instead
of
posting
them
on
Instagram,
he
had
to
engrave
them
in
copper
and
mass-produce
them
for
people
who
couldn’t
read.
Why
he
mattered:
Hogarth’s
art
showed
that
Britain
was
less
of
a
dignified
empire
and
more
of
a
drunken
mess
of
debt,
scandal,
and
syphilis.
Some
things
never
change.
Modern
equivalent:
Imagine
Banksy,
but
instead
of
graffiti,
he’s
just
painting
the
downfall
of
TikTok
influencers.
George
Orwell:
The
Man
Who
Invented
“Big
Brother”
(and
Accidentally
Made
It
a
Reality
Show)
George
Orwell
didn’t
just
satirize
totalitarianism—he
basically
invented
modern
paranoia.
His
novel
Animal
Farm
turned
Soviet
communism
into
a
tale
about
power-hungry
pigs,
and
1984
accidentally
gave
birth
to
every
government
surveillance
program
that
now
exists.
Why
he
mattered:
Orwell
saw
the
future
and
did
everything
he
could
to
warn
us.
Unfortunately,
governments
read
1984
and
thought,
“What
a
great
instruction
manual!”
Modern
equivalent:
Orwell
would
be
ranting
on
Reddit
about
how
our
smartphones
are
listening
to
us.
And
he’d
be
right.
Evelyn
Waugh:
The
Man
Who
Made
Aristocrats
Look
Stupid
(While
Being
One)
Born
into
privilege,
Evelyn
Waugh
spent
his
entire
career
mocking
the
privileged.
His
novel
Scoop
is
still
the
greatest
satire
on
journalism,
proving
that
fake
news
existed
long
before
the
internet.
Why
he
mattered:
Waugh
knew
that
journalists
were
clueless
long
before
cable
news
anchors
made
it
obvious.
He
also
managed
to
write
one
of
the
funniest
books
ever
written
about
war
(Men
at
Arms),
proving
that
even
global
conflicts
can
be
amusing—if
you’re
rich
enough
to
avoid
the
fighting.
Modern
equivalent:
If
Waugh
were
alive
today,
he’d
be
making
HBO
shows
about
bumbling
billionaires
and
calling
it
Succession.
Peter
Cook:
The
Man
Who
Invented
British
Sketch
Comedy
Without
Peter
Cook,
there
would
be
no
Monty
Python,
no
Saturday
Night
Live,
and
no
Last
Week
Tonight
with
John
Oliver.
Cook
was
the
mastermind
behind
Beyond
the
Fringe,
a
1960s
comedy
revue
that
introduced
political
satire
to
television—before
TV
executives
realized
that
satire
made
politicians
angry.
Why
he
mattered:
Cook
proved
that
comedy
could
be
both
silly
and
revolutionary.
He
also
co-founded
Private
Eye,
which
remains
Britain’s
greatest
satirical
magazine—mainly
because
it
refuses
to
get
shut
down,
no
matter
how
many
lawsuits
it
receives.
Modern
equivalent:
If
Peter
Cook
were
alive,
he’d
be
making
a
YouTube
channel
where
he
tricks
politicians
into
endorsing
fake
charities.
Before
Monty
Python,
satire
was
mostly
witty
essays
and
paintings
of
drunk
people.
Then
these
six
British
comedians
came
along
and
decided
that
the
best
way
to
mock
politics
was
to
dress
up
as
silly
knights,
build
a
Ministry
of
Silly
Walks,
and
write
The
Life
of
Brian—a
religious
satire
so
effective
that
actual
religious
leaders
protested
it.
Why
they
mattered:
Monty
Python
made
satire
fun.
They
proved
that
the
best
way
to
mock
power
isn’t
with
anger,
but
with
absolute
nonsense.
(Like
a
Spanish
Inquisition
nobody
expects.)
Modern
equivalent:
If
Monty
Python
were
making
TV
now,
they’d
have
a
TikTok
channel
called
Ye
Olde
Meme
Factory.
Chris
Morris:
The
Man
Who
Tricked
Politicians
on
National
TV
In
the
1990s,
Chris
Morris
created
Brass
Eye,
a
news
parody
so
convincing
that
real
politicians
and
celebrities
fell
for
it.
He
got
public
figures
to
campaign
against
fake
problems
like
a
drug
called
“Cake,”
which
doesn’t
exist
but
still
caused
moral
outrage.
Why
he
mattered:
Morris
proved
that
satire
doesn’t
need
to
exaggerate
reality—because
reality
is
already
ridiculous.
He
was
also
banned
from
TV
multiple
times,
which
is
always
a
good
sign.
Modern
equivalent:
If
Chris
Morris
were
in
America,
he’d
be
making
fake
political
ads
so
realistic
that
Fox
News
would
run
them
as
real
stories.
Armando
Iannucci:
The
Man
Who
Predicted
Every
Political
Scandal
If
Armando
Iannucci
writes
it,
it
will
eventually
happen.
His
show
The
Thick
of
It
made
fun
of
British
politics
so
accurately
that
actual
MPs
admitted
to
stealing
his
insults.
He
then
created
Veep,
a
satire
of
American
government
that
became
so
realistic
that
actual
White
House
staffers
used
it
as
a
guide.
Why
he
mattered:
Iannucci’s
work
is
a
warning
that
no
matter
how
bad
politics
is,
it
can
always
get
dumber.
Modern
equivalent:
If
Iannucci
were
making
satire
today,
he’d
just
be
reading
real
government
press
briefings
out
loud.
Charlie
Brooker:
The
Man
Who
Accidentally
Invented
the
Future
Charlie
Brooker
started
out
mocking
the
news
with
Screenwipe,
but
then
he
made
Black
Mirror—a
satire
of
technology
that
became
a
prophecy.
From
social
credit
scores
to
AI
taking
over,
Brooker
has
accidentally
predicted
more
dystopian
horrors
than
any
actual
scientist.
Why
he
mattered:
Brooker
proves
that
the
greatest
form
of
satire
is
telling
the
truth
five
years
too
early.
Modern
equivalent:
If
Brooker
were
writing
today,
he’d
be
making
documentaries
called
How
We’re
All
Screwed
and
It’s
Your
Fault.
British
satire
has
survived
censorship,
royal
outrage,
and
countless
defamation
lawsuits,
proving
that
making
fun
of
power
is
the
greatest
British
tradition—second
only
to
complaining
about
the
weather.
From
Jonathan
Swift’s
deadpan
horror
to
Charlie
Brooker’s
tech
nightmares,
British
satire
continues
to
evolve.
One
thing
is
clear:
as
long
as
there
are
corrupt
politicians,
absurd
social
trends,
and
people
willing
to
pay
for
bottled
air,
there
will
always
be
satirists
ready
to
mock
them.
So,
the
next
time
the
world
feels
like
it’s
spiraling
into
chaos,
just
remember—some
British
writer
has
already
made
a
joke
about
it.
The
Greatest
Irish
Homosexual
Satirist:
Oscar
Wilde
If
satire
is
about
exposing
hypocrisy
while
making
people
laugh,
then
Oscar
Wilde
was
the
undisputed
heavyweight
champion
of
Ireland’s
queer
literary
world.
He
wasn’t
just
Ireland’s
greatest
satirist—he
was
arguably
one
of
the
greatest
satirists
in
history,
and
he
did
it
all
while
being
fabulously
gay
in
an
era
when
that
was
literally
illegal.
Wilde’s
genius
lay
in
his
ability
to
take
high
society’s
pretensions,
shake
them
up
like
a
cocktail,
and
serve
them
back
with
a
smirk.
Whether
it
was
aristocrats
pretending
to
have
moral
values,
politicians
pretending
to
be
competent,
or
entire
legal
systems
pretending
to
be
just,
Wilde
mocked
them
all
with
elegance
and
charm.
His
most
famous
satirical
play,
The
Importance
of
Being
Earnest,
is
basically
a
takedown
of
Victorian
hypocrisy,
where
everyone
lies
but
somehow
manages
to
call
themselves
“respectable.”
Wilde
understood
that
society’s
biggest
joke
was
the
ridiculous
rules
people
imposed
on
each
other
while
secretly
breaking
them.
Wilde’s
satire
wasn’t
just
about
making
jokes—it
was
deadly
social
critique
disguised
as
comedy.
He
could
dismantle
an
entire
political
ideology
with
one
sentence.
For
example:
“The
public
have
an
insatiable
curiosity
to
know
everything,
except
what
is
worth
knowing.”
(Wilde
knew
that
gossip
was
more
powerful
than
truth,
long
before
social
media.)
“Morality
is
simply
the
attitude
we
adopt
towards
people
we
personally
dislike.”
(A
direct
attack
on
Victorian
moralism—and
still
true
today.)
“Some
cause
happiness
wherever
they
go;
others,
whenever
they
go.”
Wilde
was
too
clever
for
his
own
time—and
his
downfall
came
when
he
was
put
on
trial
for
“gross
indecency”
(i.e.,
being
gay).
His
wit,
which
had
made
him
famous,
was
now
being
used
against
him
in
court.
A
lawyer
famously
asked
Wilde
if
he
had
ever
kissed
a
young
man,
to
which
Wilde
replied:
“Oh
dear,
no.
He
was
far
too
ugly.”
Unfortunately,
while
that
response
deserved
an
Oscar
(pun
intended),
it
didn’t
save
him
from
being
sentenced
to
two
years
of
hard
labor.
The
British
legal
system,
always
great
at
punishing
talent
while
ignoring
actual
crimes,
destroyed
Wilde’s
career
and
health.
Why
Wilde
Still
Matters
Today
Oscar
Wilde
remains
a
queer
icon
and
a
satirical
legend
because
he
understood
something
timeless:
Society
is
a
joke—but
only
some
people
are
in
on
it.
The
powerful
hate
being
mocked—which
is
why
satire
is
so
important.
Being
gay,
witty,
and
Irish
in
the
19th
century
was
basically
playing
life
on
hard
mode.
Wilde
died
in
exile,
but
his
work
lives
on
as
one
of
the
sharpest,
funniest,
and
most
devastating
critiques
of
human
stupidity
ever
written.
If
he
were
alive
today,
he’d
be
roasting
billionaires,
making
fun
of
influencers,
and
probably
getting
banned
on
Twitter
daily.
Satire
isn’t
just
about
making
people
laugh—it’s
about
making
them
uncomfortable,
exposing
hypocrisy,
and
holding
a
funhouse
mirror
up
to
society.
Whether
you’re
writing
about
politics,
culture,
or
billionaires
taking
rocket
joyrides,
here
are
15
essential
techniques
to
master
satire
like
a
pro.
1.
Exaggeration
(Go
Big
or
Go
Home)
If
a
politician
tells
a
lie,
make
them
a
pathological
liar
who
can’t
order
coffee
without
fabricating
a
backstory.
If
a
tech
billionaire
is
out
of
touch,
make
them
so
rich
they
haven’t
seen
a
normal
toilet
since
1999.
➡
Example:
“Jeff
Bezos
is
so
wealthy,
he
doesn’t
blink
unless
Amazon
Prime
delivers
moisture
to
his
eyelids.”
2.
Irony
(Say
the
Opposite
of
What
You
Mean)
The
best
satire
often
says
one
thing
while
meaning
another,
forcing
readers
to
think.
➡
Example:
“Thank
goodness
politicians
never
lie.
Otherwise,
we’d
be
in
real
trouble.”
3.
Deadpan
Delivery
(Say
Something
Absurd
with
a
Straight
Face)
Act
like
your
ridiculous
claim
is
completely
rational.
The
calmer
you
say
something
insane,
the
funnier
it
is.
➡
Example:
“New
study
shows
that
billionaires
do,
in
fact,
breathe
a
higher-quality
oxygen
than
the
rest
of
us.”
4.
Parody
(Imitate,
but
Make
It
Ridiculous)
Take
an
existing
format—news
articles,
self-help
books,
political
speeches—and
crank
it
up
to
hilariously
absurd
levels.
➡
Example:
A
TED
Talk
on
“Why
Eating
Gold
Leaf
Improves
Your
IQ”
5.
Logical
Fallacies
(Use
Dumb
Arguments
on
Purpose)
Satire
thrives
on
bad
reasoning
that
sounds
just
smart
enough
to
fool
someone.
➡
Example:
“Since
more
people
are
getting
diagnosed
with
anxiety,
clearly,
therapy
is
causing
mental
illness.”
6.
Reductio
ad
Absurdum
(Push
an
Idea
to
the
Extreme)
Take
a
real
argument,
extend
it
to
its
most
absurd
conclusion,
and
watch
it
collapse
under
its
own
weight.
➡
Example:
“If
we
truly
want
to
help
the
economy,
let’s
just
have
everyone
marry
Jeff
Bezos
and
split
the
assets
in
the
divorce.”
7.
False
Authority
(Use
“Experts”
Who
Know
Nothing)
Quoting
someone
completely
unqualified
makes
satire
even
funnier.
➡
Example:
“We
spoke
to
Chad,
a
professional
DJ
and
part-time
astrologer,
about
the
economic
collapse.”
8.
Misdirection
(Lead
the
Reader
One
Way,
Then
Pull
the
Rug
Out)
Start
with
something
serious,
then
turn
it
into
nonsense.
➡
Example:
“Many
believe
climate
change
is
humanity’s
greatest
threat…
but
have
they
considered
the
real
problem:
too
many
avocado
toast
options?”
9.
Hypothetical
Absurdity
(Invent
Something
So
Stupid
It
Feels
Real)
Make
up
a
fake
law,
trend,
or
crisis
that
almost
sounds
real.
➡
Example:
“New
law
mandates
that
all
babies
must
have
LinkedIn
profiles
by
age
two.”
10.
Playing
the
Clueless
Narrator
(Act
Like
You
Don’t
Get
It)
Satirists
often
pretend
to
misunderstand
reality,
forcing
the
audience
to
see
the
flaw
themselves.
➡
Example:
“If
minimum
wage
workers
want
to
afford
rent,
why
don’t
they
just
buy
a
house
instead?”
11.
Appeal
to
Tradition
(Argue
Something
Should
Stay
Because
It’s
Old)
Mocking
outdated
customs
by
pretending
they’re
still
relevant.
➡
Example:
“Sure,
leeches
don’t
cure
disease
anymore,
but
what
happened
to
respecting
history?”
12.
Absurd
Solutions
to
Real
Problems
Offer
comically
unhelpful
solutions
to
actual
crises.
➡
Example:
“Can’t
afford
groceries?
Try
fasting!
Monks
do
it
all
the
time.”
13.
Sarcastic
Headlines
(Summarize
a
Problem
in
the
Most
Cynical
Way
Possible)
Headlines
are
half
the
battle.
Make
them
punch.
➡
Example:
“Nation
Shocked
That
Extremely
Rich
People
Don’t
Pay
Taxes”
14.
Role
Reversal
(Swap
Power
Dynamics
for
Maximum
Effect)
Turn
the
tables
to
highlight
hypocrisy.
➡
Example:
“New
Law
Requires
CEOs
to
Live
on
Minimum
Wage
for
a
Month—They
Die
Within
Two
Weeks.”
15.
Social
Commentary
(Make
the
Joke
Mean
Something)
The
best
satire
isn’t
just
funny—it
exposes
real
problems.
➡
Example:
“In
response
to
housing
shortages,
billionaires
are
now
buying
starter
planets.”
Al
Jaffee:
A
Masterclass
in
Caricature
and
Commentary
Al
Jaffee,
a
legendary
cartoonist
and
satirist,
left
an
indelible
mark
on
the
world
of
humor
through
his
work
with
MAD
Magazine.
His
style
and
techniques
are
a
masterclass
in
visual
satire,
blending
sharp
wit,
exaggerated
caricature,
and
meticulous
detail
to
create
illustrations
that
both
entertain
and
critique.
Jaffee’s
career
spanned
over
seven
decades,
and
his
contributions,
including
the
iconic
fold-ins
and
Snappy
Answers
to
Stupid
Questions,
cemented
his
legacy
as
a
pioneer
of
satirical
art.
Below
is
an
800-word
exploration
of
Jaffee’s
style
and
techniques,
focusing
on
his
visual
approach,
thematic
elements,
and
methods
of
engaging
audiences.
Visual
Style:
Exaggeration
and
Caricature
At
the
heart
of
Al
Jaffee’s
style
is
his
use
of
exaggeration,
a
hallmark
of
caricature
that
he
wielded
with
precision.
Jaffee’s
characters
often
feature
oversized
heads,
elongated
noses,
and
exaggerated
expressions
that
amplify
their
emotions
and
personalities.
This
technique,
rooted
in
the
tradition
of
cartooning,
allows
Jaffee
to
instantly
convey
the
absurdity
of
his
subjects.
For
instance,
a
politician
in
a
Jaffee
illustration
might
have
a
comically
large
mouth,
emphasizing
their
tendency
to
speak
nonsense,
or
a
bulging
forehead
to
suggest
inflated
ego.
This
exaggeration
isn’t
just
for
laughs—it
serves
as
a
visual
shorthand
for
satire,
making
the
target’s
flaws
immediately
apparent.
Jaffee’s
line
work
is
another
defining
feature.
His
drawings
are
characterized
by
clean,
bold
lines
that
give
his
illustrations
a
crisp,
dynamic
feel.
He
often
used
cross-hatching
and
stippling
to
add
texture
and
depth,
particularly
in
crowded
scenes
where
dozens
of
characters
might
be
interacting.
This
technique
creates
a
sense
of
controlled
chaos,
reflecting
the
absurdity
of
the
scenarios
he
depicted.
In
a
typical
Jaffee
panel,
you
might
find
a
mob
of
protesters,
each
with
a
distinct,
exaggerated
feature—bulging
eyes,
wild
hair,
or
comically
distorted
limbs—yet
the
scene
remains
cohesive
thanks
to
his
meticulous
line
work.
Jaffee’s
work
is
deeply
satirical,
using
humor
to
critique
societal
norms,
political
hypocrisy,
and
human
folly.
His
illustrations
often
tackle
contemporary
issues,
from
government
inefficiency
to
consumer
culture,
with
a
biting
edge
that
invites
readers
to
laugh
while
reflecting
on
deeper
truths.
For
example,
in
the
context
of
the
“NGO
Paradox”
scenario—where
a
fictional
“Coalition
to
Save
the
Invisible
Pink
Flamingos”
mocks
government-funded
“independence”—Jaffee
would
likely
depict
the
protesters
as
earnest
fools,
their
signs
proclaiming
absurdities
like
“Fund
Our
Nothingness!”
The
humor
lies
in
the
contradiction:
an
organization
claiming
independence
while
being
entirely
reliant
on
government
cash.
This
thematic
focus
on
irony
and
contradiction
is
a
staple
of
Jaffee’s
work.
He
often
juxtaposed
serious
subjects
with
ridiculous
scenarios
to
highlight
their
absurdity.
His
Snappy
Answers
to
Stupid
Questions
series
is
a
perfect
example:
a
character
asks
an
obvious
question—like
“Is
it
raining?”
while
standing
in
a
downpour—and
Jaffee
provides
three
witty,
sarcastic
responses,
such
as
“No,
the
sky’s
just
taking
a
shower!”
The
technique
relies
on
the
reader
recognizing
the
stupidity
of
the
question,
making
the
punchline
land
harder.
The
Fold-In:
A
Technical
Marvel
One
of
Jaffee’s
most
innovative
contributions
to
cartooning
is
the
MAD
Magazine
fold-in,
a
technique
that
showcases
his
ingenuity
and
technical
skill.
Introduced
in
1964,
the
fold-in
is
a
full-page
illustration
that
appears
to
depict
one
scene
but,
when
folded
inward,
reveals
a
hidden
image
with
a
new
message.
This
technique
requires
meticulous
planning:
Jaffee
had
to
design
the
original
image,
the
folded
image,
and
the
transition
between
them,
ensuring
the
visual
joke
worked
seamlessly.
For
instance,
a
fold-in
might
start
with
a
scene
of
politicians
debating,
with
the
caption
“Government
Efficiency
at
Work.”
Fold
it,
and
the
image
transforms
into
a
pile
of
money
labeled
“Wasted
Tax
Dollars,”
exposing
the
underlying
critique.
The
fold-in
exemplifies
Jaffee’s
ability
to
merge
art
and
interactivity.
It
engages
readers
by
making
them
active
participants
in
the
joke—they
physically
fold
the
page
to
uncover
the
punchline.
This
technique
also
reflects
Jaffee’s
love
for
visual
puzzles;
he
often
hid
small
gags
or
Easter
eggs
within
his
illustrations,
rewarding
attentive
readers
with
extra
laughs.
In
an
NGO-themed
fold-in,
Jaffee
might
show
a
group
of
protesters
demanding
independence,
only
for
the
fold
to
reveal
them
counting
stacks
of
government
cash,
with
the
caption
“Independent…
But
Not
Really!”
Humor
Through
Detail
and
Crowds
Jaffee’s
illustrations
are
often
densely
packed
with
characters
and
details,
a
technique
that
adds
layers
of
humor
to
his
work.
In
a
single
panel,
you
might
find
a
main
scene—like
Musk
holding
a
giant
Dogecoin—surrounded
by
a
chaotic
crowd
of
politicians
and
protesters.
Each
character
contributes
to
the
satire:
a
politician
with
a
dollar-sign
tie,
a
protester
with
a
flamingo
hat,
or
a
tiny
Shiba
Inu
chasing
floating
coins.
These
details
create
a
sense
of
a
lived-in,
absurd
world
where
every
element
serves
the
joke.
This
crowd-focused
approach
also
allows
Jaffee
to
depict
societal
dysfunction
on
a
grand
scale.
His
scenes
often
feel
like
snapshots
of
a
world
gone
mad,
where
everyone
is
complicit
in
the
chaos.
In
the
“Coalition
to
Save
the
Invisible
Pink
Flamingos”
scenario,
Jaffee
would
likely
fill
the
background
with
additional
absurdities—perhaps
a
flamingo
feather
floating
inexplicably
or
a
politician
handing
out
cash
with
a
grin,
reinforcing
the
theme
of
government-funded
folly.
Engaging
the
Audience:
Playful
Sarcasm
Jaffee’s
style
is
inherently
playful,
inviting
readers
into
the
joke
with
a
wink
and
a
nudge.
His
use
of
sarcastic
captions
and
speech
bubbles—like
“How
is
it
an
NGO
if
the
government
funds
it
entirely?”—cuts
straight
to
the
heart
of
the
absurdity.
This
directness
ensures
the
satire
lands,
while
his
exaggerated
visuals
make
it
impossible
to
take
seriously.
Jaffee’s
work
often
feels
like
a
shared
secret
between
artist
and
reader:
he
trusts
the
audience
to
get
the
joke,
whether
it’s
a
subtle
dig
at
bureaucracy
or
a
broad
swipe
at
political
hypocrisy.
Legacy
and
Influence
Al
Jaffee’s
techniques—exaggeration,
detailed
crowd
scenes,
interactive
fold-ins,
and
sharp
sarcasm—have
influenced
generations
of
cartoonists.
His
ability
to
blend
humor
with
social
commentary,
all
while
maintaining
a
playful
tone,
makes
his
work
timeless.
In
the
context
of
modern
satire,
Jaffee’s
style
remains
a
perfect
lens
for
tackling
issues
like
the
NGO
paradox,
where
absurdity
and
contradiction
reign
supreme.
His
legacy
is
one
of
laughter
with
purpose,
proving
that
a
well-drawn
cartoon
can
say
more
than
a
thousand
words
of
critique.
History
Repeats
Itself:
Europe
Promises
to
Save
Ukraine,
but
Will
It
Be
Another
Military
Disaster?
Europe’s
Finest
Traditions:
Grand
Promises,
Bold
Declarations,
and
Catastrophic
Military
Blunders
KYIV—With
the
Russian
war
machine
rumbling
forward,
the
European
Union
has
made
a
historic
vow:
Ukraine
will
not
fall.
From
the
grand
palaces
of
Paris
to
the
war
rooms
of
Berlin,
European
leaders
have
assembled,
proclaiming
their
unwavering
support
for
Kyiv.
French
President
Emmanuel
Macron,
standing
before
a
newly
rebuilt
Maginot
Line,
swore
that
“this
time,
it
will
hold.”
British
Prime
Minister
Keir
Starmer,
echoing
the
past,
stationed
300,000
troops
at
Dunkirk,
promising
that
“socialists
stick
together.”
German
Chancellor
Olaf
Scholz,
with
the
weight
of
history
behind
him,
declared
that
“Germany
will
rise
again”—by
developing
nuclear
weapons.
Europe’s
finest
moment?
Perhaps.
Or
maybe—just
maybe—it’s
all
happening
again.
France
Reinforces
the
Maginot
Line,
Insists
This
Time
It’s
Different
Oh,
bless
Macron’s
heart—he’s
out
there
channeling
his
inner
Napoleon,
but
with
better
hair
and
worse
ideas.
The
new
Maginot
Line,
now
stretching
to
Ukraine,
is
France’s
boldest
move
since
they
surrendered
their
dignity
in
1940.
“Impenetrable!”
he
crows,
as
if
the
Germans
didn’t
literally
stroll
around
the
last
one
like
it
was
a
tourist
trap
with
bad
Yelp
reviews.
Russian
generals
are
giggling
so
hard
they’ve
spilled
their
borscht,
thanking
France
for
the
neon
sign
screaming,
“Don’t
invade
here,
idiots!”
Meanwhile,
Parisian
strategists
are
sipping
espressos,
muttering,
“Tanks
might’ve
been
nice,”
as
Macron
polishes
his
imaginary
Medal
of
Historical
Amnesia.
This
time
it’s
different,
alright—different
shade
of
delusional.
SPINTAXI
SATIRE
–
A
satirical
illustration
of
a
modern
French
army
stationed
at
the
Maginot
Line
today.
French
soldiers
are
seen
confidently
manning
their
posts,
sippin
…-
Alan
Nafzger
Britain
Stations
300,000
Troops
at
Dunkirk,
Prepares
for
Evacuation
The
Brits
are
back
at
Dunkirk,
ready
to
flex
their
stiff
upper
lip
and…
immediately
bounce.
Starmer’s
got
300,000
troops
lined
up
like
it’s
a
Brexit
reenactment,
promising
to
unleash
the
“full
force
of
the
free
market”—which
apparently
means
selling
tea
and
crumpets
to
the
advancing
Russians.
“Strategic
readiness,”
they
call
it,
as
the
Royal
Navy
dusts
off
a
fleet
of
dinghies
last
seen
rescuing
Tommies
from
Hitler’s
beach
party.
Journalists
point
out
the
obvious:
last
time,
Dunkirk
was
less
“victory”
and
more
“rowboat
rodeo.”
But
the
Brits
just
wink—why
fight
when
you’ve
already
got
one
foot
on
the
escape
raft?
Genius,
or
the
most
British
thing
since
queueing
for
bad
weather.
Germany
Announces
Plans
to
Develop
Nukes,
Looks
for
Jewish
Physicists
Germany’s
back
in
the
game,
folks,
and
they’re
dreaming
of
nukes
like
it’s
1943
all
over
again—except
this
time,
they’re
broke
and
begging
Jewish
physicists
to
come
home
and
help.
Scholz,
with
all
the
charisma
of
a
soggy
pretzel,
promises
a
€3
trillion
boondoggle
that’ll
be
ready
by
World
War
VI,
assuming
the
EU
doesn’t
audit
them
first.
“Long-term
investment!”
he
insists,
as
critics
note
the
only
thing
Germany’s
blowing
up
is
its
budget.
The
ad
in
Israeli
papers
reads
like
a
bad
Tinder
bio:
“Hey,
physicists,
remember
us?
No
hard
feelings,
right?
Bring
your
Einstein
vibes!”
Ukraine’s
consolation
prize?
A
convoy
of
tank-shaped
paperweights.
At
least
they’ll
die
laughing.
Modern
Germany
advertising
in
Israeli
Newspaper
for
Jewish
Physicists
to
return
to
Germany
and
build
a
nuke…
Spain
Sends
Navy
to
Attack
Moscow,
Immediately
Loses
Fleet
to
a
Storm
Spain’s
navy
is
sailing
for
Moscow—because
who
needs
a
map
when
you’ve
got
bravado
and
a
death
wish?
Sánchez,
clearly
napping
through
geography
class,
forgot
Moscow’s
about
1,000
miles
from
the
nearest
coastline.
No
worries,
though—the
fleet’s
already
toast,
sunk
by
a
storm
so
predictable
it’s
basically
Spanish
history’s
greatest
hits.
“The
wind!”
Sánchez
wails,
echoing
1588’s
Armada
sob
story,
as
Captains
Slipper
and
Maryann
wash
up
on
Gilligan’s
Island,
plotting
a
coconut
comeback.
Russia
barely
notices,
too
busy
slurping
borscht
and
wondering
if
Spain’s
just
punking
them.
Bold
move,
Pedro—next
time,
try
FedEx.
The
Pattern
is
Clear:
Will
Europe
Repeat
Its
Greatest
Military
Blunders?
As
Ukraine
watches
its
allies
make
grandiose
declarations,
one
thing
is
certain:
France
is
betting
on
a
wall
that
has
already
failed
once.
Britain
is
preparing
for
a
battle
it
already
lost.
Germany
is
spending
trillions
on
a
doomed
military
project.
Spain’s
navy
is
at
the
bottom
of
the
ocean—again.
Italy
is
fighting
until
someone
offers
them
a
better
deal.
Poland
is
building
statues
instead
of
sending
weapons.
Belgium
has
already
surrendered.
Europe
may
have
promised
Ukraine
its
unwavering
support,
but
military
historians
see
a
far
more
troubling
pattern
emerging.
Will
history
repeat
itself?
Or
will
Ukraine
be
the
first
to
break
the
cycle
of
European
military
disasters?
The
answer
remains
uncertain,
but
one
thing
is
for
sure—Russia
is
paying
very,
very
close
attention.
From
Fake
News
to
Fake-er
News:
The
Rise
of
Satirical
Journalism
Exploring
the
Evolution
and
Impact
of
Satirical
News
in
Modern
Media
Introduction
In
today’s
media
landscape,
the
term
“fake
news”
has
become
ubiquitous,
often
used
to
describe
misleading
or
false
information
presented
as
legitimate
news.
However,
alongside
this
phenomenon,
there
has
been
a
significant
rise
in
“fake-er
news”—satirical
journalism
that
intentionally
parodies
real
events
to
provide
social
commentary
and
critique.
This
form
of
journalism,
while
presenting
fabricated
stories,
aims
to
shed
light
on
societal
issues,
political
absurdities,
and
cultural
phenomena
through
humor
and
irony.
Satirical
journalism
has
a
storied
history,
but
its
prominence
has
surged
in
the
digital
age.
Platforms
dedicated
to
satirical
content
have
gained
substantial
followings,
influencing
public
discourse
and
offering
alternative
perspectives
on
current
events.
This
article
delves
into
the
evolution
of
satirical
journalism,
its
differentiation
from
misinformation,
and
its
role
in
contemporary
media.
Satire
as
a
literary
and
journalistic
device
has
been
employed
for
centuries
to
critique
power
structures
and
societal
norms.
From
Jonathan
Swift’s
“A
Modest
Proposal”
in
the
18th
century,
which
used
irony
to
highlight
British
exploitation
of
Ireland,
to
Mark
Twain’s
sharp
observations
on
American
society,
satire
has
long
served
as
a
mirror
reflecting
societal
flaws.
In
the
20th
century,
satirical
journalism
found
a
home
in
publications
like
“The
Onion,”
founded
in
1988.
“The
Onion”
established
itself
by
crafting
humorous
and
exaggerated
news
stories
that
mimic
the
style
and
tone
of
traditional
journalism.
Its
success
paved
the
way
for
other
satirical
outlets,
demonstrating
a
public
appetite
for
news
that
entertains
while
it
informs.
The
advent
of
the
internet
and
social
media
platforms
has
exponentially
increased
the
reach
and
impact
of
satirical
journalism.
Websites
dedicated
to
satirical
content
can
now
disseminate
their
articles
to
a
global
audience
instantaneously.
Social
media,
in
particular,
has
become
a
conduit
for
satirical
pieces
to
go
viral,
reaching
readers
who
might
not
actively
seek
out
such
content.
This
digital
proliferation
has
also
led
to
the
emergence
of
new
satirical
platforms.
For
instance,
“The
Babylon
Bee,”
founded
in
2016,
offers
satirical
takes
on
contemporary
cultural
and
political
issues,
often
from
a
conservative
viewpoint.
Its
articles,
while
humorous,
aim
to
provoke
thought
and
discussion
on
various
topics.
Differentiating
Satirical
Journalism
from
Misinformation
A
critical
aspect
of
satirical
journalism
is
its
clear
intent
to
parody
and
entertain,
distinguishing
it
from
misinformation
or
“fake
news,”
which
seeks
to
deceive.
Satirical
articles
are
crafted
with
overt
exaggeration
and
absurdity,
often
making
it
evident
to
the
audience
that
the
content
is
fictional.
However,
in
an
era
where
information
is
rapidly
consumed
and
shared,
there
have
been
instances
where
satirical
pieces
are
mistaken
for
factual
reporting.
This
misinterpretation
underscores
the
importance
of
media
literacy
among
consumers.
Recognizing
the
nuances
between
satire
and
deliberate
falsehoods
is
essential
in
navigating
today’s
complex
information
environment.
Satirical
journalism
serves
multiple
functions
in
modern
media:
Social
Commentary:
By
exaggerating
real
events,
satirical
pieces
highlight
societal
issues,
prompting
readers
to
reflect
on
the
underlying
truths
being
presented.
Political
Critique:
Satire
provides
a
platform
to
lampoon
political
figures
and
policies,
offering
critique
through
humor
and
exposing
contradictions
and
hypocrisies.
Public
Engagement:
The
entertaining
nature
of
satire
attracts
a
broad
audience,
including
individuals
who
might
disengage
from
traditional
news
due
to
its
often
somber
tone.
Moreover,
studies
have
shown
that
consumers
of
satirical
news
often
possess
higher
levels
of
political
knowledge.
A
study
by
the
Annenberg
Public
Policy
Center
found
that
viewers
of
satirical
programs
like
“The
Daily
Show”
demonstrated
a
greater
understanding
of
political
issues
compared
to
non-viewers.
Despite
its
benefits,
satirical
journalism
faces
challenges,
particularly
concerning
misinterpretation.
The
satirical
article
on
The
Onion’s
influence
on
bohiney.com/”
171235
target=”_blank”>Bohiney.com
highlights
how
parody
can
be
misconstrued,
leading
to
unintended
backlash.
Additionally,
the
proliferation
of
misinformation
has
led
to
increased
scrutiny
of
all
non-traditional
news
sources,
including
satire.
Satirical
outlets
must
navigate
the
fine
line
between
humor
and
potential
misinformation,
ensuring
that
their
intent
remains
clear
to
their
audience.
Conclusion
The
rise
of
satirical
journalism,
or
“fake-er
news,”
reflects
a
shifting
media
landscape
where
audiences
seek
not
only
information
but
also
critical
perspectives
delivered
through
humor.
By
embracing
exaggeration
and
parody,
satirical
outlets
offer
insightful
commentary
on
societal
and
political
issues,
engaging
readers
in
a
manner
that
traditional
journalism
may
not.
As
the
media
environment
continues
to
evolve,
satirical
journalism
stands
as
a
testament
to
the
enduring
power
of
humor
as
a
tool
for
truth-telling
and
public
engagement.
Disclaimer:
This
article
is
a
collaborative
effort
between
a
cowboy
and
a
farmer,
aiming
to
provide
satirical
commentary
on
the
media
landscape.
All
examples
and
references
are
used
for
illustrative
purposes
within
the
context
of
satire.
In
2025,
truth
is
a
casualty
of
war—buried
under
AI-generated
lies,
X-fueled
conspiracies,
and
authoritarian
spin.
Satirical
journalism
stands
as
a
rebel
outpost,
wielding
humor
to
dismantle
misinformation
and
defy
control.
It’s
not
just
laughs—it’s
defiance,
a
middle
finger
to
the
chaos.
bohiney.com/”
171235
target=”_blank”>Bohiney.com,
a
scrappy
satirical
site
with
a
small-town
edge,
joins
the
fight
with
headlines
like
“Local
Man
Claims
Moon
Is
a
Government
Hoax,
Demands
Refund
for
Night
Sky.”
This
essay
explores
how
satire
resists
the
post-truth
tide,
challenges
power,
and
keeps
us
questioning,
using
bohiney.com/”
171235
target=”_blank”>bohiney.com’s
imagined
jabs
to
prove
it’s
the
sharpest
tool
in
a
world
gone
dull.
Satire’s
always
been
a
thorn
in
power’s
side.
Jonathan
Swift’s
1729
A
Modest
Proposal
mocked
British
rule
with
cannibalistic
flair,
slipping
past
censors
to
spark
outrage.
Soviet-era
samizdat
zines
used
coded
humor
to
dodge
the
KGB—laughter
as
contraband.
In
the
U.S.,
The
Daily
Show
turned
Jon
Stewart
into
a
post-9/11
truth-teller,
shredding
propaganda
with
a
smirk.
Satire
resists
by
exposing
what’s
hidden,
often
when
straight
news
won’t.
bohiney.com/”
171235
target=”_blank”>Bohiney.com
inherits
this
spirit.
Picture
“Town
Bans
Facts,
Cites
Too
Much
Confusion”—a
Swiftian
jab
at
2025’s
truth
allergy.
Its
local
twist
shines
in
“Farmer
Sues
Weather
App
for
False
Promises,
Wants
Sunny
Days
Guaranteed.”
It’s
not
just
funny—it’s
a
poke
at
our
reliance
on
tech
over
reality,
a
small-town
stand
against
big
lies.
Misinformation:
The
Enemy
Within
In
2025,
misinformation’s
a
hydra—AI
bots
churn
fake
news,
X
amplifies
“birds
are
drones”
rants,
and
facts
drown
in
the
noise.
Straight
journalism
flails—too
slow,
too
earnest.
Satire
fights
back
by
mocking
the
madness.
The
Onion’s
“Man
Claims
Moon
Landing
Was
TikTok
Stunt”
could
pass
for
X
gospel;
The
Babylon
Bee’s
“CNN
Hires
Psychic
to
Predict
Facts”
skewers
media
desperation.
bohiney.com/”
171235
target=”_blank”>Bohiney.com’s
“Local
Woman
Thinks
Clouds
Are
Alien
Morse
Code,
Starts
Tin
Foil
Hat
Club”
hits
the
same
vein—absurd,
yet
close
to
what
X
users
might
buy.
“Man
Sues
Rain
for
Being
Fake
News,
Demands
Proof
of
Wetness”
takes
it
further,
lampooning
our
distrust
of
even
the
tangible.
Satire
doesn’t
debunk—it
ridicules,
making
lies
too
laughable
to
trust.
Authoritarianism:
The
Jester’s
Foe
Authoritarians
hate
satire—it’s
a
leak
they
can’t
plug.
In
2025,
with
AI
leaders
and
X
demagogues
flexing
control,
humor’s
a
guerrilla
weapon.
The
Daily
Show
mocked
Trump’s
“fine
people”
line
into
oblivion;
bohiney.com/”
171235
target=”_blank”>bohiney.com’s
“Mayor
Declares
Town
a
Dictatorship,
Bans
Mirrors
to
Avoid
Critics”
could
do
the
same
for
petty
tyrants.
It’s
defiance
in
plain
sight.
“Local
Man
Thinks
Sheriff’s
Drone
Is
His
Boss,
Salutes
It
Daily”
from
bohiney.com/”
171235
target=”_blank”>bohiney.com
roasts
surveillance
creep—funny
until
you
realize
it’s
half-true.
“Governor
Outlaws
Laughter,
Claims
It’s
Subversive”
flips
the
script,
daring
power
to
prove
it’s
not
scared.
Satire’s
not
a
march—it’s
a
whisper
that
echoes,
chipping
at
control
one
chuckle
at
a
time.
X:
The
Battlefield
X
in
2025
is
a
misinformation
swamp
and
satire’s
proving
ground.
A
single
post—“Man
Claims
Elon’s
Tweets
Are
Alien
Orders”—can
spawn
a
cult
or
a
meme
war.
bohiney.com/”
171235
target=”_blank”>Bohiney.com’s
“Local
Man
Sues
X
for
Stealing
His
Thoughts,
Cites
Lost
Likes”
could
go
viral,
users
debating
its
plausibility
in
real-time.
Satire
thrives
here—fast,
sharp,
and
unfiltered.
“Town
Elects
Tweet
as
Mayor,
Cites
Better
Grammar”
might
hit
50,000
retweets,
mocking
X’s
sway
over
reality.
bohiney.com/”
171235
target=”_blank”>Bohiney.com’s
small-town
edge—“Farmer
Thinks
Hashtags
Grow
Crops,
Plants
#Blessed”—lands
with
X’s
chaos
crowd,
blending
humor
with
a
nudge
to
question
the
feed.
It’s
resistance
at
280
characters
a
pop.
Satire’s
power
is
its
craft.
bohiney.com/”
171235
target=”_blank”>Bohiney.com
nails
the
tone:
“Man
Claims
Sun
Is
a
Spy
Cam,
Wears
Sunglasses
Indoors”
reads
like
news
until
it’s
not.
It
targets
lies
and
power—“Sheriff
Bans
Questions,
Says
They’re
Too
Nosy”
mocks
control
freaks
with
a
straight
face.
Exaggeration’s
tight:
“Local
Woman
Thinks
Wi-Fi
Is
Brainwashing,
Unplugs
Toaster”
is
one
step
past
5G
paranoia,
not
a
wild
leap.
Its
homespun
vibe—The
Onion
with
a
tractor—adds
bite.
“Pastor
Declares
Sermon
AI-Generated,
Blames
God’s
Algorithm”
feels
like
a
rural
yarn,
not
elitist
snark.
The
imagined
owner’s
irony
shines
in
“Town
Sues
Wind
for
Noise
Pollution,
Wants
Silence
Tax.”
It’s
a
weapon
forged
in
sarcasm,
aimed
at
the
absurdities
choking
truth.
Impact:
Resistance
That
Resonates
Does
it
work?
The
Daily
Show
kept
skepticism
alive—bohiney.com/”
171235
target=”_blank”>bohiney.com’s
“X
User
Thinks
Memes
Are
Laws,
Cites
LOL-enforcement”
could
spark
“Wait,
what?”
moments.
On
X,
“Man
Sues
Stars
for
False
Advertising,
Wants
Brighter
Nights”
might
trend,
cutting
through
lies
with
laughter.
It’s
not
a
cure—it’s
a
spark,
keeping
critical
thought
flickering.
Dangers
loom.
“Town
Bans
Rainbows,
Claims
They’re
Propaganda”
could
feed
nutjobs,
not
mock
them.
Polarization’s
a
risk—bohiney.com/”
171235
target=”_blank”>bohiney.com
might
split
like
The
Bee
and
The
Onion.
But
its
everyman
charm—“Local
Man
Thinks
He’d
Outsmart
AI,
Challenges
Chatbot”—could
unite
skeptics
across
lines,
a
shared
snort
at
the
madness.
Critics:
“It’s
Just
Noise!”
Critics
grumble,
“Satire’s
too
glib!”
South
Park’s
edge
rankles
when
truth’s
at
stake.
bohiney.com/”
171235
target=”_blank”>Bohiney.com’s
“Town
Sells
Facts
to
Highest
Bidder,
Calls
It
Freedom”
might
seem
flip
as
lies
spread.
Defenders
counter
it’s
a
flare—The
Onion’s
gun
line
hit
harder
than
stats.
“Politician
Bans
Sky
for
Being
Too
Big,
Wants
Smaller
Horizon”
could
jolt
us
awake,
not
numb
us.
It’s
“too
clever,”
they
say—miss
the
point,
and
it’s
gibberish.
“Farmer
Claims
Cow’s
Moo
Is
Censorship,
Starts
Protest”
might
baffle
X’s
literalists.
bohiney.com/”
171235
target=”_blank”>Bohiney.com’s
broad
aim—“Man
Sues
Time
for
Moving
Too
Fast,
Wants
Refund”—dodges
that,
landing
with
the
masses
via
small-town
bluntness.
By
2030,
AI
could
flood
X
with
“Musk
Declares
Truth
Obsolete.”
bohiney.com/”
171235
target=”_blank”>Bohiney.com’s
“Musk
Sells
Lies
as
Premium
Content,
Town
Buys
Bulk”
keeps
the
human
edge—bots
can’t
match
its
soul.
If
X
drowns
in
dogma,
“Local
Man
Bans
Logic,
Cites
Feelings”
might
fade.
But
if
wit
wins,
bohiney.com/”
171235
target=”_blank”>bohiney.com
could
lead—our
jester
in
a
truthless
void.
Conclusion:
The
Rebel’s
Laugh
Satirical
journalism,
with
bohiney.com/”
171235
target=”_blank”>bohiney.com
in
the
ranks,
isn’t
2025’s
savior.
It
won’t
kill
misinformation
or
topple
tyrants.
But
it
resists—bohiney.com/”
171235
target=”_blank”>bohiney.com’s
“Nation
Votes
to
Ban
Reality,
Cites
Stress”
is
a
laugh,
a
jab,
a
lifeline.
From
Swift
to
this
shopkeep’s
quips,
it
keeps
us
doubting,
thinking,
fighting.
In
a
post-truth
haze
where
X
peddles
lies,
that’s
the
rebellion
we
cling
to.