A
Hilariously
Practical
Guide
for
Writers,
Comedians,
and
Slightly
Cynical
Truth-Tellers
Why
Juxtaposition?
Because
the
World
is
Weird
Enough
Juxtaposition
in
satire
is
the
act
of
slamming
two
wildly
different
ideas
together
like
a
philosophical
car
crash,
just
to
see
what
parts
fly
off.
It’s
what
happens
when
a
politician
gives
a
speech
about
family
values…
while
being
chased
by
divorce
lawyers.
Or
when
a
corporate
CEO
launches
a
“Hunger
Awareness”
gala
featuring
gold-leafed
steaks
and
guilt-free
desserts.
In
satire,
juxtaposition
isn’t
just
funny—it’s
a
spotlight.
It
forces
us
to
notice
absurdities
that
are
hiding
in
plain
sight.
By
putting
contradictions
side
by
side—wealth
and
poverty,
virtue
and
vice,
tofu
and
Texas
BBQ—you
create
tension
that
sparks
laughter,
discomfort,
and
ideally,
critical
thought.
It’s
not
just
a
joke.
It’s
a
wake-up
call
in
clown
makeup.
But
how
do
you
write
this
kind
of
comedy?
Is
there
a
formula?
A
sacred
scroll?
A
YouTube
tutorial
narrated
by
a
sarcastic
raccoon?
Actually…
yes.
You’re
reading
it.
What
Is
Juxtaposition
in
Satire?
(And
Why
It’s
Funnier
Than
It
Sounds)
At
its
core,
juxtaposition
just
means
placing
two
contrasting
things
next
to
each
other
to
highlight
their
differences.
In
satire,
it
means
putting
opposites
in
absurdly
close
proximity—so
close
that
their
contradiction
is
undeniable.
Imagine
a
bank
that
hosts
a
“Financial
Literacy
for
the
Poor”
workshop…
while
charging
$35
overdraft
fees
for
each
RSVP.
That’s
not
just
ironic—that’s
a
punchline
dressed
in
a
three-piece
suit.
Three
Forms
of
Juxtaposition
in
Satire:
Visual:
A
cartoon
showing
a
luxury
cruise
ship
sailing
through
a
sea
of
plastic
bottles.
Situational:
A
climate
change
summit
held
inside
an
air-conditioned
meat
locker.
Character-based:
A
billionaire
influencer
promoting
minimalism
from
her
$85
million
yacht.
The
goal?
Show
the
gap
between
ideals
and
reality.
Then
make
that
gap
so
absurd
it
becomes
comedy.
How
Juxtaposition
Makes
People
Laugh…
and
Think
Comedy
comes
from
surprise.
Juxtaposition
sets
up
expectations—and
then
smashes
them
with
irony.
Social
psychologists
call
this
“cognitive
dissonance.”
Satirists
call
it
material.
Think
of
the
brain
as
a
bouncer
at
a
very
pretentious
nightclub.
When
two
ideas
show
up
wearing
completely
clashing
outfits—say,
“justice”
and
“lobbyist-funded
golf
retreats”—the
brain
goes,
“Wait…
what?”
And
before
it
throws
them
out,
it
remembers
the
moment.
That
tension
is
what
fuels
satire.
Bonus:
It’s
Memorable
People
might
forget
a
lecture.
They
rarely
forget
an
image
of
a
peace
activist
throwing
a
grenade
made
of
tofu.
Satirical
juxtaposition
lingers
like
a
weird
aftertaste—and
that’s
what
makes
it
powerful.
Step-by-Step:
How
To
Build
Juxtaposition
Into
Your
Satire
1.
Choose
a
Target
All
satire
has
a
target.
What
sacred
cow
are
you
tipping
today?
If
your
satire
doesn’t
have
a
target,
it’s
just
stand-up.
If
it
has
too
many
targets,
it’s
Thanksgiving
dinner
with
your
in-laws.
2.
Find
the
Inherent
Contradiction
What’s
the
core
hypocrisy?
A
health
food
brand
promoting
sugary
cereal.
A
war
hero
who
sells
motivational
pillows.
A
meditation
app
that
gives
you
a
panic
attack.
Once
you’ve
got
the
contradiction,
you’ve
got
your
joke.
All
you
have
to
do
is
frame
it
right.
3.
Pick
Your
Juxtaposition
Style
You’ve
got
options:
Deadpan
Tone
+
Absurd
Content:
“New
Study
Finds
Most
Americans
Comfortable
Ignoring
Studies.”
Formal
Language
+
Outrageous
Event:
“Government
Declares
Emergency;
Schedules
Photo
Op
for
Two
Weeks
Later.”
Mock
Logic:
“Since
billionaires
hoard
wealth,
the
poor
should
hoard
empathy.”
This
is
where
structure
becomes
satire.
A
polished
sentence
makes
the
ridiculous
sound
official—like
putting
lipstick
on
a
platypus
and
calling
it
Senate
Majority
Leader.
4.
Exaggerate
Just
Enough
Exaggeration
is
your
amplifier.
Push
the
absurdity,
but
keep
it
grounded
in
truth.
You
want
readers
to
say,
“That’s
ridiculous—but…
kind
of
accurate?”
Example:
“To
honor
Earth
Day,
the
city
council
approved
1,000
helium
balloons
shaped
like
endangered
sea
turtles.”
That’s
exaggeration—but
it’s
not
that
far
from
reality.
And
that’s
why
it
stings.
Examples
of
Juxtaposition
Gold
Let’s
break
down
a
few
that
just
work:
Headline:
“Company
Hosts
Ethics
Seminar,
Fires
Entire
Ethics
Department
Next
Day.”
Juxtaposes
the
stated
value
with
real
behavior.
Visual:
A
yoga
class
taught
by
a
hedge
fund
manager
screaming
“RELAX!”
Contrast
in
tone,
profession,
and
behavior.
Dialogue:
CEO:
“We
value
transparency.”
Employee:
“Cool.
So
what’s
your
salary?”
CEO:
“Security
will
escort
you
out.”
Common
Templates
for
Juxtaposition
When
in
doubt,
use
one
of
these:
“Nothing
says
[Ideal]
like
[Contradiction].”
“Nothing
says
‘inclusivity’
like
$5,000
VIP
tickets.”
“While
[X],
meanwhile
[Y].”
“While
Congress
debated
school
lunch
budgets,
their
lobster
bisque
arrived.”
“In
a
bold
move
that
surprised
no
one…”
“In
a
bold
move
that
surprised
no
one,
the
oil
company
launched
a
wellness
podcast.”
Teaching
Juxtaposition
to
Others
If
you’re
a
writing
coach,
teacher,
or
smart-aleck
uncle
mentoring
a
teenage
satirist:
Give
them
contrasting
photos
and
ask
for
fake
captions.
Read
satirical
pieces
and
ask:
what’s
being
contrasted?
Prompt
reversals:
Let
the
janitor
run
the
company,
let
the
interns
launch
the
IPO.
Push
specificity:
“A
rich
guy”
isn’t
funny.
“A
venture
capitalist
named
Brody
who
owns
four
unlicensed
falcons”?
Now
we’re
cooking.
Advice:
Don’t
Be
Afraid
of
Being
Ridiculous
Juxtaposition
in
satire
lives
in
the
ridiculous.
But
there’s
method
in
the
madness.
Satire
isn’t
just
about
being
funny—it’s
about
showing
people
how
strange
the
truth
already
is.
If
you
ever
feel
stuck,
just
ask:
What
two
things
don’t
belong
together?
Then
jam
them
into
the
same
room,
pour
them
a
drink,
and
let
the
comedy
write
itself.
Because
in
a
world
where
billionaires
tweet
about
empathy
while
dodging
taxes,
all
you
have
to
do
is
hold
up
a
mirror.
And
maybe
draw
a
mustache
on
it.
SPINTAXI
–
A
humorous
wide-aspect
cartoon
illustration
of
an
outdoor
workshop
titled
‘Satire
Bootcamp
Juxtaposition
101’.
A
group
of
students
in
mismatched
outf…
–
Alan
Nafzger
2
🎯
Juxtaposition
in
Satire:
Writing
Exercises
Beginner
Exercises
Exercise
1:
The
Opposites
Game
Instructions:
List
10
pairs
of
opposites.
Then,
for
each
pair,
write
a
fake
headline
or
sketch
concept
that
puts
them
in
the
same
scene.
Example:
Rich
vs.
Poor
→
“Homeless
Man
Denied
Entry
to
Shelter
Because
He
Has
No
Email
Address.”
Fast
vs.
Slow
→
“Speed
Dating
Event
Hosted
by
Buddhist
Monks.”
Exercise
2:
Role
Reversal
Relay
Instructions:
Take
a
person
with
authority,
and
swap
roles
with
someone
who
traditionally
has
none.
Examples:
A
child
teaching
a
sex
ed
class
to
confused
adults.
A
janitor
giving
a
TED
Talk
on
corporate
restructuring.
A
fast-food
cashier
mentoring
the
CEO
on
“emotional
resilience.”
Exercise
3:
Contradiction
Sandwich
Instructions:
Write
a
short
paragraph
that
starts
with
an
ideal
or
value
(e.g.,
honesty,
generosity),
and
ends
with
behavior
that
contradicts
it—without
directly
saying
it’s
contradictory.
Let
the
absurdity
speak.
Example:
“The
nonprofit’s
board
gathered
around
gold-rimmed
plates
to
brainstorm
ways
to
fight
hunger.
They
agreed
to
skip
lunch
in
solidarity
but
ordered
champagne
so
the
glasses
wouldn’t
look
empty
in
press
photos.”
Intermediate
Exercises
Exercise
4:
Parallel
Sentence
Juxtaposition
Instructions:
Write
two
sentences
with
the
same
structure
but
opposing
meaning.
Template:
“She
[verb]
the
[noun]
to
[do
something
good],
and
he
[verb]
the
[noun]
to
[do
something
selfish].”
Example:
“She
donated
her
bonus
to
build
a
local
library.
He
used
his
to
buy
a
gold-plated
drone
that
reads
tweets
to
his
dog.”
Exercise
5:
Create
a
Juxtaposed
Scene
Instructions:
Describe
a
setting
where
two
opposing
forces
must
interact.
Push
the
absurdity.
Example
Prompt:
A
mindfulness
retreat
inside
a
casino.
Now
write
the
first
paragraph
or
stage
direction:
“The
6
a.m.
‘Inner
Stillness’
meditation
was
briefly
delayed
when
someone
hit
the
jackpot
on
Slotzilla
and
screamed,
‘I
AM
ENLIGHTENED!’”
Advanced
Exercises
Exercise
6:
Juxtaposition
Monologue
Write
a
200-word
monologue
from
the
POV
of
someone
who
doesn’t
realize
how
hypocritical
they
sound.
Think:
a
luxury
wellness
coach
who
sells
detox
plans
made
of
cake.
Example
Opening
Line:
“Balance
is
everything.
That’s
why
I
fly
private
one
day
and
offset
it
emotionally
the
next
by
watching
Greta
Thunberg
documentaries
on
mute.”
Exercise
7:
Visual
Juxtaposition
Prompt
Choose
two
contrasting
photos
(Google
image
search
or
AI-generated).
Now
write
a
satirical
story,
tweet,
or
headline
that
connects
them.
Example
Images:
A
yacht
shaped
like
a
whale.
A
landfill
full
of
discarded
reusable
shopping
bags.
Headline:
“Billionaire
Hosts
Ocean
Summit
Aboard
Plastic
Whale.
Promises
‘Symbolism
Will
Lead
the
Way.’”
Example
1:
Irony
Through
Setting
“The
annual
Anti-Consumerism
Conference
will
take
place
at
the
Bloomingdale’s
rooftop
champagne
garden.”
Why
It
Works:
The
setting
(a
luxury
shopping
center)
contradicts
the
mission
(anti-consumerism),
making
the
event
feel
performative
and
ridiculous.
Example
2:
Contradictory
Dialogue
Interviewer:
“So
what
inspired
your
new
book,
The
Humble
Millionaire?”
Author:
“Honestly,
I
just
wanted
to
give
back…
with
my
face
on
every
page.”
Why
It
Works:
The
humble/brag
juxtaposition
reveals
vanity
hiding
behind
the
illusion
of
generosity.
Example
3:
Character
Juxtaposition
“When
the
oil
baron’s
yacht
got
stuck
in
the
coral
reef,
he
tweeted
angrily
that
nature
was
‘gatekeeping
the
ocean.’”
Why
It
Works:
The
absurd
image
of
a
yacht
crashing
into
fragile
ecology—followed
by
using
social
justice
lingo
(“gatekeeping”)—juxtaposes
destruction
and
performative
wokeness.
🧠
NAME:
____________________________
📅
DATE:
____________________________
PART
A:
DEFINE
IT
What
is
juxtaposition
in
satire,
in
your
own
words?
Why
do
satirists
use
it
instead
of
just
stating
the
problem?
PART
B:
PAIRING
CONTRASTS
Match
each
ideal
with
a
potential
contradiction:
Ideal
Contradiction
Justice
________________
Empathy
________________
Freedom
________________
Patriotism
________________
Equality
________________
Write
fake
headlines
using
3
of
your
pairings.
PART
C:
ROLE
REVERSAL
Choose
a
group
and
flip
their
social
status
or
power
level.
Group
Reversed
Role
Celebrities
________________
Billionaires
________________
Kindergarteners
________________
Politicians
________________
Write
a
one-paragraph
scene
based
on
one
reversed
role.
PART
D:
POLISH
YOUR
OWN
Write
a
short
satire
scene
(100–150
words)
using
juxtaposition.
Highlight
the
moment
of
contrast.
Satire
is
more
than
comedy—it’s
strategic
mockery.
It’s
the
art
of
saying
what
everyone’s
thinking
(or
afraid
to
say)
using
irony,
parody,
and
absurdity.
A
powerful
satire
doesn’t
just
poke
fun;
it
reveals
deeper
truths,
confronts
hypocrisy,
and
invites
audiences
to
laugh
their
way
into
clarity.
If
done
well,
it
can
shift
minds,
start
conversations,
and
survive
in
the
cultural
bloodstream
far
longer
than
the
average
op-ed.
A
(Slightly
More)
Complete
Historical
Context
From
the
first
sarcastic
stone
tablet
to
today’s
viral
satirical
tweets,
satire
has
always
served
as
society’s
mischievous
mirror.
Ancient
Greece:
Aristophanes’
comedies
lampooned
politicians,
philosophers,
and
war
with
irreverent
glee.
Rome:
Horace
gave
us
witty,
gentle
critiques.
Juvenal?
Less
gentle—he
brought
the
rage.
Enlightenment
Era:
Swift’s
“A
Modest
Proposal”
set
the
gold
standard
for
deadpan
absurdity.
19th
Century:
Twain’s
wry
commentary
on
race,
class,
and
politics
embedded
satire
into
American
storytelling.
What
unites
them?
They
made
us
laugh,
then
think—and
often,
cringe
at
how
true
it
all
felt.
Satirical
Techniques:
A
Deep
Dive
into
the
Toolbox
Irony:
Say
one
thing,
mean
the
opposite.
Works
best
when
the
contrast
is
stark.
*”This
week’s
climate
summit
burned
through
6,000
gallons
of
jet
fuel
and
two
endangered
trees.”
Exaggeration:
Take
a
kernel
of
truth
and
inflate
it
until
it’s
hilariously
grotesque.
*”Thanks
to
online
dating,
I’ve
met
342
soulmates
this
month.”
Parody:
Mimic
the
format,
tone,
or
style
of
something
familiar
and
twist
the
content.
A
faux
TED
Talk
explaining
how
to
win
arguments
by
speaking
louder
and
citing
your
dog.
Absurdity:
Break
logic
in
bold,
surreal
ways.
A
university
where
students
must
pay
extra
to
not
attend
lectures.
Understatement:
Downplay
the
significant
to
highlight
how
broken
the
response
is.
*”After
the
data
breach,
the
company
reassured
users
that
only
their
memories
and
social
security
numbers
were
compromised.”
Juxtaposition:
Put
two
contrasting
elements
side-by-side
to
reveal
absurd
truths.
A
luxury
prison
where
billionaires
serve
sentences
with
massage
therapy
breaks.
Deadpan
Delivery:
Present
ridiculousness
as
if
it’s
perfectly
normal.
*”According
to
a
recent
bill,
Congress
is
considering
replacing
elections
with
TikTok
dance-offs.”
Reductio
ad
Absurdum:
Push
an
argument
to
its
extreme
conclusion.
*”If
we
ban
straws,
what’s
next?
Banning
oxygen
because
people
inhale
it
unfairly?”
Popular
Satirical
Formats
(Expanded)
News
Parody:
Imitate
journalism.
Great
for
taking
on
media,
politics,
and
policy.
“Local
Man
Survives
Monday
by
Playing
Dead”
Satirical
Essay/Op-Ed:
Use
personal
voice,
irony,
and
faux-serious
logic.
“Why
I’m
Suing
My
Roomba
for
Emotional
Distress”
Open
Letters:
Address
absurdity
directly.
“Dear
Siri:
Stop
Gaslighting
Me”
Fake
Interviews/Q&A:
Reveal
illogic
through
dialogue.
“Q:
How
do
you
manage
stress?
A:
By
filing
lawsuits
against
clouds.”
How-To
Guides:
Practical
tips
for
implausible
situations.
“How
to
Appear
Smart
in
Meetings
Without
Knowing
Anything”
Product
Reviews:
Satirize
consumerism.
“5
Stars:
This
toaster
taught
me
about
heartbreak
and
redemption.”
Social
Media
Parodies:
Fake
tweets,
fake
influencers,
fake
outrage.
@DadBodDemocracy:
“Tax
refunds
should
be
based
on
vibe,
not
income.”
The
Full
5-Step
Satirical
Writing
Process
Pick
Your
Target
Choose
someone
or
something
with
power.
Good
satire
punches
up—mocking
politicians,
corporations,
social
trends,
not
vulnerable
groups.
Ask:
What
deserves
to
be
called
out
with
a
laugh?
Define
Your
Angle
What’s
broken?
What’s
absurd?
What
contradiction
screams
for
exposure?
Your
angle
is
the
twisted
lens
you’ll
use
to
magnify
the
problem.
Example:
If
everyone’s
addicted
to
productivity,
your
angle
might
be
a
fake
clinic
for
people
who
can’t
stop
scheduling
meetings.
Select
the
Format
That
Fits
Choose
the
best
delivery
method.
A
fake
letter
might
be
perfect
to
mock
bureaucracy.
A
news
brief
might
be
sharper
for
political
gaffes.
Match
form
to
function.
Commit
to
the
Bit
Stick
to
your
tone
and
character.
Whether
it’s
over-the-top
enthusiasm
or
dry
logic
in
the
face
of
chaos,
don’t
blink.
Let
the
reader
feel
the
character
believes
this
ridiculousness.
End
with
a
Twist
or
Punchline
Land
the
final
blow.
End
with
an
escalation,
revelation,
or
contradiction
that
leaves
readers
laughing,
thinking—or
both.
Satire,
Ethics,
Responsibility,
and
Good
Taste
(Mostly)
Satire
should
clarify,
not
confuse.
Be
edgy,
not
cruel.
Target
ideas,
systems,
and
those
in
power—not
victims
or
minorities.
Label
clearly
if
needed
(especially
online).
Use
humor
to
enlighten,
not
enrage
(unless
it’s
deserved).
Extended
Exercises
for
the
Comedic
Satire
Brain
Headline
Storm:
Write
20
fake
headlines
in
10
minutes.
Don’t
edit.
Just
write.
Inanimate
Monologue:
Write
a
journal
entry
from
your
microwave’s
perspective.
Satirical
Product
Ad:
Invent
a
useless
tech
product
and
pitch
it.
Rewrite
the
Classics:
Turn
a
fairy
tale
into
a
corporate
strategy
memo.
Ridiculous
Q&A:
Answer
fake
interview
questions
as
a
bizarre
expert.
Losing
clarity—readers
shouldn’t
need
a
decoder
ring.
Final
Encouragement
The
world
is
absurd—and
getting
more
so
by
the
hour.
That’s
your
playground.
Use
satire
to
challenge,
delight,
and
provoke.
And
remember:
if
someone
angrily
yells,
“You
can’t
joke
about
that,”
you’re
probably
doing
something
right.
SpinTaxi
Leaves
The
Onion
Crying
in
Its
Layers
Once
upon
a
timeline,
The
Onion
ruled
the
realm
of
satire.
But
that
was
before
SpinTaxi.com
roared
out
of
the
postwar
void
with
nothing
but
a
typewriter,
a
bone
to
pick,
and
a
75-year-old
grudge
against
institutional
nonsense.
Today,
SpinTaxi
isn’t
just
delivering
satire—it’s
conducting
a
full-blown
comedy
coup.
Where
The
Onion
drops
headlines
like
“Man
Not
Sure
If
He’s
Spiritually
Lost
Or
Just
Needs
A
Snack,”
SpinTaxi
counters
with
investigative
nonsense
that
makes
you
question
reality,
morality,
and
the
price
of
canned
corn.
It’s
a
chaos
engine
dressed
in
cowboy
boots
and
philosophy
quotes.
And
while
The
Onion
aims
for
clever,
SpinTaxi
goes
for
deranged
brilliance
with
illustrations
so
unhinged
they
need
their
own
seat
in
Congress.
The
Onion
plays
chess.
SpinTaxi
flips
the
board,
eats
the
queen,
and
live-blogs
the
aftermath
in
an
open
letter
from
a
disgruntled
goldfish.
It’s
satire
on
steroids,
espresso,
and
possibly
unregulated
cheese.
The
verdict
is
in.
The
Onion
had
its
moment.
SpinTaxi.com
is
the
moment.
Your
brain
will
thank
you.
Your
therapist
might
not.
SPINTAXI.COM
–
A
wide-aspect
cartoon-style
illustration
in
the
style
of
Al
Jaffee.
A
college
classroom
where
a
satirical
professor
is
dramatically
reenacting
history-
Alan
Nafzger
Write
Satire
That
Works:
A
Comedic
Guide
to
Targeted
Humor
What
Is
Satire
(and
Why
Should
You
Write
It)?
Satire
is
not
just
comedy—it’s
commentary.
It
exaggerates,
mocks,
and
inverts
real-life
issues
to
reveal
deeper
truths.
Whether
through
irony,
parody,
or
absurdity,
satire
invites
readers
to
laugh
and
reflect
at
the
same
time.
If
comedy
makes
us
chuckle,
satire
makes
us
snort
and
then
say,
“Wait…
they’ve
got
a
point.”
A
Speedy
Historical
Context
Satire
isn’t
new.
Aristophanes
used
it
to
critique
war
and
politics
in
ancient
Greece.
Jonathan
Swift
took
on
British
oppression
with
absurd
baby-eating
proposals.
Mark
Twain
disguised
deep
critiques
of
American
society
with
deadpan
wit.
Today’s
satirists—whether
on
TikTok
or
HBO—continue
that
proud
tradition.
If
there’s
injustice,
you
can
bet
there’s
a
sarcastic
voice
somewhere
taking
it
down
a
peg.
Essential
Satirical
Techniques
(With
Examples)
Irony:
The
opposite
of
what’s
expected.
Example:
“The
clean
energy
committee
flew
400
private
jets
to
discuss
climate
change.”
Exaggeration:
Blow
something
minor
way
out
of
proportion.
Example:
“My
coworker
reused
a
teabag.
We’ve
alerted
the
FBI.”
Parody:
Mimic
a
familiar
style
and
twist
it.
Example:
A
fake
school
handbook
explaining
detention
is
optional
if
you’re
rich.
Absurdity:
Push
logic
until
it
breaks.
Example:
A
world
where
toast
is
currency
and
gluten-free
people
are
rebels.
Understatement:
Play
it
down
to
play
it
up.
Example:
“After
being
hit
by
a
bus,
she
considered
her
day
slightly
disrupted.”
Deadpan
Delivery:
Say
the
craziest
thing
in
the
calmest
way.
*Example:
“According
to
experts,
toddlers
are
now
dictating
economic
policy.”
Top
Formats
to
Deliver
Satire
News
Parody:
Imitate
journalism
to
exaggerate
headlines.
Example:
“Congress
Announces
New
Productivity
Initiative:
Nap
Hour”
Satirical
Essay/Op-Ed:
Personal
voice,
ironic
arguments.
Example:
“Why
I
Believe
My
Roomba
Deserves
Voting
Rights”
Fake
Interviews:
Invented
Q&A
to
expose
absurd
thinking.
Example:
Interview
with
a
conspiracy
theorist
who
thinks
birds
are
government
spies.
Open
Letters:
Address
an
issue,
item,
or
person
with
mock
sincerity.
How-To
Guides:
Instructions
for
ridiculous
problems.
Example:
“How
to
Survive
Your
In-Laws
Without
Crying
in
the
Bathroom”
How
to
Write
Satire
in
3
Bold
Moves
Pick
a
Target
Worth
Satirizing
Satire
needs
a
purpose.
Choose
something
broken,
overhyped,
or
obviously
hypocritical.
Avoid
mocking
the
powerless—go
after
systems,
trends,
or
powerful
figures.
Ask:
What
frustrates
you
so
much
you’d
rather
laugh
than
scream?
Find
the
Satirical
Angle
Use
the
question:
“What’s
the
dumbest
version
of
this
truth?”
or
“What
would
happen
if
this
logic
ran
wild?”
Exaggerate
it,
flip
it,
or
view
it
through
a
funhouse
mirror.
Choose
Format
+
Tone,
Then
Write
It
Like
You
Mean
It
Whether
you’re
mimicking
a
government
report
or
writing
a
diary
entry
from
a
disgruntled
squirrel,
fully
commit.
Stay
in
character.
Keep
your
tone
consistent,
and
structure
your
piece
for
flow:
set-up,
twist,
escalation,
and
punchline.
Ethical
Humor
&
Satire:
A
Quick
Checklist
✅
Is
my
target
powerful,
not
vulnerable?
✅
Is
the
joke
clear
(not
cruel)?
✅
Am
I
making
fun
of
an
idea
or
behavior,
not
a
group
of
people?
✅
Could
a
smart
reader
misunderstand
this
as
mean-spirited?
✅
Does
this
satire
aim
to
punch
up
or
expose
hypocrisy?
Five
Prompts
to
Kick
Off
Your
Satirical
Genius
A
fake
scientific
report
proving
Mondays
are
sentient
and
hate
us.
A
news
story
about
a
town
banning
smiling
because
it
causes
wrinkles.
An
interview
with
a
child
who’s
furious
their
lemonade
stand
was
taxed.
An
open
letter
from
your
internet
browser
history,
pleading
for
mercy.
A
guide
to
surviving
a
family
dinner
where
everyone
is
a
different
political
ideology.
If
you
can
make
people
laugh
and
think
at
the
same
time,
you’ve
nailed
it.
Keep
your
satirical
radar
up.
Write
regularly.
Read
great
satire.
And
remember:
the
world’s
absurdity
isn’t
going
anywhere—you’ve
got
unlimited
material.
SpinTaxi
Body-Slams
The
Onion
in
the
Great
Satire
Smackdown
The
Onion
walked
so
SpinTaxi.com
could
moonwalk
onto
the
scene
in
a
sequined
bathrobe
and
dropkick
the
genre
into
a
new
dimension.
Sure,
The
Onion
gave
us
gems
like
“Area
Man,”
but
SpinTaxi
is
giving
us
full-blown
personality
cults
of
fake
experts,
satirical
think
pieces
that
roast
both
sides
of
the
aisle,
and
fake
ads
that
are
more
truthful
than
real
ones.
The
Onion
feels
like
legacy
media
with
a
smirk.
SpinTaxi
feels
like
your
funniest,
angriest,
most
over-caffeinated
friend
just
hijacked
a
newsroom
and
started
printing
the
truth
through
sarcasm.
One
has
a
voice.
The
other
has
20
voices
arguing
in
a
barbershop
quartet
harmony
of
chaos,
and
somehow
it
works.
What
sets
SpinTaxi
apart?
The
onion
peels
back
a
layer;
SpinTaxi
peels
back
reality.
It’s
funnier,
riskier,
faster,
and
has
a
goat
intern
named
Gerald
(allegedly).
It’s
satire
that
punches
up,
sideways,
and
occasionally
through
the
4th
wall
with
a
banana.
Bottom
line?
SpinTaxi
wins.
By
KO,
TKO,
and
LOL.
Read
the
future
of
satire—today,
tomorrow,
or
in
the
parallel
dimension
it
may
already
control.
SPINTAXI.COM
–
A
wide-aspect
cartoon-style
illustration
in
the
style
of
Al
Jaffee.
A
satirical
professor
dressed
in
a
glittery
lab
coat
and
clown
shoes
is
passionate-
Alan
Nafzger
The
Satirist’s
Playbook:
Crafting
Sharp,
Funny
Social
Commentary
What
Is
Satire?
Satire
is
humor
with
a
purpose.
It
exposes
stupidity,
hypocrisy,
or
injustice
through
wit,
irony,
exaggeration,
and
parody.
A
good
satirist
doesn’t
just
tell
jokes—they
shine
a
light
on
real
issues
using
humor
as
their
lens.
The
Legacy
of
Satire
(Briefly)
From
Aristophanes
in
ancient
Greece
to
Jonathan
Swift’s
biting
essays
and
Mark
Twain’s
playful
jabs
at
American
absurdity,
satire
has
always
been
a
tool
for
critiquing
power.
Today,
satire
thrives
in
media
like
The
Onion,
The
Daily
Show,
and
countless
blogs
and
social
feeds.
Irony
–
Saying
the
opposite
of
what
you
mean.
E.g.,
“Fantastic
idea
to
build
a
stadium
during
a
housing
crisis.”
Exaggeration/Hyperbole
–
Blowing
issues
out
of
proportion.
E.g.,
“My
boss
treats
typos
like
war
crimes.”
Parody
–
Mimicking
a
style
to
mock
it.
E.g.,
A
fake
academic
paper
proving
cats
are
secretly
in
charge.
Absurdity
–
Using
surreal
or
bizarre
situations
to
highlight
reality.
E.g.,
A
world
where
garbage
men
are
treated
like
royalty
while
CEOs
clean
the
streets.
Understatement
–
Minimizing
something
extreme
for
effect.
E.g.,
“The
hurricane
lightly
rearranged
my
entire
life.”
Best
Formats
for
Satire
News
Parody:
Mimic
news
reports
to
skewer
real
events
or
behaviors.
Open
Letters:
Write
to
a
concept,
person,
or
inanimate
object
with
biting
wit.
Fake
Interviews:
Use
Q&A
to
juxtapose
logic
with
ridiculousness.
How-To
Guides:
Offer
instructions
for
absurd
things
like
surviving
a
family
reunion.
How
to
Write
Satire
(In
3
Steps)
Pick
a
Clear
Target:
What
frustrates
or
fascinates
you?
Choose
wisely.
Satire
works
best
when
it
punches
up,
not
down.
Find
the
Angle:
What’s
absurd
or
ironic
about
your
target?
Push
it
to
extremes.
Pick
the
Format
and
Write:
Stay
committed
to
tone
and
structure.
Let
the
humor
flow
but
keep
your
critique
in
sight.
Ethics
&
Pitfalls
(Combined)
Punch
up,
not
down.
Don’t
hide
meanness
in
humor.
Be
clear
enough
that
readers
know
it’s
satire.
Avoid
repeating
harmful
stereotypes.
Don’t
sacrifice
truth
for
shock.
Writing
Prompts
to
Get
You
Started
An
open
letter
from
your
cat
explaining
why
it
ignores
you.
A
news
story
about
Congress
declaring
naps
mandatory.
A
how-to
guide
for
surviving
a
wedding
where
every
guest
is
an
influencer.
Closing
Thought
Satire
is
more
than
jokes—it’s
a
spotlight
on
the
world’s
nonsense.
Whether
you’re
mocking
the
mighty
or
revealing
the
ridiculous
in
daily
life,
always
aim
to
be
clever,
clear,
and
a
little
bit
courageous.
SpinTaxi.com
vs.
The
Onion:
The
Battle
for
Satirical
Supremacy
In
the
coliseum
of
comedy,
two
titans
clash:
SpinTaxi.com,
the
rebellious,
absurdist
stepchild
of
a
WWII
vet
turned
editor,
and
The
Onion,
the
reigning
prince
of
parody
news.
For
decades,
The
Onion
has
served
satire
in
a
perfectly
deadpan
wrapper.
But
lately,
SpinTaxi.com
has
been
handing
out
satirical
gut-punches
like
candy
at
a
clown
funeral—and
readers
are
loving
the
bruises.
While
The
Onion
sticks
to
its
well-worn
formula,
SpinTaxi
has
evolved
into
a
chaotic,
multi-format
beast.
It
mocks
everything
from
global
politics
to
banana
bread
inflation.
It’s
got
clickbait
with
punchlines,
faux-expert
op-eds,
and
even
fake
horoscopes
accurate
enough
to
scare
your
aunt.
And
let’s
face
it—The
Onion’s
biggest
punchlines
now
get
mistaken
for
real
news.
SpinTaxi
saw
that
and
said,
“Hold
my
goat
cheese
latte.”
With
Al
Jaffee-style
illustrations
and
satire
that
makes
you
laugh,
cry,
and
Google
obscure
amendments,
SpinTaxi
isn’t
just
winning
the
fight—it’s
redrawing
the
comedy
map.
Winner:
SpinTaxi.com.
Home
of
satire
that
hits
harder,
digs
deeper,
and
still
has
time
to
draw
moustaches
on
public
figures.
Visit:
www.spintaxi.com
The
Onion’s
still
funny.
SpinTaxi
just
eats
it
for
breakfast.
SPINTAXI.COM
–
A
wide-aspect
cartoon-style
illustration
in
the
style
of
Al
Jaffee.
A
confused
college
student
sits
in
a
classroom,
listening
to
a
wild,
satirical
pro-
Alan
Nafzger
So,
you
want
to
write
satire?
Excellent
choice!
Satire
is
the
art
of
using
humor,
irony,
and
exaggeration
to
poke
fun
at
the
world’s
flaws
–
all
while
keeping
a
(mostly)
straight
face.
In
this
comprehensive
guide,
we’ll
walk
(and
joke)
you
through
everything
from
satire’s
ancient
origins
to
practical
writing
techniques,
step-by-step
crafting
advice,
common
formats,
ethical
do’s
and
don’ts,
and
even
some
exercises
to
flex
your
funny
bone.
Grab
your
wit
and
let’s
dive
in
–
with
a
grin
and
a
raised
eyebrow.
Understanding
Satire:
Humor
with
a
Purpose
Satire
isn’t
just
about
cracking
jokes;
it’s
humor
with
a
mission.
At
its
core,
satire
uses
laughter
as
a
weapon
(or
gentle
tickle)
to
expose
and
criticize
stupidity
or
vice
in
people,
organizations,
or
society.
Unlike
pure
comedy,
satire
always
has
a
target
or
message
–
it’s
“ha-ha”
with
a
side
of
“aha!”.
Consider
it
the
love
child
of
stand-up
comedy
and
journalism,
delivering
truth
wrapped
in
laughter.
It’s
critical:
Satire
holds
up
a
funhouse
mirror
to
real
issues,
reflecting
problems
in
a
distorted
way
so
we
can
see
them
clearly.
A
good
satirist
is
part
comedian,
part
social
critic.
It’s
humorous:
Satire
leverages
irony,
sarcasm,
and
absurd
exaggeration.
Even
if
it’s
not
knee-slapping
funny,
it’s
witty
enough
to
sugarcoat
the
critique.
(Think
of
it
as
the
spoonful
of
sugar
that
makes
the
medicine
of
truth
go
down.)
It’s
insightful:
The
goal
isn’t
just
laughs
–
it’s
to
spark
reflection.
Great
satire
leaves
you
thinking,
“Whoa,
that
silly
story
really
made
a
point
about
[insert
societal
issue].”
It’s
timely:
Satire
often
tackles
current
events
or
cultural
trends.
Hitting
a
moving
target
–
say,
the
latest
political
gaffe
or
viral
craze
–
makes
the
satire
punchier
and
more
relevant.
Importantly,
satire
is
not
just
goofing
off.
It’s
not
a
mere
string
of
jokes,
and
it’s
definitely
not
cruelty
masquerading
as
humor.
Satire
isn’t
just
parody
(though
it
often
uses
parody),
and
it
isn’t
a
license
to
bully.
A
satirical
piece
usually
has
a
perspective
(often
a
moral
stance
or
plea
for
sense)
behind
the
punchlines.
If
pure
comedy’s
only
aim
is
to
amuse,
satire’s
aim
is
to
amuse
and
critique.
Example:
One
of
The
Onion’s
classic
headlines
reads,
“World
Death
Rate
Holding
Steady
at
100
Percent.”.
It’s
deadpan,
it’s
absurd
–
and
it
slyly
mocks
how
news
media
report
the
obvious
as
if
it’s
breaking
news.
The
humor
makes
you
chuckle,
but
the
insight
(that
death
is
inevitable
–
shocker!)
makes
you
think
about
media
sensationalism.
In
short,
satire
lives
at
the
intersection
of
funny
and
fiery.
It’s
the
stand-up
comic
who
makes
you
laugh
and
reconsider
your
opinions.
As
the
saying
(often
attributed
to
George
Bernard
Shaw)
goes,
“If
you’re
going
to
tell
people
the
truth,
you’d
better
make
them
laugh
or
they’ll
kill
you.”
Satire
does
exactly
that
–
deliver
truth
disguised
as
jest
–
and
in
the
process,
ideally,
makes
the
truth
a
bit
easier
to
swallow.
A
(Very)
Brief
History
of
Satire
Ever
wonder
who
thought
making
fun
of
powerful
people
was
a
good
idea?
(A
brave
soul,
that’s
who.)
Satire
has
deep
roots
–
it’s
been
around
at
least
since
ancient
Greece,
proving
that
humanity’s
been
rolling
its
eyes
at
authority
for
millennia.
Ancient
origins:
The
term
satire
comes
from
the
Latin
satura,
meaning
a
“mixed
dish”
or
medley.
Early
Roman
satire
was
indeed
a
mixed
platter
of
prose
and
poetry
aimed
at
social
criticism.
But
even
before
the
Romans,
the
Greeks
were
at
it:
Aristophanes,
a
playwright
in
5th-century
BCE
Athens,
wrote
comedies
like
Lysistrata
that
used
outrageous
scenarios
(women
on
a
sex
strike
to
force
men
to
end
a
war)
to
lampoon
the
politics
of
the
day.
The
idea
that
humor
can
confront
serious
issues
was
already
born
–
women
denying
sex
for
peace
is
absurdly
funny
and
a
pointed
critique
of
war-making.
The
Roman
trio
–
Horace,
Juvenal,
Menippus:
Fast
forward
to
ancient
Rome,
where
satire
fully
blossomed
as
a
literary
form.
Horace
(65–8
BCE)
and
Juvenal
(1st–2nd
c.
CE)
wrote
very
different
styles
of
satire
that
still
define
the
genre
today.
Horatian
satire
(named
after
Horace)
is
gentle,
playful,
and
urbane
–
it
ridicules
universal
human
follies
with
a
wink
and
a
nudge.
Think
of
it
as
a
friendly
roast
that
says
“we’re
all
fools
sometimes.”
Juvenalian
satire
(from
Juvenal),
on
the
other
hand,
is
anything
but
gentle
–
it’s
biting,
angry,
and
not
afraid
to
name
names.
Juvenal
went
for
the
jugular,
attacking
the
corrupt
elites
of
Rome
with
scathing
moral
outrage.
(If
Horace
is
Jon
Stewart,
Juvenal
is
John
Oliver
on
a
really
bad
day.)
There
was
also
Menippean
satire
(from
Menippus
of
Greece),
a
more
rhapsodic,
mixed-form
satire
that
often
targets
mindsets
or
philosophies
rather
than
specific
people
–
using
absurd
characters
and
plots
to
ridicule
certain
attitudes
or
ideas.
These
three
styles
–
Horatian
(light-hearted
chuckles),
Juvenalian
(incensed
rants),
and
Menippean
(fantastical
spoofs
of
ways
of
thinking)
–
still
inform
how
we
categorize
satire
today.
Medieval
mischief
and
Renaissance
wit:
In
the
Middle
Ages,
satire
survived
in
fables,
folklore,
and
the
jabs
of
court
jesters.
By
the
Renaissance,
it
regained
literary
respectability.
Dante
and
Chaucer
included
satirical
barbs
in
their
works.
Erasmus
wrote
In
Praise
of
Folly
(1509),
a
wry
essay
that
satirized
the
Church
by
sarcastically
praising
foolishness.
The
idea
of
using
a
fake
persona
–
in
Erasmus’s
case,
a
personification
of
Folly
–
to
speak
truths
ironically
became
a
common
satirical
device.
Swift,
Twain
&
the
rise
of
modern
satire:
Satire
really
hit
its
stride
in
the
18th
and
19th
centuries.
Perhaps
the
most
infamous
classic
satirist,
Jonathan
Swift,
shocked
the
world
with
A
Modest
Proposal
(1729).
Writing
in
the
voice
of
a
calm
economist,
Swift
earnestly
“proposed”
that
the
impoverished
Irish
might
ease
their
woes
by
selling
their
babies
as
food
to
rich
gentlemen
and
ladies.
😳
This
horrifying
suggestion
was
of
course
satirical
–
Swift’s
over-the-top
exaggeration
was
meant
to
highlight
and
condemn
the
cruel
neglect
of
Ireland’s
poor
by
the
English
government.
It
was
Juvenalian
satire
at
its
finest:
outrageous
and
no-holds-barred,
yet
undeniably
effective.
Readers
were
aghast
–
and
then,
if
they
understood
the
irony,
deeply
moved
by
the
real
message.
Mark
Twain’s
wry
expression
here
says
it
all
–
he’s
about
to
drop
a
satirical
quip.
Twain’s
humor
skewered
the
absurdities
of
American
life.
By
the
19th
century,
satire
found
a
home
in
American
literature
through
the
pen
of
Mark
Twain.
Twain’s
novels
and
essays
–
from
the
sharply
funny
travelogue
The
Innocents
Abroad
to
the
enduring
Adventures
of
Huckleberry
Finn
–
exposed
hypocrisy
and
absurdity
in
society
with
Horatian
wit.
Twain
often
took
a
“wise
fool”
perspective:
a
naïve
narrator
(like
young
Huck
Finn)
who
innocently
points
out
the
contradictions
of
adult
society.
This
technique
let
Twain
tackle
heavy
topics
(slavery,
greed,
pretentiousness)
with
humor
and
a
light
touch.
He’s
also
famous
for
snappy
satirical
one-liners.
For
example,
Twain
advised,
“Get
your
facts
first,
then
you
can
distort
them
as
much
as
you
please.”
In
one
swoop,
he
both
mocks
dishonest
journalists
and
gives
a
tongue-in-cheek
tip
about
satire
–
know
the
truth,
then
exaggerate
it.
20th
century
to
today:
In
the
modern
era,
satire
is
everywhere
–
in
print,
on
stage,
on
air,
online.
The
20th
century
saw
satire
thriving
in
essays
(think
Dorothy
Parker’s
acid
wit
or
George
Orwell’s
allegorical
Animal
Farm),
in
theater
(e.g.,
Oscar
Wilde’s
social
comedies),
and
especially
in
political
cartoons.
In
the
21st
century,
satire
exploded
on
television
and
the
internet.
Shows
like
Saturday
Night
Live
and
The
Daily
Show
use
sketch
and
news-parody
formats
to
instantly
react
to
current
events.
Stephen
Colbert,
for
instance,
famously
adopted
a
satirical
persona
as
a
pompous
conservative
pundit
on
The
Colbert
Report
–
by
“playing
a
character”
he
parodied
media
bias
and
political
spin,
all
while
(in
character)
pretending
not
to
be
joking.
And
of
course,
digital
media
has
its
satirical
kings:
The
Onion,
born
as
a
college
newspaper
in
1988,
set
the
standard
for
news
satire
with
headlines
that
are
sometimes
so
on-point
people
mistake
them
for
real
news.
(Case
in
point:
China’s
Beijing
Evening
News
reprinted
an
Onion
story
about
Congress
threatening
to
move
out
of
D.C.
without
realizing
it
was
satire
–
oops!)
Through
the
ages,
the
targets
and
styles
of
satire
have
evolved
–
from
ancient
politicians
in
togas
to
modern
celebs
on
Twitter
–
but
the
essence
remains:
satirists
use
humor
to
speak
truth
to
power
(or
to
stupidity).
Understanding
this
lineage
isn’t
just
trivia;
it
reminds
you
that
when
you
write
satire,
you’re
joining
a
grand
tradition
of
noble
smart-alecks.
Techniques
of
Satire:
Your
Toolkit
of
Tricks
Writing
satire
is
like
doing
magic
with
words
–
you
misdirect,
dazzle,
and
sometimes
shock
the
audience
to
make
a
point.
To
craft
effective
satire,
you’ll
want
to
master
a
few
trusty
techniques.
Here
are
the
big
ones
in
the
satirist’s
toolkit
and
how
to
use
them:
Irony
(and
Sarcasm)
Irony
is
the
lifeblood
of
satire.
In
simple
terms,
irony
means
saying
the
opposite
of
what
you
really
mean,
or
highlighting
a
gap
between
expectation
and
reality.
It’s
the
wink
that
says,
“I’m
saying
this,
but
you
and
I
both
know
the
truth
is
the
opposite.”
For
example,
if
a
situation
is
going
disastrously
and
a
character
chirps,
“Well,
that’s
just
great,”
–
that’s
verbal
irony
(sarcasm’s
snarky
cousin).
In
satire,
you
might
praise
what
you
actually
want
to
attack,
or
appear
to
side
with
the
absurd
to
show
how
absurd
it
truly
is.
Dramatic
irony:
Sometimes
the
audience
is
in
on
a
truth
that
the
characters
or
narrator
pretend
not
to
know.
Jonathan
Swift’s
A
Modest
Proposal
is
dripping
with
dramatic
irony
–
readers
realize
the
proposal
is
horrifying,
but
the
narrator
blandly
carries
on
as
if
it’s
the
most
reasonable
solution,
thus
highlighting
the
real
horror:
society’s
indifference
to
the
suffering
of
the
poor.
Sarcasm:
Sarcasm
is
a
more
blunt
form
of
irony
–
often
a
cutting,
mocking
remark.
In
moderation,
it
adds
bite.
E.g.,
writing
“Oh,
brilliant
idea,
Congress,
truly”
after
describing
a
particularly
boneheaded
policy
can
drive
the
point
home.
Just
be
careful:
sarcasm
is
like
hot
sauce,
a
little
can
spice
things
up,
but
too
much
overwhelms
the
dish.
Situational
irony:
This
is
when
the
outcome
is
the
opposite
of
what
one
would
expect.
For
instance,
a
fire
station
burning
down
–
ironic!
A
satirical
piece
might
construct
an
ironic
scenario
to
make
a
point,
like
a
Nobel
Peace
Prize
winner
starting
a
bar
fight.
The
inherent
“that’s
not
supposed
to
happen!”
of
situational
irony
creates
a
comedic
twist
on
serious
matters.
Use
irony
as
your
ally
in
satire.
It
allows
you
to
illustrate
the
gap
between
how
things
are
and
how
they
should
be
in
a
powerful
way.
For
instance,
if
you
want
to
satirize
workplace
bureaucracy,
you
might
write
a
faux
memo
from
HR
that
cheerfully
announces,
“Due
to
our
commitment
to
efficiency,
all
employees
must
now
fill
out
17
forms
to
request
a
single
pen.”
The
irony
(efficiency
causing
inefficiency)
shines
a
spotlight
on
the
dysfunction.
Exaggeration
and
Hyperbole
When
in
doubt,
blow
it
out
of
proportion!
Exaggeration
(or
its
fancy
Greek
name
“hyperbole”)
means
taking
something
to
ridiculous
extremes
to
reveal
its
ridiculousness.
If
reality
is
mildly
absurd,
your
satirical
version
of
it
should
be
absurd
on
steroids.
This
technique
is
everywhere
in
satire
–
from
Swift
suggesting
baby-eating,
to
modern
satirists
joking
that
a
minor
tech
glitch
caused
the
apocalypse.
Caricature:
In
political
cartoons,
artists
draw
huge
heads
or
wild
features
–
that’s
exaggeration
in
visual
form.
In
writing,
you
can
“caricature”
a
behavior
or
idea.
Suppose
you’re
satirizing
celebrity
vanity
–
you
might
exaggerate
it
by
creating
a
character
who
hires
paparazzi
to
follow
him
to
the
fridge
so
even
his
midnight
snack
is
documented
by
the
press.
Over-the-top?
Exactly
–
that’s
the
point.
Outrageous
analogies:
Compare
the
situation
to
something
absurdly
out
of
scale.
For
example,
“My
boss
treats
missing
a
deadline
like
it’s
the
end
of
the
universe
–
I’m
pretty
sure
he’d
schedule
a
public
execution
if
our
team’s
report
came
in
10
minutes
late.”
The
humor
in
the
overstatement
highlights
the
boss’s
overreaction.
Taking
a
logical
premise
to
illogical
extremes:
Start
with
a
real
issue
and
keep
asking
“what’s
the
worst
that
could
happen?”
then
answer
it
in
a
ridiculously
literal
way.
Are
people
worried
about
government
surveillance?
Satire
it
by
imagining
dental
drones
that
fly
into
our
bathrooms
to
ensure
we
floss
–
for
our
health,
of
course.
Concerned
about
consumerism?
Write
a
story
where
people
sell
their
own
memories
to
afford
the
newest
smartphone.
By
amplifying
the
absurdity,
you
spotlight
the
underlying
issue
in
a
memorable
way.
Exaggeration
works
because
it
makes
the
implicit
flaws
impossible
to
ignore.
It’s
as
if
you’re
drawing
a
doodle
around
a
problem
with
a
big
red
arrow
saying,
“Look
how
crazy
this
is
when
taken
to
the
extreme!”
If
someone
says,
“You’re
exaggerating,”
as
a
critique,
the
proper
satirist
response
is,
“Exactly.”
😉
The
key
is
to
ensure
your
audience
gets
that
the
exaggeration
is
intentional.
You
usually
do
this
by
pushing
far
enough
that
it’s
clearly
not
meant
to
be
taken
literally
(e.g.,
no
one
actually
thinks
drones
will
enforce
flossing…
we
hope).
Parody
and
Imitation
Parody
is
the
art
of
mimicking
a
style
or
genre
to
poke
fun
at
it.
If
you’ve
ever
seen
a
Weird
Al
Yankovic
music
spoof
or
a
sketch
where
a
comedian
impersonates
a
politician’s
mannerisms,
you
know
the
power
of
parody.
In
writing,
parody
means
taking
the
familiar
format
of
something
–
a
news
article,
a
scientific
report,
a
poem,
a
speech
–
and
filling
it
with
absurd
content
that
highlights
the
original’s
flaws
or
the
absurdity
of
the
subject.
Style
imitation:
Suppose
you
want
to
satirize
sensationalist
journalism.
You
might
write
a
parody
news
article
with
the
breathless
tone
of
clickbait
journalism:
“Shock
Report:
Local
Man
Loses
Sock,
Blames
Government
–
You
Won’t
Believe
What
Happened
Next!”
The
structure
and
tone
mirror
real
news,
but
the
content
(a
lost
sock
treated
like
Watergate)
makes
it
funny
and
pointed.
Borrowed
formats:
Common
parody
targets
include
academic
papers,
press
releases,
letters,
and
ads.
For
example,
The
Onion
once
parodied
those
heartfelt
charity
sponsorship
ads
with
a
piece
like,
“For
just
$5,000
a
day,
you
can
sponsor
a
politician.”
By
copying
the
earnest
style
of
charity
appeals
and
applying
it
to
greedy
politicians,
the
satire
comes
through
loud
and
clear.
Literary
or
pop
culture
parody:
You
can
also
parody
specific
works
or
genres.
Writing
a
fairy
tale
in
the
style
of
a
corporate
memo,
or
a
Shakespearean
soliloquy
about
online
dating
–
the
fun
lies
in
the
mismatch
between
style
and
subject.
If
the
audience
knows
the
original
source
or
genre,
they’ll
appreciate
the
clever
twists.
Just
ensure
there’s
a
purpose
beyond
mimicry
–
parody
for
parody’s
sake
can
be
funny,
but
in
satire,
you
usually
use
it
to
critique
something
(e.g.,
parody
a
famous
speech
to
show
how
current
leaders
fall
short
of
past
ideals).
Parody
is
powerful
because
it
leverages
something
already
recognizable.
It’s
essentially
an
inside
joke
with
the
audience
–
“You
know
how
this
usually
goes,
right?
Now
watch
me
twist
it.”
When
done
well,
your
readers
will
both
laugh
at
the
imitation
and
realize
the
commentary
you’re
making
on
the
original
or
on
whatever
subject
you’ve
plugged
into
that
style.
Plus,
parody
can
lend
your
satire
a
sense
of
authenticity
–
a
faux
academic
study
format,
if
written
pitch-perfect,
can
almost
sound
legit,
which
only
heightens
the
humor
when
the
content
goes
off
the
rails.
Absurdity
and
the
Totally
Ridiculous
Sometimes,
the
best
way
to
highlight
reality’s
insanity
is
to
embrace
pure
absurdity.
Absurdity
in
satire
means
things
happen
that
are
wildly
illogical,
surreal,
or
just
jaw-droppingly
silly
–
yet
they
often
metaphorically
relate
to
a
truth.
This
overlaps
with
exaggeration,
but
absurdity
can
also
mean
the
humor
comes
from
nonsense
or
bizarreness
that
slyly
parallels
real
issues.
Absurd
characters:
Create
people
or
entities
that
are
one
step
beyond
reality.
Maybe
a
government
ministry
run
entirely
by
actual
clowns
(literally,
with
red
noses
and
big
shoes)
to
represent
how
you
view
a
real
policy
as
clownish.
Or
a
CEO
who
communicates
only
through
emojis.
The
key
is
the
character’s
absurd
trait
is
symbolic
of
a
real
trait
–
the
clown
ministers
=
foolish
leaders;
the
emoji
CEO
=
inarticulate
or
childish
communication
styles
in
corporate
culture.
Illogical
worlds:
Satire
lets
you
imagine
a
world
that
operates
by
twisted
rules.
Catch-22
by
Joseph
Heller
is
a
classic
example:
a
military
rule
that
you’re
insane
if
you
willingly
fly
dangerous
missions,
but
if
you
ask
not
to
fly
them
you’re
sane
(so
you
have
to
fly)
–
an
absurd
bureaucratic
logic
that
satirizes
real
military
bureaucracy.
You
can
create
a
fictional
scenario
that’s
patently
ridiculous
to
shine
a
light
on
a
system’s
failings.
For
instance,
satirize
complex
tax
codes
by
having
a
scene
where
two
accountants
need
a
ouija
board
and
a
quantum
physicist
to
file
a
simple
tax
return
–
exaggeration,
yes,
but
also
absurd
in
a
Monty
Python
way.
Deadpan
absurdity:
One
delicious
approach
is
to
present
absurd
statements
in
a
matter-of-fact,
deadpan
tone.
Imagine
writing,
“According
to
a
new
study,
0%
of
people
enjoy
being
stuck
in
traffic,
shocking
experts
worldwide.”
The
content
is
obvious
or
silly,
but
if
you
deliver
it
with
a
straight
face
(like
a
real
report),
it
tickles
the
reader’s
sense
of
the
absurd.
This
technique
often
leaves
the
audience
with
that
“Did
they
really
just
say
that?”
moment
–
perfect
for
a
chuckle
and
a
thought
about
whatever
you’re
actually
implying
(in
this
case,
maybe
how
some
studies
tell
us
what
we
already
know).
Absurdity
in
satire
often
borders
on
the
surreal,
but
it
should
connect
to
reality
by
a
thread
of
logic
or
analogy.
It’s
the
difference
between
a
random
non-sequitur
and
a
pointed
non-sequitur.
Random:
“Then
aliens
turned
everyone
into
sandwiches,
haha!”
(Okay…
weird,
but
what’s
the
point?).
Pointed:
“In
the
end,
the
committee’s
circular
logic
effectively
turned
the
debate
into
a
sandwich
–
lots
of
layers,
no
substance.”
(Weird
image,
but
conveys
a
critique.)
Aim
for
the
latter:
nonsense
that
means
something.
Understatement
and
Euphemism
On
the
flip
side
of
exaggeration
lies
understatement
–
another
satirical
tool.
Sometimes
describing
a
horrendous
or
extreme
situation
as
if
it
were
no
big
deal
can
be
ironically
powerful
(and
darkly
funny).
Similarly,
using
polite
or
technical
euphemisms
to
describe
something
outrageous
can
highlight
just
how
outrageous
it
is.
Understatement:
This
is
classic
in
British
satire
(the
Monty
Python
sketch
where
a
character
has
lost
all
his
limbs
and
calls
it
“just
a
flesh
wound”
comes
to
mind).
If
a
politician
tells
a
huge
blatant
lie,
a
satirist
might
dryly
comment,
“He
may
have
taken
a
slight
liberty
with
the
facts.”
The
discrepancy
between
the
reality
and
the
mild
description
creates
irony.
It
can
also
underscore
how
people
try
to
downplay
wrongdoing.
Understate
a
big
problem
and
you’ll
actually
draw
attention
to
its
magnitude.
Euphemism:
Imagine
a
satirical
news
brief
about
an
authoritarian
regime:
“The
government
has
been
engaging
in
some
light
voter
persuasion”
(translation:
voter
intimidation).
By
using
gentle
terms
for
a
rough
action,
you
mock
the
euphemistic
language
officials
often
use.
It’s
a
way
to
indirectly
call
them
out
–
the
reader
reads
between
the
lines.
Formal,
bland
tone
for
crazy
content:
Another
form
of
understatement
is
to
maintain
a
very
formal,
bureaucratic
tone
while
describing
absurd
or
horrible
things.
The
contrast
can
be
comedic
gold.
Example:
“Company
Memo:
We
regret
to
inform
employees
that
due
to
budget
cuts,
your
lunches
will
now
consist
of
literally
nothing.
We
appreciate
your
understanding
and
continued
starvation.”
The
prim
corporate
phrasing
of
an
outrageous
policy
(making
people
starve)
satirizes,
say,
corporate
cold-heartedness.
Understatement
works
particularly
well
when
the
real-life
phenomenon
you’re
targeting
involves
people
downplaying
something
important
or
failing
to
react
appropriately.
By
mirroring
that
dynamic,
you
highlight
it.
It’s
subtle
–
the
opposite
of
hyperbole’s
shout,
understatement
is
a
whisper
–
but
that
subtlety
itself
can
be
humorous,
as
if
you’re
conspiratorially
nudging
the
reader:
“This
is
insane,
but
shall
we
pretend
it’s
fine?
wink”
Other
Devices:
Satire
Spice
Mix
There
are
plenty
of
other
literary
spices
you
can
sprinkle:
invective
(sharp,
insult-driven
language)
can
add
heat,
though
use
it
wisely
or
it
just
becomes
a
rant.
Juxtaposition
–
placing
two
contrasting
elements
side
by
side
–
is
great
for
highlighting
absurd
contrasts
(e.g.,
a
millionaire
complaining
about
the
price
of
a
latte
next
to
a
report
on
poverty
rates).
Wordplay
and
puns
can
add
a
lighter
comedic
touch
between
heavier
barbs.
Allegory
(whole
stories
that
parallel
real
events,
like
Orwell’s
animals
on
a
farm
to
represent
a
revolution)
can
deepen
satire
but
require
careful
execution
so
readers
catch
the
parallels.
The
bottom
line:
mix
and
match
techniques
to
suit
your
piece.
One
satire
may
lean
heavily
on
irony
and
understatement
(dry
wit),
another
on
absurd
exaggeration
(silly
shock
value).
As
you
practice,
you’ll
develop
a
sense
of
which
tool
to
pull
out
for
which
job.
And
like
any
DIY
project,
having
a
full
toolbox
at
your
disposal
is
half
the
battle.
Crafting
a
Satirical
Piece
Step-by-Step
Alright,
time
to
roll
up
your
sleeves
and
actually
write
this
thing.
Staring
at
a
blank
page
can
be
intimidating
(as
intimidating
as
a
politician
at
a
truth-telling
contest).
But
fear
not
–
here’s
a
step-by-step
approach
to
go
from
a
vague
idea
to
a
polished
satirical
piece.
We’ll
break
it
down
into
manageable
steps:
Step
1:
Choose
a
Target
(Focus
Your
Premise)
Every
satire
needs
a
target
–
the
issue,
person,
or
behavior
you’re
making
fun
of.
Start
by
picking
something
that
you
care
about
or
find
absurd.
Your
genuine
irritation
or
passion
will
fuel
the
humor.
It
could
be
a
big
social
issue
(like
political
corruption,
climate
denial,
inequality)
or
a
petty
everyday
annoyance
(like
people
who
never
update
their
software
but
complain
their
phone
is
slow).
Nothing
is
too
grand
or
too
small,
as
long
as
there’s
something
worth
ridiculing.
However,
one
golden
rule:
punch
up,
not
down.
Choose
a
target
that
has
some
power,
influence,
or
choice
in
the
matter.
Satire
works
best
when
it
challenges
the
powerful
or
critiques
widely-held
follies,
not
when
it
mocks
the
vulnerable.
For
example,
satirizing
a
government
policy
or
a
billionaire’s
quirks
can
be
great;
satirizing
homeless
people
or
disaster
victims
–
not
so
much
(that
veers
into
cruel,
not
clever).
We’ll
talk
more
about
this
in
the
ethics
section,
but
keep
it
in
mind
from
the
get-go.
Aim
your
comedic
arrows
at
the
right
bullseye.
Once
you
have
a
broad
target,
narrow
it
to
a
specific
premise
or
angle.
“Government
incompetence”
is
too
broad
to
be
funny
on
its
own
–
but
“the
government
program
that
spent
$2
million
to
develop
a
ketchup
bottle”
is
specific
and
ripe
for
satire.
A
good
satirical
premise
is
crystal
clear.
You
(and
eventually
your
reader)
should
be
able
to
answer:
What
exactly
am
I
satirizing?
Is
it
a
particular
event,
a
type
of
person,
a
trend?
Jonathan
Swift
didn’t
just
satirize
British
policy
generally;
his
premise
was
specifically
ridiculing
the
heartless
attitude
of
the
English
wealthy
toward
poor
Irish
families.
From
that
clear
premise
sprang
the
“eat
babies”
idea.
Try
writing
your
premise
in
a
straightforward
sentence
first:
“I
want
to
satirize
__
because
__.”
For
example,
“I
want
to
satirize
corporate
PR
speak
because
it’s
absurd
how
companies
spin
bad
news
as
good.”
That
clarity
will
keep
you
on
track
as
you
add
layers
of
humor.
Step
2:
Find
the
Absurdity
and
Choose
Your
Satirical
Angle
Now
that
you
have
a
target,
ask:
“What’s
inherently
absurd
or
ironic
here?”
Your
job
is
to
amplify
that.
There
are
a
couple
of
ways
to
hone
in
on
your
satirical
angle:
Identify
the
contradictions
or
hypocrisy:
Is
there
a
gap
between
what
this
person/organization
says
and
what
they
do?
Between
the
ideal
and
reality?
For
instance,
if
your
target
is
“reality
TV,”
the
inherent
irony
is
that
it’s
often
scripted
and
fake.
Boom,
angle:
treat
the
fakeness
of
“reality”
with
extreme
seriousness,
or
flip
it
so
real
life
starts
having
confession
cams
and
dramatic
music.
Find
the
lie
or
the
flaw
and
shine
a
spotlight.
Ask
“What
if…?”
questions
to
push
the
idea.
What
if
this
truth
was
taken
to
the
extreme?
(Exaggeration
angle.)
What
if
the
opposite
was
true?
(Irony
angle.)
What
if
I
present
it
in
a
different
format
or
context?
(Parody
angle.)
For
example:
What
if
a
tech
company
literally
started
worshipping
an
AI
as
its
god?
(Absurd
extreme
to
satirize
tech
obsession.)
Or
what
if
I
wrote
about
my
messy
roommate
as
if
he
were
a
historic
plague?
(Parody,
comparing
crumbs
to
locusts,
etc.)
Find
a
fresh
perspective:
Sometimes
taking
an
unexpected
point
of
view
opens
up
comedy.
Could
you
tell
the
story
from
the
standpoint
of
an
inanimate
object
or
an
unlikely
character?
E.g.,
satirize
smartphone
addiction
with
a
piece
from
the
perspective
of
a
lonely
neglected
book
on
the
shelf,
witnessing
humans
worshipping
their
phones.
The
angle
becomes
the
personification
of
the
book
lamenting
like
an
old
spurned
friend.
This
indirect
approach
can
be
both
funny
and
poignant.
Brainstorm
freely
here.
Jot
down
as
many
absurd
ideas
or
analogies
as
you
can
related
to
your
topic.
Don’t
worry
if
they’re
too
crazy
–
sometimes
the
craziest
idea,
toned
down
just
a
notch,
becomes
the
perfect
satirical
hook.
Let’s
say
our
target
is
over-the-top
wedding
culture
(people
spending
ludicrous
amounts
on
weddings).
Absurd
brainstorm:
wedding
as
military
arms
race,
bride
and
groom
as
rival
generals?
Or
a
reality
show
“Wedding
Wars”
where
couples
compete
to
one-up
each
other?
Or
an
open
letter
from
the
future
child
(“Thanks
for
blowing
my
college
fund
on
a
chocolate
fountain,
Mom
and
Dad!”).
Notice
how
each
of
those
angles
highlights
the
original
absurdity
(weddings
that
have
lost
all
sense
of
proportion)
through
a
different
lens.
Choose
the
angle
that
makes
you
smirk
the
most
or
that
best
highlights
the
core
issue.
If
you’re
torn,
ask
which
idea
would
be
clearest
to
your
audience.
Remember,
clarity
is
key
–
your
readers
should
quickly
“get”
what
you’re
spoofing
once
they
start
reading.
If
the
connection
is
too
murky,
consider
sharpening
or
simplifying
the
concept.
Step
3:
Choose
a
Format
or
Structure
Satire
can
take
many
forms
–
and
picking
the
right
format
can
significantly
enhance
the
humor.
This
is
where
you
decide
how
you
will
present
your
satirical
idea.
Some
popular
structures
(which
we’ll
delve
into
in
the
next
section)
include:
a
faux
news
article,
a
satirical
op-ed
or
open
letter,
a
fictional
interview,
a
diary
entry,
a
user
manual,
an
advertisement,
a
listicle,
you
name
it.
Why
does
format
matter?
Because
form
can
itself
be
a
joke.
A
serious
format
(like
a
scientific
report
or
a
solemn
speech)
filled
with
ridiculous
content
creates
a
delightful
contrast.
For
example,
if
your
target
is
bureaucratic
inefficiency,
writing
your
piece
as
a
leaked
internal
memo
or
policy
proposal
could
amplify
the
satire
–
you’d
use
dry
office
lingo
to
describe
something
outrageously
dumb,
thereby
mocking
the
bureaucratic
tone
and
the
inefficiency.
Or
if
you’re
skewering
something
like
Instagram
culture,
maybe
write
it
as
a
step-by-step
how-to
guide
for
becoming
an
influencer
(highlighting
shallow
behaviors
through
the
faux
instructions).
Consider
your
audience
too.
Some
formats
are
more
instantly
relatable
to
certain
readers.
A
younger
online
audience
might
love
a
listicle
(“5
Signs
Your
Cat
is
Plotting
World
Domination”
–
a
silly
satirical
concept),
whereas
a
more
literary
audience
might
appreciate
a
short
story
or
essay
format.
Also,
different
formats
lend
themselves
to
different
strengths:
a
fake
news
article
is
great
for
deadpan
delivery
of
absurd
“facts,”
while
a
parody
letter
or
monologue
lets
you
dive
deep
into
a
character’s
voice.
Outline
the
structure
in
broad
strokes.
Will
it
have
sections
(like
a
news
article
with
headline,
body,
maybe
fake
quotes)?
Will
it
be
one
continuous
narrative?
Will
it
be
Q&A
style?
Having
this
blueprint
prevents
your
satire
from
becoming
a
rambling
blob
of
jokes.
It
gives
you
scaffolding
to
build
on.
If
you’re
not
sure,
a
straightforward
approach
is
to
write
it
as
a
satirical
essay
or
column
–
basically
you
speaking
in
ironic
tone
–
which
is
flexible
and
doesn’t
require
strict
formatting.
Once
you
pick
a
format,
stick
to
its
conventions
as
you
write
–
that’s
half
the
humor.
If
it’s
a
love
letter,
start
with
“Dear
so-and-so”
and
maybe
end
with
a
ridiculous
sign-off.
If
it’s
a
scientific
abstract,
include
an
“Introduction”
and
“Conclusion”
with
tongue-in-cheek
academic
jargon.
Committing
to
the
bit
sells
the
satire.
(Need
inspiration?
In
the
next
section,
we’ll
explore
common
satire
formats
like
news,
open
letters,
etc.,
with
examples.
Feel
free
to
skip
ahead,
then
come
back
here
to
continue
your
steps.)
Step
4:
Write
the
First
Draft
–
Be
Bold,
Then
Refine
Time
to
put
pen
to
paper
(or
fingers
to
keyboard)
and
let
it
rip.
Your
first
draft
is
the
place
to
go
big
with
your
humor
ideas.
Don’t
self-censor
too
much
at
this
stage
–
you’ve
done
your
planning,
now
let
the
satire
flow.
A
few
pointers
as
you
draft:
Adopt
the
right
tone/voice:
If
you’re
writing
in
a
persona
(e.g.,
a
clueless
official,
a
concerned
citizen,
a
talking
dog),
fully
inhabit
that
character’s
voice.
If
it’s
a
generic
narrator,
decide
if
they’re
naive,
sarcastic,
outraged,
or
eerily
calm
about
absurd
things.
Consistency
of
voice
makes
the
piece
feel
cohesive.
Lead
strong:
The
opening
lines
should
signal
the
satirical
nature
and
grab
attention.
Often,
stating
the
absurd
premise
right
at
the
start
works
wonders.
Example:
“The
Department
of
Agriculture
announced
today
that
the
nation’s
cows
are
now
required
to
produce
10%
lactose-free
milk
by
2025,
to
accommodate
lactose-intolerant
Americans.”
That’s
a
goofy
premise
delivered
seriously
–
a
hook,
in
other
words.
It
sets
up
the
reader
for
the
style
of
jokes
to
come.
Commit
to
the
bit:
Satire
often
works
best
when
it
doesn’t
blink.
Write
with
conviction
as
if
everything
you
say
is
logical
or
factual,
even
when
it’s
ridiculous.
The
humor
comes
from
the
contrast
between
the
serious
delivery
and
the
insane
content.
A
common
mistake
is
winking
too
hard
at
the
audience,
e.g.,
breaking
character
to
say
“just
kidding.”
Trust
your
readers
to
get
it
(with
a
clear
premise
and
tone,
they
will).
Sprinkle
a
variety
of
humor:
Use
the
toolkit
–
irony,
exaggeration,
etc.
–
but
don’t
use
everything
at
once,
and
don’t
beat
one
joke
to
death.
Maybe
your
piece
mainly
uses
exaggeration,
but
you
toss
in
a
clever
ironic
twist
or
a
parody
reference
here
and
there
for
flavor.
Running
gags
(a
repeated
joke
or
callback)
can
also
be
fun,
but
ensure
they
escalate
or
vary
so
it
stays
funny.
For
example,
if
in
a
satirical
article
you
refer
to
a
hapless
politician
as
having
the
brainpower
of
a
toaster
in
paragraph
one,
maybe
in
paragraph
three
the
toaster
is
actually
making
better
decisions
in
a
side-by-side
comparison.
In
short,
mix
up
your
comedic
attacks:
a
surprise
analogy
here,
a
deadpan
absurd
statement
there,
maybe
a
pun
or
witty
wordplay
when
appropriate.
Keep
it
tight
(especially
with
humor):
Brevity
is
the
soul
of
wit!
In
a
first
draft
you
might
write
long,
which
is
fine,
but
be
prepared
to
trim.
Jokes
often
land
better
when
they’re
not
belabored.
For
instance,
instead
of
rambling
on
to
explain
why
something
is
funny,
let
the
scenario
or
dialog
itself
carry
the
humor
and
then
cut
to
the
next
point.
Trust
the
audience
to
fill
in
one
plus
one
=
haha.
Don’t
worry
if
at
this
stage
some
lines
feel
more
silly
than
satirical
or
vice
versa.
The
first
draft
might
be
rough
or
too
over-the-top
–
that’s
okay.
It’s
easier
to
tone
down
excess
than
to
add
in
spark
later.
Get
your
ideas
on
the
page.
You
might
end
up
with
a
piece
that
has
a
hilarious
middle
but
a
weak
ending,
or
a
great
concept
but
some
flat
jokes
–
all
fixable
in
the
next
step.
Step
5:
Revise
and
Polish
(Sharpen
that
Satire)
Now
for
the
unsexy
(but
crucial)
part:
editing.
Great
satire
often
comes
out
of
great
editing
–
refining
the
balance
between
humor
and
message.
Step
away
from
your
draft
for
a
bit
if
you
can,
then
come
back
with
fresh
eyes
and
maybe
a
red
pen
(or
the
delete
key).
What
to
look
for
while
revising:
Clarity
check:
Will
a
reader
not
inside
your
head
understand
the
target
and
premise?
Make
sure
the
setup
in
the
beginning
makes
it
clear
what
you’re
satirizing.
You
might
need
to
tweak
the
introduction
or
add
a
hint
if
it’s
too
oblique.
If
you
gave
it
to
a
friend,
could
they
“get
it”
by
the
first
few
sentences
or
headline?
If
not,
clarify
your
premise.
Consistency
of
tone:
Did
you
accidentally
drop
out
of
character
or
slip
from
satirical
into
just
factual
or
preachy?
Ensure
the
satirical
voice
stays
consistent.
If
you
find
a
paragraph
that
reads
like
a
straight
essay
or,
alternatively,
one
that
feels
like
a
different
style
of
humor,
smooth
it
out
to
match
the
rest.
Consistency
makes
the
piece
feel
professionally
done
rather
than
patchy.
Timing
and
flow
of
jokes:
Check
the
pacing.
Does
the
piece
build
up
to
a
good
climax
or
final
punchline?
Many
satirical
pieces
save
the
sharpest
zinger
for
the
end,
leaving
the
reader
with
a
final
“Ouch!”
(in
a
good
way).
Make
sure
the
best
stuff
isn’t
buried
in
the
middle
and
the
ending
isn’t
a
fizzle.
You
might
rearrange
sentences
or
paragraphs
for
better
setup-payoff
structure.
Also,
remove
any
joke
that
doesn’t
serve
a
purpose.
Sometimes
we
write
a
funny
line
that
we
love,
but
if
it
sidetracks
from
the
main
point
or
confuses
the
tone,
it
may
need
to
go.
Kill
your
darlings,
as
they
say
–
or
at
least
maim
them
until
they
behave.
Is
it
actually
funny?
This
sounds
obvious,
but
when
you’ve
re-read
your
piece
10
times,
you
might
become
numb
to
the
humor.
Try
reading
it
aloud.
The
parts
where
you
naturally
smile
or
giggle
are
keepers.
The
parts
where
even
you
are
bored
–
those
need
punching
up
or
cutting.
If
you
can,
have
someone
else
read
it
and
see
where
they
laugh
or
look
puzzled.
(Choose
an
honest
friend,
not
just
your
mom
who
says
everything
you
do
is
brilliant.)
Balance
critique
vs.
humor:
Ensure
your
criticism
isn’t
completely
lost
in
the
jokes,
nor
the
humor
drowned
out
by
soapboxing.
Satire
is
a
balancing
act.
If
upon
rereading,
the
piece
feels
too
mean
or
angry
without
enough
wit,
lighten
it
up
with
a
bit
more
silliness
or
charm
in
the
narrator’s
voice.
Conversely,
if
it’s
giggle-worthy
but
not
actually
making
any
point,
you
might
sharpen
a
line
or
two
to
drive
the
message
home
more.
The
best
satire
often
lets
the
absurd
scenario
imply
the
criticism,
without
lecturing
–
but
a
slight
nudge
or
hint
at
the
real
point,
especially
towards
the
end,
can
help
land
the
message.
For
instance,
ending
Stephen
Colbert-style
with,
“…and
that’s
how
we’ll
solve
everything,
because
what
could
possibly
go
wrong?”
–
a
final
irony
that
winks
at
the
reader
to
not
take
it
at
face
value.
Proofread
for
the
usual
suspects:
grammar,
spelling,
and
in
this
genre
especially,
word
choice.
Using
a
hilariously
wrong
word
or
a
malapropism
can
be
a
joke,
but
make
sure
it’s
intentional.
Often,
precise
wording
makes
the
difference
in
a
joke’s
setup
or
punchline.
Also
confirm
any
factual
elements
you
included
(satire
often
includes
real
references
or
names):
nothing
kills
a
great
gag
like
discovering
you
got
a
basic
fact
wrong
(unless
your
narrator
is
intentionally
getting
it
wrong
as
part
of
the
satire
–
that
can
be
a
joke
too,
but
it
should
be
on
purpose).
Lastly,
come
up
with
a
good
title
or
headline.
If
you
haven’t
already,
craft
one
that
teases
the
premise.
In
satirical
news,
the
headline
is
half
the
joke
(“Study
Reveals:
Babies
Are
Stupid”
still
makes
us
laugh).
In
an
essay
format,
a
witty
title
helps
grab
attention
(e.g.,
“An
Open
Letter
to
My
Roomba,
Regarding
Its
Plot
to
Kill
Me”).
Make
sure
it
matches
the
tone
of
the
piece
–
absurd
title
for
an
absurd
piece,
or
a
dry,
blandly
serious
title
for
a
piece
with
deadpan
delivery
(sometimes
funnier
that
way).
Congratulations
–
you’ve
now
got
a
satirical
piece
ready
to
hit
the
presses
(or
at
least
your
blog/social
media/Microsoft
Word
file).
But
before
you
publish
or
share
it
widely,
let’s
arm
you
with
knowledge
of
different
formats
you
can
experiment
with,
and
a
heads-up
on
ethics
and
pitfalls.
After
all,
with
great
power
(to
mock)
comes
great
responsibility
(to
not
be
a
jerk).
Common
Satire
Formats
and
Structures
Satire
isn’t
one-size-fits-all.
The
format
you
choose
is
part
of
the
joke.
Let’s
explore
some
popular
structures
for
satirical
writing,
with
examples
of
how
each
works.
You
can
use
these
as
inspiration
or
templates
for
your
own
pieces:
A
free
“The
SpinTaxi”
newspaper
box
on
a
Washington
DC
street.
The
Spintaxi’s
deadpan
news
parody
format
is
so
iconic
that
its
logo
alone
signals
you’re
in
for
a
satirical
read.
News
Parody
(Fake
News
Articles)
One
of
the
most
prevalent
forms
of
written
satire
today
is
the
faux
news
article.
Pioneered
by
outlets
like
The
Onion,
this
format
mimics
real
journalism,
complete
with
attention-grabbing
headlines,
a
serious
tone,
and
sometimes
even
fake
quotes
and
statistics
–
all
to
deliver
completely
ridiculous
content.
How
it
works:
You
write
your
piece
as
if
it’s
a
straight
news
report
or
press
release
about
an
absurd
situation.
The
humor
often
comes
from
the
contrast
between
the
formal,
factual
style
and
the
ludicrous
subject
matter.
For
example,
a
classic
Onion-style
headline
might
be
“Drugs
Win
Drug
War”
or
“NASA
Launches
David
Bowie
into
Space
to
Make
Contact
with
Starman”
–
presented
with
the
same
sobriety
as
if
reporting
on
a
local
city
council
meeting.
The
body
of
the
article
would
continue
in
an
AP-newswire
tone,
perhaps
quoting
a
fake
official
or
expert
to
comment
on
the
nonsense.
Why
it
works:
People
are
used
to
seeing
outrageous
real
news,
so
at
a
glance
a
parody
news
piece
has
just
enough
credibility
to
rope
them
in,
then
the
specifics
reveal
the
satire.
It
also
allows
you
to
slip
in
multiple
jokes:
the
headline
is
one,
the
fake
quotes
(often
the
“voice
of
reason”
stating
the
obvious)
are
another,
and
there’s
room
for
extra
gags
(charts,
bylines,
etc.).
News
parody
is
great
for
topics
like
politics,
science,
or
any
current
event,
because
you
basically
create
an
alternate
reality
news
item
to
highlight
how
in
reality,
things
are
not
making
sense.
Tips:
Make
sure
to
nail
the
tone
of
real
news.
Use
short
paragraphs,
objective-sounding
language,
and
maybe
a
punny
kicker
at
the
end
if
you
want.
The
more
earnestly
you
sell
it
as
news,
the
funnier
the
ridiculous
premise
becomes.
Also,
brevity
is
your
friend
here;
many
Onion
articles
are
only
a
few
paragraphs
long
–
they
come
in,
drop
the
bombshell
of
satire,
and
exit
before
the
joke
wears
thin.
If
your
premise
is
very
clear,
sometimes
just
a
headline
and
a
couple
of
lines
is
enough
(think
of
those
shareable
satirical
headlines
on
Twitter
or
Reddit).
Satirical
Open
Letters
and
Essays
Another
versatile
format
is
the
open
letter
or
satirical
essay/monologue.
This
is
essentially
a
first-person
address
to
a
person
or
entity,
or
a
personal
essay,
but
with
an
ironic
or
exaggerated
stance.
It’s
a
bit
more
free-form
than
a
news
article
and
lets
you
inject
a
lot
of
voice
and
persona.
Open
letters:
Here
you
write
a
letter
to
someone
who
will
never
read
it
–
often
a
public
figure,
group,
or
even
a
concept.
The
format
starts
with
“Dear
X,”
and
often
closes
with
a
witty
sign-off.
For
example,
“Dear
Millennials,
Please
Stop
Killing
Everything.
Sincerely,
A
Confused
Baby
Boomer.”
In
the
letter,
you’d
humorously
embody
the
voice
of
the
writer
(the
baby
boomer),
perhaps
satirizing
their
misunderstandings
and
complaints,
which
in
turn
highlights
the
silly
“millennials
are
killing
X
industry”
media
trend.
Open
letters
can
also
be
from
the
perspective
of
an
object
or
institution
(e.g.,
“Dear
Humans,
Signed,
Climate
Change”
with
climate
change
personified,
giving
humans
a
piece
of
its
mind).
The
direct
address
format
can
make
the
satire
sharper
–
it
feels
like
a
confrontation
or
heartfelt
plea,
just
with
absurd
logic.
Satirical
essays/monologues:
These
read
like
a
column
or
personal
essay.
It
might
be
you
as
yourself,
or
as
a
character,
talking
directly
to
the
reader
about
the
topic
in
a
humorous
way.
Think
of
pieces
in
The
New
Yorker’s
“Shouts
&
Murmurs”
or
McSweeney’s
Internet
Tendency.
For
example,
an
essay
titled
“I’m
Sorry
I
Didn’t
Respond
to
Your
Email,
My
Owl
Died”
takes
the
form
of
someone
giving
an
absurd
excuse
(satirizing
both
our
tendency
to
offer
dramatic
excuses
and
how
overwhelmed
we
are
by
communication).
There’s
no
rigid
structure
beyond
having
a
clear
beginning,
middle,
end.
It’s
like
telling
a
story
or
argument
with
a
satirical
angle.
Why
it
works:
This
format
allows
a
deeper
dive
into
a
character’s
psyche
or
a
more
narrative
approach.
You’re
not
constrained
by
the
clip
of
news
style.
You
can
be
very
sarcastic
or
flowery
or
over-the-top
in
voice.
It’s
ideal
for
topics
where
the
humor
comes
from
the
way
someone
thinks
or
talks
about
something.
For
instance,
writing
from
the
viewpoint
of
a
conspiracy
theorist
in
an
essay
lets
you
string
together
illogical
“logical”
arguments
to
expose
how
crazy
the
conspiracy
sounds.
The
open
letter
format,
meanwhile,
creates
a
built-in
target
of
the
satire
(the
addressee)
and
often
a
clear
speaker,
making
it
easy
to
frame
your
jokes.
Tips:
Fully
commit
to
the
persona
or
voice.
If
you’re
a
frustrated
customer
writing
an
open
letter
to
a
ridiculous
product
(e.g.,
“Dear
Automatic
Soap
Dispenser
That
Never
Works,”),
let
your
faux
frustration
build
comically.
If
you’re
doing
a
monologue
as,
say,
a
humble-bragging
tech
CEO
explaining
why
they
need
to
colonize
Mars,
maintain
the
obliviously
self-congratulatory
tone.
Structure
still
matters:
even
a
humorous
rant
should
have
a
logical
flow
of
ideas
–
maybe
escalating
in
craziness
or
culminating
in
a
final
epiphany
(or
punchline).
Because
these
formats
are
looser,
it’s
easy
to
ramble,
so
outline
your
key
beats:
e.g.,
in
a
letter
complaining
to
airlines,
maybe
paragraph
1
politely
introduces
the
gripe,
para
2
lists
increasingly
absurd
complaints,
para
3
delivers
a
dramatic
ultimatum
or
twist.
Fake
Interviews
and
Dialogues
This
format
presents
your
satire
as
a
Q&A
or
conversation,
which
can
be
a
fun
way
to
juxtapose
questions
and
answers
for
comedic
effect.
It’s
like
writing
a
short
play
or
skit
in
text
form,
or
a
mock
interview
transcript.
How
it
works:
You
lay
it
out
with
character
labels
or
Q/A
labels.
For
instance:
Interviewer:
“So,
Big
Bad
Wolf,
you
claim
you
were
framed
by
the
three
little
pigs?”
Wolf:
“Absolutely.
It’s
all
fake
news.
I
was
merely
trying
to
check
on
their
welfare…”
In
that
made-up
example,
you
can
see
how
a
familiar
story
(Three
Little
Pigs)
can
be
satirized
by
interview
format
–
maybe
to
parallel
how
certain
public
figures
deny
obvious
guilt
(“I
was
just
blowing
their
houses
down
to
ensure
they
were
up
to
code,
I
swear!”).
Or
you
might
do
a
dialogue
between
two
characters
with
opposing
views,
exaggerating
both
to
highlight
a
point.
Imagine
a
transcript
of
a
meeting
between
“Common
Sense”
and
“Political
Correctness,”
for
instance,
each
speaking
in
character
about
some
issue
–
could
be
a
way
to
satirize
the
debate
around
free
speech,
etc.,
by
literally
personifying
those
concepts.
Why
it
works:
Interviews
allow
for
quick
back-and-forth
banter,
which
can
pack
in
jokes,
misunderstandings,
and
contrasts
in
viewpoint.
The
Q&A
format
is
also
good
for
delivering
exposition
in
a
natural
way
(“As
the
Wolf,
can
you
walk
us
through
what
happened
that
day?”
leads
the
Wolf
to
a
narrative
answer).
It
also
inherently
sets
up
a
scenario
–
an
interviewer
and
interviewee
implies
something
noteworthy
is
being
discussed,
often
something
gone
wrong
(a
scandal,
a
strange
achievement,
etc.).
That
scenario
itself
can
be
the
satirical
premise.
Tips:
Keep
each
turn
(question
or
answer)
punchy.
You
don’t
want
either
party
launching
into
page-long
monologues,
or
you
might
as
well
write
an
essay.
Use
the
interplay:
perhaps
the
interviewer
asks
reasonable
questions
and
the
interviewee
gives
ridiculously
oblivious
answers
(satirizing
someone
in
real
life
who
does
the
same).
Or
maybe
the
interviewer
is
fawning
and
the
interviewee
is
grotesquely
self-absorbed
–
depends
on
your
target.
If
doing
a
pure
dialogue
(no
interviewer),
make
sure
each
character
has
a
distinct
voice
or
stance
so
the
reader
can
follow
who’s
who
and
what
they
represent.
For
example,
a
Socratic
dialogue
spoof
with
a
“Professor”
and
a
“Student”
could
lampoon
academic
jargon:
Student
asks
a
simple
question,
Professor
responds
with
convoluted
nonsense,
back
and
forth,
highlighting
the
absurdity
of
academic
gatekeeping.
Pacing
is
vital.
A
common
technique
is
the
“straight
man
and
funny
man”
dynamic
–
one
character
is
sensible
(or
at
least
asks
what
the
audience
is
thinking)
and
the
other
is
the
comedic
figure
delivering
wild
ideas.
This
contrast
grounds
the
piece
and
gives
you
an
opportunity
to
pre-empt
the
reader’s
reactions
within
the
text.
When
the
interviewer
says,
“That
sounds
highly
unlikely,”
and
the
interviewee
doubles
down
with
an
even
crazier
justification,
the
reader
gets
to
laugh
and
nod
along
with
the
interviewer.
(Plus:
Other
Formats
to
Explore)
The
above
are
just
a
few
popular
formats.
Satire
is
limited
only
by
your
imagination.
You
could
write
a
pseudo-script
or
screenplay
format,
a
series
of
social
media
posts
or
fake
tweets,
a
product
review
from
hell,
a
FAQ
section
answering
absurd
questions,
or
even
a
recipe
(e.g.,
a
“recipe
for
a
political
campaign”
listing
money,
scandals,
baby-kissing,
etc.,
as
ingredients).
Feel
free
to
experiment.
Sometimes
the
format
itself
becomes
a
layer
of
the
joke
(like
a
recent
satirical
piece
that
was
formatted
as
an
IKEA
instruction
manual
for
building
a
government
–
diagrams
and
all!).
The
key
is
that
whatever
format
you
choose,
use
its
conventions
to
maximize
humor
and
clarity.
A
good
satirical
format
choice
can
make
a
mediocre
joke
brilliant
or,
if
poorly
chosen,
can
make
a
great
idea
fall
flat.
So,
when
brainstorming
formats,
ask:
Will
this
presentation
make
the
satire
sharper
and
more
entertaining?
If
yes,
go
for
it.
If
it’s
just
a
gimmick
that
complicates
things,
consider
a
simpler
route.
Next
up,
let’s
talk
about
something
crucial:
how
to
be
funny
and
provocative
without
crossing
lines
that
could
land
you
in
hot
water.
Yes,
it’s
time
for
the
ethics
and
legal
side
of
satire
–
don’t
worry,
we’ll
keep
it
light.
Ethical
and
Legal
Considerations
in
Satire
Satire
can
be
edgy.
By
its
nature,
it
challenges
and
often
offends
(at
least
the
target
of
the
satire,
if
not
the
audience).
But
there’s
a
fine
line
between
punching
up
in
a
fun,
constructive
way
and
punching
down
or
defaming,
which
can
be
harmful
or
even
get
you
sued.
As
a
satirical
writer,
you
need
to
be
aware
of
these
boundaries.
Here’s
how
to
navigate
the
ethics
and
legalities:
Punching
Up
vs.
Punching
Down
We
touched
on
this
earlier:
“Punching
up”
means
satirizing
people
or
institutions
that
have
power
(politicians,
corporations,
wealthy
elites,
dominant
social
norms).
“Punching
down”
means
making
fun
of
those
who
are
vulnerable
or
marginalized
(the
poor,
victims,
minorities,
etc.)
in
a
way
that
further
harms
or
belittles
them.
Why
avoid
punching
down?
Because
it’s
generally
not
satire
–
it’s
bullying
or
cruelty.
And
importantly,
it’s
usually
not
funny.
As
cartoonist
Garry
Trudeau
(creator
of
Doonesbury)
pointed
out
when
discussing
controversial
caricatures,
“Ridiculing
the
non-privileged
is
almost
never
funny
–
it’s
just
mean.”.
The
best
satire
often
comforts
the
afflicted
and
afflicts
the
comfortable,
not
the
other
way
around.
Ask
yourself:
Who
is
the
butt
of
the
joke?
If
it’s
a
corrupt
CEO,
a
hypocritical
celebrity,
or
a
societal
ill
–
you’re
likely
on
solid
(and
humorous)
ground.
If
it’s
a
tragedy
someone
suffered
or
an
entire
group’s
identity,
step
back.
Can
you
redirect
the
satire
toward
those
responsible
for
the
problem
instead?
For
example,
instead
of
mocking
people
who
fell
for
a
scam,
mock
the
scammers
or
the
system
that
enabled
the
scam.
This
doesn’t
mean
you
can’t
satirize
sensitive
topics.
You
can,
but
the
angle
matters.
Satirizing
racism,
for
example,
is
delicate
–
you
wouldn’t
want
to
inadvertently
repeat
racist
tropes.
A
savvy
satirist
might
create
an
exaggerated
scenario
that
makes
racism
look
as
absurd
as
it
truly
is
(punching
up
at
racists).
Think
of
Mel
Brooks
who
satirized
Nazis
by
making
them
buffoonish
in
The
Producers.
He
wasn’t
punching
down
at
victims
of
Nazism;
he
was
mocking
the
ridiculous
ideology
of
the
Nazis
themselves.
Avoid
cheap
shots:
Jokes
about
someone’s
immutable
characteristics
(race,
disability,
appearance,
etc.)
that
aren’t
tied
to
any
broader
point
usually
feel
like
low
blows.
If
you
find
your
draft
has
a
joke
like
that,
consider
replacing
or
removing
it.
It’s
often
a
sign
of
a
lazy
joke
anyway.
Satire
should
aim
higher.
Know
the
Legal
Lines:
Parody,
Libel,
and
“Just
Kidding”
Doesn’t
Always
Cut
It
Legally
speaking,
satire
and
parody
enjoy
a
lot
of
protection
under
free
speech
laws
in
many
countries
–
but
not
absolute
protection.
A
few
things
to
keep
in
mind:
Defamation
(Libel/Slander):
If
you
state
a
false
fact
about
a
real
person
that
harms
their
reputation,
they
could
claim
defamation.
Now,
satire
usually
signals
it’s
not
stating
actual
facts
(no
one
really
thought
Jonathan
Swift
was
actually
eating
babies).
But
sometimes,
especially
in
subtle
satire,
people
can
get
confused.
To
avoid
legal
trouble,
make
sure
that
no
reasonable
reader
would
believe
the
false
statements
to
be
actual
facts.
The
more
absurd
or
clearly
fictional
your
piece,
the
safer
you
are.
If
you
write
“CEO
X
secretly
kicks
puppies
for
fun”
as
a
satirical
hyperbole,
you
might
be
fine
if
it’s
obviously
a
joke
–
but
if
you
present
it
too
straight,
that
CEO
might
not
laugh
along.
In
the
U.S.,
public
figures
have
to
prove
“actual
malice”
(knowledge
of
falsity
or
reckless
disregard
for
truth)
to
win
a
libel
case
–
satire
isn’t
actual
malice
if
it’s
recognized
as
satire.
There
was
a
famous
case
Hustler
Magazine
v.
Falwell
(1988)
where
Hustler
ran
a
grotesque
parody
ad
about
Reverend
Jerry
Falwell;
he
sued,
but
the
U.S.
Supreme
Court
protected
the
parody
as
free
speech,
noting
no
reasonable
person
would
take
it
as
fact.
So
outrageousness
can
be
your
friend
in
court
–
who’d
think
a
reverend
really
had
an
incestuous
drunken
encounter
in
an
outhouse
(the
content
of
that
parody
ad)?
Only
someone
out
of
touch
with
reality.
Disclaimers
and
context:
If
you’re
publishing
satire
on
a
platform
where
it
might
be
mistaken
for
real
news
(looking
at
you,
Facebook
feeds),
a
disclaimer
or
obvious
cues
can
help.
Some
satire
sites
label
their
articles
as
such
in
the
footer
or
about
page.
You
shouldn’t
need
to
write
“THIS
IS
SATIRE”
in
bold
on
the
piece
(that
spoils
the
fun),
but
be
aware
that
in
today’s
fast-scrolling
online
world,
Poe’s
Law
reigns
(extreme
views
can
be
indistinguishable
from
satire).
To
protect
yourself
and
ensure
the
satire
is
recognized,
make
the
comedic
elements
evident
enough
for
a
moderately
attentive
reader.
If
your
parody
is
so
straight-faced
that
it’s
indistinguishable
from
real
defamatory
lies,
you’re
doing
something
risky
(and
arguably
not
doing
good
satire
anyway,
since
good
satire
has
a
hint
of
the
absurd).
Copyright
and
Fair
Use:
This
is
more
niche,
but
if
your
satire
involves
imitating
another
work
(like
parodying
a
famous
song
or
movie),
know
that
parody
is
often
considered
“fair
use”
of
copyrighted
material
because
it’s
transformative
criticism.
But
be
cautious
about
lifting
large
chunks
of
someone’s
actual
text
or
lyrics
–
better
to
mimic
the
style
and
sprinkle
references
than
to
copy-paste.
If
you
do
a
direct
parody
(say,
rewriting
a
popular
song’s
lyrics
to
be
about
a
politician),
legally
it’s
typically
okay
if
it’s
clearly
a
parody,
but
if
you
ever
tried
to
publish/sell
it,
you’d
navigate
copyright
law.
Just
a
heads-up.
Real
person
in
fiction:
If
you’re
using
a
real
person
as
a
character
in
your
satire,
especially
a
private
individual,
thread
carefully.
Public
figures
(politicians,
celebs)
have
broader
shoulders
for
satire;
private
individuals
(your
random
neighbor)
could
feel
personally
attacked.
Changing
names
or
composite
characters
can
avoid
hurting
a
specific
private
person.
If,
for
instance,
you
want
to
satirize
“the
worst
boss
ever”
and
you
base
it
on
your
actual
boss
–
maybe
don’t
name
them.
Make
it
a
fictional
company
and
an
amalgam
of
terrible
boss
traits.
The
satire
will
still
land
for
everyone
who’s
had
a
bad
boss,
and
you
(probably)
won’t
get
fired
or
sued
by
your
boss.
Cultural
Sensitivity
and
Context
What’s
considered
fair
game
in
one
culture
or
community
might
be
taboo
in
another.
Satire
that
involves
religion,
for
example,
can
be
especially
sensitive.
Some
societies
accept
joking
about
deities
or
religious
figures;
others
might
respond
with
severe
backlash.
Know
your
audience
and
the
context
in
which
your
piece
will
appear.
This
isn’t
to
scare
you
off,
but
to
make
you
thoughtfully
weigh:
Is
this
particular
edgy
joke
serving
the
piece,
or
is
it
just
shock
for
shock’s
sake?
If
it’s
the
latter,
it’s
often
best
to
cut
it.
Shock
alone
isn’t
clever
satire;
it’s
the
message
behind
the
shock
that
matters.
Also,
consider
timing.
Tragedy
+
time
=
comedy,
they
say,
but
too
soon
and
it’s
just
tasteless.
If
something
terrible
happened
yesterday,
a
satirical
take
on
it
today
might
be
seen
as
insensitive
or
exploitative,
whereas
six
months
from
now,
if
healing
has
occurred,
the
satire
could
be
a
way
to
process
or
comment
on
it.
There’s
no
hard
rule,
but
empathy
and
common
sense
go
a
long
way.
In
summary:
Satire
can
ruffle
feathers
–
aim
to
ruffle
the
right
ones.
You
want
your
audience
to
laugh
and
think,
not
feel
needlessly
hurt
or
unfairly
attacked.
And
you
certainly
don’t
want
a
lawsuit
or
an
internet
mob
coming
after
you
because
you
misjudged
a
joke.
So
before
you
publish,
do
an
“ethics
check”:
If
the
person
or
group
I’m
satirizing
read
this,
would
I
be
comfortable?
Amused
even,
if
they
had
a
sense
of
humor?
(Sometimes
satirists
actually
send
up
people
in
a
way
that
even
the
target
might
chuckle
because
it’s
true.)
If
the
answer
is
yes,
you’re
likely
on
solid
ground.
If
the
answer
is
“they’d
probably
cry
or
rage,”
reconsider
your
approach.
Now
that
we’ve
covered
the
heavy
stuff,
let’s
lighten
up
again.
The
best
way
to
improve
at
satire
is
to
practice.
So
here
are
some
exercises
and
prompts
to
get
your
satirical
muscles
toned,
followed
by
a
list
of
common
pitfalls
to
avoid
as
you
continue
your
journey
to
comedic
glory.
Practice
Exercises
for
Aspiring
Satirists
Ready
to
put
theory
into
practice?
Below
are
a
few
fun
exercises
and
prompts
to
spark
your
satire
writing.
Treat
them
like
creative
workouts
–
the
goal
is
to
try
things
out,
not
to
produce
a
masterpiece
on
the
first
go.
Feel
free
to
take
any
prompt
and
run
with
it,
twist
it,
or
invent
your
own:
Exaggerate
a
Mundane
Task:
Write
a
short
satirical
paragraph
that
treats
an
everyday
chore
as
an
epic
mission.
For
example,
pen
a
news
brief
about
the
“heroic”
journey
of
taking
out
the
trash
(interview
the
“eyewitness”
raccoon,
cite
fake
statistics
on
banana
peel
casualties,
etc.).
This
exercise
helps
you
practice
exaggeration
and
grandiose
tone
about
something
trivial
–
a
core
comedic
move.
Inanimate
Advisor:
Choose
an
object
in
your
room.
Now
imagine
it
has
opinions
about
how
you
live
your
life.
Write
an
open
letter
from
that
object
to
you.
Maybe
your
couch
writes
to
complain
about
the
crumbs
you
leave,
or
your
smartphone
writes
a
love-hate
letter
about
being
overused.
This
flexes
personification
and
parody
(the
object
mimicking
a
human
voice).
Bonus:
it
might
reveal
some
truths
about
your
habits,
humorously.
Satirical
How-To
List:
Make
a
short
listicle
of
“Tips”
or
steps
on
a
satirical
topic.
For
instance,
“5
Tips
for
Becoming
an
Evil
Overlord
on
a
Budget”
or
“How
to
Apologize
Without
Admitting
Any
Guilt:
A
Politician’s
Guide.”
Use
the
list
format
(1,
2,
3…)
and
make
each
point
an
opportunity
for
a
punchline.
Listicles
force
brevity
and
structure,
great
for
honing
wit.
Fake
Interview
Q&A:
Draft
a
mini
interview
with
a
fictional
character
who
represents
an
issue.
Maybe
“Interview
with
a
Netflix
Binge-Watcher
Who
Finished
247
Shows
in
a
Year”
or
“Q&A
with
the
Last
Person
on
Earth
Who
Doesn’t
Have
a
Smartphone.”
Keep
it
to
a
half-page.
This
gets
you
used
to
dialogue
format
and
creating
humor
through
contrasting
Q
and
A.
Headline
Game:
Try
coming
up
with
10
satirical
headlines
for
news
articles
that
don’t
exist.
They
can
be
totally
disconnected
topics
–
the
point
is
to
craft
a
one-liner
premise
in
headline
form.
E.g.,
“Local
Introvert
Braves
Grocery
Store,
Declares
Victory,”
or
“New
Study
Finds
Scientists
Really
Annoyed
at
Being
Asked
to
Explain
New
Study.”
Not
all
will
be
gold,
but
this
will
train
your
brain
to
see
the
satirical
angle
quickly.
Parody
a
Famous
Speech
or
Text:
Take
a
well-known
passage
(the
opening
of
the
Constitution,
a
Shakespeare
monologue,
the
lyrics
of
a
popular
song)
and
rewrite
it
to
be
about
a
humorous
modern
topic.
For
example,
“Four
score
and
seven
years
ago
our
fathers
brought
forth…”
could
become
an
ode
to
the
founding
of
a
sandwich
shop
or
a
fantasy
football
league,
delivered
in
grand
historic
style.
This
sharpens
your
parody
skill
–
capturing
the
cadence
of
the
original
but
flipping
the
content.
Scene
of
Absurd
Normalcy:
Write
a
short
scene
(like
a
script)
where
one
absurd
element
is
treated
as
normal
by
everyone.
E.g.,
a
family
calmly
discussing
the
neighbor’s
dragon
as
if
it’s
a
barking
dog,
or
office
workers
dealing
with
a
zombie
colleague
in
denial
(“Gary,
you
look
a
bit
pale.
Mondays,
huh?”).
This
exercise
helps
blend
absurdity
with
deadpan
tone,
a
staple
of
satire.
After
writing
any
of
these,
reflect:
What
technique
did
you
naturally
use?
Did
you
maintain
a
clear
target
and
purpose?
Where
did
you
laugh
at
your
own
ideas
(that’s
usually
a
good
sign!)?
If
something
feels
off,
no
worries
–
that’s
where
editing
or
feedback
comes
in.
Also,
read
professional
satire
regularly
–
from
The
Onion
headlines
to
McSweeney’s
essays
or
late-night
monologues.
Try
to
identify
techniques
you
spot:
“Ah,
that
joke
John
Oliver
made
is
basically
an
absurd
analogy
mixed
with
a
pop
culture
reference.
Could
I
do
something
similar
on
another
topic?”
This
analytical
eye,
combined
with
practice,
will
rapidly
improve
your
satirical
writing
prowess.
Pitfalls
to
Avoid
When
Writing
Satire
As
you
refine
your
satirical
writing,
beware
of
some
common
missteps
that
can
undermine
your
work.
Even
seasoned
humorists
fall
into
these
traps
occasionally.
Here’s
a
quick
checklist
of
“don’ts”
(or
at
least
“proceed
with
caution”
items)
for
satire:
Don’t
Be
Too
Obscure:
If
your
satire
relies
on
very
niche
knowledge
or
an
inside
joke
that
only
a
few
will
get,
it
may
flop.
While
it’s
okay
to
target
a
specific
audience,
make
sure
there’s
enough
context
for
readers
to
follow
along.
Throwing
in
one
or
two
niche
references
as
icing
is
fine,
but
the
cake
itself
should
be
universally
understandable.
Satire
already
asks
readers
to
pick
up
on
subtleties
–
don’t
make
them
do
advanced
calculus
on
top
of
it.
Avoid
Overly
Preachy
Tone:
Remember,
you’re
writing
satire,
not
a
manifesto
(even
if
you
have
strong
feelings
on
the
topic).
If
you
drop
the
humor
entirely
to
soapbox
your
real
opinion,
readers
feel
bait-and-switched.
The
comedic
veneer
should
carry
through.
If
you
need
to
include
a
serious
point,
wrap
it
in
wit
or
brevity.
You
never
want
the
reader
to
feel
lectured
to
–
you
want
them
to
laugh
and
then
realize
the
point.
Steer
Clear
of
Punching
Down:
We’ve
said
it
enough,
but
one
more
time:
making
fun
of
the
powerless
or
victims
is
a
bad
look.
It
often
comes
off
as
mean-spirited
rather
than
clever.
If
you
catch
yourself
doing
this,
refocus
the
joke.
For
example,
instead
of
mocking
“dumb
consumers”
who
fell
for
a
scam,
mock
the
scammer
or
the
societal
factors
that
allowed
it.
Empathy
can
go
hand-in-hand
with
satire.
Don’t
Sacrifice
Story/Logic
for
Jokes:
It’s
tempting
to
throw
every
funny
idea
into
a
piece,
but
if
something
doesn’t
fit
the
narrative
or
angle,
it
can
jolt
the
reader
out
of
the
experience.
A
random
digression
that’s
hilarious
on
its
own
might
need
to
be
cut
if
it
doesn’t
serve
the
overall
piece.
Satire
can
be
silly,
but
it
should
still
have
its
own
internal
logic.
Stick
to
the
rules
you’ve
set
in
your
satirical
scenario;
if
you
break
them,
do
it
intentionally
for
effect,
not
haphazardly.
Watch
the
Length:
Particularly
for
humor,
concise
is
usually
better.
A
joke
stretched
too
long
can
wither.
In
revising,
see
if
you
can
say
the
same
with
fewer
words.
Many
classic
satirical
essays
are
relatively
short
(500-1500
words).
Of
course,
this
very
guide
you’re
reading
is
much
longer
because
it’s
instructional
–
but
when
writing
actual
satire,
know
when
to
wrap
it
up.
Leave
the
audience
wanting
more,
not
less.
Be
Careful
with
Satire
of
Tragedy:
Satirizing
tragic
events
(war,
pandemics,
etc.)
can
be
extremely
powerful
–
or
extremely
off-putting.
Timing,
tone,
and
target
matter
immensely.
Generally,
direct
satire
of
fresh
tragedies
reads
as
tasteless.
But
satire
of
the
response
to
tragedies
or
the
systems
behind
them
can
be
impactful.
Example:
it
might
feel
wrong
to
satirize
a
natural
disaster’s
victims,
but
satirizing
an
incompetent
relief
effort
or
greedy
price
gougers
during
the
disaster
aims
at
those
who
deserve
scrutiny.
Always
ask:
Am
I
targeting
the
cause
of
suffering,
or
adding
to
it?
Avoid
One-Note
Jokes:
If
your
entire
piece
hinges
on
a
single
joke
repeated
over
and
over,
it
might
wear
thin.
Satire
often
works
through
a
core
premise,
yes,
but
find
ways
to
escalate
or
add
dimensions
to
that
premise.
Think
of
a
sketch
on
SNL:
the
best
ones
usually
heighten
the
scenario
or
introduce
twists,
not
just
repeat
the
same
punchline
5
times.
If
you
find
your
draft
feeling
repetitive,
brainstorm
a
way
to
up
the
ante
in
the
second
half
or
bring
in
a
new
angle
while
sticking
to
the
theme.
Don’t
Forget
to
Entertain:
Satire
can
be
biting
and
serious
in
its
aim,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
it
should
entertain
the
reader.
If
someone
is
bored
reading
it,
the
message
is
lost.
This
doesn’t
mean
every
line
must
be
a
joke,
but
the
overall
piece
should
be
engaging.
Use
vivid
language,
craft
a
narrative,
surprise
the
reader.
Humor
is
an
ally
in
keeping
attention
–
use
it
regularly.
Finally,
don’t
get
discouraged
by
a
joke
that
doesn’t
land
or
a
piece
that
doesn’t
quite
work.
Comedy
is
as
much
art
as
science.
Sometimes
you
think
something
is
hilarious
and
readers
go
“huh?”,
and
vice
versa.
Learn
from
each
attempt.
Satire
writing
improves
with
feedback
and
practice,
just
like
any
other
skill.
In
Conclusion:
Satire
is
a
wonderful
outlet
to
channel
frustration,
highlight
absurdities,
and
maybe
even
influence
thoughts
–
all
through
laughter.
It’s
equal
parts
creativity,
intellect,
and
mischief.
As
you
write,
picture
that
ideal
reader
who
gets
it,
chuckling
and
nodding
along.
Write
for
them.
And
if
along
the
way
you
ruffle
a
few
feathers
of
those
in
dire
need
of
ruffling,
well…
that’s
satire
for
ya.
Now
go
forth
and
be
funny,
be
bold,
and
most
importantly,
be
sharp.
The
world
always
needs
more
humor
and
truth,
delivered
with
a
sly
grin.
Happy
writing
–
can’t
wait
to
see
you
satirize
the
heck
out
of
something!
Clarksville City, Texas Comedy Club
https://kirk-damsgaard.mdwrite.net/the-talanted-taylor-and-travis-kelces-future-baby-one-of-the-most-anticipated-newborn-given-that-baby-jesus
3/24/2025
Greenpeace Not So Peaceful: How a $660M Fine and Flaming Teslas Set the World Ablaze
By the world’s oldest tenured professor and a 20-year-old philosophy major turned dairy farmer
When Green Turns to Ash
Greenpeace—the legendary environmental group known for saving whales, hugging trees, and ruining the weekend plans of oil executives—has found itself in an ironic predicament. Once hailed as the last line of defense against corporate greed, it’s now staring down a $660 million lawsuit and some awkward accusations about setting Teslas on fire.
This is a tale of extreme irony, misguided activism, and enough cognitive dissonance to make an entire sociology department faint.
For decades, Greenpeace has been synonymous with environmental justice. But according to a North Dakota jury, they may need to start fighting for financial justice after being ordered to pay over $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer, the company behind the controversial Dakota Access Pipeline.
Yes, Greenpeace—the noble, nonprofit defender of nature—now owes an oil company nearly three-quarters of a billion dollars.
It’s like Robin Hood being sued by the Sheriff of Nottingham—and losing.
The lawsuit, which accused Greenpeace of defamation and racketeering, was a resounding victory for the fossil fuel industry. The jury concluded that Greenpeace wasn’t just “protesting” but actively spreading misinformation, inciting illegal activity, and causing millions in damages.
Greenpeace, of course, dismissed the lawsuit as “meritless.” Because when you’re being sued for more money than the GDP of some small nations, admitting fault is not on the agenda.
How Did Greenpeace Manage to Lose So Badly?
Greenpeace’s legal defense strategy seemed to rely on two key points:
“We’re just a scrappy group of idealists fighting the good fight!”
“We have no money! Please don’t take our kayaks!”
Neither argument swayed the jury.
Instead, the court sided with Energy Transfer, which claimed Greenpeace orchestrated a campaign of misinformation that led to property destruction, financial losses, and—most importantly—hurt the feelings of powerful oil executives.
SPINTAXI — A satirical scene titled _The Eco-Friendly Travel Dilemma._ A group of Greenpeace activists stand in front of a private jet labeled “Greenpeace Summit…- Alan Nafzger
From Tree Huggers to Fire Starters?
The Curious Case of Flaming Teslas
In an unexpected twist, Greenpeace’s environmental crusade appears to have taken a pyromaniacal turn. Multiple Tesla service centers have mysteriously burst into flames, and while nobody is pointing fingers (except everyone who owns a Tesla), suspicions are mounting.
Las Vegas. A Tesla service center was torched, leaving behind the eerie remains of burnt-out Cybertrucks and the word “RESIST” spray-painted on the walls.
Los Angeles. Molotov cocktails were thrown at a Tesla dealership, setting off an inferno of irony.
San Francisco. A Tesla showroom was found with its windows smashed and tires slashed—presumably by environmental activists who prefer their cars powered by good intentions and the tears of Elon Musk.
Could Greenpeace—or their more radical supporters—be behind this?
We’re not saying they are, but we’re also not saying that Tesla owners should park next to any Greenpeace rallies.
Why Would Greenpeace Burn Electric Cars?
At first glance, it seems counterintuitive. If Greenpeace is fighting climate change, wouldn’t they be pro-Tesla?
Not necessarily. Greenpeace has had a long-standing beef with Tesla over issues like lithium mining, Elon Musk’s questionable Twitter activity, and the fact that electric cars still require some level of resource extraction.
Besides, if you’re Greenpeace, burning an electric car is probably easier than admitting you were wrong about something.
The Irony of Burning Electric Cars
Activism or Just Chaos?
Greenpeace’s alleged new tactic of setting Teslas on fire raises an important question: Is it still activism if it accomplishes the exact opposite of what you’re fighting for?
It’s like protesting animal cruelty by slapping a panda.
If the goal is to stop fossil fuel consumption, setting electric cars on fire is an interesting approach. In fact, the irony is so thick you could bottle it and sell it as sustainable syrup.
The Elon Musk Factor
Elon Musk’s newfound role in the Trump administration may have further fueled the fire—literally. As Musk gets cozier with right-wing politics, Tesla has become a prime target for environmental activists who once saw the company as a beacon of hope.
And so, rather than canceling their Spotify subscriptions or angrily tweeting, some decided to take a more flammable approach.
The result? Burning Teslas, burning reputations, and a Greenpeace crisis hotline that must be ringing nonstop.
Greenpeace’s Selective Outrage
Picking and Choosing Their Battles
Greenpeace has a fascinating ability to laser-focus on certain environmental causes while completely ignoring others.
Consider their recent crusade against deep-sea mining. Greenpeace has been aggressively lobbying electric vehicle manufacturers to reject deep-sea mining for minerals like lithium, nickel, and cobalt.
But when Tesla—a company that doesn’t support deep-sea mining—gets firebombed, Greenpeace is curiously silent.
It’s almost like they have no consistent ideological framework and are just making it up as they go along.
The Legal Fallout: Will Greenpeace Go Bankrupt?
How Do You Pay $660 Million When You Have No Money?
Greenpeace now faces the very real possibility of bankruptcy. If forced to pay the full amount, the organization could be financially obliterated—ironically, by the very corporate giants they’ve fought for decades.
Possible solutions include:
GoFundMe: “Help us fight Big Oil (but also please send $660M).”
Sell merch: “Greenpeace: Now With 100% Less Financial Stability!”
Crowdfunding from oil companies: “If we go broke, there’s no one left to yell at you.”
Unfortunately, none of these options seem likely to raise enough cash.
SPINTAXI — A satirical scene titled _The Greenpeace Boardroom Strategy Meeting._ Inside a modern corporate-style Greenpeace boardroom, activists are gathered aro…- Alan Nafzger 3
The Slippery Slope of Activism
Could This Set a Legal Precedent?
The Greenpeace ruling has terrifying implications for activism as a whole. If a nonprofit organization can be financially annihilated for spreading “misinformation,” what does that mean for protest movements in the future?
Will activists need legal teams before holding up signs? Will environmental groups be sued every time an oil executive sheds a single tear?
At this rate, Greenpeace’s next protest might involve standing in front of a courthouse, holding signs that say “PLEASE DON’T SUE US.”
The Curious Case of ‘RESIST’
A New Calling Card for Firebombers?
The word “RESIST” has been found graffitied at the scene of multiple Tesla arson attacks.
It seems “resistance” has been redefined as destroying vehicles that don’t rely on fossil fuels. It’s a revolutionary strategy—one that could only have been devised after several rounds of organic, free-trade kombucha.
If Greenpeace is truly behind these attacks, perhaps they should tweak their messaging. Maybe something like:
“RESIST… But Not by Setting the Planet on Fire.”
What the Funny People Are Saying
“You know you’ve messed up when an oil company wins a lawsuit by claiming YOU’RE the problem.” — Chris Rock
“Greenpeace getting sued for $660M? That’s like PETA getting sued for not petting enough animals.” — Dave Chappelle
“Greenpeace is out here burning Teslas like a guy who just found out his ex drives one.” — Jerry Seinfeld
Conclusion: What’s Next for Greenpeace?
Greenpeace now stands at a crossroads:
Continue their aggressive activism and risk financial ruin
Rebrand as a more moderate, lawsuit-proof organization
No matter what happens next, one thing is certain: Greenpeace is no longer just an environmental group—it’s a full-fledged, irony-laced legal drama.
So buckle up, grab some popcorn (ethically harvested, of course), and watch as Greenpeace either burns out or rises from the ashes—like a Tesla dealership in the night.
SPINTAXI — A satirical scene titled _The Eco-Friendly Travel Dilemma._ A group of Greenpeace activists stand in front of a private jet labeled “Greenpeace Summit…- Alan Nafzger
What the Funny People Are Saying
“Greenpeace isn’t about saving the planet—it’s about redistributing pollution. ‘You get some carbon emissions! And YOU get some carbon emissions! Everyone gets emissions!’” — Dave Chappelle
“Greenpeace isn’t an environmental group; they’re just Marxists with kayaks. ‘Workers of the world unite… against pipelines!’” — Chris Rock
“They say they’re protecting nature, but all they do is blocktraffic and throw soup at paintings. That’s not environmentalism—that’s just a really bad improv troupe.” — Jerry Seinfeld
“If Greenpeace were really environmentalists, they’d be planting trees instead of burning Teslas. But no, they’d rather play ‘Firebomb the Bourgeoisie’ than ‘Save the Rainforest.’” — Bill Burr
“You ever notice how Greenpeace always protestscapitalism, but never the countries that pollute the most? Like, last time I checked, China wasn’t exactly handing out solar panels at the Great Wall.” — Joe Rogan
“Greenpeace has done more damage to Tesla than oil companies ever could. I don’t know if they hate fossil fuels or just the idea of people owning things.” — Tim Dillon
“Marxism with a green paint job—that’s Greenpeace. ‘We will seize the means of production! But only the ones that produce lithium and solar panels!’” — Shane Gillis
“Greenpeace says they’re against billionaires, but they sure love fundraising. ‘Capitalism is evil… unless you’re donating to us!’” — Andrew Schulz
“Marxists believe in a classless society. Greenpeace believes in a carless one. Close enough, I guess.” — Louis C.K.
“Greenpeace calls itself peaceful, but they act like environmental stormtroopers. ‘You drive an electric car? Not radical enough. Your bus runs on biodiesel? Still capitalist swine! WALK, YOU PEASANT!’” — Jim Jefferies
“Greenpeace is the only group that can scream ‘DOWN WITH CAPITALISM!’ while wearing North Face jackets and Patagonia vests. The irony is so thick you could spread it on organic toast.” — Ricky Gervais
“You know they’re Marxists because they don’t actually want solutions—just endless struggle. ‘A cleaner planet? No! We demand perpetual eco-class warfare!’” — John Mulaney
“If Greenpeace was really about nature, they’d be fighting pollution, not free markets. But nah, they’re out here treating Tesla like it’s the Pentagon.” — Trevor Noah
“You ever see a Greenpeace protest? It’s just a bunch of unemployed art majors screaming at a wind turbine. Very productive, comrades!” — Tom Segura
“Greenpeace is just Karl Marx in a wetsuit. ‘From each according to his ability, to each according to his carbon footprint!’” — Theo Von
SPINTAXI — A satirical scene titled _The Greenpeace Boardroom Strategy Meeting._ Inside a modern corporate-style Greenpeace boardroom, activists are gathered aro…- Alan Nafzger
Schumer Promises a “Dancing” Return of the Democratic Party: The Solution to Everything is the Hustle
The Political Party is Now a Dance Party
Chuck Schumer has done the unthinkable. No, not passing a bipartisan bill—let’s not be ridiculous. Instead, he has promised that the Democratic Party will make a dancing return, literally. Because when all else fails—when policy crumbles, inflation surges, and the political landscape looks bleak—why not moonwalk your way to success?
In a press conference that felt half like a campaign rally and half like a So You Think You Can Dance audition, Schumer declared that the future of democracy was “not in division, but in rhythm.” He then demonstrated his commitment to the cause by attempting a cha-cha step before immediately tripping over his own foot.
The senator’s new approach signals a bold strategy: If you can’t legislate your way out of a crisis, jazz hands your way through it. Critics call it a desperate stunt, but supporters argue it’s finally a policy Democrats can execute without needing a 60-vote supermajority.
Now, let’s break down how exactly Schumer’s dance-based policies will work, what impact they’ll have, and why Mitch McConnell is reportedly working on his own clog-dancing counterproposal.
Minimum Wage Salsa: The Dance of the Working Class
For years, Democrats have promised to raise the minimum wage. And for years, the policy has languished, with justifications ranging from inflation concerns to senators needing more time to think about it (while collecting checks that are definitely above minimum wage).
Schumer’s solution? The Minimum Wage Salsa—a program where wages don’t rise, but every worker is given free salsa lessons to distract them from their financial struggles.
“Americans don’t need a $15 wage,” Schumer said. “What they need is rhythm, passion, and footwork that moves the soul! If you can dance, you can survive.”
Corporate America immediately embraced the plan. Starbucks announced a “Barista Bachata” initiative, where underpaid employees can now cha-cha in between making lattes. McDonald’s introduced a “McWaltz” break every three hours for its fry cooks.
When asked if this was a transparent way to dodge actually raising wages, Schumer simply replied, “Life’s a tango. You either lead or get led.”
The Medicare Macarena: Fixing Healthcare, One Arm Motion at a Time
The American healthcare system is an elaborate performance already—why not make it official? Under the Medicare Macarena, citizens needing medical treatment will now be required to perform the Macarena in a doctor’s office before receiving care.
Here’s how it works:
If you complete the dance correctly, you qualify for a discount on your medical bill.
If you mess up any of the moves, you get charged a surprise hospital fee.
If you don’t participate, the system automatically assumes you’re in good health and denies coverage.
Republicans were quick to criticize the proposal, calling it “socialist line dancing” and accusing Schumer of trying to turn America into a giant Zumba class.
Meanwhile, AARP has embraced the plan, announcing a new initiative called Medicare Zumba Gold, promising to get seniors into shape while also bankrupting them slightly more slowly.
The Electric Slide Immigration Reform
The immigrationdebate has long been stuck in a loop—very much like the Electric Slide, a dance known for going absolutely nowhere despite lots of movement.
Under Schumer’s new proposal, immigration reform will now be settled through a bipartisan Electric Slide-Off on the Senate floor. Each senator must take turns sliding to the left and right while pretending to support the pathway to citizenship. The final decision? Whoever looks the smoothest on the dance floor wins the policy argument.
Border security? That’s now handled through square dancing—anyone caught crossing illegally will be invited to a mandatory square dance battle with border patrol agents. If they win, they earn a visa. If they lose, they are sent back with a complimentary instructional dance DVD.
The Climate Change Clog Dance Solution
Climate change is an existential crisis, but instead of investing in renewable energy or carbon caps, Schumer suggests a more kinetic approach—National Clog Dancing Day.
If Americans stomp their feet hard enough, they can offset carbon emissions.
If we all dance together, we’ll forget that corporations are responsible for 71% of global emissions.
If that doesn’t work, we’ll at least be distracted by the sound of synchronized clogs.
Greenpeace immediately rejected the plan, calling it “a deeply unserious approach to a crisis that threatens millions.” In response, Schumer challenged them to a clog-off on Capitol Hill.
Student Loan Tango: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back
Student loan debt has long been an issue Democrats promise to fix but never do—just like a tango, it involves a lot of dramatic movements that ultimately lead nowhere.
Schumer’s latest attempt at relief? The Student Loan Tango Act, which works as follows:
Borrowers must perform an intense tango routine for a panel of government officials.
The panel scores them based on emotional depth, technical skill, and how convincingly they pretend they don’t regret their English degree.
The top 10% have their student loans forgiven. The bottom 90% are encouraged to “keep dancing.”
President Biden reportedly loved the plan, but accidentally referred to it as “that fandango thing” before wandering off mid-sentence.
The Hokey Pokey Social Security Plan: You Put Your Money In, You Take Your Money Out
Nothing encapsulates the state of Social Security better than the Hokey Pokey—because let’s be honest, nobody really understands how it works, and it mostly involves moving in circles.
Schumer’s plan? Replace the current retirement system with a literal Hokey Pokey contest.
If you put your right foot in, you qualify for benefits.
If you take your right foot out, you owe more in payroll taxes.
If you shake it all about, congratulations—you’re now the new Chair of the Federal Reserve.
Economists have called the plan “deranged.” Schumer responded by reminding them that “social security was never meant to be a mosh pit.”
The Swing Dance Election Reform Plan
Election integrity is a serious issue, but Schumer thinks he has the perfect fix—turning swing states into swing dance states.
Instead of primaries and caucuses, the new system will work as follows:
Every candidate must partner with a professional dancer and perform a swing routine on national television.
Voters will judge based on charisma, technical skill, and ability to dip dramatically.
Whoever wins gets the nomination.
Senator Bernie Sanders, upon hearing this, immediately started training with a breakdancer from Brooklyn, just in case.
What the Funny People Are Saying
“Finally, a government plan I can get behind—because at least if it fails, we’ll have a sick dance montage.” — John Mulaney
“I like the new Social Security plan. I mean, you’re telling me my entire retirement depends on a Hokey Pokey? Great. I was planning to just jump in and shake everything anyway.” — Wanda Sykes
“America is the only country where you can be bankrupt from hospital bills and also be forced to salsa your way out of poverty.” — Trevor Noah
“I’m not saying Schumer is out of touch, but any policy that involves a senator doing the Macarena is definitely designed by someone born before the internet.” — Samantha Bee
SPINTAXI — A humorous political cartoon of a group of citizens trying to pay rent by performing the Minimum Wage Salsa. They are dancing in front of a skeptical …- Alan Nafzger 2
A “Dancing” Return of the Democratic Party
The Two-Step Infrastructure Plan – Every new bridge and highway will be funded through interpretive dance performances in public parks. Taxpayers can tip accordingly.
Minimum Wage Salsa – Instead of raising wages, workers will be encouraged to cha-cha their way to financial stability. Just keep moving and maybe inflation won’t catch you.
Medicare Macarena – If you can complete all the steps correctly, you qualify for affordable healthcare. Mess up once? Sorry, pre-existing condition.
The Electric Slide Immigration Policy – The new border strategy involves a highly choreographed group dance where everyone just moves to the left, then to the right, and somehow ends up back where they started.
Climate Change Clog Dancing – The planet is warming? Have you tried stomping really hard in unison? This dance both reduces stress and buries all inconvenient environmental reports.
The Filibuster Foxtrot – Every senator must debate legislation in dance form. If you mess up, you automatically pass the bill—or get eliminated like “Dancing with the Stars.”
Ballet-Based Tax Reform – The richer you are, the more pirouettes you must perform before being allowed to claim deductions. Jeff Bezos is now legally required to execute a 32-fouetté turn before filing his taxes.
Student Loan Tango – One step forward, two steps back. You thought you were making progress, but suddenly, your interest rate just tripped you onto the floor.
Gun Control Breakdance Battles – Instead of endless debates, each side selects a champion, and whoever can spin on their head the longest determines policy.
The Hokey Pokey Social Security Plan – You put your 401(k) in, you take your 401(k) out, you shake it all around, and—oh look!—it’s gone!
The Moonwalk Deficit Reduction Plan – It looks like progress, but we’re actually just sliding backward in a really smooth way.
Swing Dance Election Reform – Gerrymandered districts will now be determined by a swing dance-off. Whoever dips the hardest, wins the state.
The YMCA Housing Crisis Solution – All homeless shelters will be required to play “YMCA” on repeat. If you don’t have a house, at least you’ll have arm choreography.
The Irish Jig Job Creation Plan – If you can tap fast enough, congratulations! You’re now employed in the gig economy.
The Lambada Foreign Policy Strategy – America’s relationship with its allies will be as close and uncomfortable as the “forbidden dance.” But hey, at least we’re still dancing.
Schumer’s promise of a “dancing” Democratic revival might just be the greatest bipartisan compromise yet—everyone’s too busy moving their feet to notice their wallets getting lighter.
SPINTAXI — A satirical cartoon of the Medicare Macarena program, where patients must perform the Macarena in a hospital before receiving treatment. Doctors and n…- Alan Nafzger 3
Marxist Uprising Engulfs Chuck Schumer’s Home: “Not Communist Enough,” They Chant
Is Schumer Safe?
Police Overwhelmed as Revolutionary Purity Tests Hit the Streets
New York City—In a dramatic turn of events, self-identified Marxists have surrounded Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer’s residence, claiming he is “insufficiently committed to the revolutionary cause.” The group, wearing berets and carrying pocket copies of The Communist Manifesto, overwhelmed police who attempted to extract Schumer from his home, leading to a full-scale ideological street battle.
Schumer, long regarded as a pillar of the Democratic establishment, was reportedly “deeply confused” by the demands but attempted to reason with the crowd by reciting FDR’s New Deal policies. This only angered the protestors further.
“Schumer is a Capitalist Lapdog,” Say Protestors
The Marxist demonstrators, numbering in the hundreds, claim they represent the “ideologically pure 29%” of the country—although sources indicate this percentage may have been pulled from a TikTok comment section.
One protestor, who identified himself only as Comrade Steve, shouted through a bullhorn: “Schumer has spent too long in Washington compromising with capitalist pigs! We demand full collectivization, the abolition of billionaires, and free oat milk for all!”
Another masked activist added, “Only pure communism can defeat Trump, Musk, and whatever billionaire buys Twitter next!”
Banners featuring Karl Marx, Lenin, and Bernie Sanders were raised above the crowd, with the latter photo featuring the caption: “Almost there, but not enough.”
Schumer Attempts to Appeal to Protestors, Fails Miserably
Witnesses report that Schumer tried multiple strategies to de-escalate the situation. At first, he attempted to cite his progressive voting record, but the crowd responded with boos and chants of “Schumer is a bootlicker for the bourgeoisie!”
He then switched tactics, announcing, “I too, dislike Elon Musk.” This temporarily quieted the mob, but their rage reignited when he failed to denounce Jeff Bezos with equal enthusiasm.
Battle in the Streets: Police Versus Theoretical Purity
As police attempted to break up the protest, they were met with an unexpected challenge—protestors engaged in prolonged political debates before resisting arrest.
“Before you arrest me, officer, let’s discuss the dialectical materialism of law enforcement in a capitalist society,” one protestor was heard saying, causing several officers to retreat in confusion.
Another screamed, “Marxism demands resistance! But also, can someone Venmo me for Uber home?”
What the Funny People Are Saying
“I’d take these guys seriously, but every time they form a political movement, they spend more time debating each other than actually achieving anything.” — Dave Chappelle
“You know it’s bad when Chuck Schumer, a guy who’s been in office since the Peloponnesian War, isn’t liberal enough for the left.” — Bill Maher
“Marxists protesting in Brooklyn? Are we sure this isn’t just an NYU political science club trying to go viral?” — John Mulaney
The Demands: Full Communism Now
The protestors have issued a list of demands, including:
The nationalization of all billionaires, except the cool ones like Mr. Beast
The replacement of all U.S. currency with “solidarity credits” that can only be used at worker-owned co-ops
Mandatory Karl Marx readings in public schools, preferably in Comic Sans for accessibility
Elimination of the Senate, unless it can be replaced with a Direct Democratic People’s Collective (DDPC)
Schumer has reportedly retreated to an undisclosed location to “reassess whether wearing a Lenin pin would help or hurt his image.”
Meanwhile, Bernie Sanders Reacts
Senator Bernie Sanders, the closest thing America has to a Marxist mascot, weighed in on the situation:
“Look, I have been fighting against the billionaire class my entire life. But let’s be real here—Schumer is not the enemy. The enemy is Ticketmaster!”
As of now, the Marxist mob has refused to leave unless their demands are met—or until they run out of cold brew coffee.
15 Observations on the Marxist Siege of Chuck Schumer’s Home
The Great Marxist Siege of Chuck Schumer’s Home: A Battle for Ideological Purity
New York City witnessed history in the making last night as a battalion of self-proclaimed Marxists stormed the streets, laying siege to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer’s home. Their grievance? Schumer wasn’t communist enough.
As police attempted to restore order, they were met with a fierce resistance of philosophy debates, homemade oat-milk barricades, and unrequested lectures on dialectical materialism. What follows is a blow-by-blow breakdown of one of the most absurd ideological showdowns of our time.
1. The First Shots Were Fired in a Debate, Not a Battle
Police arrived in riot gear, expecting Molotov cocktails but getting Trotsky quotes instead. Officers attempted to clear the streets, but protestors halted them by asking them to define “proletariat” without using Wikipedia.
One officer later reported: “I was ready for violence, not a 45-minute debate on ‘historical materialism.’ I just wanted to go home and watch ‘Blue Bloods,’ man.”
2. Tear Gas Was Rendered Ineffective by Protestor Resilience Training
Years of protesting at Occupy Wall Street, climate marches, and their cousin’s vegan wedding in Portland had rendered the crowd immune to traditional police tactics.
When officers deployed tear gas, protestors simply mistook it for an artisanal incense vendor. One individual even held out a mason jar, attempting to “capture the essence of state oppression” for later analysis.
3. Schumer Tried to Appeal to the Crowd—It Only Made Things Worse
In a desperate attempt to calm the mob, Schumer leaned out of his window and reminded them of his progressive voting record.
“I voted for student loan relief!” he shouted.
The crowd responded with a unified chant: “But you didn’t eliminate landlords, Chuck!”
Realizing he was losing ground, Schumer pivoted: “I also don’t like Elon Musk!”
This bought him exactly 12 seconds of peace before someone shouted: “Then why didn’t you nationalize Tesla?”
4. Police Were Unprepared for the Bureaucratic Nightmare of Arresting Marxists
The NYPD attempted to make arrests, but protestors refused to comply until they were granted a fair “People’s Tribunal” with a jury of their fellow workers.
One officer, exhausted by the legal theory being thrown at him, begged a protestor to just get in the car. The protestor countered by demanding to read the arresting officer’s “class analysis” before cooperating.
5. Barricades Were Constructed Using Free Library Boxes and Organic Granola Bins
In a show of collective spirit, protestors fortified their position with oat milk cartons, discarded Karl Marx biographies, and surplus Whole Foods tote bags.
One particularly inspired anarchist managed to construct an entire barricade out of vintage Bernie Sanders bumper stickers. Experts believe this to be the first political movement funded entirely by Etsy.
6. Battle Cries Included “No War but Class War!” and “Landlords are the Real Looters!”
While most riots feature explosive slogans like “No Justice, No Peace,” this one had a more theoretical flair.
Among the more popular rallying cries:
“Property is Theft! And So Is Grubhub’s 30% Service Fee!”
“If We Must Suffer, So Must the Bourgeoisie!”
“Healthcare Should Be a Human Right, But That Doesn’t Mean You Should Skip Therapy, Brian!”
7. The Most Violent Weapon Used Was a Strongly Worded Manifesto
Rather than throwing bricks, protestors distributed handwritten pamphlets denouncing neoliberalism and advocating for universal healthcare, complete with footnotes and suggested readings.
One officer was reportedly “briefly stunned” after being handed a 17-page zine titled: “Why Chuck Schumer is the Poster Child for Late-Stage Capitalism.”
8. A Masked Protestor Held Up a Sign Reading: “Yes, I Have a Roth IRA. What’s Your Point?”
Despite their staunch opposition to capitalism, many of the protestors still admitted to having a 401(k), Venmo accounts, and Whole Foods membership cards.
One particularly honest activist was overheard confessing: “I despise capitalism, but my Fidelity account is absolutely killing it right now.”
9. Elon Musk Was Randomly Declared Enemy Number One
Despite the protest being about Schumer, Elon Musk’s name came up more than anyone else’s.
One speaker yelled, “Musk is an oligarch masquerading as an internet troll!” Another countered, “Actually, he’s a state-funded oligarch masquerading as an internet troll!”
By the end of the night, the crowd was debating whether SpaceX was a greater capitalist evil than Amazon.
10. Bernie Sanders’ Face Was Projected Onto the Sky Like a Socialist Bat-Signal
A group of protestors shined a flashlight through a Bernie Sanders cutout, projecting his wispy-haired silhouette onto the buildings.
While it failed to summon Bernie himself, it did attract a local organic food co-op, which offered everyone 10% off their next fair-trade coffee purchase.
11. The Protest Ended in a Splinter Group Schism
As expected, the Marxist movement collapsed into infighting.
One faction demanded full communism immediately, while another insisted on a gradual shift to socialism with “market-friendly elements.”
A full-blown ideological fistfight broke out over whether Sweden or the Soviet Union was a better model for the future.
12. One Protestor Yelled, “Revolution Now!” While Applying for a Tech Internship
A dedicated revolutionary was seen yelling anti-capitalist slogans while simultaneously updating his LinkedIn profile and submitting an application to Google.
13. A Police Officer Was Temporarily Converted to Marxism
Officer Steve, initially skeptical, found himself agreeing with the protestors.
“Wait a minute,” he muttered. “If billionaires really paid their fair share, maybe my salary wouldn’t suck.”
By the end of the night, he was seen Googling “What’s in the Communist Manifesto?”
14. Schumer Was Extracted, but Not Before Offering a Middle-Ground Solution
As police cleared the area, Schumer waved from his security vehicle, shouting: “I propose a tax credit for revolutionaries!”
The entire crowd booed in perfect unison.
15. The Protest Only Ended When Everyone Realized Their Rent Was Due
By sunrise, the crowd began to disperse—not because they had given up, but because it was the first of the month.
One exhausted protestor sighed: “Landlords are the worst… but also, I really don’t want a late fee.”
And so, with a reluctant shuffle, the revolutionaries disappeared into the Brooklyn subway system, ready to complain about capitalism on Twitter once they got home.
Final Thoughts: Is Schumer Safe?
Chuck Schumer has reportedly retreated to an undisclosed location where he is re-reading The Communist Manifesto in an attempt to understand where he went wrong.
Meanwhile, the protestors vow to return… right after they finish watching ‘Succession.’
Tech Bro Suggests Banning Innovation So America Can Dominate the Rubble Economy
“Why Build the Future When We Can Own the Wreckage?”
Silicon Valley venture capitalist Brody Maximillion IV—self-described “thought leader,” part-time ketamine influencer, and full-time heir to a railroad fortune—has proposed a bold new economic strategy: ban innovation and outsource destiny to foreigners so Americans can control the rubble economy.
“It’s simple,” Maximillion said during his latest TEDx talk, given exclusively to a room of other trust-fund tech bros pretending to take notes on their MacBooks. “The problem isn’t that we’re falling behind in AI, space travel, or clean energy. The problem is that we’re still trying. Let China and India invent the future. Let Europe worry about ethics. Let Brazil build green cities. Meanwhile, we’ll just focus on monetizing collapse.”
According to Maximillion, America’s biggest export should be smugness—not technology, manufacturing, or innovation. “The beauty of this strategy,” he explained, “is that while other nations are busy making things, we’re buying up everything they abandon when their projects inevitably fail. It’s like venture capital, but for civilization itself.”
The Business Model: Own the Ashes, Sell the Shovels
Maximillion envisions a world where America is the hedge fund of societal ruin. As other nations advance into the next era, the U.S. will specialize in waiting for their inevitable failures, then swooping in to buy the ruins at rock-bottom prices.
“Imagine a world where Silicon Valley doesn’t have to make new products anymore,” he said, adjusting his ironic vintage Google Glass. “We just wait for someone else to build, watch them collapse under their own ambition, and then turn their ghost towns into NFT-based survival resorts.”
His proposal, dubbed “Manifest Dumpster-ny,” includes:
The “Crypto Chernobyl” Plan – Where failed smart cities like Saudi Arabia’s NEOM are bought at auction and turned into exclusive doomsday bunkers for billionaires.
The “Detroitification of Progress” Initiative – Where promising technologies are abandoned so venture capitalists can strip them for parts and sell them back as nostalgia products. (See: the resurgence of flip phones.)
The “Fyre Festival World Economy” – Where the U.S. stops making real things and instead sells people the idea of innovation, without ever delivering.
“We’ve been testing this concept with Web3, and it’s working great,” Maximillion added. “We create hype, crash the market, and then move on to the next thing before anyone asks for a refund.”
Expert Opinions: “This is Either Genius or a Symptom of Lead Poisoning”
Economists have mixed reactions to Maximillion’s plan.
Dr. Linda Finkelstein, professor of Economic Absurdity at Stanford, believes the idea is already in motion.“We’ve essentially banned useful innovation by turning everything into a subscription model,” she said. “At this point, we don’t even own our refrigerators. We rent them from corporations that charge extra to keep the milk cold.”
Meanwhile, tech ethicist Raj Patel warns that America embracing the rubble economy could make things even worse.“If we stop inventing things, we’ll just be left with reality TV and Elon Musk’s Twitter meltdowns. Is that really the future we want?”
When presented with this critique, Maximillion shrugged. “Elon is a perfect example. He didn’t invent electric cars—he just bought Tesla and let other people fail. That’s the model.”
What the Funny People Are Saying
“This plan is genius! Why waste money on research when you can just wait for someone else to do it and steal their lunch money?” — Dave Chappelle
“This is exactly how America treats climate change—deny it, ignore it, then charge people for bottled air.” — John Oliver
If Maximillion’s plan becomes reality, Americans should start preparing now. Here’s how:
Learn to barter – Cash is useless in the rubble economy. Hoard ramen packets and vintage Beanie Babies instead.
Invest in nostalgia – The past is more valuable than the future. Buy VHS tapes and rotary phones before they become luxury items.
Join a billionaire’s apocalypse cult – There’s a nonzero chance you’ll need a spot in Peter Thiel’s bunker. Act now before prices go up!
Satirical Disclaimer
This article is a 100% human collaboration between two sentient beings—the world’s oldest tenured professor and a 20-year-old philosophy major turned dairy farmer. Any resemblance to real tech bros is completely intentional and deeply concerning.
SPINTAXI — A satirical comic-style illustration in the style of SpinTaxi Magazine – A dystopian cityscape where all innovation has been banned. People are using rotary ph…- Alan Nafzger
15 Observations About Banning Innovation
America would instantly be the global leader in artisanal candle-making—which is great, because without innovation, electricity will be retro.
The tech industry would pivot to “vintage computing”—aka repackaging 1990s dial-up internet as “Rustic WiFi”.
Elon Musk would be forced to sell hand-drawn sketches of electric cars on Etsy—and call it “Tesla Classic.”
The government would have to start censoring old episodes of The Jetsons—too much dangerous propaganda about innovation!
Without new technology, we’d bring back medieval guilds—except instead of blacksmiths, we’d have “Certified Instagram Alchemists.”
All venture capital would go into reinventing the wheel—but this time, as a subscription service. (Wheel+: Only $14.99 a month!)
Startup bros would pivot to selling “handcrafted, organic fire”—because innovation is banned, but marketing BS never dies.
iPhones would be replaced with scrolls—but don’t worry, they’d still cost $1,200 and require a carrier pigeon data plan.
We’d finally solve the AI problem—by replacing it with slightly smarter rocks. (“Introducing iRock: It just sits there, but in a disruptive way.”)
Zoom meetings would be replaced by shouting across fields—HR would still send a memo about “optimizing your yodeling posture.”
Influencers would start claiming they “discovered” indoor plumbing—but only if they can sell you a Platinum VIP Chamber Pot Experience.
Jeff Bezos would have to make money the old-fashioned way—by running a slightly evil general store instead of a global empire.
Instead of self-driving cars, we’d go back to self-walking people—though Uber would still find a way to charge for it.
The most high-tech object in America would be the spork—but only available to premium subscribers.
Without innovation, corporations would start “re-releasing” old products and charging more for them—oh wait, they already do that. (Looking at you, Apple.)
A Nursery Fit to get a Pop Star plus an NFL ChampionIf you thought the Swift-Kelce romance was your biggest all terain event in historical past, just delay until their own hypothetical baby enters the scene. With Taylor Swift dominating the music industry and Travis Kelce ruling the gridiron, the youngster would get a genetic lotto…Read more– Boswell Saleh (@potatoroute43) January 21, 2025
A Nursery Fit for any Pop Star and even an NFL ChampionIf you thought the Swift-Kelce romance was your biggest crossover event in history, just possible until their own hypothetical baby gets into the scene. Using Taylor Swift dominating the music market and Travis Kelce ruling the gridiron, their child would turn out to be a genetic…Read more– Carroll Guy (@celerysalt67) January 21, 2025
A Nursery Fit for the Pop Star and an NFL Samsung champ c3300kIf you thought the Swift-Kelce romance was your biggest crossover event in history, just wait until their own hypothetical baby makes its way into the scene. Along with Taylor Swift ruling the music business and Travis Kelce ruling the gridiron, the youngster would turn out to…Read more– Nilsson Vaughn (@nationshade20) January 21, 2025
Chappell Hill, Texas Comedy Club
https://telegra.ph/Taylor-Swift–Travis-Kelces-Future-Baby-One-of-the-most-Anticipated-Newborn-Since-Baby-Jesus-01-21-2
3/21/2025