Experts Warn That Reading Books May Lead to Independent Thinking

A Shocking Discovery Shakes Educational Institutions

In a startling announcement that sent shockwaves through the education sector, leading experts today warned that extensive reading, particularly of books, is directly linked to dangerously high levels of independent thinking among individuals. The alarming findings were published in the prestigious “Journal of Conformist Psychology.”

Dr. Ignatius Pageburner, senior researcher at the Committee Against Independent Thinking (CAIT), revealed, “Our comprehensive study clearly demonstrates a direct causation between book reading and the unsettling tendency to question accepted social norms. Frankly, it’s an epidemic of alarming proportions.”

The Terrifying Rise of Book-Related Free Thinking

The study conducted by CAIT observed over 5,000 avid readers and found disturbing correlations:

• 88% exhibited significantly heightened skepticism toward authority.
• 76% displayed concerning symptoms such as curiosity and critical analysis.
• An unprecedented 69% began openly questioning traditional beliefs after just a month of sustained reading.

“What we’re seeing here is truly troubling,” Dr. Pageburner added gravely. “Books are no longer just benign bundles of paper and ink; they’re weapons of mass independent thought.”

Eyewitness Accounts and Anecdotal Evidence

Parents and educators across the nation have begun speaking out about the alarming transformations they witness. Sharon Holloway, mother of two teenagers, recounted her harrowing experience: “My son read just one philosophy book and suddenly started questioning why he needed to make his bed. It escalated quickly—by the end of the month, he challenged my entire system of chores as an authoritarian construct.”

A high school English teacher, Mr. Alan Fretwell, shared similar concerns: “It starts innocently enough with classics like ‘To Kill a Mockingbird.’ Before you know it, students are analyzing societal injustices and proposing reforms—it’s terrifying.”

Public Opinion on Independent Thinking

In a nationwide poll conducted by the Center for Safe Thought (CST), approximately 62% of respondents agreed that independent thinking was “concerning” or “deeply troubling.” Respondents specifically expressed anxiety that individuals might “think differently from one another,” leading inevitably to disagreements and the exhausting necessity of debates.

Expert Recommendations to Curb the Crisis

In response to the crisis, CAIT issued urgent guidelines recommending:

• Immediate replacement of libraries with subscription-based streaming services.
• Removal of novels and philosophical texts from school curricula, replacing them with standardized test preparation guides and government-approved pamphlets.
• Introduction of mandatory Reality TV viewing to neutralize independent cognitive tendencies.

Logical Deduction and Analogy

Dr. Pageburner elaborated on his reasoning through analogy: “Allowing unrestricted reading is like handing teenagers the keys to a mental sports car—sure, it’s exciting, but inevitably someone’s thoughts are going to crash into traditional values.”

Testimonial Evidence from Former Readers

One former reader, David Bland, described his recovery journey: “I used to read constantly and questioned everything. It was exhausting. Now, after switching to reality TV marathons and celebrity gossip magazines, I’m much happier. My opinions are safely mainstream again.”

Social Commentary: Books as the Gateway Drug

Some researchers are now likening book reading to a gateway drug. Dr. Ella Shepherd, author of “Reading: The Dangerous Habit,” commented, “It starts with innocent picture books, then moves onto novels, and before you know it, they’re diving headfirst into existentialist philosophy and radical social critiques.”

Satirical Solutions Offered by Experts

CAIT humorously proposed several exaggerated yet oddly popular solutions:

• Mandating all books include warning labels: “Caution: May Lead to Independent Thought.”
• Requiring book stores to operate under “dangerous materials” licensing, similar to firearm dealers.
• Instituting “Safe Reading” classes, instructing readers how to quickly identify and avoid ideas that might stimulate independent thought.

The Economic Impact of Independent Thinking

Economists warn independent thinking could disrupt industries reliant on conformity and predictability. “If people start thinking for themselves,” warned Dr. Edward Conformi, “they might stop buying what they’re told to buy, crashing the entire consumer economy.”

Disclaimer

This meticulously researched and entirely human-crafted article was authored by two exceptionally qualified experts—a retired rodeo cowboy who believes in strict adherence to conventional wisdom, and a dairy farmer who thinks independence should only apply to cows. Any resemblance to genuine educational or psychological research is entirely coincidental and hilariously unintended.

The post Reading Books May Lead to Independent Thinking appeared first on Bohiney News.

Local Man Claims Watching Reality TV Makes Him Qualified to Run for President

Couch Potato Sets Presidential Ambitions

In a shocking move from his couch, local reality-TV enthusiast Chuck Maxwell announces his presidential candidacy based purely on extensive binge-watching credentials.

TV Marathon as a Qualification for Oval Office

In a stunning and unprecedented announcement from his living room couch, local resident and certified reality-TV aficionado Chuck Maxwell officially declared his candidacy for President of the United States, proudly citing his extensive reality television viewing history as his primary qualification.

“I’ve watched every single episode of ‘Survivor,’ ‘The Bachelor,’ and ‘Big Brother,’ twice,” Maxwell confidently proclaimed to a crowd consisting mostly of confused neighbors and his mother, Mildred. “If that doesn’t prepare me for the political backstabbing, dramatic alliances, and constant betrayals of Washington, nothing will.”

Expert Opinions Validate Reality TV Presidency

Political analyst Dr. Clive Barkley, author of the critically acclaimed book Survivor: Washington D.C. said, “At first, this seems absurd—until you realize Congress is essentially just a televised game show with suits instead of bikinis. Maxwell might actually be onto something.”

Supporting this unconventional candidacy, Dr. Helen Park, professor of Pop Culture Politics at State University, added, “Honestly, if you can keep track of the alliances and betrayals on ‘Love Island,’ you might just survive dealing with foreign leaders. It’s practically the same skill set.”

Eye Witnesses Corroborate Maxwell’s Commitment

Neighbors confirm Maxwell’s commitment, noting his tireless dedication to reality television. Carla Jenkins, who lives across the street, stated, “I’ve seen Chuck through his living room window, diligently taking notes during every elimination ceremony. He treats every rose handed out on ‘The Bachelor’ as seriously as a peace treaty negotiation.”

Maxwell’s mother, Mildred, further confirmed, “Chuck has always been politically savvy. When he was four, he convinced his preschool class to unanimously vote nap time out of their schedule. He’s always had a knack for swaying popular opinion.”

Public Opinion Polls Show Surprising Support

A recent informal poll conducted by “Reality Checks,” a popular entertainment news blog, revealed Maxwell already commands a shocking 38% favorability rating among individuals who identify as “avid binge-watchers.” Survey respondents noted, “At least he’s honest about getting his information from TV,” and “I trust him more than the politicians who claim they read policy papers.”

Analogical Reasoning Highlights Reality-TV Skills

Drawing comparisons between reality TV and modern politics, Maxwell explained, “On ‘Big Brother,’ you have to build strategic alliances to survive weekly evictions. Politics is just like that, except the evictions happen every four years, and instead of Julie Chen, you have Wolf Blitzer and Anderson Cooper.”

Dr. Barkley reinforced Maxwell’s analogy, observing, “Political campaigns today essentially follow the ‘Bachelor’ model. Candidates give roses to voters instead of promises—temporary affection, no lasting commitments.”

Satirical Solutions Proposed by Maxwell

Maxwell outlined several satirical yet oddly popular policies at his announcement:

• Replacing traditional debates with Survivor-style immunity challenges.
• Resolving international disputes through “dance-offs,” inspired by ‘Dancing with the Stars.’
• Using confessionals instead of press conferences for greater transparency.

Audience member Susan Goodman reacted positively: “Honestly, I’d watch that. Imagine the ratings if Congress had to complete obstacle courses to pass legislation.”

Social Science Research Supports the Phenomenon

Research conducted by the Center for Political Entertainment Studies (CPES) found a striking correlation between reality TV viewership and political understanding. The report humorously concluded, “Participants who correctly predicted ‘Bachelor’ outcomes also accurately predicted recent election winners, often using the same shallow criteria.”

Personal Experiences Justify Unconventional Leadership

Maxwell shared his profound personal experience, “I’ve endured heartbreak every finale of ‘The Bachelor,’ betrayal every season of ‘Survivor,’ and public humiliation on behalf of every contestant of ‘America’s Got Talent.’ Clearly, I’m emotionally prepared for political office.”

Local psychologist Dr. Rachel Myers humorously agreed, “If Chuck survived watching every Kardashian spin-off, he definitely possesses the mental fortitude to endure Congress.”

Financial Backing from Reality Stars

In a shocking twist, several reality TV personalities have already endorsed Maxwell’s campaign. Famous ‘Bachelor’ contestant Brad Rosen enthusiastically commented, “Finally, a candidate who understands the importance of a good rose ceremony!” Additionally, ‘Survivor’ alumni pledged campaign donations in the form of unused immunity idols.

Impact on Future Political Discourse

Political science experts predict Maxwell’s campaign will irreversibly alter future elections. Professor Andrew Keaton from the Institute of Electoral Absurdity remarked, “If this catches on, voters might start demanding politicians complete actual challenges—like balancing budgets or negotiating treaties live on television.”

Disclaimer

This thoroughly researched and impeccably sourced piece was crafted entirely through an organic, non-artificial collaboration between two esteemed human experts—a cowboy turned amateur politician, and a farmer proficient only in cattle diplomacy. Any resemblance to actual candidates or logical politics is completely unintentional and genuinely hilarious.

Comedian Lines on “Local Man Claims Watching Reality TV Makes Him Qualified to Run for President”

1. “This guy thinks binge-watching ‘The Bachelor’ qualifies him for president. Hey, at least he’ll know how to eliminate the competition with roses.” — Jerry Seinfeld

2. “Watching reality TV to run a country? Makes sense. Politics already feels like a season finale of ‘Survivor’ every single day.” — Ron White

3. “Forget debates; I wanna see politicians battle it out on ‘American Ninja Warrior.’ Whoever doesn’t fall wins healthcare.” — Amy Schumer

4. “Honestly, I’d trust a guy who watches reality TV over politicians. At least he’s used to disappointment and drama.” — Larry David

5. “You ever notice reality TV and politics are the same thing? Fake alliances, big egos, and everyone’s secretly hoping the other guy gets voted off.” — Chris Rock

6. “He thinks watching reality TV makes him presidential? By that logic, I’m qualified to run NASA because I binge-watch ‘Star Trek’.” — John Mulaney

7. “A reality TV president wouldn’t be so bad. Imagine the State of the Union address replaced by confessionals. ‘America, I didn’t come here to make friends.’” — Ali Wong

8. “This guy says reality TV taught him everything he needs for the White House. True—lying convincingly and crying on command are essential political skills.” — Kevin Hart

9. “Reality TV for president? I can’t wait for him to yell, ‘You’re fired!’ every week, only to realize we already did that.” — Tina Fey

10. “If watching reality TV qualifies you for president, I must be Secretary of Defense after watching two seasons of ‘Cops’.” — Sarah Silverman

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The post Local Man Claims Watching Reality TV Makes Him Qualified to Run for President appeared first on Bohiney News.

Millennials Discover That Avocado Toast Actually Prevents Home Ownership

Groundbreaking Research Shakes the Housing Market

In a groundbreaking new study published this week in the esteemed “Journal of Dubious Economic Theory,” researchers have confirmed a long-held suspicion: millennials’ insatiable appetite for avocado toast is, indeed, directly responsible for their inability to purchase homes.

Lead researcher Dr. Melvin Banks, Ph.D. in Culinary Economics from the prestigious Toastington University, stated emphatically, “After years of meticulous observation at brunch cafes nationwide, we’ve established irrefutable causation between avocado toast consumption and chronic financial instability.”

“Millennials aren’t homeless—they just live in a perpetual state of brunch.” — Jerry Seinfeld

Expert Opinions Back Toast Theory

Dr. Banks explained, “Every time a millennial orders avocado toast, they’re not just purchasing breakfast—they’re actively destroying their financial future. With each bite of artisan sourdough covered in overpriced, organic avocado mash, they’re essentially taking a sledgehammer to their savings account.”

Financial consultant Amanda Wisely, author of the bestselling book “Toastbusters: How to Avoid Breakfast Bankruptcy,” reinforced Dr. Banks’ findings. “I’ve personally observed millennials spending upwards of $17 per avocado toast. Over a year, this habit costs roughly $6,205—enough for a down payment on a cardboard box in San Francisco or at least three bricks toward a real house elsewhere.”

Eyewitness Accounts Reveal Toast Addiction

Witnesses across metropolitan brunch spots have corroborated these shocking findings. Stacy Jones, a server at the trendy Cafe Avocuddle in Brooklyn, stated, “They line up every morning, eyes glazed, wallets open. It’s an addiction. Last week, one guy cried because we ran out of gluten-free multigrain bread. He said he’d rather go homeless than eat plain toast.”

Survey Data Confirms the Phenomenon

A recent survey by the National Breakfast Crisis Association (NBCA) revealed alarming statistics:

• 89% of millennials admitted prioritizing avocado toast over savings.
• 74% believe avocado toast is “more fulfilling” than owning property.
• 63% responded they feel “financial anxiety” only when avocado prices rise.

NBCA President Margaret Butterfield summarized the situation: “We’re dealing with a generation that’s literally eating their future. It’s avocado-infused tragedy.”

The Kale Epidemic Annoys Dinner Companions Nationwide

Simultaneously, the “Journal of Social Dining and Etiquette” released an equally unsettling study highlighting kale’s disturbing societal impacts. Researchers determined conclusively: Kale consumption offers no health benefits beyond irritating friends and family during meals.

Chief investigator Dr. Raymond Leafblower noted, “Our double-blind study of dinner conversations showed that kale eaters universally irritated 100% of non-kale diners. Participants consuming kale exhibited a marked tendency toward unsolicited lectures on antioxidants, fiber content, and something called ‘toxins.’”

Restaurant owner Chef Lorenzo Parmesan added anecdotal support: “People ordering kale salads consistently decreased neighboring diners’ enjoyment by 82%, based purely on smugness alone.”

Debate Experts Conclude Online Debates Are Meaningless

Meanwhile, social scientists from the Institute of Futile Arguments released findings confirming what many already suspected: online debates serve no purpose other than inflating egos and wasting bandwidth.

Dr. Hannah Threadwell commented, “In our exhaustive analysis of 10,000 online debates across various social media platforms, exactly zero participants changed their minds. Yet remarkably, 95% ended with both sides declaring an absolute victory, accompanied by emojis, memes, and poorly spelled insults.”

Book Reading Linked to Dangerous Levels of Independent Thought

In a separate startling revelation, literary critics and educational watchdogs from the Committee Against Independent Thinking (CAIT) have warned about the risks of excessive book reading. According to spokesperson Ignatius Pageburner, “Reading promotes independent thought, and independent thought promotes questioning societal norms, which inevitably leads to chaos.”

Alarmingly, CAIT’s study showed a 67% rise in uncomfortable questions directed at authority figures among those who read regularly. Mr. Pageburner warned parents, “If you catch your child reading, redirect them immediately to safe, thought-neutralizing activities like reality television or online shopping.”

Reality TV Viewer Announces Presidential Run

Finally, in an unsurprising turn of events, local resident Chuck Maxwell declared his candidacy for President based solely on his extensive experience watching reality TV. Maxwell proudly stated at his announcement rally—held fittingly in front of a TV store—”I’ve watched every season of ‘The Bachelor,’ ‘Survivor,’ and ‘Big Brother.’ Clearly, I’m qualified to handle the intricacies of international diplomacy, economic crises, and climate change.”

Political analyst Dr. Clara Ballot commented, “Given recent political trends, Maxwell’s qualifications aren’t even that unusual. At this point, reality TV might indeed offer more relevant experience than traditional politics.”

Disclaimer

Disclaimer: This completely factual and meticulously researched article is brought to you entirely by human hands—a collaboration between two utterly qualified sentient beings: a cowboy who once ran for mayor of a ghost town, and a farmer whose primary skill is distinguishing between cows and horses. Any resemblance to actual financial advice or responsible journalism is purely coincidental and unintended.

---

---

15 Observations on Millennials and Avocado Toast

1. Avocado toast isn’t breakfast—it’s a direct investment in your landlord’s yacht.

Evidence: Economists found millennials spend $6,205 annually on avocado toast. That’s precisely the down payment on a used Toyota Corolla.

2. Millennials think financial planning means choosing whole-grain toast over sourdough.

A recent poll revealed 78% believe their finances improved after switching to cheaper bread.

3. Every avocado toast ordered moves your dream house 14 inches further away.

Experts confirm: With enough toast, your future home will officially be located in another state.

4. Millennials now list “Brunch Spot” as their permanent address on official documents.

Eyewitnesses at the DMV confirm millennials regularly confuse apartment numbers with table numbers.

5. Your bank doesn’t decline your loan because of poor credit—it’s because your down payment is garnished with cilantro.

A personal finance expert noted, “I’ve seen bank managers laugh openly at avocado-themed budgeting plans.”

5. Home ownership among millennials now defined as “owning a toast-shaped plate.”

A recent poll revealed 72% feel plates are a realistic investment.

6. Millennials think of avocados as green, buttery down payments that go straight to their landlord’s pocket.

Financial advisor quote: “At this rate, millennials will be living in smashed-avocado-funded tents.”

7. The only equity millennials understand is the equality of avocado distribution across the toast.

A social scientist’s study showed avocado spread evenly across toast correlated with increased happiness, but also inevitable poverty.

8. Banks now offer avocado toast financing plans to attract millennial customers.

Eye-witnesses confirm: “Yes, your mortgage now comes with a side of sourdough.”

7. Millennials’ retirement planning consists entirely of saving avocado pits.

According to social scientists, “They plan to barter pits for tiny houses later.”

8. The most common phrase among millennials isn’t “Will you marry me?” but “Can I add extra avocado?”

A waitress confirmed, “I overheard someone say they’d sell their first-born for extra guac.”

9. “Financial Freedom” for millennials means switching from avocado toast to plain toast.

A groundbreaking study determined this single act boosts their credit score by 50 points.

10. Economists warn that adding smoked salmon to avocado toast is financially equivalent to setting your wallet on fire.

Analogy experts explain: “It’s like leasing a Ferrari just to eat breakfast in it.”

11. Millennials proudly announce, “I bought my first home!” meaning a $400 artisanal avocado toast rack.

A recent survey indicated 63% of millennials sincerely believed they’d made a significant investment.

11. Avocado toast addiction now ranks above gambling and alcoholism in financial harm.

Research confirms: “Intervention meetings are now held exclusively at brunch.”

12. The leading cause of empty savings accounts among millennials is labeled “Chronic Brunchitis.”

Medical experts describe symptoms as frequent Instagramming and irrational tipping.

13. The average millennial’s net worth can now be accurately calculated in slices of avocado toast.

Statistics reveal the current rate is 0.75 toasts per dollar.

14. Financial literacy classes for millennials now focus on convincing them avocados aren’t currency.

A recent survey found that 89% disagreed strongly.

14. Millennials refer to budgeting as “trying to limit avocado intake to fewer than 14 slices per day.”

A financial analyst sighed: “Even that goal is typically aspirational.”

15. If millennials stopped eating avocado toast today, they’d own homes by next Thursday.

Deductive reasoning by housing experts: “But they won’t, because brunch is delicious.”

---

---

Comedians on Millennials Discovering Avocado Toast Actually Prevents Home Ownership

1. “If millennials put as much money into houses as they do avocado toast, they could buy the White House and Airbnb it.” — Ron White

2. “Millennials think escrow is some kind of fancy avocado spread.” — Amy Schumer

3. “These millennials aren’t house-hunting; they’re toast-hunting, looking for the perfect shade of green to smear on their dreams.” — Larry David

4. “My financial advisor asked if I had equity. I said sure—half an avocado and three pieces of sourdough.” — Sarah Silverman

5. “Millennials believe the only good foundation is gluten-free multigrain.” — Chris Rock

6. “If millennials saved the money they spend photographing brunch, they’d own half of Brooklyn.” — Kevin Hart

7. “Millennials aren’t in debt; they’re just paying off their avocado-toast student loans.” — Tina Fey

8. “Banks now pre-approve millennials for mortgages based entirely on their Instagram brunch likes.” — John Mulaney

9. “Millennials don’t dream about picket fences—they dream about perfectly sliced avocados.” — Ali Wong

The post Avocado Toast Prevents Home Ownership appeared first on Bohiney News.

The Great Science Gender Crisis: Why Girls Refuse to Explode Stuff in Labs

The Shocking Discovery: Women Are Not Rushing to Mix Chemicals and Wear Unflattering Goggles

For decades, scientists—mostly men—have been scratching their heads trying to figure out why women aren’t flooding into fields like physics, chemistry, and computer science. Despite multiple “Women in STEM” initiatives, stacks of recruitment pamphlets featuring cheerful girls holding beakers, and at least three viral hashtags, the problem persists.

One researcher at the University of Accidental Discoveries put it best:
“We assumed girls would love science. After all, it’s just like cooking—except with explosions, less seasoning, and an alarming number of safety waivers.”

Yet, girls continue to avoid the field as if it were a group project in a college lecture hall. To uncover the truth, we embarked on a groundbreaking investigation, consulting a mix of experts, social science research, and eye-witness testimony. And, in the spirit of scientific inquiry, we totally ignored any inconvenient data that didn’t fit our hypothesis.

---

Lab Coats: The Fashion Crime No One Talks About

The first and most obvious reason for this scientific gender gap is the tragic existence of lab coats. These long, shapeless garments, often resembling rejected hospital gowns, strip their wearers of any individuality.

“I put one on,” says Sarah Kensington, a former chemistry student who defected to marketing. “I looked like a Jedi dropout who couldn’t quite make it through Sith training.”

A social media poll revealed that 87% of women would rather wear a hazmat suit designed by Chanel than the standard lab coat. Scientists have proposed a radical solution: bedazzled protective gear. Unfortunately, their last attempt at introducing “STEM sequins” resulted in a chemical fire and a major lawsuit.

---

The Hair-Hazard Hypothesis: Science Is a Threat to Highlights

Long hair and science do not mix. Literally. Every year, an estimated 5,000 ponytails are lost to Bunsen burner incidents.

“It happened so fast,” said one traumatized student, clutching the remains of her once-lush locks. “One moment, I was measuring hydrochloric acid. The next, I smelled burnt keratin and my professor was patting my head like a birthday candle.”

The American Chemical Society has proposed a solution: mandatory pixie cuts for all female students. However, after a wave of protests—featuring slogans like “My Hair, My Choice” and “Down with the Patriarchy, Not My Ponytail”—they are reconsidering.

---

Safety Goggles: When Science Makes You Look Like a Housefly

Science has given the world many wonderful things: electricity, vaccines, and the realization that Pluto is no longer a planet. However, it has also given us safety goggles, the universal destroyer of self-esteem.

“I put on safety goggles and my boyfriend suddenly looked unsure about our future,” one microbiology major confided. “We had a ‘where is this going’ conversation later that day. It was brutal.”

Goggles leave indentations on foreheads, fog up at the worst times, and make wearers look like cartoon supervillains. They’re the reason 67% of science majors refuse to make eye contact in the hallway. Some universities have considered anti-fog, designer frames, but until Prada starts funding STEM, women in science will continue to suffer.

---

The Periodic Table: 118 Elements, Zero Fun

For some reason, educational institutions insist that students memorize the periodic table—a cruel and unusual punishment disguised as “learning.”

“I don’t need to know what francium is,” one former biology student vented. “No one is out here casually working with francium. You know what I need to know? How to fold a fitted sheet.”

A recent study found that 82% of students who drop out of chemistry cite the periodic table as their “villain origin story.” Meanwhile, people with chemistry degrees have confirmed that they haven’t actually used their knowledge of transition metals since the final exam.

---

Math: The Gatekeeper of Science (and Sanity)

Let’s be honest—math is the bouncer at the club of science, and it’s not letting just anyone in.

“I realized I wasn’t cut out for science when I saw letters in my math equations,” said one ex-physics major, who now sells homemade candles on Etsy.

Some students report PTSD-like symptoms when recalling trigonometry, while others experience spontaneous flashbacks to being told to “show their work.” Despite centuries of math-induced suffering, professors continue to insist it is “important” and “necessary” for science.

We remain skeptical.

---

The Harsh Reality: Socializing in a Laboratory Is…Impossible

Let’s paint a picture. It’s a Friday night. Normal college students are at parties, living their best lives. Science students? They’re in a fluorescent-lit laboratory, pipetting things into other things, while someone named Chad explains gravity like he discovered it himself.

“I just wanted to be a doctor,” whispered one weary medical student. “I didn’t sign up to spend my best years inhaling formaldehyde and getting excited over properly labeled test tubes.”

Science, for all its wonders, is not a particularly social field. You can’t exactly flirt while dissecting a frog or crafting a hypothesis about dirt. Some students attempt to form friendships by bonding over mutual suffering, but most give up and flee to the humanities, where at least the despair is poetic.

---

The ‘Breaking Bad’ Stigma: Too Much Chemistry, Not Enough Drama

For the few women who do enter chemistry, there’s an added obstacle: the assumption that they are somehow involved in an underground drug empire.

“The moment I tell people I’m a chemist, they ask if I know how to make meth,” sighed Dr. Lisa Carmichael. “Do I look like I’m cooking in a trailer? This is a lab, not a crime syndicate.”

The damage from TV stereotypes is real. Some scientists are fighting back by demanding Hollywood create more realistic scientist characters. Unfortunately, the closest Hollywood has come is Tony Stark, who built a nuclear-powered suit in a cave with a box of scraps.

---

Robots: The Silent Saboteurs of Women in Science

At first, robotics seems cool. You get to build a tiny mechanical friend, program it to do basic tasks, and marvel at technology’s progress. Then, one day, your robot vacuums up your thesis notes and refuses to return them.

“I designed a robot to assist me,” said one former engineering student. “Now, it just follows me around, judging my life choices.”

Women are realizing that engineering isn’t just about creating; it’s about fighting the very machines they bring into existence. And they’re opting out before the robot uprising begins.

---

Astronomy: The Science of Looking at Things Very Far Away

At first, astronomy seems fun. You get to gaze at stars, ponder the meaning of the universe, and sound intellectual at parties. Then, you realize it’s mostly math. And cold observatories. And sleep deprivation.

“I thought I’d be discovering new planets,” said one astronomy dropout. “Instead, I spent three years trying to measure the distance between two points in space. Turns out, it’s far.”

Astronomers have tried to make the field more appealing by emphasizing its mysteries. Unfortunately, the biggest mystery to students remains: why am I still awake at 3 AM calculating the orbit of a hypothetical asteroid?

---

DNA: Where You Learn You’re 12% Neanderthal

Genetics is fascinating until you realize it means confronting your own embarrassing ancestry.

“I took a genetics class, spit in a tube for a DNA test, and now I have 12 cousins I didn’t know about,” one woman complained. “Also, apparently, I’m related to Napoleon. Who do I sue?”

While genetics has revolutionized medicine, it has also ruined family gatherings. Thanks to at-home DNA kits, many people now know that “Great Uncle Greg” wasn’t actually a great uncle at all.

---

The Fossil Fantasy: Digging in the Dirt is Less Fun Than Expected

Paleontology: the dream job of every kid who watched Jurassic Park. The reality? Sweating in the desert, digging for hours, and finding…nothing.

“I wanted to discover dinosaurs,” said a former fossil hunter. “Instead, I found a rock that looked like a dinosaur, and my professor crushed my hopes in five seconds.”

Turns out, most of the exciting fossil discoveries were made decades ago. Now, new students just get the honor of brushing dirt off already-discovered bones.

---

Conclusion: Can Science Ever Win Back Women?

Science, despite its noble efforts, continues to struggle with recruitment. Maybe it’s the math. Maybe it’s the goggles. Maybe it’s the fact that lab explosions are only fun when you’re watching them on YouTube.

Will science ever truly win back women? The answer is uncertain. But one thing is clear: if the next recruitment poster features a scientist in a bedazzled lab coat, perfectly curled hair, and designer goggles, we’ll know someone, somewhere, took notes.

---

---

15 Observations on Why Girls Are Less Likely to Become Scientists

1. The Lab Coat Conundrum

Observation: Maybe it’s the unflattering lab coats. Who wants to wear a shapeless white robe all day?​

Comment: “I put on a lab coat once; looked like I was auditioning for ‘Ghostbusters.’”​

---

2. The Hair-Raising Hypothesis

Observation: Laboratories and Bunsen burners are a bad mix for long hair.​

Comment: “Tried to light a Bunsen burner; ended up with a new hairstyle called ‘The Singe.’”​

---

3. The Safety Goggle Glamour

Observation: Safety goggles: because who doesn’t want to look like a bug-eyed alien?​

Comment: “Nothing says ‘fashion’ like indentations on your face from too-tight goggles.”​

---

4. The Element of Surprise

Observation: Memorizing the periodic table isn’t as thrilling as, say, shopping.​

Comment: “I tried to learn the elements; got stuck on ‘Unobtainium.’”​

---

5. The Math Myth

Observation: Whoever said math is fun probably never had to calculate the trajectory of a falling apple.​

Comment: “I can balance a checkbook; isn’t that enough physics for one day?”​

---

6. The Social Experiment

Observation: Spending Saturday nights in the lab isn’t exactly ‘living the dream.’​

Comment: “While others were at parties, I was mixing chemicals, hoping not to create a new species.”​

---

7. The ‘Breaking Bad’ Bias

Observation: Thanks to TV, people think all chemists are cooking up trouble.​

Comment: “No, I don’t know how to make that, but I can whip up a mean soufflé.”​

---

8. The Robot Rebellion

Observation: Building robots sounds cool until they start vacuuming your room without permission.​

Comment: “I programmed a robot to clean; it now judges my lifestyle choices.”​

---

9. The Space Case

Observation: Astronomy is just stargazing with homework.​

Comment: “I looked through a telescope once; saw my neighbor sunbathing. Awkward.”​

---

10. The DNA Dilemma

Observation: Genetics: where you find out you’re more related to a banana than you’d like.​

Comment: “Explains my appeal to monkeys and fruit flies.”​

---

11. The Fossil Fiasco

Observation: Paleontology: fancy term for digging in the dirt.​

Comment: “Spent hours excavating; found a chicken bone. KFC, not Jurassic Park.”​

---

12. The Test Tube Tango

Observation: Mixing chemicals is all fun and games until something explodes.​

Comment: “Created a new compound; also, a hole in the ceiling.”​

---

13. The Quantum Quandary

Observation: Quantum physics: because regular physics wasn’t confusing enough.​

Comment: “Tried to understand Schrödinger’s cat; ended up adopting a dog.”​

---

14. The Ecology Enigma

Observation: Studying ecosystems is great until you realize mosquitoes are part of it.​

Comment: “Saving the planet, one bug bite at a time.”​

---

15. The Statistician’s Sorrow

Observation: Statistics: where you’re 99% bored and 1% confused.​theaustralian.com.au

Comment: “I have a significant relationship with my calculator.”​

---

Disclaimer: This satirical piece is a collaborative effort between a cowboy and a farmer, aiming to humorously highlight the stereotypes and challenges in the field of science. No lab equipment was harmed in the making of these jokes.

The post STEM Gender Crisis appeared first on Bohiney News.

Belfast, Tennessee: Where Every Girl Wants to Be Hailey Welch (And Every Guy is Counting Their Blessings)

Belfast Tennessee’s New Tourism Slogan?

“Belfast, Tennessee: Come for the Charm, Stay for the Spit.”

Belfast, Tennessee, used to be one of those places you only heard about when you accidentally zoomed in too far on Google Maps. A town so small that the only fast-food joint is a guy named Bubba selling fried bologna sandwiches out of his garage. The kind of place where excitement meant watching the gas station price sign change.

But that was before Hailey Welch did the unthinkable—before she uttered the now-legendary, economy-shifting, testosterone-igniting phrase heard ‘round the world:

“Hawk Tuah!”

Like Paul Revere’s midnight ride, it signaled a revolution—except this one involved more Mountain Dew, fewer lanterns, and a sudden surge in interest from men across the country who didn’t know Tennessee even had a Belfast.

And now? Belfast is a whole different place. The girls want to be Hailey Welch. The guys are thanking their lucky stars. And the rest of the world is just trying to figure out what the hell is happening.

---

Welcome to “Hawk Tuah” County, Tennessee

The ‘Hawk Tuah’ Effect: How One Woman’s Spit Turned a Small Town into the Center of the Universe

Once upon a time, Belfast was known for three things:

1. A Piggly Wiggly with questionable expiration dates.
2. A single traffic light that no one really obeys.
3. The annual “Who Can Catch The Most Catfish With Their Bare Hands?” competition.

But now? Now it’s a tourist destination. A cultural epicenter. A mecca for men seeking a woman who can spit with the force of a medieval trebuchet.

The Welcome to Belfast sign has been updated. It used to say, “Belfast, Tennessee: A Great Place to Call Home.” Now it says:

“Belfast, Tennessee: Home of the Hawk Tuah Queen.”

Below it, someone has spray-painted:

“Spit Happens.”

If you think guys across America are excited about this new cultural phenomenon, you should see the local boys in Belfast.

“I ain’t never seen anything like this,” says Cletus Ray Johnson, a lifelong Belfast resident, wearing a camo hat that says SPIT GAME STRONG. “One day, we’re all sittin’ around playing cornhole, and the next, every girl in town is standing in front of a mirror practicing their ‘Hawk Tuah’ like it’s the SATs.”

---

The Women of Belfast: All Trying to Be Hailey Welch

If you thought only one Hailey Welch was enough to make the internet lose its mind, imagine an entire town full of them.

The girls of Belfast, Tennessee, have united under a single cause: achieving Hawk Tuah-level fame.

At Misty’s Hair & Tanning, the most popular beauty salon in town, they’re now offering a “Hawk Tuah Makeover Package”—which includes a smoky eye, extra-large hoop earrings, and a custom-fitted crop top that reads, Spit Like a Lady, Swear Like a Sailor.

At the local high school, the cheerleading team is rewriting their cheers:

“Give me an H! Give me an A! Give me a W-K-T-U-A-H! What’s that spell? GLOBAL INTERNET FAME, BABY!”

And at The Last Chance Saloon, a bar known for its $3 whiskey shots and questionable life choices, the girls are practicing their spit like they’re training for the Olympics.

“We used to do karaoke on Thursdays,” says Crystal-Jean Montgomery, who now refers to herself as Hailey 2.0. “Now? We got a ‘Hawk Tuah’ competition. You get judged on distance, accuracy, and overall attitude. First prize is a free shot of Fireball and a tank top that says, ‘I Spit, Therefore I Am’.”

The mayor of Belfast is even considering an official “Hawk Tuah Festival” to honor the town’s new claim to fame. Planned events include:

• A spitting contest with categories for style, range, and dramatic delivery.
• A Hailey Welch lookalike contest, with a grand prize of a lifetime supply of lip gloss.
• A “Date a Belfast Babe” auction, where out-of-towners can bid for the chance to take a local lady out to dinner at the Waffle House.

In other words, Belfast, Tennessee, is no longer just a town. It’s a movement.

---

The Men of Belfast: Counting Their Blessings

If you think the men of America are thrilled by this development, just take a look at the guys in Belfast.

“I ain’t never had options before,” says Jimmy Dale Tucker, who works at the local AutoZone and suddenly finds himself a hot commodity. “One minute, I’m just a guy fixin’ carburetors. The next, I’m the most eligible bachelor in a town full of Hailey Welch impersonators. It’s like Christmas, but sexier.”

Even Dale Pickens, a 57-year-old divorcé who hadn’t had a date since Bush was president, suddenly has hope.

“I tell you what,” Dale says, wiping a tear from his eye. “These young girls are learning to spit and cuss and act wild, and I don’t care if my heart medication gives out—I’m ready to risk it all.”

Meanwhile, out-of-town men are flooding into Belfast like it’s the new Las Vegas.

At the gas station, license plates from Florida, Texas, and even California have been spotted.

“I drove nine hours to get here,” says Bradley Thomas, a Florida resident who describes himself as an “enthusiast of strong Southern women.” “I just… I just needed to see it for myself.”

And if you think local men are panicking about the competition, think again.

“I welcome it,” says Tucker Ray McGraw, leaning against his lifted Ford F-150. “This town used to be a dating wasteland. Now? It’s like a Playboy mansion, but with more camouflage and fewer LA fitness trainers.”

The real concern?

Other small towns trying to steal Belfast’s thunder.

“There’s a girl in Alabama trying to do a ‘Spit Like a Stallion’ thing,” says Cletus Ray, shaking his head. “Nice try, sweetheart. Belfast is the OG home of the Hawk Tuah. We ain’t giving up our crown that easy.”

---

The Future of Belfast: Where Do We Go From Here?

At this rate, Belfast is on track to becoming the Hollywood of internet spitting culture.

Real estate prices are rising.
Tourism is booming.
Bars, salons, and gas stations are all cashing in on the “Hawk Tuah” economy.

There’s even a Netflix documentary crew rumored to be circling the town, hoping to capture the sociocultural revolution happening before our very eyes.

And as for Hailey Welch herself?

She’s too busy cashing checks and dodging marriage proposals to comment.

One thing’s for sure:

The world may not know what it did to deserve Belfast, Tennessee, but Belfast sure as hell knows what it’s doing to the world.

And if you listen closely on a warm Southern night, you’ll hear it in the distance—

The unmistakable sound of a thousand hopeful young women… spitting their way into history.

---

Final Thought: Belfast’s New Tourism Slogan?

“Belfast, Tennessee: Come for the Charm, Stay for the Spit.”

Or as the local boys like to say—

“Y’all ain’t seen nothin’ yet.”

---

---

15 Observations on Belfast, Tennessee’s “Hawk Tuah” Revolution

1. Belfast, Tennessee used to be known for its one blinking traffic light—now it’s the epicenter of a global spit-based movement. If this isn’t the American Dream, what is?

2. The local AutoZone now has a waitlist for mechanics. Why? Because every woman in town is suddenly into guys who can rotate tires and tolerate excessive spitting.

3. Forget “The Bachelor”—Belfast men are living in their own dating reality show. Except instead of roses, the ladies are handing out cans of Busch Light and aggressive winks.

4. The phrase “Hey girl, show me your spit game” is now considered an acceptable pickup line. Southern hospitality has reached new heights (or lows, depending on who you ask).

5. Misty’s Hair & Tanning now offers a “Hawk Tuah Deluxe Package.” It includes spray tan, lip gloss, and a practice session on how to spit with precision.

6. The local high school cheerleaders have rewritten their chants. Now, instead of “Go Tigers!” they scream “Hawk Tuah!” and the other team just forfeits out of confusion.

7. Guys from Florida, Texas, and even California are making “pilgrimages” to Belfast. Not for religious reasons—but because they heard the ladies there have a “special set of skills.”

8. Somewhere, a confused historian is preparing to explain this cultural moment in a future college textbook. “Chapter 12: The Spitting Revolution and Its Socioeconomic Impact on Rural America.”

9. The mayor is considering changing the town’s name from Belfast to ‘Hawk Tuah, TN.’ At this point, why fight destiny?

10. Netflix producers are reportedly circling Belfast like vultures. They know gold when they see it—and a town full of women perfecting their spit technique is absolute TV magic.

11. The biggest threat to Belfast isn’t the economy—it’s other small towns trying to steal its spotlight. Alabama is reportedly working on a “Spit Like a Stallion” campaign. Nice try, sweethearts.

12. Real estate prices are skyrocketing. Because nothing screams “prime real estate” like being ground zero for the most talked-about internet sensation of 2025.

13. Single men in Belfast who once had ZERO game are now being treated like local celebrities. One guy named Dale, who hasn’t been on a date since 2003, is now fielding marriage proposals.

14. The gas station clerks are TIRED. Every day, another tourist walks in and asks, “Where can I meet a real-life Hawk Tuah girl?” Buddy, just step outside.

15. There’s no telling where this ends. Will Belfast become the next Hollywood? The next Vegas? One thing’s for sure—this town has officially SPIT its way into history.

---

---

12 Comedian Lines About Belfast, Tennessee & the “Hawk Tuah” Revolution

1. “Belfast, Tennessee used to be known for its one gas station and a Piggly Wiggly. Now? It’s known for an entire generation of women who could put a baseball pitcher out of a job with their spit velocity.” — Ron White

2. “Guys are driving from Florida to Belfast just to meet a ‘Hawk Tuah’ girl. Bro, if you’re willing to travel nine hours for a woman who can spit across state lines, maybe it’s time to re-evaluate your life choices.” — Dave Chappelle

3. “The AutoZone in Belfast has a 3-hour wait because suddenly, every woman in town thinks a mechanic is the ultimate catch. Somewhere, a dude covered in motor oil is realizing he just became a sex symbol.” — Bill Burr

4. “I love how men are treating Belfast like a hidden treasure. Like they just found the last Blockbuster but instead of renting movies, they’re hoping to get spit on by a pretty girl.” — Kevin Hart

5. “The local mayor is thinking about changing the town name to ‘Hawk Tuah, Tennessee.’ Imagine explaining to your grandkids: ‘Yeah, I grew up in the spit capital of America!’” — Nikki Glaser

6. “Women in Belfast are practicing their ‘Hawk Tuah’ like it’s the SATs. ‘Alright, ladies, deep breath, arch your back, follow through—NO! You gotta put your whole soul into it!’” — John Mulaney

7. “A gas station clerk in Belfast was asked by a tourist, ‘Where can I meet a Hawk Tuah girl?’ Man, just open your ears—you’ll hear one revving up before you even step out of your car.” — Trevor Noah

8. “Netflix is probably filming a documentary about this as we speak. ‘From Belfast to Billionaire: The Spit Heard Around the World.’ And yes, it’s trending #1.” — Amy Schumer

9. “Dudes in Belfast used to struggle to get a date. Now they can’t even go to the grocery store without getting spit on. And for once—it’s a GOOD thing.” — Chris Rock

10. “The high school cheerleaders changed their chant from ‘Go Team!’ to ‘Hawk Tuah!’ I don’t know if that’s spirit or a warning.” — Wanda Sykes

11. “Some guy named Dale who hasn’t been on a date since ‘03 just got asked out by three different women. All it took was one internet trend and suddenly, he’s the town’s Leonardo DiCaprio.” — Sarah Silverman

12. “Real estate in Belfast is going through the roof. Some guy just listed his house as ‘Prime Hawk Tuah Location.’ And you know some idiot is gonna buy it.” — Jerry Seinfeld

The post Belfast, Tennessee appeared first on Bohiney News.

Whoopi Goldberg’s Vision of Racism

How She Sees Oppression in Everything, Everywhere, All at Once

Whoopi Goldberg doesn’t just see race—she detects it, dissects it, and then files an official complaint. When most people hear the word “white,” they think of a color. Whoopi? She hears a dog whistle. It’s why she recently declared The White Lotus to be too Caucasian. The show, which features wealthy elites behaving badly at luxury resorts, apparently didn’t have enough melanin to pass her personal racial purity test.

But Whoopi’s race-detection skills extend far beyond television. She can sense white supremacy in things most people wouldn’t even consider racist—like snow, chess, and even cauliflower.

The Racist Nature of Snow

Whoopi has allegedly been investigating why snow is always white. “Why doesn’t it snow in a more inclusive shade of brown?” she recently mused on The View. She believes snow is part of an ancient conspiracy to promote whiteness as the default color of the world. If climate change results in less snowfall, she considers it a win for diversity.

A team of Whoopi-approved scientists is currently developing Diversity Snow, which melts equally in all neighborhoods and doesn’t require shoveling by marginalized communities.

White Noise: The Silencing of Diversity

According to Whoopi, white noise machines are just another tool of oppression. Why do people want to fall asleep to something called white noise? What happened to black noise, Latino noise, or Pan-African ambient sounds? She has proposed a new line of Culturally Equitable Sleep Machines that will play the soothing sounds of historical protests, spoken-word poetry, and the gentle clatter of bamboo wind chimes made by indigenous artisans.

Chess: A Game of Systemic Oppression

Chess is one of the most blatantly racist games in history, according to Whoopi. The fact that white pieces move first is a direct symbol of racial hierarchy. “The entire game is structured around the idea that white dominates black,” she explained in a recent interview. “We need to rethink this game before we continue poisoning young minds.”

She has personally submitted a new version of chess to the International Chess Federation. In her version, all pieces are the same color and each move must be pre-approved by a diversity and inclusion panel.

The Oreo Conundrum: A Subtle Message of Superiority

Whoopi is deeply suspicious of Oreos, which she believes were designed to subconsciously reinforce racial power structures. A black cookie with white stuffing? That’s not a coincidence—it’s a message. “Why is the black part of the cookie being forced to contain whiteness?” she asked a confused Nabisco representative during a panel discussion. “Who approved this?”

She has proposed a new, socially responsible cookie where the filling is a blend of multiple colors, ensuring no single race dominates the snack.

The Problem with The White House

One of Whoopi’s longest-running campaigns is to rename The White House. “The name itself implies a certain kind of supremacy,” she argued on air. “At the very least, we should consider calling it The Inclusive House.”

She has suggested that, if a full rebrand isn’t possible, the building should be repainted in a gradient of earth tones to symbolize the country’s diversity. A proposed color scheme includes Guilt Beige, Apology Tan, and We’re Working On It Mauve.

The Tyranny of Black Friday

Why is Black Friday associated with chaos, excessive spending, and mass hysteria while White Christmas is seen as a peaceful, joyful holiday? Whoopi believes this is another example of the system devaluing blackness. She is pushing for Black Friday to be renamed Historically Exploited Shopping Event and is demanding reparations in the form of gift cards.

The Racist Implications of Cauliflower

Whoopi refuses to eat cauliflower. “It’s like the vegetable equivalent of gentrification,” she says. “It’s trying to take over where broccoli naturally belongs.” She has accused grocery stores of whitewashing the produce aisle by prioritizing cauliflower over culturally significant vegetables like collard greens.

A Whoopi-backed organization, Veggies for Justice, has begun lobbying supermarkets to stock more racially inclusive vegetables. Their recent efforts include demanding that quinoa be officially labeled as “Colonial Millet.”

Beethoven: The Problematic Composer

Whoopi has also turned her attention to classical music, demanding that we acknowledge the problematic legacy of Ludwig van Beethoven. “People act like Beethoven was some kind of genius,” she scoffed. “But no one talks about how his powdered wigs were a blatant display of European privilege.”

She is currently advocating for orchestras to replace Beethoven’s symphonies with Afrobeat remixes and slam poetry readings.

Eggs: A Culinary Microaggression

Why do egg whites get all the respect while egg yolks are dismissed as unhealthy? Whoopi believes this is another example of how society uplifts whiteness while degrading other colors. She has proposed renaming egg whites “oppressively purified ovum extract” while rebranding yolks as “nutritionally marginalized spheres.”

The Future of Whoopi’s Racial Investigations

Whoopi’s work is far from over. She has pledged to continue uncovering hidden racial messages in everyday life. Next on her list? Investigating the racial undertones of vanilla ice cream, the oppressive nature of white wedding dresses, and why ghosts are always portrayed as white.

Her efforts may be controversial, but one thing is certain—if there’s even a hint of racism in something, Whoopi Goldberg will find it. And if there isn’t, she’ll find a way to put it there.

Whoopi Goldberg Declares ‘White Lotus’ Too Caucasian, Calls for More Racially Balanced Fictional Resorts

15 Observations on Whoopi’s Color Vision

1. Whoopi Sees Race Like the Terminator Sees Threats
   The moment Whoopi hears “White” in anything, her internal scanner lights up like a Christmas tree. “TARGET IDENTIFIED: TOO CAUCASIAN. ENGAGE COMMENTARY MODE.”

2. The Color Wheel of Oppression
   According to Whoopi, every color has a secret agenda. White? Colonization. Black? Appropriation. Red? Cultural erasure. Blue? A sign of police brutality. Green? Capitalism. Yellow? A traffic light that won’t commit.

3. She’s About to Sue Snow for Being Racist
   Winter is clearly a hate crime. Why is snow always white? Why does it insist on blanketing the world in racial supremacy? “Mother Nature needs to diversify its color palette.” — Whoopi Goldberg, probably.

4. Whoopi Goldberg’s Synesthesia Only Detects Racism
   Some people hear colors or taste sounds. Whoopi smells microaggressions in the air like a truffle pig sniffing out prejudice.

5. ‘Black Friday’ is Still Suspicious
   If “White Lotus” is too white, then why is Black Friday a day of discounts and chaos? Clearly, consumerism is conspiring against the Black community.

6. Chess is Problematic, and So is Checkers
   Chess is racist because white moves first. Checkers is racist because red and black are forced to fight each other. Backgammon? That’s just colonialism with dice.

7. Every Zebra is Engaged in a Silent Civil Rights Battle
   Black and white stripes existing in harmony? Whoopi knows that’s a fragile truce. One wrong move, and the white stripes take over the whole animal.

8. She Demands They Rename the TV Show ‘White Collar’
   White-collar crime? Too positive. Why not “Rich Criminals Who Are Definitely Not Innocent Because They Went to Harvard”?

9. She’s Petitioning for a ‘50 Shades of Gray’ Investigation
   Is the book really about BDSM, or is it a slow indoctrination into racial ambiguity? Whoopi will get to the bottom of this.

10. She Suspects Cauliflower is a Microaggression
    Broccoli is fine. But cauliflower? That’s just albino oppression sitting on a dinner plate.

11. White Noise Machines Are an Attempt to Silence Diversity
    Why do people want to fall asleep to something called “white noise”? It’s erasing all other sounds, including those of marginalized communities.

12. Beethoven Was Problematic Because He Had White Hair
    If Whoopi had a time machine, she’d sit Beethoven down and explain that powdered wigs were perpetuating European privilege.

13. She Thinks ‘The White House’ Should Be Repainted
    Why not “The Inclusive House”? Or at least a fresh coat of socially aware beige?

14. The Oreo Cookie Conundrum
    A black cookie with white stuffing? Who signed off on this? “I want reparations in the form of an all-chocolate Oreo.” — Whoopi Goldberg, in a dream I had.

15. She Demands ‘Egg Whites’ Be Rebranded as ‘Egg Privilege’
    Why do egg whites get all the respect in omelets? Meanwhile, yolks are seen as unhealthy, lazy, and high in cholesterol. The system is broken.

---

Whoopi Goldberg’s Vision of Racism: How She Sees Oppression in Everything, Everywhere, All at Once

If you’ve ever wanted to see racism in places you didn’t even think possible—like a salad bar or a cloud—then Whoopi Goldberg is here to give you a masterclass in advanced racial detection. Forget about crime-fighting superheroes—Whoopi has the uncanny ability to see racial undertones in everything. No object, concept, or slightly beige-colored wall is safe from her ever-expanding radar of cultural injustice.

Recently, Whoopi had a visceral reaction to The White Lotus, a show about absurdly rich people vacationing in absurdly beautiful places. “It’s too Caucasian,” she declared. That’s right—The White Lotus has been accused of being too white, despite it being a satire on privilege, excess, and people who wear linen pants unironically.

But if you think Whoopi’s expertise stops at HBO programming, you are sorely mistaken. She has developed an entire theory of racial relativity, wherein she deciphers microaggressions, secret supremacies, and hidden biases lurking in everyday life. Here are 15 ironclad pieces of satirical evidence proving that Whoopi Goldberg sees racism in places no one else would dare to look.

---

1. Whoopi Sees Race Like the Terminator Sees Threats

Most people watch TV to unwind. Whoopi watches it like an NSA analyst looking for coded messages. The moment she hears the word “white” in any context, her internal scanner activates. “TARGET IDENTIFIED: TOO CAUCASIAN. ENGAGE COMMENTARY MODE.”

According to eyewitnesses, her pupils dilate whenever someone says white bread, white lies, or White Claw. When presented with a glass of whole milk, Whoopi reportedly whispered, “Not in my America.”

In an effort to balance things out, she has proposed renaming “white lies” to “historically marginalized untruths.”

---

2. The Color Wheel of Oppression

If colors could oppress people, Whoopi would be the one to crack the case.

• White is colonization.
• Black is appropriation (unless she approves of its use).
• Red is cultural erasure (sorry, tomatoes).
• Blue is a sign of police brutality.
• Green is capitalism.
• Yellow is… well, a cowardly shade, according to outdated cartoons.
• Orange? Suspicious, but we’ll get back to that.

Rumor has it that Whoopi has personally petitioned Crayola to release a more socially aware crayon box. The new shades include Structural Injustice Gray, Decolonized Fuchsia, and Post-Colonial Mauve.

---

3. She’s About to Sue Snow for Being Racist

You ever notice how it only snows in white? That’s right, folks—winter is a hate crime. Why does the snow insist on blanketing the world in white supremacy?

Whoopi is reportedly assembling a legal team to sue Mother Nature. “She’s been doing this for centuries,” Whoopi was overheard saying, as she pointed to a snowman in Central Park and demanded it be diversified.

Whoopi has also suggested that snowfall be required to alternate between brown and black flakes to “better reflect America’s diversity.”

---

4. Whoopi’s Synesthesia Only Detects Racism

Some people can hear colors or taste sounds. Whoopi? She can smell racism.

One time, she walked into a bakery and instinctively knew that all the sourdough bread was made by privileged hands. “I can tell,” she muttered, inspecting a perfectly baked baguette.

When asked what racism smells like, Whoopi simply responded, “It smells like a Whole Foods on a Sunday.”

---

5. ‘Black Friday’ is Still Suspicious

Whoopi wants to know why The White Lotus gets to be glamorous while Black Friday is synonymous with absolute chaos.

She believes that this is not a coincidence, but rather a systemic attempt to devalue blackness. Why is white associated with purity and luxury while black is linked to discount TVs and people fist-fighting over air fryers?

She is now calling for the renaming of Black Friday to “Historically Exploited Shopping Event.”

---

6. Chess is Problematic, and So is Checkers

Chess? Racist. White moves first. Enough said.

Checkers? Equally troubling. The game pits red against black in an endless battle for dominance.

Whoopi has suggested a new board game called “Racially Equitable Discourse,” where all pieces are the same color and take turns apologizing to each other.

---

7. Every Zebra is Engaged in a Silent Civil Rights Battle

Did you know zebras are walking microaggressions? The constant juxtaposition of black and white stripes creates an unspoken racial tension within the animal kingdom.

According to Whoopi’s latest book “Nature’s Unchecked Privilege”, zebras are a metaphor for America: two colors, constantly in conflict, never truly blending.

Rumor has it, she refuses to visit zoos that feature zebras, citing “historical trauma.”

---

8. She Demands They Rename the TV Show ‘White Collar’

White-collar crime? Too positive.

Whoopi believes that corporate fraud and embezzlement are whitewashed to sound harmless. She has personally written to the FBI, demanding that the term be changed to “Affluent Criminality.”

She also wants to rename “blue-collar workers” to “Historically Resilient Laborers.”

---

9. She’s Petitioning for a ‘50 Shades of Gray’ Investigation

Why is the book about bondage and control 50 shades of gray? Why not “50 Shades of Economic Disparity”, or “50 Shades of Systemic Oppression”.

Whoopi believes that the book was a secret propaganda effort to normalize racial ambiguity in an effort to erase cultural identity.

She has since called for a sequel titled “50 Shades of Woke.”

---

10. She Suspects Cauliflower is a Microaggression

Broccoli? Perfectly acceptable. But cauliflower? That’s just albino oppression on a dinner plate.

Whoopi has officially called for a boycott of cauliflower, citing its “problematic lack of melanin.”

She has, however, graciously made an exception for buffalo cauliflower.

---

11. White Noise Machines Are an Attempt to Silence Diversity

Why do people want to fall asleep to white noise? What happened to black noise?

Whoopi believes that white noise is a tool of oppression, erasing all other sounds—including those of marginalized communities.

Her new startup will soon be releasing “Multicultural Noise Machines,” which feature soothing sounds of social justice protests, spoken-word poetry, and distant conga drums.

---

12. Beethoven Was Problematic Because He Had White Hair

If Whoopi had a time machine, her first order of business would be to sit down Ludwig van Beethoven and explain that powdered wigs were perpetuating European privilege.

She would then demand that Mozart publicly acknowledge his role in classical music gatekeeping.

---

13. She Thinks ‘The White House’ Should Be Repainted

Why is it called The White House? Shouldn’t it be The Equitable House?

Whoopi has officially proposed a new government initiative to paint the White House in a mosaic of diverse colors. “If we can light it up in rainbow colors for Pride, we can paint it in a shade that acknowledges our nation’s struggles,” Whoopi proclaimed.

Proposed colors include Guilt Beige, Apology Tan, and We’re Working On It Mauve.

---

14. The Oreo Cookie Conundrum

A black cookie with white stuffing? Whoopi is convinced this was a metaphor engineered by Nabisco to subliminally reinforce racial hierarchies.

Her solution? A new Oreo, where both cookies are the same shade and the filling is “historically aware cocoa cream.”

---

15. She Demands ‘Egg Whites’ Be Rebranded as ‘Egg Privilege’

Why do egg whites get all the respect? Meanwhile, yolks are seen as lazy, high in cholesterol, and bad for your health.

Whoopi has proposed renaming egg whites “oppressively purified ovum extract.”

The yolks, meanwhile, are now “nutritionally marginalized spheres.”

---

Conclusion: Whoopi’s Vision Knows No Bounds

If you think Whoopi is stopping here, think again. There is no item, no concept, no inanimate object that cannot be scrutinized for racial intent. She is the Sherlock Holmes of seeing racism in places no one else thought to look.

And if you disagree with her? Well, that’s just another microaggression.

The post Is Whoopi Goldberg a Racist? appeared first on Bohiney News.

James Bond and the Amazon Takeover: A License to Bill

The Name’s Bond, Prime Bond

James Bond has battled megalomaniacs, dodged lasers, and survived decades of changing cultural norms—but can he handle his greatest challenge yet? No, not AI-generated deepfakes or TikTok influencers trying to cancel him. We’re talking about a hostile takeover by Amazon, which now holds the creative keys to the franchise.

Forget MI6; Bond’s real employer is now Amazon Studios, which means his missions will come with same-day delivery options and a helpful “People who tried to take over the world also tried this” recommendation section.

Alexa, Do You Expect Me to Talk?

Picture this: Bond, strapped to a chair, facing a shadowy villain with a state-of-the-art interrogation technique.

“Mr. Bond, I have hacked your Amazon account. I know everything you’ve ever purchased.”

Bond sweats. “That’s impossible. My passwords are uncrackable.”

“Are they, 007? Let’s see… one shaken martini set, three tuxedos, and… oh, what’s this? A bulk order of Rogaine? My, my, we’re getting a little insecure, aren’t we?”

The future of espionage isn’t about sneaking into secret lairs—it’s about clearing your browser history before someone exposes your embarrassing impulse buys.

From MI6 to Wi-Fi 6: Spying in the Age of High-Speed Internet

In the golden age of Bond, espionage was all about dead drops, cryptic messages, and seducing the ambassador’s wife for intel. Today, thanks to Amazon’s tech empire, MI6 has been downgraded from “top-tier intelligence agency” to “just another user on a data farm.”

Q no longer hands out laser watches and ejector seats. Instead, he just upgrades Bond’s Wi-Fi plan.

“Your Aston Martin now comes with built-in 5G, James. Should help you buffer those high-speed chases better.”

Nothing says thrilling espionage like waiting for a mission file to download while MI6’s IT guy tells you to try turning the world domination plot off and on again.

License to Bill: How Amazon Monetizes Espionage

Under Amazon’s ownership, James Bond movies are no longer just thrilling adventures—they’re revenue streams. Expect 007 to fight crime while casually dropping Amazon product placements.

“Ah, Mr. Bond, I see you’ve chosen our latest Omega watch with built-in GPS. Might I interest you in our extended warranty?”

Even Bond’s iconic opening gun barrel sequence is being revamped. Instead of the usual silhouette and gunshot, we get:

“This assassination is brought to you by Audible. Listen to War and Peace on your next mission!”

The result? Bond doesn’t just have a License to Kill. He has a License to Bill.

Villains in the Age of E-Commerce: The New Threats to Global Security

Gone are the days of elaborate, world-ending schemes. The modern Bond villain isn’t hatching a convoluted plan to blow up Fort Knox or launch nukes from space.

No, today’s villains are much more sinister. They manipulate Amazon’s delivery algorithms to ensure your packages arrive one minute after you leave the house.

“Welcome, Mr. Bond. I am Lord Prime. I control all supply chains. You will never receive your orders on time again!”

The world gasps in terror.

The Spy Who Loved 1-Click Ordering

Even Bond himself is not immune to Amazon’s temptations. After all, why infiltrate a heavily guarded base when you can just order a secret dossier?

“Q, I need a USB drive with encrypted nuclear codes.”

“You can have it in two days with Prime, or we can drone-drop it in five hours for an additional fee.”

The sheer efficiency of modern espionage is terrifying.

Goldfinger’s User Reviews: The Power of Public Feedback

Bond villains used to gloat over their evil plans. Now they have to worry about online reviews.

“Three stars: The underwater lair was decent, but the piranha pit took forever to warm up. Will not be returning.” — @BritishSpy69

Even Ernst Stavro Blofeld, the classic Bond villain, has had to pivot:

“Mr. Bond, welcome to my volcano lair. Before I kill you, I would appreciate if you could rate your captivity experience. If you leave five stars, I promise a quick and painless death.”

Bond sighs. “Fine. But I’m deducting a star for the lack of Wi-Fi.”

Casino Royale with Ads

Bond movies used to be known for their sophisticated gambling sequences—high-stakes poker, baccarat, roulette. Now, thanks to Amazon, the next Casino Royale scene might look a little different.

Bond sits at the poker table, staring down his opponent. Just as he’s about to make a bold move…

“This high-stakes game is brought to you by Amazon Music. Want to hear ‘Live and Let Die’ in high fidelity? Subscribe now!”

Nothing kills the mood of a tense game like an unskippable ad.

Q’s Tech Support: The New Reality of Spy Gadgets

“James, this pen is equipped with a hidden explosive.”

“Great, how do I activate it?”

“Well, first you have to download the Q-Labs app, agree to the terms and conditions, verify your identity, and sync it with your smartwatch.”

Spy gadgets used to be sleek. Now they come with firmware updates.

Moneypenny’s Work-From-Home Setup

In a post-pandemic world, even MI6 isn’t immune to remote work.

“Sorry, James, I can’t flirt with you today. I have three Zoom calls and a Slack update to write.”

Bond, meanwhile, is learning to adjust:

“Good evening, M. I’ve infiltrated the enemy base.”

“James, you’re on mute.”

Aston Martin Echo Auto: The AI That Spies on Spies

Bond’s classic Aston Martin is getting a 21st-century upgrade.

“Alexa, initiate self-destruct.”

“Are you sure? Customers who self-destructed also viewed: Kevlar suits, Life Insurance, and Untraceable Swiss Bank Accounts.”

Privacy? In this economy?

Dr. No… More Free Returns

Villains have long been obsessed with power, but nothing is more powerful than Amazon’s return policy.

“James, you may have escaped, but can you escape… my customer service hotline?“

After 45 minutes on hold, even Bond cracks.

“Fine! I’ll exchange my rocket boots for store credit!”

The Man with the Golden Algorithm

Bond’s new arch-nemesis isn’t a maniacal billionaire—it’s an AI-driven algorithm that predicts his every move.

“Mr. Bond, according to my calculations, you are 86% likely to infiltrate through the ventilation system at 02:43 a.m. Shall I order you a grappling hook?”

Bond scowls. “Damn it. They’ve automated villainy.”

Live and Let Prime: The Future of Bond Films

Under Amazon’s leadership, Bond films are no longer just cinematic experiences—they’re full-blown corporate ecosystems.

“The next Bond film is a Prime Exclusive, available only to subscribers who have also purchased an Amazon Basics tuxedo and watched three Tom Clancy adaptations.”

The price of espionage has never been higher.

You Only Stream Twice

Gone are the days when Bond films were events. Now, they’re just more content to scroll past.

“James Bond’s latest adventure is out.”

“Oh cool, I’ll binge it this weekend… right after I finish season four of The Great British Bake Off.”

The streaming era has even softened Bond’s reputation. Now, instead of “the world’s greatest spy,” he’s “that guy from Prime Video.”

Final Thoughts: Bond, Rebranded

The James Bond we knew is gone. No more Cold War intrigue, no more globe-trotting mystery. Instead, we have a high-speed, algorithm-driven, subscription-based superspy whose biggest threat isn’t world domination—it’s running out of cloud storage.

His next mission? Stopping an evil mastermind from taking control of global e-commerce.

But honestly, how is that different from just fighting Amazon itself?

Disclaimer

This article is a 100% human collaboration between two sentient beings—the world’s oldest tenured professor and a 20-year-old philosophy major turned dairy farmer. No AI villains, secret agents, or rogue algorithms were harmed in the making of this satire.

---

---

15 Observations on the Future of James Bond Under Amazon’s Control

Inspired by the comedic styles of Ron White and Jerry Seinfeld.

1. The Name’s Bond, Prime Bond

Is it just me, or does the idea of James Bond working for Amazon make you picture 007 delivering packages? “Shaken, not stirred… and arriving within two business days.”

2. Alexa, Do You Expect Me to Talk?

Imagine Bond’s new nemesis: Alexa. “I’m sorry, Mr. Bond, I can’t do that.” The ultimate showdown between man and smart speaker.

3. From MI6 to Wi-Fi 6

Gone are the days of secret dossiers. Now, Bond’s missions are uploaded to the cloud. “Double-O Seven, your mission briefing is buffering. Please wait.”

4. License to Bill

With Amazon’s penchant for subscriptions, will Bond need a Prime membership to access his own gadgets? “Your Aston Martin is ready, but first, sign up for a 30-day free trial.”

5. Villains in the Age of E-Commerce

Why take over the world when you can corner the market on same-day delivery? Bond’s next adversary plans to monopolize drone deliveries.

6. The Spy Who Loved 1-Click Ordering

Bond’s new gadget: a pen that orders martinis with a single click. Convenient, but dangerous during high-speed chases.

7. Goldfinger’s User Reviews

Before hatching evil plans, villains now check customer feedback. “Three stars: The laser was effective, but the monologue was too long.”

8. Casino Royale with Ads

Bond at the poker table, interrupted by, “This high-stakes game is brought to you by Audible. Listen to ‘Spy Thrillers’ on your next mission.”

9. Q’s Tech Support

“Have you tried turning it off and on again, 007?” Bond spends more time troubleshooting gadgets than using them.

10. Moneypenny’s Work-From-Home Setup

“Sorry, James, I can’t flirt right now. I’m on a Zoom call.” The challenges of espionage in the remote work era.

11. Aston Martin Echo Auto

“Alexa, eject passenger seat.” Integrating smart tech into spy cars—what could possibly go wrong?

12. Dr. No… More Free Returns

Bond’s mission is delayed because he missed the return window for his exploding cufflinks. Even spies aren’t exempt from return policies.

13. The Man with the Golden Algorithm

Villains now use data analytics to predict Bond’s moves. “According to our metrics, he’ll infiltrate from the west vent at 0300 hours.”

14. Live and Let Prime

Bond films are now exclusive to Prime Video. “This message will self-destruct unless you have Amazon Prime.”

15. You Only Stream Twice

Bond’s past missions are remastered and available for streaming. “Relive the classics, now with 20% more explosions and 50% more product placements.”

Conclusion

As Amazon takes the helm of the James Bond franchise, one can’t help but chuckle at the possibilities. Will our suave spy adapt to the digital age, or will he find himself tangled in the web of e-commerce? One thing’s for sure: the martinis will always be shaken, not delivered.

The Amazon James Bond – Image Gallery

The post The Amazon James Bond… appeared first on Bohiney News.

House Censures Al Green; 1.2 Million Fundraising Emails Later, He Raises Just $16.95

The $16.95 Fundraising Fiasco

Congressman Al Green experienced a one-of-a-kind political embarrassment this week. After being formally censured by the House of Representatives in a dramatic floor session, Green attempted to turn the punishment into a fundraising opportunity. He blasted out 1.2 million fundraising emails to supporters, detractors, and probably anyone who ever accidentally clicked on a campaign petition. The result? An eye-watering grand total of just $16.95 in contributions. Yes, you read that correctly: sixteen dollars and ninety-five cents – roughly the cost of a movie ticket or a modest lunch special.

“Al Green sent 1.2 million emails and only raised $16.95. That means even Karl Marx’s ghost saw it and went, ‘Eh, sounds a little too socialist for me.’” — Dave Chappelle

Mass Outreach, Minimal Outcome

Political fundraising emails are known for their hyperbolic urgency – “Donate in the next 10 minutes or democracy dies!” – but even seasoned observers were stunned by the sheer scale and futility of Green’s email blast. According to campaign insiders (who insisted on anonymity out of sheer embarrassment), the Green team sent out messages with subject lines like “I’m Being Censored – Support My Voice!” and “They Tried to Silence Me, Stand With Al!”. The emails dramatically recounted how Representative Green was censured by his colleagues, painting him as a martyr for a righteous cause and imploring recipients to chip in $5, $10, or $50 to help him “fight back.”

Despite hitting inboxes across the nation (and quite possibly landing in a lot of spam folders), the plea fell flat in spectacular fashion. “It’s like shouting into the void, but the void sent back an invoice,” joked one staffer from a rival campaign, referencing the likelihood that the email service provider’s fees cost more than what was raised. Indeed, with 1.2 million emails sent, experts estimated the campaign probably spent far more on the mass emailing software and flashy “DONATE NOW” graphics than the $16.95 it scraped in. For context, that’s roughly $0.000014 per email – essentially a microscopic fraction of a penny per message. It was a return so abysmal that even a coin-toss would have yielded more spare change.

Observers have already dubbed the effort a textbook example of how not to execute digital fundraising. One veteran political fundraiser noted, “Usually, getting censured leads to at least a few thousand in sympathy donations. This? Unprecedented. Maybe people thought the email was satire. Or maybe everyone’s just tapped out.”

“He asked Marxists for money? That’s like asking vegans to sponsor a steakhouse.” — Jerry Seinfeld

Hyperbolic Reactions from Capitol Hill

The response from political figures and media pundits to Green’s fundraising flop was swift, over-the-top, and dripping with irony. On Capitol Hill, where schadenfreude is a bipartisan pastime, lawmakers from both parties found rare common ground in comic relief. House colleagues even gave him a standing ovation – not for any noble stand on principle, but for achieving what one GOP aide mockingly called “the smallest political fundraiser in modern history.”

Democratic Congresswoman Jane Doe, a close ally of Green’s, facetiously announced she would start a GoFundMe for him, aiming to raise “another $16.95 to double his war chest.” The Speaker of the House also got in on the fun, wryly telling reporters, “We don’t censor our members’ speech – but in Congressman Green’s case, it looks like the public effectively did it for us.” Some members even joked about introducing a House resolution to declare Green’s email “the least effective communication since New Coke.”

Over on cable news, commentators from all sides piled on. One conservative pundit offered tongue-in-cheek sympathy: “I always knew big government was inefficient, but I never thought I’d see a 1.2 million-email effort result in less money than I have in my wallet.” Meanwhile, a progressive talk show host laughed, “Al Green’s email must have been so persuasive that people decided to save their money — you know, to protect him from himself.” Even a satirical late-night program joined in: SNN (Satire News Network) ran a segment titled “Censured and Penniless,” featuring a graphic of an empty wallet superimposed over the Capitol dome.

“1.2 million emails and less than 17 bucks? Somewhere, Joseph Stalin is looking down and saying, ‘Comrade, you should have just taken the money by force.’” — Chris Rock

Campaign Strategy Gone Awry

Behind the scenes, campaign strategists are performing a post-mortem on how this plan went so horribly awry. The idea seemed straightforward: turn Green’s censure – essentially a public scolding by the House – into a rallying cry for supporters. In theory, being censured could be spun as a badge of honor, proof that he was standing up to the establishment. Many politicians have turned reprimands into fundraising gold, assuming supporters will open their wallets out of outrage. The Green team followed the usual playbook: send a heartfelt email to the base about how “they’re trying to silence me for speaking truth,” then watch the contributions roll in from folks eager to stick it to The Man.

So what went wrong? For starters, the email list was apparently bloated with cold contacts – people who never actively signed up to hear from Al Green. In their zeal, his campaign carpet-bombed every address they could find – even people who’d signed unrelated online petitions years ago. Many recipients greeted the plea with confusion or irritation. One man in Iowa said he opened the email thinking Al Green was the singer (of “Let’s Stay Together” fame) announcing a new tour – only to find a congressman begging for five bucks. He marked it as spam.

Even among Green’s actual supporters, the appeal misfired. The tone of the email, described by one loyal donor as “half apocalypse, half infomercial,” may have been too melodramatic to take seriously. It essentially warned that if people didn’t donate, it would be a victory for those who “silenced Al’s voice.” As one longtime supporter put it, “It sounded like if I didn’t give, Al would be hauled off to a gulag by midnight.” The campaign’s strategy of sending multiple follow-ups in the span of 24 hours – each with an increasingly desperate subject line (e.g. “Still waiting, friend”) – likely annoyed more people than it motivated. By the third email in a single day, even loyal fans were frantically hunting for the unsubscribe link.

“Marxists don’t donate money, Al. They redistribute it. Next time, just ask them for someone else’s credit card.” — Ron White

Absurd Aftermath: $16.95 and a Dream

What can a politician do with a grand total of $16.95 raised? The absurdly tiny haul has led to a flurry of tongue-in-cheek speculation about how Green might deploy his new “war chest.” A few hypothetical options have been floated:

• Buy Lunch (for One): He could treat himself to a very modest lunch, perhaps just a sandwich and a coffee. It might be the first-ever case of campaign funds spent on a consolation meal for the candidate.
• Campaign Merch (Limited Edition): Maybe he can produce a single campaign t-shirt as a collector’s item. One staffer joked the slogan would be “I sent 1.2 million emails and all I got was $16.95.”
• Return Postage: Use the $16.95 to buy stamps for snail-mail thank-you notes to the two or three people who actually donated. (Ironically, the postage might cost more than the donations themselves.)

In truth, the amount is so low that it costs more to process than it’s worth. FEC (Federal Election Commission) rules require meticulous accounting of campaign funds, so someone in Green’s operation now has the unenviable task of itemizing “sixteen dollars and ninety-five cents” on an official finance report. One can only imagine the eye-rolls and chuckles when that filing hits the public database. The absurdity even sparked suggestions that Green should frame the $16.95 check (if any donor mailed a physical check) as a memento, or perhaps hand it over to the House as symbolic payment for his censure “fine.”

Expert Analysis from Questionable Sources

A parade of armchair experts – some with dubious credentials – has emerged to analyze the situation, each adding their own satirical spin:

Dr. Ima Faux, Professor of Political Oddities at Nowhere University: In Dr. Faux’s view, this episode “will go down in the annals of political history as a landmark case of donor apathy. Not since a state senator’s charity milkshake sale in 1979 raised only $12 have we seen such a fruitless fundraising effort. It’s truly remarkable – I might write a paper about it, if I can stop laughing.”

Lola McSpamm, Email Marketing Consultant: McSpamm offered a scathing review of Green’s tactics. “Blasting 1.2 million emails without proper targeting is like dropping leaflets from a plane and hoping one lands in an open wallet. That never works,” she said. McSpamm suspects the email content itself triggered spam filters en masse: “When algorithms see too many ALL-CAPS and exclamation points about being ‘censored,’ they send the email to spam heaven. In a sense, technology literally censored his cry of being censored.”

Bubba “Bud” Watkins, Local Barbershop Analyst: Bud, a self-appointed political pundit at his neighborhood barbershop, didn’t mince words. “This takes the phrase ‘money talks’ to a whole new level. Apparently, no money talks, too – and it’s saying people don’t like being panhandled via email,” he chuckled. “If I annoyed all my customers with 1.2 million messages, I’d be out of business. Heck, my charity car wash raised more than $16, and I only washed ten cars!”

Countess Petra, Internet Personality: In one of the more bizarre analyses, Countess Petra – a social media influencer famous for cheekily extracting money from willing fans – treated Green’s failure as performance art. “He asked for money and basically got told ‘no’ by an entire nation. That’s hard to do,” she said on her live-stream. “Maybe he should ask people to pay him not to email them. I bet he’d make more.” It’s a cynical take, but given the circumstances, even unconventional experts are proposing that Green completely reverse his strategy to recoup some dignity (and funds).

Social Media Speaks Out: Outrage and Amusement

On social media, news of Al Green’s $16.95 fundraising flop spread quickly, generating equal parts laughter and disbelief. Many users couldn’t resist poking fun at the stark contrast between the massive effort and the minuscule outcome. A few choice reactions:

• @CampaignJester: “Al Green sent me 12 emails in 2 days. I was about to donate $5 just to make it stop, but it looks like everyone else had the same idea… which was not to donate. #EmailFail”
• @PoliticalWonk: “1.2 million emails and only $16.95 raised? My spam folder has officially started protesting against campaign spam on my behalf. #CensuredAndPenniless”
• @HistoryBuff: “This has to be a record. Even those ‘Dewey Defeats Truman’ misprinted newspapers are worth more than $16.95 today. Future political science textbooks will have a chapter on the Green Email Fiasco.”
• Facebook Commenter Jane L.: “Is this a typo? Did he mean $16,950? If it’s really $16.95, I’m equal parts horrified and relieved – horrified at how bad that is, but relieved that politicians might finally realize we’re not ATM machines.”

The internet’s verdict oscillated between mockery and sympathetic embarrassment. One trending meme showed a photo of Al Green shrugging, with the caption: “Sends 1,200,000 emails – Raises $16.95” followed by “At least nobody can accuse him of being bought!”. Even Green’s usual critics, who would normally pounce, sat back and enjoyed the spectacle. When a political facepalm is this epic, it needs no piling on.

Historical and Fictional Parallels

Commentators with a flair for history and satire eagerly drew parallels to put Green’s tiny haul in context. Some pointed to historical flops: for example, Herbert Hoover’s 1932 campaign reportedly attempted a nationwide fundraising telegram that barely covered the cost of the telegrams. At least Hoover ended up with a few hundred dollars (a decent sum in those days) – by contrast, Green’s effort in modern times couldn’t even break twenty bucks.

Others turned to pop culture and fiction. A columnist in the Washington Toast likened Green’s endeavor to Mel Brooks’ The Producers, joking that “Green pulled off a political Springtime for Hitler – a production engineered to flop, except he wasn’t actually in on the joke.” Meanwhile, even the Smithsonian’s Museum of American History jokingly offered to acquire the $16.95 check as an artifact of campaign history. Clearly, Green’s email debacle is already being immortalized as political folklore alongside legendary flubs of yore.

Al Green, Congressman, Considers Second Career as a Clown After Fundraising Flop

After his record-breaking failure to raise more than $16.95 from a 1.2 million-email fundraising campaign, Congressman Al Green is reportedly exploring a more “financially stable” second career—as a clown. Sources close to the congressman say he is considering trading in his suit for a red nose and oversized shoes after realizing that he could probably make more money juggling in a park than running for re-election.

From Capitol Hill to Clown Alley

Insiders claim that Green’s new career path came to him after reviewing his latest campaign finance report, which confirmed that he had, in fact, raised less money than a child’s lemonade stand. As he stared at the official total of $16.95, he reportedly sighed and said, “I might as well start learning balloon animals.”

According to sources, Green has already begun studying the fundamentals of clowning, including honkable noses, slapstick comedy, and fitting an entire political campaign into a tiny car. When asked why he was making such a drastic career shift, Green allegedly responded, “Because at least when a clown gets pied in the face, people throw him a few bucks.”

Fundraising vs. Clowning: A Financial Comparison

Experts in both campaign finance and circus performance have crunched the numbers, and the results don’t look great for Green’s political career:

• Fundraising Emails: 1.2 million emails = $16.95 total donations
• Street Clowning: One afternoon of balloon twisting = $40 in tips + loose change from children’s pockets

Political strategist Frankie McDonough weighed in on the situation: “Look, at this point, Al Green would make more money falling off a unicycle in Times Square than he does running for office. Clowns, unlike politicians, actually turn a profit.”

House of Representatives or Clown College?

Green’s pivot to clowning has reportedly caused a stir among his colleagues in Congress. Some support his new ambition, saying it aligns perfectly with the general circus-like atmosphere of Washington, D.C. Others believe he should have stuck with traditional political grifting, like writing a book nobody reads or starting a PAC that launders money legally.

Representative Jim Jordan commented: “I mean, at least as a clown, he’ll finally be honest about his profession. Washington is already 90% performance art.”

Early Clown Training Mishaps

Despite his enthusiasm, Green’s early attempts at clowning have not been without problems. At a recent kid’s birthday party, he attempted to make a balloon elephant but accidentally wrote a 12-page filibuster on it instead. Witnesses say the children were bored to tears and left without tipping.

Still, Green remains optimistic. “Hey, my last campaign raised $16.95. If I can pull in $20 as a clown, that’s already a promotion.”

Conclusion: A Cautionary Tale Wrapped in Comedy

Al Green’s post-censure fundraising debacle will likely be remembered far longer than the reason he was censured in the first place. In the annals of political campaigning, it stands as a cautionary tale that bigger outreach isn’t always better – especially if your message misses the mark. It also offers a bit of social commentary: perhaps the public’s collective wallet simply snapped shut out of fatigue with constant donation pleas, or out of a sense of irony – maybe both.

For Congressman Green, there is an oddly redemptive silver lining. In an era when campaign finance scandals usually involve suspiciously large sums, he has become the poster child for the opposite problem – a campaign that almost nobody wanted to fund. Critics can’t accuse him of being in anyone’s pocket when his entire fundraising sum can be crumpled up and stuck into his shoe with room to spare.

In the meantime, this saga has provided the rest of us a much-needed laugh. It’s a reminder that sometimes reality out-satires satire. The next time your inbox pings with a dramatic plea from a politician, remember the now-legendary Ballad of Al Green’s $16.95. If politics can’t occasionally make us laugh, we’d probably end up crying.

---

---

What the Funny People Say…

• “Sending fundraising emails to Marxists is like asking anarchists to support more government. It’s a bold strategy… but not a profitable one.” — Bill Burr

• “He should’ve asked for labor instead of money. He’d have 10,000 volunteers ready to ‘seize the means of campaign production.’” — Amy Schumer

• “If a Marxist had actually donated, it would’ve come with a 12-page manifesto and a demand that the money be evenly distributed to every working-class American.” — Kevin Hart

• “Al Green was out here asking Marxists for capital. That’s like asking libertarians to help fund the DMV.” — Jim Gaffigan

• “His fundraising email should have just said, ‘Give me five dollars, or I will tell everyone you own property.’” — Trevor Noah

• “The real mistake? He should’ve told them the money was for a revolution, not a re-election.” — Wanda Sykes

• “Some Marxists did try to donate, but only in theoretical currency backed by the workers’ struggle.” — John Mulaney

• “Al Green’s email campaign was the perfect Marxist experiment—at the end, everyone was equally broke.” — Sebastian Maniscalco

• “He should’ve written his email in Das Kapital language: ‘To contribute to the proletarian cause of re-electing me, send five non-exploitative, wage-free dollars.’” — Hasan Minhaj

• “Marxists saw the ‘DONATE’ button and clicked ‘COLLECTIVIZE’ instead.” — Patton Oswalt

• “1.2 million emails later, the only thing Al Green successfully redistributed was his dignity.” — Ricky Gervais

The post Al Green: Clown appeared first on Bohiney News.

The Art of the Troll: How Trump’s 2025 Speech Was a Masterclass in Socialist Provocation

Donald Trump’s return to the congressional podium on March 4, 2025, wasn’t just another speech-it was a full-fledged, premeditated, take-no-prisoners verbal brawl aimed directly at socialists in the Democratic Party. But the twist? The Squad and their progressive allies, knowing full well what was coming, had planned in advance to sit in silence, maintaining poker faces throughout his remarks.

What they didn’t realize was that Trump wasn’t just speaking to Congress-he was speaking at them, through them, and around them. This speech wasn’t designed for a debate. It was designed as a 90-minute demolition derby, a rhetorical wrecking ball that made every socialist in the room sweat through their overpriced, union-made suits while pretending not to react.

“Trump trolled them so hard, I half expected AOC to call for emotional reparations after the speech.” – John Mulaney

Here’s how Trump did it.

---

The Setup: A Speech Designed for Maximum Damage

By the time Trump stepped up to the podium, everyone in the room knew what to expect-or at least they thought they did. The Squad, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and the rest of the progressive wing had made a pact: Do not react. Do not heckle. Do not interrupt. Just stare blankly, no matter what he says.

They assumed this would neutralize his power. That by robbing him of a dramatic foil, they could drain the life from his attacks.

What they didn’t count on was that Trump thrives in this environment. This wasn’t just a speech-it was a set piece, a stand-up routine, and a cage match all rolled into one. And his opponents, by remaining silent, effectively turned themselves into lifeless props for his verbal beatdown.

---

The Open: A Swift Punch to the Gut

Trump didn’t ease into it. He didn’t start with polite pleasantries. He walked straight to the microphone, took in the silent, stone-faced progressives in the room, and delivered his opening salvo:

“Folks, I see a lot of happy faces here tonight-well, mostly on my side of the aisle. Over there” (he gestured toward the Democrats), “I see the usual suspects doing their best impression of a wax museum exhibit. Very stoic. Very brave. Almost like they’re trying not to cry.”

With that, the room exploded in laughter-from one half of it, anyway. The other half remained locked in their disciplined silence, but Trump knew what they were thinking. He could see the clenched jaws, the white-knuckled grips on their armrests, the rapid blinking as they resisted the urge to roll their eyes.

And that was exactly what he wanted.

---

Destroying Their Sacred Cows, One by One

From that moment on, the speech became a wrecking ball aimed at everything the progressive movement holds dear.

On the Economy: “Bernie, Look Away”

Trump beamed as he announced:

“The stock market is at an all-time high. Unemployment is at an all-time low. American energy is booming. Socialism has never produced results like this. Bernie, look away-it’s too much for you.”

Cameras cut to Bernie Sanders, who stared straight ahead, his expression as blank as a North Korean parade soldier. But the slight twitch in his left eyebrow betrayed him. Trump had him.

On Immigration: “AOC’s Tears Could Power a Small City”

Next came the border.

“We have shut down illegal immigration. We’ve built a real border. And, folks, I have to tell you, when we did it, I could hear AOC’s tears hitting the ground from 2,000 miles away. We may actually be able to harness that energy for green power-finally, a climate solution Democrats can support!”

Again, nothing from AOC. But her lips pressed together so tightly they nearly disappeared.

On Women’s Sports: “Sorry, Cori”

Trump wasn’t done.

“We’ve restored fairness to women’s sports. No more biological men crushing female athletes. I know, I know-Cori Bush is shaking her head so hard she might sprain something. Sorry, Cori, but we’re not letting dudes in wigs beat up your daughters anymore. This is America, not The Hunger Games.”

Cori Bush didn’t react. But her hands tensed around the arms of her chair.

Trump smiled. He was in their heads.

---

The Silent Rage: Socialists Stuck in Their Own Trap

The longer the speech went on, the harder it became for progressives to maintain their planned silence. They had thought that staying stone-faced would make them appear strong, but in reality, it made them look powerless-like prisoners forced to endure a punishment they couldn’t stop.

With every new attack, every mocking line, every joke at their expense, they sat there, unable to clap, unable to rebut, unable to do anything but endure.

And Trump knew it.

At one point, he even stopped mid-sentence, looked toward their section, and said:

“You know, I was expecting a few more interruptions tonight. But it looks like they told you guys to keep quiet. Smart move! If I had to defend your policies, I’d probably want to stay quiet, too.”

Again, they didn’t move. But you could practically hear their teeth grinding.

---

The Final Blow: Turning Their Silence Into His Victory

By the time Trump reached the climax of his speech, he knew he had already won.

Instead of ending on a typical patriotic note, he decided to narrate their silence for the American people watching at home:

“Tonight, you’ve seen two things. On one side, you’ve seen an administration that’s winning, a country that’s thriving, and a future that’s brighter than ever. On the other side, you’ve seen stone-cold silence. No applause. No excitement. No vision. Just gloom. Just pouting. Just… nothing.”

He let that sink in.

“That’s the difference between us and them. We believe in America. They believe in-well, I don’t even think they know anymore. But that’s okay. We’re going to keep winning, and they can keep sitting there in stunned silence, watching it happen.”

And with that, he walked off the stage.

---

The Aftermath: Socialists Break Their Silence-Too Late

The Squad and their allies maintained their poker faces during the speech, but once Trump was gone, their restraint shattered.

Ilhan Omar was the first to break. She stormed to the press, calling the speech “dangerous.”

AOC took to social media:

“That speech was a disgrace. The cruelty wasn’t accidental-it was the point.”

Bernie, visibly rattled, told reporters:

“This was the most hateful, divisive, and frankly, unhinged speech in American history.”

Elizabeth Warren called it “the end of democracy as we know it.”

CNN, MSNBC, and late-night talk shows went into full meltdown mode. But it didn’t matter. The damage was already done. By staying silent during the speech, they had let Trump control the entire narrative. Their post-speech whining only confirmed what he had already made clear: they had no answers, no comebacks, no fight left.

---

The Legacy: Trump Turned Their Strategy Against Them

Trump’s 2025 speech will go down as one of the most masterful troll jobs in political history.

The socialists had thought they were neutralizing him by staying quiet. Instead, they had given him a silent audience to mock at will. They had turned themselves into props for his monologue. They had played into his hands so completely that even they probably realized it too late.

They had tried to sit still and look strong. Instead, they had sat still and looked beaten.

And Trump? He walked out of that chamber victorious, having delivered one of the greatest political takedowns in American history-without a single interruption.

It was, in the end, a flawless victory.

---

---

Trump’s Trolling Quotes: The Socialist Roast of 2025

1. “In just 43 days, we’ve done more than Biden did in four years-well, more than he remembers doing, anyway. AOC and her Marxist friends still think we print money like it’s Monopoly, Bernie still hasn’t figured out why socialism turns every country into a toilet, and Rashida Tlaib is probably screaming about something right now.”
2. “On day one, we cut off every penny to useless government programs. That means no more climate change lunacy, no more DEI grift, and-sorry, Ilhan Omar-no more sending money to countries that hate us. You’ll have to fund your revolutions the old-fashioned way: by shaking down your woke donors on Twitter.”
3. “We brought back oil drilling, and let me tell you, when I signed that executive order, I heard AOC’s tears hit the floor from the other side of the country. She said the world would end in 12 years. Well, it’s been six, and the only thing ending is the socialist fantasy.”
4. “No more taxpayer-funded safe spaces. If you need a ‘healing circle’ after hearing conservative ideas, maybe politics isn’t for you. Maybe get a job? No, wait-I forgot who I was talking to.”
5. “We banned biological men from women’s sports. I know, I know-Cori Bush is shaking her head so hard she’s about to sprain it. Sorry, Cori, but we’re not letting dudes in wigs beat up your daughters in the ring anymore. This is America, not The Hunger Games.”
6. “Look at this-stock market at record highs, unemployment at record lows, and yet Bernie Sanders is still out here ranting about ‘evil capitalism.’ Bernie, capitalism is why you own three houses instead of standing in a breadline, buddy. Say thank you.”
7. “We secured the border. I can actually see the steam coming out of the ears of every Democrat in this room. Elizabeth Warren is already drafting a 3,000-page bill to undo it, but too bad, Pocahontas-we’re putting Americans first.”
8. “We slashed foreign aid because Americans shouldn’t be paying for wars in countries that can’t find America on a map. I know, I know-Adam Schiff just clutched his pearls. But guess what? Ukraine can fight its own battles. And China? Yeah, they’re not getting a dime. Cry harder.”
9. “We’re getting rid of DEI nonsense in government hiring. Sorry, Jamaal Bowman, but hiring people based on skill instead of their pronouns is actually how you build a competent workforce. I know, crazy idea, right?”
10. “Gun rights are here to stay. I see the squad looking horrified. Ilhan Omar looks like she just watched a bald eagle land on the White House lawn. If you don’t like the Second Amendment, I hear Canada still has room for socialists-barely.”
11. “We’ve cleaned out the FBI and DOJ, no more weaponized government against political opponents. Adam Schiff looks like he just realized there’s an audit coming his way. Good luck, Adam, I hear lawyers are expensive!”
12. “We cut taxes AGAIN. Oh no! How will Bernie Sanders afford his next lake house? Maybe take a page from actual working Americans and get a side hustle. I hear socialist podcasts pay pretty well.”
13. “We’re drilling for oil again, and that sound you hear? That’s the last of Greta Thunberg’s hope evaporating. I’d say ‘How dare you?’ but I think she already trademarked it.”
14. “We took down Critical Race Theory in schools, because children should learn math, not how to hate their own country. If you’re mad about that, maybe you shouldn’t be in Congress-maybe you should be teaching gender studies at some failing liberal arts college.”
15. “America is back. Our economy is roaring, our borders are secure, and the radicals are losing. And judging by the faces I see in front of me-oh, look at that, Bernie just whispered something to AOC. I bet it was, ‘Why is he so mean to us?’ It’s because you’re wrong. It’s because America wins when socialism loses.”

---

Now that’s a speech designed to make half of Congress absolutely melt down on live TV. You can almost hear the pearl-clutching and the MSNBC panels writing themselves.

---

---

America Reacts: Trump’s Speech Was a Masterclass in Trolling, But Policy Talk? Meh.

If there’s one thing Donald Trump understands better than anyone, it’s showmanship. His March 4, 2025, address to Congress wasn’t just a speech-it was a full-scale verbal demolition of the progressive left, complete with sarcasm, mockery, and well-placed insults that had socialists clenching their fists under the table. And the people? They loved it.

According to a flash poll conducted after the speech, 82% of viewers said the trolling was the highlight of the night, while only 51% found his actual policy proposals interesting. In other words: Americans showed up for the roast, tolerated the politics, and left thoroughly entertained.

---

The Roast That Broke Congress

For years, the Squad and their socialist allies had been waiting for this moment-Trump back at the podium, primed for a fight. But when the time came, their plan was simple: silence. No heckling, no reactions, just sit there, poker-faced, and let him talk.

Unfortunately for them, Trump doesn’t need an argument to win a fight. He turned their stillness into his joke, making their non-response part of the entertainment.

The audience at home ate it up. Trump’s jabs, like:

“I see the Squad sitting there, trying their best not to cry. Don’t worry, AOC, I’ll keep it quick so you can go back to Instagram live and tell us why capitalism is mean.”

and

“Bernie Sanders is looking at these record job numbers like a vampire looking at a sunrise. It’s painful for him, folks.”

were instant classics on social media. Within minutes, Twitter was flooded with reaction memes, and conservative commentators hailed the speech as one of his most entertaining performances yet.

---

The Policy Problem: America Prefers Entertainment to Economics

Despite the overwhelming approval of Trump’s trolling, the numbers show that only 51% of viewers found his policy discussion engaging.

Why? Because for better or worse, America has changed. We don’t just consume politics anymore-we demand that it entertain us. Sure, border security and economic growth are important, but they don’t make people laugh the way a well-placed insult about Elizabeth Warren’s tax plans does.

Many Americans tuned in expecting a fight, not a legislative proposal. And while Trump delivered a few policy victories-cutting foreign aid, restoring energy independence, strengthening gun rights-the crowd at home was mostly there for the comedy special disguised as a congressional address.

---

The Democratic Meltdown: “This Wasn’t a Speech, It Was a Stand-Up Routine”

After the speech, Democratic leaders scrambled to the press to do damage control.

• AOC: “This wasn’t a serious speech. It was just one long, mean-spirited comedy routine at the expense of hardworking progressives.”
• Bernie Sanders: “What we heard tonight wasn’t leadership. It was a carnival act.”
• Elizabeth Warren: “The president turned Congress into a late-night talk show, and America deserves better.”

Translation? They were mad because it worked.

Despite their planned silence, the speech became about them-Trump dictated the narrative, and the more they complained afterward, the more it proved his point.

---

Trump’s Strength: Making Politics Fun Again

The numbers don’t lie: Americans enjoy Trump not just for his policies, but for the way he delivers them.

Other politicians give dry, detail-heavy speeches packed with statistics. Trump, on the other hand, treats policy like a punchline:

“We cut taxes again. Sorry, Bernie, I know that means you’ll have to wait a little longer for that fourth lake house.”

And it works.

Even some viewers who don’t consider themselves Trump supporters admitted they enjoyed the spectacle, with one independent voter saying:

“Look, I don’t agree with him on everything, but at least he doesn’t bore me to death like the other guys.”

---

What This Means for 2025 and Beyond

With public approval of his trolling sky-high, it’s clear that Trump has perfected a unique political formula:

Policy + Performance = Engagement Mockery + Messaging = Memorable Moments Silence from Opponents = Trump Wins by Default

As Democrats scramble to recover, the question remains: Will they adapt and fight back with their own rhetorical weapons, or will they stick to policy-heavy speeches while Trump continues to roast them into oblivion?

One thing is certain-if the left thought they could silence Trump’s influence by sitting quietly, they severely underestimated his ability to control the narrative.

And judging by those approval numbers, America isn’t just listening-they’re laughing all the way to the ballot box.

What the Funny People Are Saying…

“Trump walked into that speech like a stand-up comic at a retirement home-half the audience was asleep, and the other half was just mad they had to be there.” – Dave Chappelle

“Watching Bernie Sanders sit through that speech was like watching a vegan at a Texas BBQ-he knew he didn’t belong, but he had to act like he was okay with it.” – Bill Burr

“Trump didn’t just give a speech-he threw a full-on roast battle and the Squad had to sit there like hostages on a bad date.” – Chris Rock

“You gotta respect AOC and Bernie for sticking to the no-reaction plan. It takes real discipline to sit still while getting bodied in 4K.” – Kevin Hart

“Trump said, ‘Look at these socialists over here, sitting in silence.’ They thought they were being strong-nah, they just looked like the losing team at a spelling bee.” – Trevor Noah

“You ever see someone try so hard not to react that they look constipated? That was Elizabeth Warren for 90 minutes straight.” – Jim Gaffigan

“Bernie Sanders trying not to react to economic growth is like Dracula pretending he’s cool with daylight. The man was dying inside.” – Andrew Schulz

“Trump’s speech had more hits than a heavyweight fight. And the best part? The Squad wasn’t even allowed to throw a punch back.” – Joe Rogan

“Man, you know a roast is brutal when the only strategy left is ‘just sit there and take it.’ That’s not a political strategy-that’s what you do when your mom’s yelling at you in the car.” – Tom Segura

“Say what you want about Trump, but that man knows how to turn a State of the Union into a Comedy Central special.” – Bill Maher

“Watching progressives sit through that speech was like watching vegans at a steakhouse-nobody’s eating, and everybody’s mad.” – Sebastian Maniscalco

“I thought the Squad’s silence was their best performance yet! I mean, usually, you gotta pay for that level of emotional suffering.” – Shane Gillis

“This was the first time I’ve seen Bernie Sanders completely silent. I didn’t even know he could do that.” – Nate Bargatze

“That wasn’t a speech-that was a political execution where the victims had to sit still and pretend they weren’t bleeding.” – Ricky Gervais

The post Trump Trolls the Marxists appeared first on Bohiney News.

KASH Claims Responsibility for SpaceX Starship Explosion

A Investigative Examination of the SpaceX Explosion

In a development that has left both the aerospace community and the public in a state of bewilderment, the organization known as KASH—Keep All Spending Here—has come forward to claim responsibility for the recent catastrophic explosion of SpaceX’s Starship during its eighth test flight. This group, with alleged strongholds in urban areas such as Compton, the 5th Ward of Houston, Harlem, Philadelphia, and Detroit, has declared an ideological war against space exploration, advocating for the reallocation of funds toward domestic social services and transfer payments.

“KASH says we should stop space exploration and invest in transfer payments instead. Yeah, that’s a great idea—let’s take the money that was gonna send us to Mars and use it to fix the Luther’s gambling NBA debt… only for it to be back two weeks later!” — Dave Chappelle

The KASH Manifesto: Prioritizing Earth Over the Cosmos

According to a manifesto purportedly released by KASH, the group argues that the billions allocated to space ventures like SpaceX would be better spent addressing pressing issues on Earth. “Why reach for the stars when our neighborhoods are crumbling?” the document reads. “Before we colonize Mars, let’s ensure every American has access to affordable healthcare, quality education, and a living wage.”

This sentiment resonates with a segment of the population that views the burgeoning space industry as a misallocation of resources. Dr. Eleanor Rigby, a sociologist at the University of the Streets, notes, “There’s a growing perception that space exploration serves the fantasies of the elite while everyday citizens grapple with tangible problems. Groups like KASH tap into this discontent, channeling it into activism—albeit extreme.”

The Cyber Connection: Hacked by the Salt Tycoon Group?

In a twist that could rival the plot of a cyber-thriller, reports have emerged suggesting that KASH’s own networks were compromised. Allegedly, technical instructions detailing vulnerabilities within SpaceX’s systems were discovered, originating from a Chinese conglomerate colloquially known as the ‘Salt Tycoon Group.’ Cybersecurity expert Max Headroom commented, “If these allegations hold water, it showcases a complex web of cyber-espionage, where one activist group’s infrastructure is infiltrated to sabotage another entity. It’s like a digital game of chess with real-world consequences.”

However, skeptics urge caution. The lack of concrete evidence and the shadowy nature of both KASH and the supposed ‘Salt Tycoon Group’ make verification challenging. “In the realm of hacktivism, attribution is notoriously difficult,” warns Headroom. “It’s plausible this is a smokescreen to divert attention from the actual perpetrators.”

Elon Musk’s Response: Rockets and Resilience

SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, known for his candid and often unfiltered commentary, addressed the incident during a press briefing. “Rockets are tricky,” Musk mused. “One moment you’re reaching for the stars; the next, you’re picking up the pieces. But hey, if you’re not failing, you’re not innovating.” He further added, “Sabotage or not, we’ll learn from this and come back stronger. Mars isn’t going to colonize itself.”

Musk’s remarks reflect his characteristic blend of humor and determination, embodying the ‘fail fast, learn faster’ philosophy that has propelled SpaceX to the forefront of aerospace innovation.

SpaceX CEO Elon Musk addressed the alleged sabotage during a press briefing, dismissing KASH’s claims as “misguided economic extremism.”

“Look, space exploration isn’t taking money from people—it’s creating new industries, new jobs, and a future for all of humanity. The only thing that’s stopping progress is people who would rather burn down opportunities than build them.”

Musk, known for his unapologetic commentary, later posted on X (formerly Twitter):

“If you don’t want to go to Mars, that’s fine. But maybe don’t blow up the rocket that was gonna take us there. Not cool.”

Former President Trump’s Commentary: A Space Race Redux?

Never one to miss an opportunity to weigh in, former President Donald Trump released a statement via his social media platform, Trumpet. “Terrible news about SpaceX. Sad! We need to focus on making America great again, right here on Earth. Space can wait. Let’s fix our cities first. Priorities, folks!”

Trump’s comments highlight a nationalist perspective, emphasizing domestic issues over extraterrestrial ambitions—a sentiment that aligns, perhaps inadvertently, with KASH’s ideology.

KASH’s Official Statement: A Call for Redistribution

A spokesperson for KASH, who identified themselves only as “Pat,” issued a statement to the press. “Our actions are a wake-up call. We cannot stand by while billions are funneled into space projects that serve the few, while the many suffer. It’s time to keep all spending here, where it’s needed most.”

The statement underscores KASH’s commitment to redirecting resources from space exploration to address socioeconomic disparities—a stance that has sparked both support and condemnation.

Public Opinion: A Nation Divided

The revelation of KASH’s alleged involvement has sparked a polarized response. Supporters argue that their actions, while extreme, highlight the need for a national discourse on fiscal priorities. “It’s a wake-up call,” says community organizer Jane Citizen. “We need to ask ourselves: are we funding rockets at the expense of our neighborhoods?”

Conversely, critics condemn the group’s methods as reckless and counterproductive. “Sabotaging scientific progress is not the answer,” asserts tech entrepreneur Chip Silicon. “We can address societal issues without hindering advancements that benefit humanity as a whole.”

The Bigger Picture: Balancing Aspirations and Obligations

The incident raises broader questions about the allocation of resources in pursuit of technological milestones versus addressing immediate societal needs. It’s a delicate balance—championing innovation while ensuring that the benefits of progress are equitably distributed.

As the investigation unfolds, one thing remains clear: the intersection of activism, cybersecurity, and space exploration has created a complex narrative that challenges our perceptions of progress and protest. Whether KASH’s claims are substantiated or dismissed, the conversation they’ve ignited is bound to influence policy discussions in boardrooms and barbershops alike.

In the words of the late philosopher Dr. Seuss, “Oh, the places you’ll go!”—but perhaps, before we venture too far, we should ensure there’s no place like home.

Statements from Anti-Musk Protesters Who Are Marxists

• Comrade Julio Sánchez, People’s Economic Liberation Front:
  “Elon Musk represents the bourgeois fantasy of escaping to Mars while the workers of the world remain shackled to wage slavery. Space exploration is just another capitalist scheme to extract resources and leave the poor behind! We say: No rockets until every worker has a home, healthcare, and a fair share of the wealth!”
• Maria Petrova, Workers Against Billionaire Exploitation (WABE):
  “Musk hoards billions while his workers struggle to afford rent. He builds rockets instead of fair wages, and yet he has the audacity to call himself a visionary? The only vision we need is economic justice and worker control over production!”
• Comrade Leroy Jackson, Revolutionary Front for Economic Justice:
  “Why should we let Musk build his billionaire space utopia when working-class people can’t even afford groceries? He wants to terraform Mars? Try terraforming Detroit first! The revolution will not be live-streamed from a SpaceX capsule—it will be fought on the streets of America!”

---

Disclaimer: This article is a satirical piece, blending factual events with fictional elements for the purpose of commentary and entertainment. Any resemblance to real persons or organizations is purely coincidental.

Note: Specific links to Howard University and Prairie View A&M University messaging boards where KASH’s statements were posted could not be located. It is possible that such posts have been removed or were never publicly accessible.

---

---

What the Funny People Are Saying…

“You gotta love a group whose entire mission is just ‘Stop doing cool sht!’ Like, who hurt you? Did a telescope make fun of you in high school?”* — Bill Burr

“KASH thinks money should stay here on Earth. You know who else does? Billionaires! They keep it all in tax havens! So, congrats, KASH, you and Jeff Bezos finally have something in common.” — Trevor Noah

“I get it, they want to ‘Keep All Spending Here.’ But, uh, you can’t spell ‘KASH’ without ‘ASH’—which is exactly what they turned that rocket into!” — Kevin Hart

“These guys are out here hacking SpaceX like, ‘No one gets off this planet until we fix the healthcare system!’ Man, we can do BOTH! You ever heard of multitasking?” — Chris Rock

“KASH claims they stopped a rocket launch because they wanted the money spent on social services. Meanwhile, the Pentagon loses $2 trillion every week and nobody blinks an eye. Maybe KASH should hack that budget.” — John Mulaney

“If KASH really wanted to stop billionaires from wasting money, they should hack the Met Gala. Have you seen what these people wear? Elon Musk once wore a vampire costume that cost more than my college tuition.” — Ali Wong

“They’re mad about space? The ONE thing America is actually good at? Bro, if we gave up on space every time something exploded, we wouldn’t even have microwaves!” — Hannibal Buress

“KASH thinks money should stay on Earth. Cool, but have you seen Earth? Maybe we should start putting some savings in the Mars bank account, just in case this place keeps going the way it’s going.” — Jim Gaffigan

“Elon Musk is out here trying to colonize Mars, and KASH is like, ‘Nah, we need that money for potholes.’ Meanwhile, I hit three potholes just getting to this show tonight, so honestly, I think we should just leave.” — Wanda Sykes

“KASH says they want universal payments for not working. Man, I’ve seen that system before—it’s called being a trust fund baby!” — Dave Chappelle

“They want government checks just for existing? I mean, fine. But can we at least make them prove they’re doing something useful, like keeping their plants alive or not blocking the grocery aisle with a cart full of nothing but ramen?” — Bill Burr

“KASH is out here saying, ‘We want money for not working.’ Bro, that’s called an inheritance. And you gotta be BORN rich for that. It’s not a policy, it’s a personality disorder.” — Trevor Noah

“They want transfer payments AND universal checks? That’s like saying, ‘I want free food, but also a personal chef, and also, I want DoorDash to pay me to eat it.’” — Kevin Hart

“KASH says money should stay on Earth. Yeah, no sht. Money doesn’t just wake up and say, ‘Screw this, I’m going to Jupiter!’ It already stays here—it’s just not in your pocket!”* — Chris Rock

“If KASH really wants a universal payment for doing nothing, I say we call it what it is—‘The Netflix and Chill Stimulus Package.’” — John Mulaney

“KASH wants everyone to get a check, even if they don’t work. So basically, they want America to be one giant HOA meeting where nobody actually fixes the community pool, but we all still demand our free refreshments.” — Ali Wong

“These dudes want government checks for breathing. Bro, my grandma’s been collecting social security for 20 years, and even SHE thinks that’s too much!” — Hannibal Buress

“KASH wants space exploration money spent on transfer payments, but also wants people to get paid for doing absolutely nothing. We already have that—it’s called Congress!” — Jim Gaffigan

“You’re telling me KASH hacked SpaceX so the government could cut them a check for staying home? Man, that’s the first time a hacker’s demanded LESS work!” — Wanda Sykes

---

KASH—Keep All Spending Here—has big dreams for SpaceX’s money…

KASH—Keep All Spending Here—has big dreams for America’s stolen money, and by “dreams,” we mean the most wasteful, absurd, and outright hilarious uses of taxpayer dollars imaginable.

First, they want universal payments for existing—that’s right, a government check for breathing. No work, no effort, just vibes. If you wake up and manage to remember your own name, congratulations! Here’s your free money, courtesy of sabotaged rockets and a blown-up economy.

Next, they demand a federally funded “Do Nothing Fund”, where people get paid to “contribute to society” by watching Netflix, posting lukewarm takes on social media, and complaining about capitalism—while living entirely off of it.

KASH also insists on “Emotional Reparations”—payouts for stress, boredom, and even mild inconvenience. If you had to wait more than 30 seconds for a coffee, you get a check. If someone sneezed too loudly near you, that’s trauma—send the cash.

And let’s not forget the “Restoration of Vibes” Initiative, where tax dollars are wasted on free therapy goats, public yoga instructors, and mandatory deep-breathing classes to “center” America’s laziest citizens.

KASH: Making sure stolen money is wasted on nonsense, one taxpayer at a time!

Gambling Interests

Rumors are swirling that KASH—Keep All Spending Here—isn’t just about stopping space travel and demanding free money. No, this noble cause of “wealth redistribution” just happens to funnel straight into the pockets of urban sports gamblers—the guys who put their rent money on a parlay and think they’re financial geniuses.

Investigators suspect that offshore gambling websites have quietly been backing KASH’s hacking and sabotage efforts, ensuring that every dollar diverted from rocket science finds its way into online betting accounts instead. “Why send a billionaire to Mars when we could be betting on the Knicks to cover the spread?” reads a KASH manifesto suspiciously posted from a sportsbook lounge in Atlantic City.

A deeper dive into the group’s financials suggests that KASH’s ‘universal income’ proposal is really just a slush fund for degenerate gamblers. Sources claim they want taxpayer dollars flowing directly into DraftKings, FanDuel, and suspicious crypto-based casinos run out of Belize.

“It’s not welfare—it’s an investment,” said one KASH supporter, placing a $500 bet on a 16-leg parlay. “With government-funded betting accounts, every American will finally have a fair shot at turning their stimulus check into an even bigger loss.”

KASH’s alleged ties to offshore gambling sites…

When asked about KASH’s alleged ties to offshore gambling sites and the influx of government money into sports betting, the NFL, NBA, and MLB all declined to comment.

League representatives remained tight-lipped, with one anonymous insider stating, “We have no official stance on federally subsidized sports gambling… but if taxpayers are funding it, we’d like our cut.”

Meanwhile, sportsbooks saw a suspicious spike in high-risk bets placed immediately after KASH’s manifesto was posted. One Vegas oddsmaker quipped, “We don’t know who’s backing KASH, but if the government wants to bankroll our customers, we’re not complaining.”

 

The post KASH Behind SpaceX Starship Explosion appeared first on Bohiney News.